Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T17:05:49.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 24 - Implementation of a Specialized Treatment Program to Reduce Violence in a Forensic Population

from Part IV - Nonpsychopharmacological Treatment Considerations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2021

Katherine Warburton
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Stephen M. Stahl
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Get access

Summary

The California Department of State Hospitals (DSH) manages the psychiatric care of almost 7,000 patients admitted to any of its five hospitals. Over 90% of these patients have forensic commitments, meaning they have been charged with, or convicted of, a crime. Treating patients with mental illness and criminal behavior reflects a general trend within state psychiatric facilities.An increase in physical violence towards staff and patients has been attributed to this mandate to care for patients with both severe mental illness and criminal backgrounds. Addressing violence is a pressing need within state hospital systems, as a safe treatment environment is quintessential to the delivery of effective care.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Warburton, K. The new mission of forensic mental health systems: managing violence as a medical syndrome in an environment that balances treatment and safety. CNS Spectr. 2014; 19: 368373.Google Scholar
Fisher, W, Geller, JL, Pandiani, JA. The changing role of the state psychiatric hospital. Health Affairs. 2009; 28(3): 676684.Google Scholar
Bader, S, Evans, SE, Welsh, E. Aggression among psychiatric inpatients: the relationship between time, place, victims, and severity ratings. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2014; 20(3): 179186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broderick, C. Violence report: DSH violence 2010–2017. California Department of State Hospitals; 2019: 265.Google Scholar
Morgan, R, Flora, DB, Kroner, DG, et al. Treating offenders with mental illness: a research synthesis. Law Hum Behav. 2012; 36(1): 3750.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrews, D. The risk-need-responsivity (RNR) model of correctional assessment and treatment. In: Dvoskin, J, Skeem, JL, Novaco, RW, Douglas, KS, eds. Using Social Science to Reduce Violent Offending. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012: 127156.Google Scholar
Skeem, J, Steadman, HJ, Manchak, SM. Applicability of the risk-need-responsivity model to persons with mental illness involved in the criminal justice system. Psychiatr Serv. 2015; 66: 916922.Google Scholar
Delgado, D, Mitchell, SM, Morgan, RD, Scanlon, F. Examining violence among not guilty by reason of insanity state hospital inpatients across multiple timepoints: the roles of criminogenic risk factors and psychiatric symptoms. Manuscript submitted for publication. 2019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, D, Bonta, J, Hoge, RD. Classification for effective rehabilitation: rediscovering psychology. Crim Justice Behav. 1990; 17(1): 1952.Google Scholar
Sugarman, P, Dickens, G. The evolution of secure and forensic mental healthcare. In: Sugarman, P, Dickens, GL, Picchioni, MM, eds. Handbook of Secure Care. London: RCPsych Publications; 2015.Google Scholar
Ulrich, R, Bogren, L, Gardiner, SK, Lundin, S. Psychiatric ward design can reduce aggressive behavior. J Environ Psychol. 2018; 57: 5366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glynn, S, Mueser, KT. Social learning for chronic mental inpatients. Schizophr Bull. 1986; 12(4): 648668.Google Scholar
Douglas, KS, Nicholls, TL, Brink, J. Interventions for the reduction of violence by persons with serious mental illness. In: Kleespies, PM, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Behavioral Emergencies and Crises. New York: Oxford University Press; 2016: 466488.Google Scholar
Paul, G, Lentz, R. Psychosocial Treatment of Chronic Mental Patients: Milieu versus Social-Learning Programs. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1977.Google Scholar
Crichton, J. Defining high, medium, and low security in forensic mental healthcare: the development of the matric of security in Scotland. J Forens Psychiatry Psychol. 2009; 20(3): 333353.Google Scholar
Achadjian, K. Assembly Bill No. 1340. Enhanced Treatment Programs. 2014.Google Scholar
Douglas, K, Skeem, JL. Violence risk assessment: getting specific about being dynamic. Psychol Public Policy Law. 2005; 11(3): 347383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dvoskin, J, Heilbrun, K. Risk assessment and release decision-making: toward resolving the great debate. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2001; 29: 610.Google ScholarPubMed
Kraemer, H, Kazdin, AE, Offord, DR, et al. Coming to terms with the terms of risk. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1997; 54: 337343.Google Scholar
De Vries Robbe, M, De Vogel, V, Douglas, KS, Nijman, HLI. Changes in dynamic risk and protective factors for violence during inpatient forensic psychiatric treatment: predicting reductions in post discharge community recidivism. Law Hum Behav. 2015; 39(1): 5356.Google Scholar
Quanbeck, C. Forensic psychiatric aspects of inpatient violence. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2006; 29: 743760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stahl, S, Morrissette, DA, Cummings, M, et al. California State Hospital Assessment and Treatment (Cal-VAT) guidelines. CNS Spectr. 2014; 19: 4490465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Douglas, K, Hart, SD, Webster, CD, Belfrage, H. HCR-20V3: Professional guidelines for evaluating risk of violence. Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University; 2013.Google Scholar
Webster, C, Nicholls, TL, Martin, ML, Desmarais, SL, Brink, J. Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START): the case for a new violence risk structured professional judgment scheme. Behav Sci Law. 2006; 24: 757766.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hare, R. The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised, 2nd edn. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems; 2003.Google Scholar
Penney, S, Marshall, LA, Simpson, AIF. The assessment of dynamic risk among forensic psychiatric patients transitioning to the community. Law Hum Behav. 2016; 40: 374386.Google Scholar
Hogan, N, Olver, ME. Assessing risk for aggression in forensic psychiatric inpatients: an examination of five measures. Law Hum Behav. 2016; 40(3): 233243.Google Scholar
Hogan, N, Olver, ME. Static and dynamic assessment of violence risk among discharged forensic patients. Crim Justice Behav. 2019; 47(7): 923938.Google Scholar
Watt, K, Storey, JE, Hart, D. Violence risk identification, assessment and management practices in inpatient psychiatry. J Threat Assess Management. 2018; 5(3): 155172.Google Scholar
Greenberg, S, Shuman, DA. Irreconcilable conflict between therapeutic and forensic roles. Prof Psychol Res Pr. 1997; 28(1): 5057.Google Scholar
Douglas, K, Nicholls, TL, Brink, J. Reducing the risk of violence among people with serious mental illess: a critical analysis of treatment approaches. In: Kleespies, P, ed. Behavioral Emergencies: An Evidence-Based Resource for Evaluating and Managing Risk of Suicide, Violence, and Victimization. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2009.Google Scholar
Viljoen, J, Cochrane, DM, Jonnson, MR. Do risk assessment tools help manage and reduce risk of violence and reoffending?: a systematic review. Law Hum Behav. 2018; 42(3): 181214.Google Scholar
Morgan, R, Kroner, DG, Mills, JF. A Treatment Manual for Justice Involved Persons with Mental Illness. New York: Routledge; 2018.Google Scholar
Kingdon, D, Turkington, D. Cognitive Therapy of Schizophrenia. New York: Guilford Press; 2005.Google Scholar
Linehan, M. Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder. New York: Guilford Press; 1993.Google Scholar
Roberts, D, Penn, D, Combs, D. Social Cognition and Interaction Training (SCIT). New York: Oxford University Press; 2016.Google Scholar
Shah, T, Weinborn, M, Verdile, G, Sohrabi, H, Martins, R. Enhancing cognitive functioning in healthy older adults: a systematic review of the clinical significance of commercially available computerized cognitive training in preventing cognitive decline. Neuropsychol Rev. 2017; 27(1): 6280.Google Scholar
Morgan, R, Kroner, DG, Mills, JF, Bauer, R, Serna, C. Treating justice involved persons with mental illness: preliminary evaluation of a comprehensive treatment program. Crim Justice Behav. 2014; 41: 902916.Google Scholar
Frazier, S, Vela, J. Dialectical behavior therapy for the treatment of anger and aggressive behaviors: a review. Aggress Violent Behav. 2014; 19(2): 156163.Google Scholar
Haddock, G, Barrowclough, C, Shaw, JJ, et al. Cognitive-behavioural therapy v. social activity therapy for people with psychosis and a history of violence: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2009; 194: 152157.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, K, Donohoe, G, O’Sullivan, D, et al. A randomized controlled trial of cognitive remediation for a national cohort of forensic patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. BMC Psychiatry. 2019; 19: 27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kern, R, Glynn, SM, Horan, WP, Marder, SR. Psychosocial treatments to promote functional recovery in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2009; 35(2): 347361.Google Scholar
Bellack, A, Mueser, KT, Gingerich, S, Agresta, J. Social Skills Training for Schizophrenia: A Step-by-Step Guide. New York: The Guilford Press; 2004.Google Scholar
Miller, W, Rollnick, S. Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change, 3rd edn. New York: Guilford Press; 2013.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, J, Mann, RE, Rotgers, F, Weekes, JR. Motivational interviewing with criminal justice populations. In: Miller, W, Rollnick, SR, eds. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change. New York: Guilford Press; 2002: 333346.Google Scholar
Barlett, M, Desteno, D. Gratitude and prosocial behavior: helping when it costs you. Psychol Sci. 2006; 17(4): 319324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanson, J, Van Dorn, RA, Swartz, MS, et al. Alternative pathways to violence in persons with schizophrenia: the role of childhood antisocial behavior problems. Law Hum Behav. 2008; 32: 228240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×