Donnez, J, Dolmans, MM. Fertility preservation in women. N Engl J Med, 2017;377:1657–1665.Google Scholar

Dolmans, MM, Masciangelo, R. Risk of transplanting malignant cells in cryopreserved ovarian tissue. Minerva Ginecol, 2018;70:436–443.Google ScholarPubMed

Rodgers, RJ, Irving-Rodgers, HF, Russell, DL. Extracellular matrix of the developing ovarian follicle. Reproduction, 2003;126:415–424.Google Scholar

Newton, H, Aubard, Y, Rutherford, A, Sharma, V, Gosden, R. Low temperature storage and grafting of human ovarian tissue. Hum Reprod, 1996;11:1487–1491.Google Scholar

Aubard, Y, Piver, P, Cogni, Y et al. Orthotopic and heterotopic autografts of frozen-thawed ovarian cortex in sheep. Hum Reprod, 1999;14:2149–2154.Google Scholar

Baird, DT, Webb, R, Campbell, BK, Harkness, LM, Gosden, RG. Long-term ovarian function in sheep after ovariectomy and transplantation of autografts stored at -196°C. Endocrinology, 1999;140:462–471.Google Scholar

Dath, C, Dethy, A, Van Langendonckt, A et al. Endothelial cells are essential for ovarian stromal tissue restructuring after xenotransplantation of isolated ovarian stromal cells. Hum Reprod, 2011;26:1431–1439.Google Scholar

Soares, M, Sahrari, K, Chiti, MC et al. The best source of isolated stromal cells for the artificial ovary: medulla or cortex, cryopreserved or fresh? Hum Reprod, 2015;30:1589–1598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Loh, QL, Choong, C. Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: role of porosity and pore size. Tissue Eng Part B Rev, 2013;19:485–502.Google Scholar

Sun, H, Wang, X, Hu, X et al. Promotion of angiogenesis by sustained release of rhGM-CSF from heparinized collagen/chitosan scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2012;100:788–798.Google Scholar

Jiang, X, Lin, H, Jiang, D et al. Co-delivery of VEGF and bFGF via a PLGA nanoparticle-modified BAM for effective contracture inhibition of regenerated bladder tissue in rabbits. Sci Rep, 2016;6:20784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peters, A, Baruch, Y, Weisbuch, F et al. Enhancing the vascularization of three-dimensional porous alginate by incorporating controlled release basic fibroblast growth factor microspheres. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2003;65:489–497.Google Scholar

Bergmann, NM, West, JL. Histogenesis in three-dimensional scaffolds. In Atala, A, Lanza, R, Thomson, JA, Nerem, RM (eds.) Principles of Regenerative Medicine. Burlington, VT: Academic Press. 2008, 686–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gigli, I, Cushman, RA, Wahl, CM, Fortune, FE. Evidence for a role for anti-Mullerian hormone in the suppression of follicle activation in mouse ovaries and bovine ovarian cortex grafted beneath the chick chorioallantoic membrane. Mol Reprod Dev, 2005;71:480–488.Google Scholar

Camboni, A, Martinez-Madrid, B, Dolmans, MM et al. Autotransplantation of frozen-thawed ovarian tissue in a young woman: ultrastructure and viability of grafted tissue. Fertil Steril, 2008;90:1215–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keros, V, Xella, S, Hultenby, K et al. Vitrification versus controlled-rate freezing in cryopreservation of human ovarian tissue. Hum Reprod, 2009;24:1670–1683.Google Scholar

Nisolle, M, Casanas-Roux, F, Qu, J, Motta, P, Donnez, J. Histologic and ultrastructural evaluation of fresh and frozen-thawed human ovarian xenografts in nude mice. Fertil Steril, 2000;74:122–129.Google Scholar

Nottola, SA, Camboni, A, Van Langendonckt, A et al. Cryopreservation and xenotransplantation of human ovarian tissue: an ultrastructural study. Fertil Steril, 2008;90:23–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Amorim, CA, Van Langendonckt, A, David, A, Dolmans, MM, Donnez, J. Survival of human pre-antral follicles after cryopreservation of ovarian tissue, follicular isolation and in vitro culture in a calcium alginate matrix. Hum Reprod, 2009;24:92–99.Google Scholar

Laschke, MW, Menger, MD, Vollmar, B. Ovariectomy improves neovascularisation and microcirculation of freely transplanted ovarian follicles. J Endocrinol, 2002;172:535–544.Google Scholar

Amorim, CA, Gonçalves, PB, Figueiredo, JR. Cryopreservation of oocytes from pre-antral follicles. Hum Reprod Update, 2003;9:119–129.Google Scholar

Irving-Rodgers, HF, Morris, S, Collett, RA et al. Phenotypes of the ovarian follicular basal lamina predict developmental competence of oocytes. Hum Reprod, 2009;24:936–944.Google Scholar

Telfer, EE, McLaughlin, M, Ding, C, Thong, KJ. A two-step serum free culture system supports development of human oocytes from primordial follicles in the presence of activing. Hum Reprod, 2008;23:1151–1158.Google Scholar

Dolmans, MM, Michaux, N, Camboni, A et al. Evaluation of Liberase, a purified enzyme blend, for the isolation of human primordial and primary ovarian follicles. Hum Reprod, 2006;21:413–420.Google Scholar

Lierman, S, Tilleman, K, Cornelissen, M et al. Follicles of various maturation stages react differently to enzymatic isolation: a comparison of different isolation protocols. Reprod Biomed Online, 2015;30:181–190.Google Scholar

Rice, S, Ojha, K, Mason, H. Human ovarian biopsies as a viable source of pre-antral follicles. Hum Reprod, 2008;23:600–605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chiti, MC, Donnez, J, Amorim, CA, Dolmans, MM. From isolation of human ovarian follicles to the artificial ovary: tips and tricks. Minerva Ginecol, 2018;70:444–455.Google Scholar

Kristensen, SG, Rasmussen, A, Byskov, AG, Andersen, CY. Isolation of pre-antral follicles from human ovarian medulla tissue. Hum Reprod, 2011;26:157–166.Google Scholar

Schmidt, KL, Byskov, AG, Nyboe Andersen, A et al. Density and distribution of primordial follicles in single pieces of cortex from 21 patients and in individual pieces of cortex from three entire human ovaries. Hum Reprod, 2003;18:1158–1164.Google Scholar

Vanacker, J, Camboni, A, Dath, C et al. Enzymatic isolation of human primordial and primary ovarian follicles with Liberase DH: protocol for application in a clinical setting. Fertil Steril, 2011;96:379–383.e3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chiti, MC, Dolmans, MM, Hobeika, M et al. A modified and tailored human follicle isolation procedure improves follicle recovery and survival. J Ovarian Res, 2017;10:71.Google Scholar

Paulini, F, Vilela, JM, Chiti, MC et al. Survival and growth of human preantral follicles after cryopreservation of ovarian tissue, follicle isolation and short-term xenografting. Reprod Biomed Online, 2016;33:425–432.Google Scholar

Soares, M, Sahrari, K, Amorim, CA et al. Evaluation of a human ovarian follicle isolation technique to obtain disease-free follicle suspensions before safely grafting to cancer patients. Fertil Steril, 2015;104:672–680.e2.Google Scholar

Soares, M, Saussoy, P, Sahrari, K et al. Is transplantation of a few leukemic cells inside an artificial ovary able to induce leukemia in an experimental model? J Assist Reprod Genet, 2015;32:597–606.Google Scholar

Mouloungui, E, Zver, T, Roux, C, Amiot, C. A protocol to isolate and qualify purified human preantral follicles in cases of acute leukemia, for future clinical applications. J Ovarian Res, 2018;11:4.Google Scholar

Soares, M, Saussoy, P, Maskens, M et al. Eliminating malignant cells from cryopreserved ovarian tissue is possible in leukaemia patients. Br J Haematol, 2017;178:231–239.Google Scholar

Von der Mark, K, Park, J, Bauer, S, Schmuki, P. Nanoscale engineering of biomimetic surfaces: cues from the extracellular matrix. Cell Tissue Res, 2010;339:131–153.Google Scholar

Murray, AA, Gosden, RG, Allison, V, Spears, N. Effect of androgens on the development of mouse follicles growing in vitro. J Reprod Fertil, 1998;113:27–33.Google Scholar

Reynaud, K, Cortvrindt, R, Smitz, J, Driancourt, MA. Effects of Kit Ligand and anti-Kit antibody on growth of cultured mouse preantral follicles. Mol Reprod Dev, 2000;56:483–494.Google Scholar

Picton, HM, Gosden, RG. In vitro growth of human primordial follicles from frozen-banked ovarian tissue. Mol Cell Endocrinol, 2000;166:27–35.Google Scholar

Xu, M, Kreeger, PK, Shea, LD, Woodruff, TK. Tissue-engineered follicles produce live, fertile offspring. Tissue Eng, 2006;12:2739–2746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Xu, M, Barrett, SL, West-Farrell, E et al. In vitro grown human ovarian follicles from cancer patients support oocyte growth. Hum Reprod, 2009;24:2531–2540.Google Scholar

West, ER, Shea, LD, Woodruff, TK. Engineering the follicle microenvironment. Semin Reprod Med, 2007;25:287–299.Google Scholar

Chan, BP, Leong, KW. Scaffolding in tissue engineering: general approaches and tissue-specific considerations. Eur Spine J, 2008;17:467–479.Google Scholar

Kim, J, Perez, AS, Claflin, J et al. Synthetic hydrogel supports the function and regeneration of artificial ovarian tissue in mice. NPJ Regen Med, 2016;1:16010.Google Scholar

Day, JR, David, A, Cichon, AL et al. Immunoisolating poly(ethylene glycol) based capsules support ovarian tissue survival to restore endocrine function. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2018;106:1381–1389.Google Scholar

Mendez, U, Zhou, H, Shikanov, A. Synthetic PEG hydrogel for engineering the environment of ovarian follicles. Methods Mol Biol, 2018;1758:115–128.Google Scholar

Gubeli, RJ, Laird, D, Ehrabar, M et al. Pharmacologically tunable polyethylene-glycol-based cell growth substrate. Acta Biomater, 2013;9:8272–8278.Google Scholar

Telfer, EC, Torrance, C, Gosden, RG. Morphological study of cultured preantral ovarian follicles of mice after transplantation under the kidney capsule. J Reprod Fertil, 1990, 89:565–571.Google Scholar

Gosden, RG. Restitution of fertility in sterilized mice by transferring primordial ovarian follicles. Hum Reprod, 1990;5:499–504.Google Scholar

Vanacker, J, Amorim, CA. Alginate: a versatile biomaterial to encapsulate isolated ovarian follicles. Ann Biomed Eng, 2017;45:1633–1649.Google Scholar

Chiti, MC, Dolmans, MM, Donnez, J, Amorim, CA. Fibrin in reproductive tissue engineering: a review on its application as a biomaterial for fertility preservation. Ann Biomed Eng, 2017;45:1650–1663.Google Scholar

Laronda, MM, Rutz, AL, Xiao, S et al. A bioprosthetic ovary created using 3D printed microporous scaffolds restores ovarian function in sterilized mice. Nat Commun, 2017;8:15261.Google Scholar

Chiti, MC. Fertility preservation in cancer patients: development of a transplantable artificial ovary protoype, in Pôle de Recherche en Gynécologie. 2017, Université Catholique de Louvain.Google Scholar

Carroll, J, Gosden, RG. Transplantation of frozen-thawed mouse primordial follicles. Hum Reprod, 1993;8:1163–1167.Google Scholar

Dolmans, MM, Martinez-Madrid, B, Gadisseux, E et al. Short-term transplantation of isolated human ovarian follicles and cortical tissue into nude mice. Reproduction, 2007;134:253–262.Google Scholar

Dolmans, MM, Yuan, WY, Camboni, A et al. Development of antral follicles after xenografting of isolated small human preantral follicles. Reprod Biomed Online, 2008;16:705–711.Google Scholar

Vanacker, J, Luyckx, V, Dolmans, MM et al. Transplantation of an alginate-matrigel matrix containing isolated ovarian cells: first step in developing a biodegradable scaffold to transplant isolated preantral follicles and ovarian cells. Biomaterials, 2012;33:6079–6085.Google Scholar

Vanacker, J, Dolmans, MM, Luyckx, V, Donnez, J, Amorim, CA. First transplantation of isolated murine follicles in alginate. Regen Med, 2014;9:609–619.Google Scholar

Van Eyck, AS, Jordan, BF, Gallez, B et al. Electron paramagnetic resonance as a tool to evaluate human ovarian tissue reoxygenation after xenografting. Fertil Steril, 2009;92:374–381.Google Scholar

Luyckx, V, Dolmans, MM, Vanacker, J et al. First step in developing a 3D biodegradable fibrin scaffold for an artificial ovary. J Ovarian Res, 2013;6:83.Google Scholar

Luyckx, V, Dolmans, MM, Vanacker, J et al. A new step toward the artificial ovary: survival and proliferation of isolated murine follicles after autologous transplantation in a fibrin scaffold. Fertil Steril, 2014;101:1149–1156.Google Scholar

Kniazeva, E, Hardy, AN, Boukaidi, SA et al. Primordial follicle transplantation within designer biomaterial grafts produce live births in a mouse infertility model. Sci Rep, 2015;5:17709.Google Scholar

Chiti, MC, Dolmans, MM, Orellana, R et al. Influence of follicle stage on artificial ovary outcome using fibrin as a matrix. Hum Reprod, 2016;31:427–435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chiti, MC, Dolmans, MM, Lucci, CM et al. Further insights into the impact of mouse follicle stage on graft outcome in an artificial ovary environment. Mol Hum Reprod, 2017;23:381–392.Google Scholar

Chiti, MC, Dolmans, MM, Mortiaux, L et al. A novel fibrin-based artificial ovary prototype resembling human ovarian tissue in terms of architecture and rigidity. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2018;35:41–48.Google Scholar

Chiti, MC, Viswanath, A, Vanacker, J et al. Hydrogel from bovine decellularized ovarian extracellular matrix supports mouse follicle survival in vitro. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2016;14:273.Google Scholar

Laronda, MM, Jakus AE, Whelan KA et al. Initiation of puberty in mice following decellularized ovary transplant. Biomaterials, 2015;50:20–29.Google Scholar

Liu, WY, Lin, SG, Zhuo, RY et al. Xenogeneic decellularized scaffold: a novel platform for ovary regeneration. Tissue Eng Part C Methods, 2017;23:61–71.Google Scholar

Jakus, AE, Laronda, MM, Rashedi, AS et al. “Tissue papers” from organ-specific decellularized extracellular matrices. Adv Funct Mater, 2017;27.Google Scholar

Ouni, E, Vertommen, D, Chiti, MC, Dolmans, MM, Amorim, CA. A draft map of the human ovarian proteome for tissue engineering and clinical applications. Mol Cell Proteomics, 2018;18(Suppl 1):S159–S173.Google Scholar

Knight, PG, Glister, C. TGF-beta superfamily members and ovarian follicle development. Reproduction, 2006;132:191–206.Google Scholar

Orisaka, M, Tajima, K, Mizutani, T et al. Granulosa cells promote differentiation of cortical stromal cells into theca cells in the bovine ovary. Biol Reprod, 2006;75:734–740.Google Scholar

Honda, A, Hirose, M, Hara, K et al. Isolation, characterization, and in vitro and in vivo differentiation of putative thecal stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2007;104:12389–12394.Google Scholar

Itoh, T, Kacchi, M, Abe, H, Sendai, Y, Hoshi, H. Growth, antrum formation, and estradiol production of bovine preantral follicles cultured in a serum-free medium. Biol Reprod, 2002;67:1099–1105.Google Scholar

Tagler, D, Tu, T, Smith, RM et al. Embryonic fibroblasts enable the culture of primary ovarian follicles within alginate hydrogels. Tissue Eng Part A, 2012;18:1229–1238.Google Scholar

Telfer, EE, Zelinski, MB. Ovarian follicle culture: advances and challenges for human and nonhuman primates. Fertil Steril, 2013;99:1523–1533.Google Scholar

Schröder, CP, Timmer-Bosscha, H, Wijchman, JG et al. An in vitro model for purging of tumour cells from ovarian tissue. Hum Reprod, 2004;19:1069–1075.Google Scholar

Meirow, D, Dor, J, Kaufman, B et al. Cortical fibrosis and blood-vessels damage in human ovaries exposed to chemotherapy. Potential mechanisms of ovarian injury. Hum Reprod, 2007;22:1626–1633.Google Scholar

Soares, M. Fertility preservation and leukemia: cellular components of the artificial ovary and disease retransmission through the graft, in Pôle de Recherche en Gynécologie. 2015, Université Catholique de Louvain.Google Scholar

Donnez, J, Dolmans, MM, Pellicer, A et al. Restoration of ovarian activity and pregnancy after transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue: a review of 60 cases of reimplantation. Fertil Steril, 2013;99:1503–1513.Google Scholar

Schmidt, VM, Isachenko, V, Rappl, G et al. Comparison of the enzymatic efficiency of Liberase TM and tumor dissociation enzyme: effect on the viability of cells digested from fresh and cryopreserved human ovarian cortex. Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 2018;16:57.Google Scholar

Chiti, MC, Dolmans, MM, Donnez, J, Amorim, CA. A fibrin based artificial ovary prototype: from animal studies to human clinical application. Curr Trends Clin Embryol submitted.Google Scholar

Brannstrom, M, Johannesson, L, Bokstrom, H et al. Livebirth after uterus transplantation. Lancet, 2015;385:607–616.Google Scholar

Brannstrom, M, Bokstrom, H, Dahm-Kahler, P et al. One uterus bridging three generations: first live birth after mother-to-daughter uterus transplantation. Fertil Steril, 2016;106(2):261–266.Google Scholar

Testa, G, McKenna, GJ, Gunby, RT Jr. et al. First live birth after uterus transplantation in the United States. Am J Transplant, 2018;18:1270–1274.Google Scholar

Sieunarine, K, Zakaria, FB, Boyle, DC et al. Possibilities for fertility restoration: a new surgical technique. Int Surg, 2005;90:249–256.Google Scholar

Oppelt, P, Renner, SP, Kellermann, A et al. Clinical aspects of Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuester-Hauser syndrome: recommendations for clinical diagnosis and staging. Hum Reprod, 2006;21:792–797.Google Scholar

Oppelt, PG, Lermann, J, Strick, R et al. Malformations in a cohort of 284 women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome (MRKH). Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 2012;10:57.Google Scholar

Brannstrom, M, Diaz-Garcia, C, Johannesson, L et al. Livebirth after uterus transplantation – Authors’ reply. Lancet, 2015;385:2352–2353.Google Scholar

Chan, YY, Jayaprakasan, K, Tan, A et al. Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2011;38:371–382.Google Scholar

Fernandez, H, Al-Najjar, F, Chauveaud-Lambling, A et al. Fertility after treatment of Asherman’s syndrome stage 3 and 4. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2006;13:398–402.Google Scholar

Brannstrom, M, Diaz-Garcia, C, Hanafy, A et al. Uterus transplantation: animal research and human possibilities. Fertil Steril, 2012;97:1269–1276.Google Scholar

Moore, FD. Ethical problems special to surgery: surgical teaching, surgical innovation, and the surgeon in managed care. Arch Surg, 2000;135:14–16.Google Scholar

McCulloch, P, Altman, DG, Campbell, WB et al. No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet, 2009;374:1105–1112.Google Scholar

Racho El-Akouri, R, Kurlberg, G, Dindelegan, G et al. Heterotopic uterine transplantation by vascular anastomosis in the mouse. J Endocrinol, 2002;174:157–166.Google Scholar

Racho El-Akouri, R, Kurlberg, G, Brannstrom, M. Successful uterine transplantation in the mouse: pregnancy and post-natal development of offspring. Hum Reprod, 2003;18:2018–2023.Google Scholar

Racho El-Akouri, R, Wranning, CA, Molne, J et al. Pregnancy in transplanted mouse uterus after long-term cold ischaemic preservation. Hum Reprod, 2003;18:2024–2030.Google Scholar

Wranning, CA, Akhi, SN, Diaz-Garcia, C, Brannstrom, M. Pregnancy after syngeneic uterus transplantation and spontaneous mating in the rat. Hum Reprod, 2011;26:553–558.Google Scholar

Diaz-Garcia, C, Akhi, SN, Wallin, A et al. First report on fertility after allogeneic uterus transplantation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2010;89:1491–1494.Google Scholar

Diaz-Garcia, C, Johannesson, L, Shao, R et al. Pregnancy after allogeneic uterus transplantation in the rat: perinatal outcome and growth trajectory. Fertil Steril, 2014;102:1545–1552 e1541.Google Scholar

Wranning, CA, Marcickiewicz, J, Enskog, A et al. Fertility after autologous ovine uterine-tubal-ovarian transplantation by vascular anastomosis to the external iliac vessels. Hum Reprod, 2010;25:1973–1979.Google Scholar

Ramirez, ER, Ramirez Nessetti, DK, Nessetti, MB et al. Pregnancy and outcome of uterine allotransplantation and assisted reproduction in sheep. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2011;18:238–245.Google Scholar

Mihara, M, Kisu, I, Hara, H et al. Uterine autotransplantation in cynomolgus macaques: the first case of pregnancy and delivery. Hum Reprod, 2012;27:2332–2340.Google Scholar

Fageeh, W, Raffa, H, Jabbad, H, Marzouki, A. Transplantation of the human uterus. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2002;76:245–251.Google Scholar

Jarvholm, S, Johannesson, L, Brannstrom, M. Psychological aspects in pre-transplantation assessments of patients prior to entering the first uterus transplantation trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2015;94:1035–1038.Google Scholar

Brannstrom, M, Johannesson, L, Dahm-Kahler, P et al. First clinical uterus transplantation trial: a six-month report. Fertil Steril, 2014;101:1228–1236.Google Scholar

Jarvholm, S, Johannesson, L, Clarke, A, Brannstrom, M. Uterus transplantation trial: Psychological evaluation of recipients and partners during the post-transplantation year. Fertil Steril, 2015;104:1010–1015.Google Scholar

Kvarnstrom, N, Jarvholm, S, Johannesson, L et al. Live donors of the initial observational study of uterus transplantation-psychological and medical follow-up until 1 year after surgery in the 9 cases. Transplantation, 2017;101:664–670.Google Scholar

Blume, C, Pischke, S, von Versen-Hoynck, F et al. Pregnancies in liver and kidney transplant recipients: a review of the current literature and recommendation. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2014;28:1123–1136.Google Scholar

Molne, J, Broecker, V, Ekberg, J et al. Monitoring of human uterus transplantation with cervical biopsies: a provisional scoring system for rejection. Am J Transplant, 2017;17:1628–1636.Google Scholar

Brannstrom, M, Bokstrom, H, Dahm-Kahler, P et al. One uterus bridging three generations: first live birth after mother-to-daughter uterus transplantation. Fertil Steril, 2016;106:261–266.Google Scholar

Wei, L, Xue, T, Tao, KS et al. Modified human uterus transplantation using ovarian veins for venous drainage: the first report of surgically successful robotic-assisted uterus procurement and follow-up for 12 months. Fertil Steril, 2017;108:346–356 e341.Google Scholar

Shuster, LT, Gostout, BS, Grossardt, BR, Rocca, WA. Prophylactic oophorectomy in premenopausal women and long-term health. Menopause Int, 2008;14:111–116.Google Scholar

Chmel, R, Novackova, M, Janousek, L et al. Revaluation and lessons learned from the first nine cases of a Czech uterus transplantation trial: four deceased donor and five living donor uterus transplantations. Am J Transplant, 2019;19(3):855–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brucker, SY, Brannstrom, M, Taran, FA et al. Selecting living donors for uterus transplantation: lessons learned from two transplantations resulting in menstrual functionality and another attempt, aborted after organ retrieval. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2018;297(3):675–684.Google Scholar

Testa, G, Koon, EC, Johannesson, L et al. Living donor uterus transplantation: a single center’s observations and lessons learned from early setbacks to technical success. Am J Transplant, 2017;17:2901–2910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Puntambekar, S, Telang, M, Kulkarni, P et al. Laparoscopic-assisted uterus retrieval from live organ donors for uterine transplant: our experience of two patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2018;25:622–631.Google Scholar

Ozkan, O, Akar, ME, Ozkan, O et al. Preliminary results of the first human uterus transplantation from a multiorgan donor. Fertil Steril, 2013;99:470–476.Google Scholar

Flyckt, RL, Farrell, RM, Perni, UC et al. Deceased donor uterine transplantation: innovation and adaptation. Obstet Gynecol, 2016;128:837–842.Google Scholar

Ejzenberg, D, Andraus, W, Baratelli Carelli, Mendes LR et al. Livebirth after uterus transplantation from a deceased donor in a recipient with uterine infertility. Lancet, 2019;392:2697–2704.Google Scholar

Miravet-Valenciano, JA, Rincon-Bertolin, A, Vilella, F, Simon, C. Understanding and improving endometrial receptivity. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2015;27:187–192.Google Scholar

Wranning, CA, Molne, J, El-Akouri, RR et al. Short-term ischaemic storage of human uterine myometrium–basic studies towards uterine transplantation. Hum Reprod, 2005;20:2736–2744.Google Scholar

Tricard, J, Ponsonnard, S, Tholance, Y et al. Uterus tolerance to extended cold ischemic storage after auto-transplantation in ewes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2017;214:162–167.Google Scholar

Erman Akar, M, Ozkan, O, Aydinuraz, B et al. Clinical pregnancy after uterus transplantation. Fertil Steril, 2013;100:1358–1363.Google Scholar

Johannesson, L, Enskog, A, Molne, J et al. Preclinical report on allogeneic uterus transplantation in non-human primates. Hum Reprod, 2013;28:189–198.Google Scholar

Kocher, T. Ueber die Bedingungen erfolgreicher Schilddrüsentransplantation beim Menschen: A. Hirschwald, 1914.Google Scholar

Jaffe, HL. On the transplantation of the guinea pig suprarenal and the functioning of the grafts. J Exp Med, 1927;45:587–594.Google Scholar

Berthold, A. Transplantation der Hoden. Mueller’s Arch f Exper Med, 1849:92.Google Scholar

Knauer, E. Einige Versuche über Ovarientransplantation bei Kaninchen. Centralblatt f Gynaekologie, 1896;20:524–528.Google Scholar

Bert, P. De la greffe animale 1863:48–49.Google Scholar

Morris, RT. The ovarian graft. New York Medical Journal, 1895;62:436.Google Scholar

Harris, M, Eakin, RM. Survival of transplanted ovaries in rats. J Exp Zool, 1949;112:131–163, incl 3 pl.Google Scholar

Green, CJ, Simpkin, S, Grimaldi, G, Johnson, A. Pregnancy after autografting and allografting vascularized ovaries and en bloc vascularized ovaries with adnexa in rabbits. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1982;89:645–651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Scott, JR, Hendrickson, M, Lash, S, Shelby, J. Pregnancy after tubo-ovarian transplantation. Obstet Gynecol, 1987;70:229–234.Google Scholar

Carmona, F, Balasch, J, Gonzalez-Merlo, J. Ovarian function, tubal viability and pregnancy after tubo-ovarian transplantation in the rabbit. Hum Reprod, 1993;8:929–931.Google Scholar

Meraz, MM, Juarez, CG, Monsalve, CR et al. Restoration of endocrine function and fertility with orthotopic tubal-ovarian allotransplant as the anatomical-functional unit in rabbits. J Invest Surg: The Official Journal of the Academy of Surgical Research, 2008;21:348–359.Google Scholar

Alberti, LR, Vasconcellos Lde, S, Petroianu, A. Autologous and allogeneic ovarian orthotopic transplantation: morphologic, endocrinologic and natural pregnancy assessment. Acta Cir Bras, 2013;28:59–65.Google Scholar

Silber, SJ, Lenahan, KM, Levine, DJ et al. Ovarian transplantation between monozygotic twins discordant for premature ovarian failure. N Engl J Med, 2005;353:58–63.Google Scholar

Silber, SJ, Gosden, RG. Ovarian transplantation in a series of monozygotic twins discordant for ovarian failure. N Engl J Med, 2007;356:1382–1384.Google Scholar

Donnez, J, Dolmans, MM, Pirard, C et al. Allograft of ovarian cortex between two genetically non-identical sisters: case report. Hum Reprod, 2007;22:2653–2659.Google Scholar

Donnez, J, Squifflet, J, Pirard, C, Jadoul, P, Dolmans, MM. Restoration of ovarian function after allografting of ovarian cortex between genetically non-identical sisters. Hum Reprod, 2010;25:2489–2495.Google Scholar

Donnez, J, Squifflet, J, Pirard, C et al. Live birth after allografting of ovarian cortex between genetically non-identical sisters. Hum Reprod, 2011;26:1384–1388.Google Scholar

Donnez, J, Dolmans, MM, Squifflet, J, Kerbrat, G, Jadoul, P. Live birth after allografting of ovarian cortex between monozygotic twins with Turner syndrome (45,XO/46,XX mosaicism) and discordant ovarian function. Fertil Steril, 2011;96:1407–1411.Google Scholar

Mhatre, P, Mhatre, J, Magotra, R. Ovarian transplant: a new frontier. Transplant Proc, 2005;37:1396–1398.Google Scholar

Mhatre, P, Mhatre, J. Orthotopic ovarian transplant–review and three surgical techniques. Pediatr Transplant, 2006;10:782–787.Google Scholar

Feichtinger, M, Barnea, ER, Nyachieo, A, Brannstrom, M, Kim, SS. Allogeneic ovarian transplantation using immunomodulator preimplantation factor (PIF) as monotherapy restored ovarian function in olive baboon. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2018;35:81–89.Google Scholar

van der Schouw, YT, van der Graaf, Y, Steyerberg, EW, Eijkemans, JC, Banga, JD. Age at menopause as a risk factor for cardiovascular mortality. Lancet, 1996;347:714–718.Google Scholar

Popat, VB, Calis, KA, Vanderhoof, VH et al. Bone mineral density in estrogen-deficient young women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2009;94:2277–2283.Google Scholar

Schmidt, PJ, Luff, JA, Haq, NA et al. Depression in women with spontaneous 46, XX primary ovarian insufficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2011;96:E278–E287.Google Scholar

Sullivan, SD, Sarrel, PM, Nelson, LM. Hormone replacement therapy in young women with primary ovarian insufficiency and early menopause. Fertil Steril, 2016;106:1588–1599.Google Scholar

Asch, R, Balmaceda, J, Ord, T et al. Oocyte donation and gamete intrafallopian transfer as treatment for premature ovarian failure. Lancet, 1987;1:687.Google Scholar

Cabry, R, Merviel, P, Hazout, A et al. Management of infertility in women over 40. Maturitas, 2014;78:17–21.Google Scholar

Yin, H, Wang, X, Kim, SS et al. Transplantation of intact rat gonads using vascular anastomosis: effects of cryopreservation, ischaemia and genotype. Hum Reprod, 2003;18:1165–1172.Google Scholar

Gosden, RG. Survival of ovarian allografts in an experimental animal model. Pediatr Transplant, 2007;11:628–633.Google Scholar

Lind, T, Holte, J, Olofsson, JI et al. Reduced live-birth rates after IVF/ICSI in women with previous unilateral oophorectomy: results of a multicentre cohort study. Hum Reprod, 2018;33:238–247.Google Scholar

Robertson, JA. Ethical issues in ovarian transplantation and donation. Fertil Steril, 2000;73:443–446.Google Scholar

Borgmann-Staudt, A, Rendtorff, R, Reinmuth, S et al. Fertility after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in childhood and adolescence. Bone Marrow Transplant, 2011;47:271. DOI:10.1038/bmt.2011.78Google Scholar

Kalich-Philosoph, L, Roness, H, Carmely, A et al. Cyclophosphamide triggers follicle activation and “Burnout”; AS101 prevents follicle loss and preserves fertility. Sci Transl Med, 2013;5(185):185ra62. DOI:10.1126/scitranslmed.3005402.Google Scholar

Salooja, N, Szydlo, RM, Socie, G et al. Pregnancy outcomes after peripheral blood or bone marrow transplantation: a retrospective survey. Lancet, 2001;358(9278):271–276. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05482-4Google Scholar

Lutchman Singh, K, Davies, M, Chatterjee, R. Fertility in female cancer survivors: pathophysiology, preservation and the role of ovarian reserve testing. Hum Reprod Update, 2005;11(1):69–89. DOI:10.1093/humupd/dmh052Google Scholar

Silber, SJ, Lenahan, K, Levine, DJ et al. Ovarian transplantation between monozygotic twins discordant for premature ovarian failure. N Engl J Med, 2005;353(1):58–63. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043157.Google Scholar

Silber, SJ. Ovary cryopreservation and transplantation for fertility preservation. Mol Hum Reprod, 2012;18(2):59–67. DOI:10.1093/molehr/gar082Google Scholar

Silber, S. How ovarian transplantation works and how resting follicle recruitment occurs: a review of results reported from one center. Women’s Health (Lond), 2016; 12(2): 217–227.Google Scholar

Silber, S, Kagawa, N, Kuwayama, M, Gosden, R. Duration of fertility after fresh and frozen ovary transplantation. Fertil Steril, 2010;94(6):2191–2196. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.073Google Scholar

Donnez, J, Dolmans, M-M, Squifflet, J, Kerbrat, G, Jadoul, P. Live birth after allografting of ovarian cortex between monozygotic twins with Turner syndrome (45,XO/46,XX mosaicism) and discordant ovarian function. Fertil Steril, 2011;96(6):1407–1411. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.09.012Google Scholar

Jadoul, P, Dolmans, MM, Donnez, J. Fertility preservation in girls during childhood: is it feasible, efficient and safe and to whom should it be proposed? Hum Reprod Update, 2010;16(6):617–630. DOI:10.1093/humupd/dmq010Google Scholar

Borgström, B, Hreinsson, J, Rasmussen, C et al. Fertility preservation in girls with Turner syndrome: prognostic signs of the presence of ovarian follicles. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol, 2009;94(1):74–80. DOI:10.1210/jc.2008-0708Google Scholar

Silber, SJ, Gosden, RG. Ovarian transplantation in a series of monozygotic twins discordant for ovarian failure. N Engl J Med, 2007;356(13):1382–1384. DOI:10.1056/NEJMc066574Google Scholar

Saitou, M, Payer, B, Lange, UC et al. Specification of germ cell fate in mice. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 2003;358(1436):1363–13670. DOI:10.1098/rstb.2003.1324Google Scholar

Lebl, J, Zahradníková, M, Vlasak, I, Neuhuber, F. Discordant growth pattern and ovarian function in monozygotic twins with 45,X/46,XX mosaicism. Horm Res Paediatr, 2001;55(2):102–105.Google Scholar

Young, LE. Imprinting of genes and the barker hypothesis. Twin Res, 2012;4(5):307–317. DOI:10.1375/twin.4.5.307Google Scholar

Hajkova, P, Erhardt, S, Lane, N et al. Epigenetic reprogramming in mouse primordial germ cells. Mech Dev, 2002;117(1):15–23. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4773(02)00181-8Google Scholar

Donnez, J, Silber, S, Andersen, CY et al. Children born after autotransplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue: a review of 13 live births. Ann Med, 2011;43(6):437–450. DOI:10.3109/07853890.2010.546807Google Scholar

Van Eyck, AS, Jordan, BF, Gallez, B et al. Electron paramagnetic resonance as a tool to evaluate human ovarian tissue reoxygenation after xenografting. Fertil Steril, 2009;92(1):374–381. DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.05.012Google Scholar

Donnez, J, Squifflet, J, Pirard, C, Jadoul, P, Dolmans, M-M. Restoration of ovarian function after allografting of ovarian cortex between genetically non-identical sisters. Hum Reprod, 2010;25(10):2489–2495. DOI:10.1093/humrep/deq186Google Scholar

Donnez, J, Squifflet, J, Pirard, C et al. Live birth after allografting of ovarian cortex between genetically non-identical sisters. Hum Reprod, 2011;26(6):1384–1388. DOI:10.1093/humrep/der089Google Scholar

Donnez, J, Dolmans, MM, Pirard, C et al. Allograft of ovarian cortex between two genetically non-identical sisters: case report. Hum Reprod, 2007;22(10):2653–2659. DOI:10.1093/humrep/dem211Google Scholar

Starzl, TE. Chimerism and tolerance in transplantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2004;101(Suppl 2):14607–14614. DOI:10.1073/pnas.0404829101Google Scholar

Gineikiene, E, Stoskus, M, Griskevicius, L. Recent advances in quantitative chimerism analysis. Expert Rev Mol Diagn, 2009;9(8):817–832. DOI:10.1586/erm.09.66Google Scholar

Donnez, J, Dolmans, MM, Demylle, D et al. Restoration of ovarian function after orthotopic (intraovarian and periovarian) transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue in a woman treated by bone marrow transplantation for sickle cell anaemia: case report. Hum Reprod, 2005;21(1):183–188. DOI:10.1093/humrep/dei268Google Scholar

Donnez, J, Martinez-Madrid, B, Jadoul, P et al. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation: a review. Hum Reprod Update, 2006;12(5):519–535. DOI:10.1093/humupd/dml032Google Scholar

Silber, SJ, Grudzinskas, G, Gosden, RG. Successful pregnancy after microsurgical transplantation of an intact ovary. 2008(1533–4406 (Electronic)).Google Scholar

Hamawi, K, Magalhaes‐Silverman, MD, Bertolatus, JA. Outcomes of renal transplantation following bone marrow transplantation. Am J Transplant, 2003;3(3):301–305. DOI:10.1034/j.1600-6143.2003.00015.xGoogle Scholar

Donnez, J, Dolmans, M-M. Fertility preservation in women. N Engl J Med, 2017;377(17):1657–1665. DOI:10.1056/NEJMra1614676Google Scholar

Gellert, SE, Pors, SE, Kristensen, SG et al. Transplantation of frozen-thawed ovarian tissue: an update on worldwide activity published in peer-reviewed papers and on the Danish cohort. J Assist Reprod and Genet, 2018(1573–7330 (Electronic)). DOI:10.1007/s10815-018-1144-2Google Scholar

Diaz-Garcia, C, Domingo, J, Garcia-Velasco, JA et al. Oocyte vitrification versus ovarian cortex transplantation in fertility preservation for adult women undergoing gonadotoxic treatments: a prospective cohort study. Fertil Steril, 2018. DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.11.018Google Scholar

Jensen, AK, Macklon, KT, Fedder, J et al. 86 successful births and 9 ongoing pregnancies worldwide in women transplanted with frozen-thawed ovarian tissue: focus on birth and perinatal outcome in 40 of these children. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2016. DOI:10.1007/s10815-016-0843-9Google Scholar

Donnez, J, Dolmans, MM, Demylle, D et al. Livebirth after orthotopic transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue. Lancet, 2004;364(9443):1405–1410. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17222-XGoogle Scholar

Sofiyeva, N, Siepmann, T, Barlinn, K, Seli, E, Ata, B. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs for gonadal protection during gonadotoxic chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Sci, 2018 October 1. DOI:10.1177/1933719118799203Google Scholar

Ge, W, Chen, C, De Felici, M, Shen, W. In vitro differentiation of germ cells from stem cells: a comparison between primordial germ cells and in vitro derived primordial germ cell-like cells. Death Dis, 2015 October; 15(6):e1906. DOI:10.1038/cddis.2015.265Google Scholar

Lee, SJ, Schover, LR, Partridge, AH et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on fertility preservation in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol, 2006;24(18):2917–2931.Google Scholar

Barton, SE, Najita, JS, Ginsburg, ES et al. Infertility, infertility treatment, and achievement of pregnancy in female survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study cohort. Lancet Oncol, 2013 August;14(9):873–881. DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70251-1Google Scholar

Hirshfield, AN. Development of follicles in the mammalian ovary. Int Rev Cytol, 1991;12: 43–101.Google Scholar

Broekmans, FJ, Soules, MR, Fauser, BC.Ovarian aging: mechanisms and clinical consequences. Endocr Rev, 2009;30(5):465–493.Google Scholar

Faddy, MJ. Follicle dynamics during ovarian aging. Mol Cell Endocrinol, 2000;163(1–2):43–48.Google Scholar

Faddy, MJ, Gosden, RG, Edwards, RG. Ovarian follicle dynamics in mice: a comparative study of three inbred strains and an F1 hybrid. J Endocrinol, 1983;96(1):23–33.Google Scholar

Hansen, KR, Knowlton, NS, Thyer, AC et al. A new model of reproductive aging: the decline in ovarian non-growing follicle number from birth to menopause. Hum Reprod, 2008;23(3):699–708.Google Scholar

Johnston, RJ, Wallace, WH. Normal ovarian function and assessment of ovarian reserve in the survivor of childhood cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer, 2009;53(2):296–302.Google Scholar

Steiner, AZ, Pritchard, D, Stanczyk, FZ et al. Association between biomarkers of ovarian reserve and infertility among older women of reproductive age. JAMA, 2017;318(14):1367–1376. DOI:10.1001/jama.2017.14588Google Scholar

McGee, EA, Hsueh, AJ. Initial and cyclic recruitment of ovarian follicles. Endocr Rev, 2000;21(2):200–214.Google Scholar

Gallardo, TD, John, GB, Shirley, L. et al. Genomewide discovery and classification of candidate ovarian fertility genes in the mouse. Genetics, 2007;177:179–194.Google Scholar

van Dooren, MF, Bertoli-Avellab, AM, Oldenburg, RA. Premature ovarian failure and gene polymorphisms. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2009;21(4):313–317.Google Scholar

Toniolo, D, Rizzolio, F. X chromosome and ovarian failure. Semin Reprod Med, 2007;25(4):264–267.Google Scholar

Zinn, AR, Ross, JL. Molecular analysis of genes on Xp controlling Turner syndrome and premature ovarian failure (POF). Semin Reprod Med, 2001;19:141–146.Google Scholar

Qin, Y, Jiao, X, Simpson, JL, Chen Z-J. Genetics of primary ovarian insufficiency: new developments and opportunities. Hum Reprod Update, 2015:21(6):787–808.Google Scholar

Di Pasquale, E, Beck-Peccoz P, Persani L. Hypergonadotropic ovarian failure associated with an inherited mutation of human bone morphogenetic protein-15 (BMP 15) gene. Am J Hum Genet, 2004;75(1):106–111.Google Scholar

Gleicher, N, Weghofer, A, Barad, DH. A pilot study of premature ovarian senescence: I. Correlation of triple CGG repeats on the FMR1 gene to ovarian reserve parameters FSH and anti-Mullerian hormone. Fertil Steril, 2009;91(5):1700–1706.Google Scholar

Edson, MA, Nagaraja, AK, Matzuk, MM. The mammalian ovary from genesis to revelation. Endocr Rev, 2009;30:624–712.Google Scholar

Qin, Y, Choi, Y, Zhao, H et al. NOBOX homeobox mutation causes premature ovarian failure. Am J Hum Genet, 2007;81(3):576–581.Google Scholar

Chand, AL, Ooi, GT, Harrison, CA et al. Functional analysis of the human inhibin a subunit variant A257 T and its potential role in premature ovarian failure. Hum Reprod, 2007;22(12):3241–3248.Google Scholar

Sundblad, V, Chiauzzi, VA, Andreone, L et al. Controversial role of inhibin alpha-subunit gene in the etiology of premature ovarian failure. Hum Reprod, 2006;21(5):1154–1160.Google Scholar

Pagnamenta, AT, Taanman, JW, Wilson, CJ et al. Dominant inheritance of premature ovarian failure associated with mutant mitochondrial DNA polymerase gamma. Hum Reprod, 2006;21(10):2467–2473.Google Scholar

Oldenburg, RA, van Dooren, MF, de Graaf, B et al. A genome-wide linkage scan in a Dutch family identifies a premature ovarian failure susceptibility locus. Hum Reprod, 2008;23(12):2835–2841.Google Scholar

Aboura, A, Dupas, C, Tachdjian, G et al. Array comparative genomic hybridization profiling analysis reveals deoxyribonucleic acid copy number variations associated with premature ovarian failure. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2009;94(11):4540–4546.Google Scholar

Kok, HS, van Asselt, KM, Van Der Schouw, YT, Peeters, PHM, Wijmenga, C. Genetic studies to identify genes underlying menopausal age. Hum Reprod Update, 2005;11(5):483–493.Google Scholar

Long, JR, Shu, XO, Cai, Q et al. Polymorphisms of the CYP1B1 gene may be associated with the onset of natural menopause in Chinese women. Maturitas, 2006;55(3):238–246.Google Scholar

Liu, P, Lu, Y, Recker, RR, Deng, HW, Dvornyk, V. Association analyses suggest multiple interaction effects of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphisms on timing of menarche and natural menopause in white women. Menopause, 2010;17(1):185–190.Google Scholar

Nelson, LM. Primary ovarian insufficiency. N Engl J Med, 2009;360:606–614.Google Scholar

Kang, H, Lee, SK, Kim, MH et al. Acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 6 is associated with premature ovarian failure. Fertil Steril, 2009;91:1339–1343.Google Scholar

Kovanci, E, Rohozinski, J, Simpson, JL et al. Growth differentiating factor-9 mutations may be associated with premature ovarian failure. Fertil Steril, 2007;87:143–146.Google Scholar

Rohr, J, Allen, EG, Charen, K et al. Anti-Mullerian hormone indicates early ovarian decline in fragile X mental retardation (FMR1) premutation carriers: a preliminary study. Hum Reprod, 2008;23(5):1220–1225.Google Scholar

Jiao, X, Qin, C, Li, J et al. Cytogenetic analysis of 531 Chinese women with premature ovarian failure. Hum Reprod, 2012;27(7):2201–2207.Google Scholar

Pastore, L, Johnson, J. The FMR1 gene, infertility, and reproductive decision-making: a review. Front Genet, 2014;5:195.Google Scholar

Phillips, KA, Collins, IM, Milne, RL et al. Anti-Müllerian hormone serum concentrations of women with germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Hum Reprod, 2011;31(5):1126–1132.Google Scholar

Giordano, S, Garrett-Mayer, E, Mittal, N et al. Association of BRCA1 mutations with impaired ovarian reserve: connection between infertility and breast/ovarian cancer risk. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol, 2016;5(4):337–343.Google Scholar

Johnson, L, Sammel, MD, Domchek, S et al. Antimüllerian hormone levels are lower in BRCA2 mutation carriers. Fertil Steril: May, 2017;107(5):1256–1265.Google Scholar

Lin, W, Titus, S, Moy, F, Ginsburg, ES, Oktay, K. Ovarian aging in women with BRCA germline mutations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2017 October 1;102(10):3839–3847.Google Scholar

Oktay, K, Turan, V, Titus, S, Stobezki, R, Liu, L. BRCA mutations, DNA repair deficiency, and ovarian aging1. Biol Reprod, 2015 September;93(3):67. Published online 2015 July 29. DOI:10.1095/biolreprod.115.132290 PMCID: PMC4710189. PMID: 26224004.Google Scholar

Derks-Smeets, AP, van Tilborg, TC, van Montfoort, A et al. BRCA1 mutation carriers have a lower number of mature oocytes after ovarian stimulation for IVF/PGD. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2017 November;34(11):1475–1482.Google Scholar

de la Noval, BD. Potential implications on female fertility and reproductive lifespan in BRCA germline mutation women. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2016 November;294(5):1099–1103. Epub 2016 August 25.Google Scholar

Ruth, KS, Murray, A. Lessons from genome-wide association studies in reproductive medicine: menopause. Semin Reprod Med, 2016 July;34(4):215–223. DOI:10.1055/s-0036-1585404Google Scholar

Tohlob, D, Abo Hashem, E, Ghareeb, N et al. Association of a promoter polymorphism in FSHR with ovarian reserve and response to ovarian stimulation in women undergoing assisted reproductive treatment. Reprod Biomed Online, 2016 September;33(3):391–397.Google Scholar

La Marca, A, Papaleo, E, Alviggi, C et al. The combination of genetic variants of the FSHB and FSHR genes affects serum FSH in women of reproductive age. Hum Reprod, 2013 May;28(5):1369–1374. DOI:10.1093/humrep/det061 Epub 2013 March 15.Google Scholar

Wood, MA, Rajkovic, A. Genomic markers of ovarian reserve. Semin Reprod Med, 2013 November;31(6):399–415. DOI:10.1055/s-0033-1356476Google Scholar

Riccetti, L, De Pascali, F, Gilioli, L et al. Genetics of gonadotropins and their receptors as markers of ovarian reserve and response in controlled ovarian stimulation. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2017 October;44:15–25. DOI:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.04.002 Epub 2017 April 17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chen, CT, Liu, CT, Chen, GK et al. Meta-analysis of loci associated with age at natural menopause in African-American women. Hum Mol Genet, 2014 June 15;23(12):3327–3342. DOI:10.1093/hmg/ddu041 Epub 2014 February 2.Google Scholar

Rahmani, M, Earp, MA, Ramezani Tehrani, F et al. Shared genetic factors for age at natural menopause in Iranian and European women. Hum Reprod, 2013 July;28(7):1987–1994. DOI:10.1093/humrep/det106 Epub 2013 April 16.Google Scholar

Shi, J, Zhang, B, Choi, JY et al. Age at menarche and age at natural menopause in East Asian women: a genome-wide association study. Age, 2016 December;38(5–6):513–523. DOI:10.1007/s11357-016-9939-5 Epub 2016 September 14.Google Scholar

Schuh-Huerta, SM, Johnson, NA, Rosen, MP et al. Genetic variants and environmental factors associated with hormonal markers of ovarian reserve in Caucasian and African American women. Hum Reprod, 2012 February;27(2):594–608. DOI:10.1093/humrep/der391 Epub 2011 November 24.Google Scholar

Pyun, JA, Kim, S, Cho, NH et al. Genome-wide association studies and epistasis analyses of candidate genes related to age at menarche and age at natural menopause in a Korean population. Menopause, 2014 May;21(5):522–529. DOI:10.1097/GME.0b013e3182a433f7Google Scholar

Tal, R, Seifer, DB. Ovarian reserve testing: a user’s guide. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2017 August;217(2):129–140. DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.027 Epub 2017 February 21.Google Scholar

Souter, I, Smith, KW, Dimitriadis, I et al. The association of bisphenol-A urinary concentrations with antral follicle counts and other measures of ovarian reserve in women undergoing infertility treatments. Reprod Toxicol, 2013 December;42:224–231. DOI:10.1016/j.reprotox.2013.09.008 Epub 2013 October 4.Google Scholar

Karwacka, A, Zamkowska, D, Radwan, M, Jurewicz, J. Exposure to modern, widespread environmental endocrine disrupting chemicals and their effect on the reproductive potential of women: an overview of current epidemiological evidence. Hum Fertil (Camb), 2017 July;31:1–24. DOI:10.1080/14647273.2017.1358828 [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar

Vabre, P, Gatimel, N, Moreau, J et al. Environmental pollutants, a possible etiology for premature ovarian insufficiency: a narrative review of animal and human data. Environ Health, 2017 April 7;16(1):37. DOI:10.1186/s12940-017-0242-4Google Scholar

Mínguez-Alarcón, L, Gaskins, AJ. Female exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals and fecundity: a review. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2017 August;29(4):202–211. DOI:10.1097/GCO.0000000000000373Google Scholar

Butts, S, Sammel, M, Greer, C et al. Cigarettes, genetic background, and menopausal timing: the presence of single nucleotide polymorphisms in cytochrome P450 genes is associated with increased risk of natural menopause in European-American smokers. Menopause, 2014 July;21(7):694–701.Google Scholar

Bhattacharya, P, Keating, AF. Impact of environmental exposures on ovarian function and role of xenobiotic metabolism during ovotoxicity. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 2012 June 15;261(3):227–235. DOI:10.1016/j.taap.2012.04.009 Epub 2012 April 13.Google Scholar

Blum, MGB, Heyer, E, Francois, O, Austerlitz, F. Matrilineal fertility inheritance detected in hunter-gatherer populations using the imbalance of gene genealogies. PLoS Genet, 2006;2(8):e122.Google Scholar

Wood, JW. Fecundity and natural fertility in humans. Oxf Rev Reprod Biol, 1989;11:61–109.Google Scholar

Frank, O, Bianchi, PG, Campana, A. The end of fertility: age, fecundity and fecundability in women. J Biosoc Sci, 1994;26(3):349–368.Google Scholar