Book contents
- Clinical Imaging of Spinal Trauma
- Clinical Imaging of Spinal Trauma
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Section 1 Normal Variants and Mimickers
- Section 2 Recommendations, Pitfalls, and Controversies
- Case 9 When and How to Scan
- Case 10 Role of Plain Films in Spine Trauma
- Case 11 CT Streak Artifacts
- Case 12 Utility of MRI after Negative CT
- Case 13 Stable vs. Unstable Spine Injuries
- Case 14 Whiplash Injury
- Case 15 Findings Likely to Be Missed
- Section 3 Trauma to Uncompromised Spine
- Section 4 Thoracolumbar Trauma Classification
- Section 5 Specifics of Pediatric Spinal Trauma
- Section 6 Trauma to Compromised Spine
- Index
- References
Case 14 - Whiplash Injury
from Section 2 - Recommendations, Pitfalls, and Controversies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2018
Book contents
- Clinical Imaging of Spinal Trauma
- Clinical Imaging of Spinal Trauma
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Section 1 Normal Variants and Mimickers
- Section 2 Recommendations, Pitfalls, and Controversies
- Case 9 When and How to Scan
- Case 10 Role of Plain Films in Spine Trauma
- Case 11 CT Streak Artifacts
- Case 12 Utility of MRI after Negative CT
- Case 13 Stable vs. Unstable Spine Injuries
- Case 14 Whiplash Injury
- Case 15 Findings Likely to Be Missed
- Section 3 Trauma to Uncompromised Spine
- Section 4 Thoracolumbar Trauma Classification
- Section 5 Specifics of Pediatric Spinal Trauma
- Section 6 Trauma to Compromised Spine
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Clinical Imaging of Spinal TraumaA Case-Based Approach, pp. 30 - 32Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Gwendolen, J, Kenardy, J, Hendrikz, J, et al. Management of acute whiplash: a randomized controlled trial of multidisciplinary stratified treatments. J Pain 2014;154:1798–1806.Google Scholar
Lamb, SE, Gates, S, Williams, MA, et al. Emergency department treatments and physiotherapy for acute whiplash: a pragmatic, two-step, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2013;381:546–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, A, Forget, M, St George, K, et al. Patient education for neck pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;3:CD005106. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005106.pub4.Google Scholar
Carroll, LJ, Holm, LW, Hogg-Johnson, S, et al. Course and prognostic factors for neck pain in whiplash-associated disorders (WAD): results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008; 33(4 Suppl): S83–S92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stiell, IG, Clement, CM, McKnight, RD, et al. The Canadian C-spine rule versus the NEXUS low-risk criteria in patients with trauma. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2510–2518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeman, MD, Croft, AC, Rossignol, AM. “Whiplash associated disorders: redefining whiplash and its management” by the Quebec Task Force. A critical evaluation. Spine 1998;23:1043–1049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, Q, Shen, H, Li, M. Magnetic resonance imaging signal changes of alar and transverse ligaments not correlated with whiplash-associated disorders: a meta-analysis of case-control studies. Eur Spine J 2013;22:14–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, SE, Boesch, C, Zimmermann, H, et al. Are there cervical spine findings at MR imaging that are specific to acute symptomatic whiplash injury? A prospective controlled study with four experienced blinded readers. Radiology 2012;262:567–575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vetti, N, Kråkenes, J, Ask, T, et al. Follow-up MR imaging of the alar and transverse ligaments after whiplash injury: a prospective controlled study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1836–1841.Google Scholar
Dullerud, R, Gjertsen, O, Server, A. Magnetic resonance imaging of ligaments and membranes in the craniocervical junction in whiplash-associated injury and in healthy control subjects. Acta Radiol 2010;51:207–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed