Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 4
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Caldwell, Marc 2009. Charles Taylor and the pre-history of British cultural studies. Critical Arts, Vol. 23, Issue. 3, p. 342.

    Meijer, Michiel 2014. Strong evaluation and weak ontology. The predicament of Charles Taylor. International Journal of Philosophy and Theology, Vol. 75, Issue. 5, p. 440.

    Perkiss, Stephanie and Tweedie, Dale 2017. Social Accounting into Action: Religion as ‘Moral Source’. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, Vol. 37, Issue. 3, p. 174.

    Meijer, Michiel 2017. Does Charles Taylor have a Nietzsche problem?. Constellations, Vol. 24, Issue. 3, p. 372.

  • Print publication year: 2004
  • Online publication date: June 2012

3 - The Self and the Good: Charles Taylor's Moral Ontology


Since the early work of Elizabeth Anscombe, Philippa Foot, and Iris Murdoch in Oxford in the 1950s, moral philosophers in the analytic tradition have discussed the viability of reconstructing something like ancient Greek ethics (Plato for Murdoch, Aristotle for the other two) in order to avoid versions of Kantian deontology or of utilitarianism, which then seemed the only choice on the agenda. Now that the latter predominates, the challenge, as Charles Taylor puts it, is to get beyond treating “all goods which are not anchored in human powers or fulfilments as illusions from a bygone age.” That is to say, he wants to open up a nonanthropocentric perspective on the good, to allow us to see the “sovereignty of good” over the moral agent. Sources of the Self, Taylor's major contribution to moral philosophy, is explicitly a “retrieval” of this nonanthropocentric perspective which, as he believes, philosophy since the Enlightenment has been motivated to occlude.

From the beginning of his philosophical career, Taylor has sought to relieve us of philosophical theorising that seems misguided or blinkered. He detected behaviourism at work in influential psychological theories (section 1). He sees modern moral philosophy concerned only with doing right at the expense of considering what the good for human beings actually is (sections 2 and 3). He contends that the ancient belief in the objectivity of the good is still at work in everyday moral behaviour, however confusing and undermining modern philosophical theories are of this idea (sections 4 and 5).

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Charles Taylor
  • Online ISBN: 9780511610837
  • Book DOI:
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *