Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T15:11:25.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 19 - Embryo Cryopreservation as a Fertility Preservation Strategy

from Section 6 - Fertility Preservation Strategies in the Female: ART

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2021

By
Pedro N Barri ,
Anna Veiga ,
Montserrat Boada  and
Miquel Solé
Edited by
Jacques Donnez  and
S. Samuel Kim
Jacques Donnez
Affiliation:
Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels
S. Samuel Kim
Affiliation:
University of Kansas School of Medicine
Get access

Summary

Conservative and functional surgery is increasingly used in surgical oncology. Its aim is to preserve organs’ functionality and to reduce radical resection. Development of new surgical procedures in oncologic gynecologic surgery is a perfect example of this evolution. Although radical surgery remains the gold standard in the treatment of ovarian cancer, a conservative approach can be considered in patients with early-stages disease, in order to preserve their fertility function. These procedures were proposed to selected patients, depending on histologic subtypes and prognostic factors. Ovarian cancers are classified in epithelial (including borderline and malignant tumors) and non-epithelial cancer.

Type
Chapter
Information
Fertility Preservation
Principles and Practice
 , pp. 211 - 214
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kato K. Vitrification of embryos and oocytes for fertility preservation in cancer patients. Reprod Med Biol, 2016; 15:227–233.Google Scholar
Alvarez M, Solé M, Devesa M, et al. Live birth using vitrified--warmed oocytes in invasive ovarian cancer: case report and literature review. Reprod Biomed Online, 2014;28(6):663–668.Google Scholar
Rodgers RJ, Reid GD, Koch J, et al. The safety and efficacy of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for fertility preservation in women with early breast cancer: a systematic review. Hum Reprod, 2017;32(5):1033–1045.Google Scholar
Dolmans M Demylle D, Martínez-Madrid B, Donnez J. Efficacy of in vitro fertilization after chemotherapy. Fertil Steril, 2005;83:897–901.Google Scholar
Oktay K. Further evidence on the safety and success of ovarian stimulation with letrozole and tamoxifen in breast cancer patients undergoing in vitro fertilization to cryopreserve their embryos for fertility preservation. J Clin Oncol, 2005;23:3858–3859.Google Scholar
Trounson A, Mohr L. Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight-cell embryo. Nature, 1983;305(5936):707–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veiga A, Calderón G, Barri PN, Coroleu B. Pregnancy after the replacement of a frozen– thawed embryo with less than 50% intact blastomeres. Hum Reprod, 1987;2(4):321–323.Google Scholar
Wenherholm UB, Södertrom Anttila V et al. Children born after cryopreservation of embryos or oocytes: a systematic review of outcome data. Hum Reprod, 18(6):815–820.Google Scholar
Jeruss JS, Woodruff TK. Preservation of fertility in patients with cancer. N Engl J Med, 2009;360:902–911.Google Scholar
Loutradis KE, Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA et al. Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril, 2008;90 (1):186–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rienzi L, Gracia C, Maggiulli R, et al. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance. Hum Reprod Update, 2017;23(2):139–155.Google Scholar
Check JH, Summers-Chase D, Yuan W, Swenson K, Horwath D. Length of time of embryo storage does not negatively influence pregnancy rates after thawing and transfer. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol, 2010;37(3):185–186.Google Scholar
Yuan Y, Mai Q, Ma J, et al. What was the fate of human embryos following long-term cryopreservation (≥12 years) and frozen embryo transfer?. Hum Reprod, 2019;34(1):52–55. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li J, Yin M, Wang B, et al. The effect of storage time after vitrification on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes among 24 698 patients following the first embryo transfer cycles. Hum Reprod, 2020;35(7):1675–1684.Google Scholar
Takahashi K, Mukaida T, Goto T, Oka C. Perinatal outcome of blastocyst transfer with vitrification using Cryoloop: a 4 year follow-up study. Fertil Steril, 2005;84:88–92.Google Scholar
Rama Raju GA, Prakash GY, Krishna KM, Madam K. Neonatal outcome after vitrified day 3 embryo transfers: a preliminary study. Fertil Steril, 2009;92:143–148.Google Scholar
Klock SC, Zhang JX, Kazer RR. Fertility preservation for female cancer patients: early clinical experience. Fertil Steril, 2010;94:149–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luna M, Boada M, Aran B et al. Couples’ opinions regarding the fate of surplus frozen embryos. Reprod Biomed Online, 2009;19(Suppl. 2):11–15.Google Scholar
Brown JP, Moden E, Obasaju M, Ying YK. Natural cycle in vitro fertilization with embryo cryopreservation prior to chemotherapy for carcinoma of the breast. Hum Reprod, 1996;11:197–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juretzka MJ, O’Hanlan KA, Katz SL, El-Danasouri I, Westphal LM. Embryo cryopreservation after diagnosis of stage IIB endometrial cancer and subsequent pregnancy in a gestational carrier. Fertil Steril, 2005;83:1041–1045.Google Scholar
Oktay K, Sönmezer M. Fertility preservation in gynecological cancers. Curr Opin Oncol, 2007;19:506–511.Google Scholar
Yang, D, Brown, SE, Nguyen, K et al. Live birth after the transfer of human embryos developed from cryopreserved oocytes harvested before cancer treatment. Fertil Steril, 2007;87(6):1469 e1–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×