Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T15:38:37.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 36 - CT Angiography of the Head and Neck

from Part III - Computed Tomography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2017

By
Saud Siddiqui  and
Monica Wattana
Edited by
J. Christian Fox
J. Christian Fox
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Clinical Emergency Radiology , pp. 495 - 504
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Parsons, MW, Pepper, EM, Chan, V, et al.: Perfusion computed tomography: prediction of final infarct extent and stroke outcome. Ann Neurol 2005;58(5):672–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhatia, R, Bal, S, Shobha, N, et al.: CT angiographic source images predict outcome and final infarct volume better than noncontrast CT in proximal vascular occlusions. Stroke 2011;42(6):1575–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoo, A, Hu, R, Hakimelahi, R, et al.: CT Angiography source images acquired with a fast-acquisition protocol overestimate infarct core on diffusion weighted images in acute ischemic stroke. J Neuroimaging 2012;22(4):329–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buerke, B, Wittkamp, G, Dziewas, R, et al.: Perfusion-weighted map and perfused blood volume in comparison with CT angiography source imaging in acute ischemic stroke: different sides of the same coin? Acad Radiol 2011;18(3):347–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jauch, E, Saver, J, Adams, H, et al.: Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2013;44(3):870–947.Google Scholar
Albers, GW, Amarenco, P, Easton, JD, et al.: Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke. Chest 2004;126(3):483S–512S.Google Scholar
Vo, KD, Lin, WL, Lee, JM: Evidence-based neuroimaging in acute ischemic stroke. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2003;13(2):167.Google Scholar
Grunwald, I, Reith, W: Non-traumatic neurological emergencies: imaging of cerebral ischemia. Eur Radiol 2002;12(7):1632–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rother, J: CT and MRI in the diagnosis of acute stroke and their role in thrombolysis. Thromb Res 2001;103:S125–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lev, MH, Segal, AZ, Farkas, J, et al.: Utility of perfusion-weighted CT imaging in acute middle cerebral artery stroke treated with intra-arterial thrombolysis – prediction of final infarct volume and clinical outcome. Stroke 2001;32(9):2021–7.Google Scholar
Lev, MH, Farkas, J, Rodriguez, VR, et al.: CT angiography in the rapid triage of patients with hyperacute stroke to intraarterial thrombolysis: accuracy in the detection of large vessel thrombus. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001;25(4):520–8.Google Scholar
Adams, HP, del Zoppo, G, Alberts, MJ, et al.: Guidelines for the early management of adults with ischemic stroke – a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups. Circulation 2007;115(20):E478–534. (Reprinted from Stroke 2007;38:1655–711.)Google Scholar
Laloux, P: Intravenous rtPA thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. Acta Neurol Belg 2001;101(2):88–95.Google Scholar
Warach, S: New imaging strategies for patient selection for thrombolytic and neuroprotective therapies. Neurology 2001;57(5):S48–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wildermuth, S, Knauth, M, Brandt, T, et al.: Role of CT angiography in patient selection for thrombolytic therapy in acute hemispheric stroke. Stroke 1998;29(5):935–8.Google Scholar
Suwanwela, N, Koroshetz, WJ: Acute ischemic stroke: overview of recent therapeutic developments. Ann Rev Med 2007;58:89–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mittal, VK, Paulson, TJ, Colaiuta, E, et al.: Carotid artery injuries and their management. J Cardiovasc Surg 2000;41(3):423–31.Google ScholarPubMed
Azuaje, RE, Jacobson, LE, Glover, J, et al.: Reliability of physical examination as a predictor of vascular injury after penetrating neck trauma. Am Surg 2003;69(9):804–7.Google Scholar
Asensio, JA, Valenziano, CP, Falcone, RE, Grosh, JD: Management of penetrating neck injuries – the controversy surrounding zone-injuries. Surg Clin North Am 1991;71(2):267–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willinsky, RA, Taylor, SM, TerBrugge, K, et al.: Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 2003;227(2):522–8.Google Scholar
Stringaris, K: Three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography and MR imaging versus conventional angiography in carotid artery dissections. Int Angiol 1996;15(1):20–5.Google Scholar
Spokoyny, I, Raman, R, Ernstrom, K, et al.: Imaging negative stroke: diagnoses and outcomes in IV t-PA treated patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2014;23(5):1046–50.Google Scholar
Chalela, J, Kidwell, C, Nentwich, L, et al.: Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in emergency assessment of patients with suspected acute stroke: a prospective comparison. Lancet 2007;369(9558):293–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Latchaw, R, Alberts, M, Lev, M, et al. Recommendations for imaging of acute ischemic stroke a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke 2009;40(11):3646–78.Google Scholar
Wardlaw, JM, Chappell, FM, Best, JJ, et al.: Noninvasive imaging compared with intra-arterial angiography in the diagnosis of symptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2006;367(9521):1503–12.Google Scholar
Koelemay, MJW, Nederkoorn, PJ, Reitsma, JB, Majoie, CB: Systematic review of computed tomographic angiography for assessment of carotid artery disease. Stroke 2004;35(10):2306–12.Google Scholar
Anzidei, M, Napoli, A, Zaccagna, F, et al.: Diagnostic accuracy of colour Doppler ultrasonography, CT angiography and blood-pool-enhanced MR angiography in assessing carotid stenosis: a comparative study with DSA in 170 patients. La Radiologia Medica 2012;117(1):54–71.Google Scholar
Katz, DA, Marks, MP, Napel, SA, et al.: Circle of Willis – evaluation with spiral CT angiography, MR-angiography, and conventional angiography. Radiology 1995;195(2):445–9.Google Scholar
Gottesman, R, Sharma, P, Robinson, K, et al.: Imaging characteristics of symptomatic vertebral artery dissection: a systematic review. Neurologist 2012;18(5):255–60.Google Scholar
Kloska, SP, Nabavi, DG, Gaus, C, et al.: Acute stroke assessment with CT: do we need multimodal evaluation? Radiology 2004;233(1):79–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schramm, P, Schellinger, PD, Klotz, E, et al.: Comparison of perfusion computed tomography and computed tomography angiography source images with perfusion-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with acute stroke of less than 6 hours’ duration. Stroke 2004;35(7):1652–7.Google Scholar
Wintermark, M, Fischbein, NJ, Smith, WS, et al.: Accuracy of dynamic perfusion CT with deconvolution in detecting acute hemispheric stroke. Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26(1):104–12.Google ScholarPubMed
Schramm, P, Schellinger, PD, Fiebach, JB, et al.: Comparison of CT and CT angiography source images with diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with acute stroke within 6 hours after onset. Stroke 2002;33(10):2426–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wintermark, M, Reichhart, M, Cuisenaire, O, et al.: Comparison of admission perfusion computed tomography and qualitative diffusion- and perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in acute stroke patients. Stroke 2002;33(8):2025–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nieuwkamp, D, Setz, L, Algra, A, et al.: Changes in case fatality of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage over time, according to age, sex, and region: a meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 2009;8(7):635–42.Google Scholar
White, PM, Wardlaw, JM, Easton, V: Can noninvasive imaging accurately depict intracranial aneurysms? A systematic review. Radiology 2000;217(2):361–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kangasniemi, M, Mäkelä, T, Koskinen, S, et al.: Detection of intracranial aneurysms with two-dimensional and three-dimensional multislice helical computed tomographic angiography. Neurosurgery 2004;54(2):336–40.Google Scholar
Chappell, ET, Moure, FC, Good, MC: Comparison of computed tomographic angiography with digital subtraction angiography in the diagnosis of cerebral aneurysms: a meta-analysis. Neurosurgery 2003;52(3):624–30.Google Scholar
Wintermark, M, Uske, A, Chalaron, M, et al.: Multislice computerized tomography angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: a comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. J Neurosurg 2003;98(4):828–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westerlaan, H, Van Dijk, J, Jansen-Van Der Weide, M, et al.: Intracranial aneurysms in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: CT angiography as a primary examination tool for diagnosis – systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 2011;258(1):134–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munera, F, Soto, JA, Palacio, DM, et al.: Penetrating neck injuries: helical CT angiography for initial evaluation. Radiology 2002;224(2):366–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soto, JA, Soto, JA, Palacio, DM, et al.: Focal arterial injuries of the proximal extremities: helical CT arteriography as the initial method of diagnosis. Radiology 2001;218(1):188–94.Google Scholar
Inaba, K, Munera, F, McKenney, M, et al.: Prospective evaluation of screening multislice helical computed tomographic angiography in the initial evaluation of penetrating neck injuries. J Trauma-Injury Infect Crit Care 2006;61(1):144–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paulus, E, Fabian, T, Savage, S, et al.: Blunt cerebrovascular injury screening with 64-channel multidetector computed tomography: more slices finally cut it. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2014;76(2):279–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etzel, RA: Risk of ionizing radiation exposure to children: a subject review. Pediatrics 1998;101(4):717–19.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×