Book contents
- Clinical Emergency Radiology
- Clinical Emergency Radiology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Part I Plain Radiography
- Part II Ultrasound
- Part III Computed Tomography
- Chapter 28 CT in the ED: Special Considerations
- Chapter 29 CT of the Spine
- Chapter 30 CT Imaging of the Head
- Chapter 31 CT Imaging of the Face
- Chapter 32 CT of the Chest
- Chapter 33 CT of the Abdomen and Pelvis
- Chapter 34 CT Angiography of the Chest
- Chapter 35 CT Angiography of the Abdominal Vasculature
- Chapter 36 CT Angiography of the Head and Neck
- Chapter 37 CT Angiography of the Extremities
- Part IV Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Index
- References
Chapter 29 - CT of the Spine
from Part III - Computed Tomography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 June 2017
Edited by
Book contents
- Clinical Emergency Radiology
- Clinical Emergency Radiology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Part I Plain Radiography
- Part II Ultrasound
- Part III Computed Tomography
- Chapter 28 CT in the ED: Special Considerations
- Chapter 29 CT of the Spine
- Chapter 30 CT Imaging of the Head
- Chapter 31 CT Imaging of the Face
- Chapter 32 CT of the Chest
- Chapter 33 CT of the Abdomen and Pelvis
- Chapter 34 CT Angiography of the Chest
- Chapter 35 CT Angiography of the Abdominal Vasculature
- Chapter 36 CT Angiography of the Head and Neck
- Chapter 37 CT Angiography of the Extremities
- Part IV Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Clinical Emergency Radiology , pp. 407 - 421Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Antevil, JL, Sise, MJ, Sack, DI, et al.: Spiral computed tomography for the initial evaluation of spine trauma: a new standard of care? J Trauma-Injury Infect Crit Care 2006;61(2):382–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffman, JR, Mower, WR, Wolfson, AB, et al.: Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group. N Engl J Med 2000;343(2):94–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiell, IG, Wells, GA, Vandemheen, KL, et al.: The Canadian C-spine Rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA 2001;286:1841–8.Google Scholar
Harris, JH Jr, Harris, WH: The radiology of emergency medicine, 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000:307–8.Google Scholar
Barrett, T, Mower, W, Zucker, M, Hoffman, J: Injuries missed by limited computed tomographic imaging of patients with cervical spine injuries. Ann Emerg Med 2006;47(2):129–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffen, MM, Frykberg, ER, Kerwin, AJ, et al.: Radiographic clearance of blunt cervical spine injury: plain radiograph or computed tomography scan? J Trauma 2003;55:222–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diaz, JJ, Gillman, C, Morris, JA Jr, et al.: Are five-view plain films of the cervical spine unreliable? A prospective evaluation in blunt trauma patients with altered mental status. J Trauma 2003;55:658–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, CVR, Antevil, JL, Sise, MJ, Sack, DI: Spiral computed tomography for the diagnosis of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine fractures: its time has come. J Trauma-Injury Infect Crit Care 2005;58(5):890–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brohi, K, Healy, M, Fotheringham, T, et al.: Helical computed tomographic scanning for the evaluation of the cervical spine in the unconscious, intubated trauma patient. J Trauma-Injury Infect Crit Care 2005;58(5):897–901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gale, SC, Gracias, VH, Reilly, PM, Schwab, CW: The inefficiency of plain radiography to evaluate the cervical spine after blunt trauma. J Trauma-Injury Infect Crit Care 2005;59(5):1121–5.Google Scholar
Holmes, JF, Akkinepalli, R: Computed tomography versus plain radiography to screen for cervical spine injury: a meta-analysis. J Trauma-Injury Infect Crit Care 2005;58(5):902–5.Google Scholar
Sheridan, R, Peralta, R, Rhea, J, et al.: Reformatted visceral protocol helical computed tomographic scanning allows conventional radiographs of the thoracic and lumbar spine to be eliminated in the evaluation of blunt trauma patients. J Trauma-Injury Infect Crit Care 2003;55(4):665–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chou, R, Qaseem, A, Snow, V, et al.: Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society. Ann Intern Med 2007 Oct;147(7):478–91.Google ScholarPubMed
Jarvik, JG, Deyo, RA: Diagnostic evaluation of low back pain with emphasis on imaging MPH. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:586–97.Google Scholar
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: American College of Radiology appropriateness criteria. 2016. Available at: https://www.guideline.gov/content.aspx?id=37931Google Scholar
Berne, JD, Velmahos, GC, El-Tawil, Q, et al.: Value of complete cervical helical computed tomographic scanning in identifying cervical spine injury in the unevaluable blunt trauma patient with multiple injuries: a prospective study. J Trauma-Injury Infect Crit Care 1999;47(5):896.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, BW, Dykes, E, Lecky, FE: Patterns and risks in spinal trauma. Arch Dis Child 2004;89:860–5.Google Scholar
Viccellio, P, Simon, H, Pressman, BD, et al.: NEXUS Group: A prospective multicenter study of cervical spine injury in children. Pediatrics 2001;108(2):e20.Google Scholar
Veena, K, Sheffali, G, Mahesh, K, Ajay, G: SCIWORA – spinal cord injury without radiological abnormality. Ind J Pediatr 2006;73(9);829–31.Google Scholar