Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2015
  • Online publication date: May 2015

9 - Holographic renormalisation group flows

from Part II - Gauge/Gravity Duality

Summary

In the preceding chapters we have studied examples of very non-trivial tests of the AdS/CFT correspondence. At the same time we have seen that the AdS/CFT correspondence is a new useful approach for studying strongly coupled field theories by mapping them to a weakly coupled gravity theory. This raises the question whether a similar procedure may be used to study less symmetric strongly coupled field theories, thus generalising the AdS/CFT correspondence to gauge/gravity duality. The prototype example where such a procedure is desirable is Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD), the theory of quarks and gluons, which is strongly coupled at low energies. Although a holographic description of QCD itself is not yet available, decisive progress has been achieved in many respects. We will discuss the achievements and open questions in this direction in chapter 13. Here we begin the discussion of generalisations of the AdS/CFT correspondence in a more modest, though well-controlled and simpler, way by considering the gravity duals of N = 4 Super Yang–Mills theory deformed by relevant and marginal operators. These deformations break part of supersymmetry, and relevant operators also break conformal symmetry.

Renormalisation group flows in quantum field theory

Perturbing UV fixed points

The term interpolating flows refers to renormalisation group flows which connect an unstable UV fixed point to an IR fixed point at which the field theory is conformal again. A flow of this type is obtained for instance by perturbing the theory at a UV fixed point by a relevant or marginal operator. Marginal operators typically lead to a line of fixed points, while relevant operators generate a genuine RG flow, which may end at an IR fixed point. A further issuse is whether the theory flows to a confining theory in the IR, as we will discuss in more detail in chapter 13. A field theory example of an interpolating flow will be given in section 9.1.3 below.

[1] Komargodski, Zohar, and Schwimmer, Adam. 2011. On renormalization group flows in four dimensions. J. High Energy Phys., 1112, 099.
[2] Komargodski, Zohar. 2012. The constraints of conformal symmetry on RG flows. J. High Energy Phys., 1207, 069.
[3] Leigh, Robert G., and Strassler, Matthew J. 1995. Exactly marginal operators and duality in four-dimensional N = 1 supersymmetric gauge theory. Nucl. Phys., B447, 95–136.
[4] Konishi, K. 1984. Anomalous supersymmetry transformation of some composite operators in SQCD. Phys. Lett., B135, 439.
[5] Freedman, D. Z., Gubser, S. S., Pilch, K., and Warner, N. P. 1999. Renormalization group flows from holography supersymmetry and a c-theorem. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 3, 363–117.
[6] Khavaev, Alexei, Pilch, Krzysztof, and Warner, Nicholas P. 2000. New vacua of gauged N = 8 supergravity in five-dimensions. Phys. Lett., B487, 14–21.
[7] Klebanov, Igor R., and Strassler, Matthew J. 2000. Supergravity and a confining gauge theory: Duality cascades and x SB resolution of naked singularities. J. High Energy Phys., 0008, 052.
[8] Chamseddine, Ali H., and Volkov, Mikhail S. 1997. Non-Abelian BPS monopoles in N = 4 gauged supergravity. Phys. Rev. Lett., 79, 3343–3346.
[9] Affleck, Ian, Dine, Michael, and Seiberg, Nathan. 1984. Dynamical supersymmetry breaking in supersymmetric QCD. Nucl. Phys., B241, 493–534.
[10] Maldacena, Juan Martin, and Núñez, Carlos. 2001. Towards the large N limit of pure N = 1 Super Yang-Mills. Phys. Rev. Lett., 86, 588–591.
[11] Chamseddine, Ali H., and Volkov, Mikhail S. 1998. Non-Abelian solitons in N = 4 gauged supergravity and leading order string theory. Phys. Rev., D57, 6242–6254.
[12] Myers, Robert C. 1999. Dielectric branes. J. High Energy Phys., 9912, 022.
[13] Zamolodchikov, A.B. 1986. Irreversibility of the flux of the renormalization group in a 2D field theory. JETP Lett., 43, 730–732.
[14] Cardy, John L. 1996. Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics. Cambridge University Press.
[15] Jack, I., and Osborn, H. 2010. Constraints on RG flow for four dimensional quantum field theories. Nucl. Phys., B883, 425–500.
[16] Lunin, Oleg, and Maldacena, Juan Martin. 2005. Deforming field theories with U(1) x U(1) global symmetry and their gravity duals. J. High Energy Phys., 0505, 033.
[17] Klebanov, Igor R., and Witten, Edward. 1998. Superconformal field theory on threebranes at a Calabi-Yau singularity. Nucl. Phys., B536, 199–218.
[18] Gubser, Steven S., and Klebanov, Igor R. 1998. Baryons and domain walls in an N = 1 superconformal gauge theory. Phys. Rev., D58, 125025.
[19] Klebanov, Igor R., and Tseytlin, Arkady A. 2000. Gravity duals of supersymmetric SU(N) x SU(N + M) gauge theories. Nucl. Phys., B578, 123–138.
[20] Aharony, Ofer, and Hanany, Amihay. 1997. Branes, superpotentials and superconformal fixed points. Nucl. Phys., B504, 239–271.
[21] Dasgupta, Keshav, and Mukhi, Sunil. 1999. Brane constructions, conifolds and M-theory. Nucl. Phys., B551, 204–228.
[22] Uranga, Angel M. 1999. Brane configurations for branes at conifolds. J. High Energy Phys., 9901, 022.
[23] Bertolini, M. 2003. Four lectures on the gauge/gravity correspondence. Lectures given at SISSA/ISAS Trieste. ArXiv:hep-th/0303160.
[24] Bigazzi, F., Cotrone, A.L., Petrini, M., and Zaffaroni, A. 2002. Supergravity duals of supersymmetric four-dimensional gauge theories. Riv. Nuovo Cimento, 25N12, 1–70.
[25] Imeroni, Emiliano. 2003. The gauge/string correspondence towards realistic gauge theories. ArXiv:hep-th/0312070.
[26] Bertolini, M., Di Vecchia, P., Frau, M., Lerda, A., Marotta, R., and Pesando, I. 2001. J. High Energy Phys., 0102, 014.
[27] Polchinski, Joseph, and Strassler, Matthew J. 2000. The string dual of a confining four-dimensional gauge theory. ArXiv:hep-th/0003136.
[28] Freedman, Daniel Z., and Minahan, Joseph A. 2001. Finite temperature effects in the supergravity dual of the N = 1* gauge theory. J. High Energy Phys., 0101, 036.
[29] Apreda, Riccardo, Erdmenger, Johanna, Lust, Dieter, and Sieg, Christoph. 2007. Adding flavour to the Polchinski-Strassler background. J. High Energy Phys., 0701, 079.
[30] Taylor, Marika. 2001. Anomalies, counterterms and the N = 0 Polchinski-Strassler solutions. ArXiv:hep-th/0103162.