Book contents
- Decriminalizing Mental Illness
- Decriminalizing Mental Illness
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Part I Introduction/Description of the Problem
- Part II Solutions
- Part III Psychopharmacological Treatment Considerations
- Part IV Nonpsychopharmacological Treatment Considerations
- Chapter 21 Neurocognition and Social Cognition Training as Treatments for Violence and Aggression in People with Severe Mental Illness
- Chapter 22 Examining Violence Among Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity State Hospital Inpatients Across Multiple Time Points: The Roles of Criminogenic Risk Factors and Psychiatric Symptoms
- Chapter 23 Criminogenic Risk and Mental Health: A Complicated Relationship
- Chapter 24 Implementation of a Specialized Treatment Program to Reduce Violence in a Forensic Population
- Chapter 25 From Trauma-Blind to Trauma-Informed: Rethinking Criminalization and the Role of Trauma in Persons with Serious Mental Illness
- Chapter 26 The Indistinguishables: Determining Appropriate Environments for Justice-Involved Individuals
- Chapter 27 Breaking Down Long-Term Chronic Aggression Within a Forensic Hospital System
- Part V Criminal Justice and Social Considerations
- Index
- References
Chapter 23 - Criminogenic Risk and Mental Health: A Complicated Relationship
from Part IV - Nonpsychopharmacological Treatment Considerations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 October 2021
Book contents
- Decriminalizing Mental Illness
- Decriminalizing Mental Illness
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Part I Introduction/Description of the Problem
- Part II Solutions
- Part III Psychopharmacological Treatment Considerations
- Part IV Nonpsychopharmacological Treatment Considerations
- Chapter 21 Neurocognition and Social Cognition Training as Treatments for Violence and Aggression in People with Severe Mental Illness
- Chapter 22 Examining Violence Among Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity State Hospital Inpatients Across Multiple Time Points: The Roles of Criminogenic Risk Factors and Psychiatric Symptoms
- Chapter 23 Criminogenic Risk and Mental Health: A Complicated Relationship
- Chapter 24 Implementation of a Specialized Treatment Program to Reduce Violence in a Forensic Population
- Chapter 25 From Trauma-Blind to Trauma-Informed: Rethinking Criminalization and the Role of Trauma in Persons with Serious Mental Illness
- Chapter 26 The Indistinguishables: Determining Appropriate Environments for Justice-Involved Individuals
- Chapter 27 Breaking Down Long-Term Chronic Aggression Within a Forensic Hospital System
- Part V Criminal Justice and Social Considerations
- Index
- References
Summary
The relationship between criminogenic risk and mental illness in justice-involved persons with mental illness (PMI) is complex and poorly understood. As previously noted, the general public is misinformed on the nature of this relationship, erroneously believing that mental illness causes violence and crime. This perception is compounded by news reports immediately speculating about mental illness in response to sensationalized criminal acts such as mass shootings, as well as in popular and social media. Of greater concern, however, is when clinicians, administrators, and policymakers are also misinformed. Criminal risk includes static (e.g. age, gender) and dynamic (e.g. antisocial attitudes, substance misuse) factors that place an individual at greater risk of involvement in crime.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Decriminalizing Mental Illness , pp. 241 - 250Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Bartholomew, NR, Morgan, RD. Comorbid mental illness and criminalness implications for housing and treatment. CNS Spectr. 2015; 20(3): 231–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonta, J, Andrews, DA. Risk-need-responsivity model for offender assessment and rehabilitation. Rehabilitation. 2007; 6(1): 1–22.Google Scholar
Bewley, MT, Morgan, RD. A national survey of mental health services available to offenders with mental illness: who is doing what? Law Hum Behav. 2011; 35(5): 351–363.Google Scholar
Morgan, RD, Flora, DB, Kroner, DG, et al. Treating offenders with mental illness: a research synthesis. Law Hum Behav. 2012; 36(1): 37–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonta, J, Andrews, DA. The Psychology of Criminal Conduct. New York, NY: Routledge; 2016.Google Scholar
Ditton, PM. Mental Health and Treatment of Inmates and Probationers. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 1999.Google Scholar
Draine, J, Salzer, MS, Culhane, DP, Hadley, TR. Role of social disadvantage in crime, joblessness, and homelessness among persons with serious mental illness. Psychiatr Serv. 2002; 53(5): 565–573.Google Scholar
Fisher, WH, Silver, E, Wolff, N. Beyond criminalization: toward a criminologically informed framework for mental health policy and services research. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2006; 33(5): 544–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skeem, JL, Winter, E, Kennealy, PJ, et al. Offenders with mental illness have criminogenic needs, too: toward recidivism reduction. Law Hum Behav. 2014; 38(3): 212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonta, J, Law, M, Hanson, K. The prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 1998; 123(2): 123.Google Scholar
Morgan, RD, Fisher, WH, Duan, N, Mandracchia, JT, Murray, D. Prevalence of criminal thinking among state prison inmates with serious mental illness. Law Hum Behav. 2010; 34(4): 324–336.Google Scholar
Wolff, N, Morgan, RD, Shi, J. Comparative analysis of attitudes and emotions among inmates: does mental illness matter? Crim Justice Behav. 2013; 40(10): 1092–1108.Google Scholar
Wolff, N, Morgan, RD, Shi, J, Fisher, W, Huening, J. Comparative analysis of thinking styles and emotional states of male and female inmates with and without mental disorders. Psychiatr Serv. 2011; 62: 1485–1493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, AB, Farkas, K, Ishler, K, et al. Criminal thinking styles among people with serious mental illness in jail. Law Hum Behav. 2014; 38(6): 592–601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolaños, AD, Mitchell, SM, Morgan, RD, et al. A comparison of criminogenic risk factors between psychiatric inpatients with and without criminal justice involvement (in preparation).Google Scholar
Gross, NR, Morgan, RD. Understanding persons with mental illness who are and are not criminal justice involved: a comparison of criminal thinking and psychiatric symptoms. Law Hum Behav. 2013; 37(3): 175–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skeem, JL, Manchak, S, Peterson, JK. Correctional policy for offenders with mental illness. Law Hum Behav. 2011; 35(2): 110–126.Google Scholar
Hodgins, S, Muller-Isberner, R, Freese, R, et al. A comparison of general adult and forensic patients with schizophrenia living in the community. Int J Forensic Ment Health. 2007; 6(1): 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, F, Morgan, RD, Mitchell, SM, et al. Community mental health settings and the criminal justice systems: The institutions of justice-involved persons with mental illness (in preparation).Google Scholar
Theriot, MT, Dulmus, CN, Sowers, KM, et al. Factors relating to self identification among bullying victims. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2005; 27(9): 979–994.Google Scholar
Walters, GD. The psychological inventory of criminal thinking styles: part II. Identifying simulated response sets. Crim Justice Behav. 1995; 22(4): 437–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millon, T, Millon, C, Davis, RD, et al. Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III (MCMI-III): Manual. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson/PsychCorp; 2009.Google Scholar
Shields, IW, Simourd, DJ. Predicting predatory behavior in a population of incarcerated young offenders. Crim Justice Behav. 1991; 18(2): 180–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Horn, SA, Morgan, RD, Grabowski, KE. Examining the relationship between criminalness, mental illness and institutional misconduct (in preparation).Google Scholar
Dawes, RM, Faust, D, Meehl, PE. Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science. 1989; 243: 1668–1674.Google Scholar
Monahan, J. Predicting Violent Behavior: An Assessment of Clinical Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1981.Google Scholar
Andrews, DA, Bonta, J, Wormith, JS. The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime Delinq. 2006; 52(1): 7–27.Google Scholar
Mills, JF. Violence risk assessment: a brief review, current issues, and future directions. Can Psychol. 2017; 58(1): 40–49.Google Scholar
Mills, JF, Kroner, DG. The effect of base-rate information on the perception of risk for re-offence. Am J Forensic Psychol. 2006; 24: 45–56.Google Scholar
Walters, GD, Kroner, DG, DeMatteo, D, Locklair, BR. The impact of base rate utilization and clinical experience on the accuracy of judgments made with the HCR-20. J Forensic Psychol Pract. 2014; 14(4): 288–301.Google Scholar
Hilton, NZ, Harris, GT, Rawson, K, Beach, CA. Communicating violence risk information to forensic decision makers. Crim Justice Behav. 2005; 32(1): 97–116.Google Scholar
Wormith, JS. The legacy of DA Andrews in the field of criminal justice: how theory and research can change policy and practice. Int J Forensic Ment Health. 2011; 10(2): 78–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, DA, Bonta, J, Wormith, JS. The Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (LS/CMI). Toronto, Ontario: Multi-Health Systems; 2004.Google Scholar
Ferguson, AM, Ogloff, JR, Thomson, L. Predicting recidivism by mentally disordered offenders using the LSI-R: SV. Crim Justice Behav. 2009; 36(1): 5–20.Google Scholar
Kelly, CE, Welsh, WN. The predictive validity of the Level of Service Inventory—Revised for drug-involved offenders. Crim Justice Behav. 2008; 35(7): 819–831.Google Scholar
Campbell, MA, French, S, Gendreau, P. The prediction of violence in adult offenders: a meta-analytic comparison of instruments and methods of assessment. Crim Justice Behav. 2009; 36(6): 567–590.Google Scholar
Gray, NS, Hill, C, McGleish, A, et al. Prediction of violence and self-harm in mentally disordered offenders: a prospective study of the efficacy of HCR-20, PCL-R, and psychiatric symptomatology. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003; 71(3): 443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrews, DA, Dowden, C. Risk principle of case classification in correctional treatment: a meta-analytic investigation. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2006; 50(1): 88–100.Google Scholar
Lowenkamp, CT, Latessa, EJ, Holsinger, AM. The risk principle in action: what have we learned from 13,676 offenders and 97 correctional programs? Crime Delinq. 2006; 52(1): 77–93.Google Scholar
Wong, SC, Gordon, A. The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale: a treatment-friendly violence risk assessment tool. Psychol Public Policy Law. 2006; 12(3): 279.Google Scholar
Prochaska, JO, DiClemente, CC. The Transtheoretical Approach: Crossing Traditional Boundaries of Therapy. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin; 1984.Google Scholar
Morgan, RD, Kroner, DG, Mills, JF, Olafsson, BN. The Services Matching Instrument. Unpublished assessment.Google Scholar
Olafsson, BN, Morgan, RD, Kroner, DG. The services matching instrument: development, reliability and preliminary validity (in preparation).Google Scholar
Morgan, RD, Kroner, DG, Mills, JF, Batastini, AB. Treating criminal offenders. In: Weiner, IB, Otto, RK, eds. Handbook of Forensic Psychology, 4th edn. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2013: 795–838.Google Scholar
Little, GL, Robinson, KD. Moral reconation therapy: a systematic step-by-step treatment system for treatment-resistant clients. Psychol Rep. 1988; 62: 135–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rotter, M, Carr, WA. Targeting criminal recidivism in mentally ill offenders: structured clinical approaches. Community Ment Health J. 2011; 47(6): 723–726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodell, S, Druss, BG, Walker, ER, Mat, M. Mental Disorders and Medical Comorbidity. Cambridge, MA: The Synthesis Project, MIT; 2011.Google Scholar
Holzer, HJ, Raphael, S, Stoll, MA. How willing are employers to hire ex-offenders? Focus. 2004; 23(2): 40–43.Google Scholar
Petersilia, J. Prisoner re entry: public safety and reintegration challenges. Prison J. 2001; 81(3): 360–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varghese, FP, Hardin, EE, Bauer, RL, Morgan, RD. Attitudes toward hiring offenders: the roles of criminal history, job qualifications, and race. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2009; 54(5): 769–782.Google Scholar
Corrigan, P. How stigma interferes with mental health care. Am Psychol. 2004; 59(7): 614.Google Scholar
Alexander, L, Link, B. The impact of contact on stigmatizing attitudes toward people with mental illness. J Ment Health. 2003; 12(3): 271–289.Google Scholar
Overton, SL, Medina, SL. The stigma of mental illness. J Couns Dev. 2008; 86(2): 143–151.Google Scholar
Batastini, AB, Bolanos, AD, Morgan, RD. Attitudes toward hiring applicants with mental illness and criminal justice involvement: the impact of education and experience. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2014; 37(5): 524–533.Google Scholar
Graffam, J, Shinkfield, AJ, Hardcastle, L. The perceived employability of ex-prisoners and offenders. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2008; 52(6): 673–685.Google Scholar
Allen, LB, McHugh, RK, Barlow, DH. Emotional disorders: a unified protocol. In: Barlow, DH, ed. Clinical Handbook of Psychological Disorders: A Step-by-Step Treatment Manual. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2008: 216–249.Google Scholar
Aaronson, CJ, Katzman, GP, Gorman, JM. Combination pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy for the treatment of major depression and anxiety disorders. In: Nathan, PE, Gorman, JM, eds. A Guide to Treatments that Work, 3rd edn. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2007.Google Scholar
Morgan, RD, Kroner, D, Mills, JF. A Treatment Manual for Justice Involved Persons with Mental Illness: Changing Lives and Changing Outcomes. New York, NY: Routledge; 2018.Google Scholar
Colwell, LH, Gianesini, J. Demographic, criminogenic, and psychiatric factors that predict competency restoration. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2011; 39(3): 297–306.Google ScholarPubMed
Gowensmith, WN, Frost, LE, Speelman, DW, Therson, DW. Lookin’ for beds in all the wrong places: outpatient competency restoration as a promising approach to modern challenges. Psychol Public Policy Law. 2016; 22(3): 293–305.Google Scholar
Gingerich, S, Mueser, KT. Illness Management and Recovery Implementation Resource Kit. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Mental Health Services; 2004.Google Scholar