Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Stakeholder Theory
- The Cambridge Handbook of Stakeholder Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Chapter Summaries
- Part I Theoretical Foundations of Stakeholder Theory
- Part II Stakeholder Theory and Society
- Part III Stakeholder Theory in the Business Disciplines
- Part IV Stakeholder Theory in Education and Practice
- Part V New Voices in Stakeholder Thinking
- Chapter 15 Considering a Behavioral View of Stakeholders
- Chapter 16 Behavioral Stakeholder Theory
- Chapter 17 Sketches of New and Future Research on Stakeholder Management
- Chapter 18 Contextual Richness at the Core of New Stakeholder Research
- Index
- References
Chapter 18 - Contextual Richness at the Core of New Stakeholder Research
from Part V - New Voices in Stakeholder Thinking
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2019
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Stakeholder Theory
- The Cambridge Handbook of Stakeholder Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Chapter Summaries
- Part I Theoretical Foundations of Stakeholder Theory
- Part II Stakeholder Theory and Society
- Part III Stakeholder Theory in the Business Disciplines
- Part IV Stakeholder Theory in Education and Practice
- Part V New Voices in Stakeholder Thinking
- Chapter 15 Considering a Behavioral View of Stakeholders
- Chapter 16 Behavioral Stakeholder Theory
- Chapter 17 Sketches of New and Future Research on Stakeholder Management
- Chapter 18 Contextual Richness at the Core of New Stakeholder Research
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Stakeholder Theory , pp. 264 - 271Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Bamberger, P. (2008). From the editors beyond contextualization: Using context theories to narrow the micro-macro gap in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 51(5): 839–846.Google Scholar
Blair, J. D. & Hunt, J. G. (1986). Getting inside the head of the management researcher one more time: Context-free and context-specific orientations in research. Journal of Management, 12(2): 147–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappelli, P. & Sherer, P. D. (1991). The missing role of context in OB: The need for a meso-level approach. In Cummings, L. L. & Staw, B. M., eds., Research in organizational behavior, pp. 55–110. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorobantu, S., Henisz, W. J., & Nartey, L. (2017). Not all sparks light a fire: Stakeholder and shareholder reactions to critical events in contested markets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(3): 561–597.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 532–550.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman Publishing.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J.S., Wicks, A.C., Parmar, B.L., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E., Rusconi, G., Signori, S., & Strudler, A. (2012). Stakeholder theory(ies): Ethical ideas and managerial action. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(1): 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frynas, J. G. (2005). The false developmental promise of corporate social responsibility: Evidence from multinational oil companies. International Affairs, 81(3): 581–598.Google Scholar
Frynas, J. G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and international development: Critical assessment. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(4): 274–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunningham, N., Kagan, R. A., & Thornton, D. (2004). Social license and environmental protection: Why businesses go beyond compliance. Law and Social Inquiry, 29: 307–341.Google Scholar
Harrison, J. S., & Freeman, R. E. (1999). Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: Empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5): 479–485.Google Scholar
Henisz, W. J., Dorobantu, S., & Nartey, L. J. (2014). Spinning gold: The financial returns to stakeholder engagement. Strategic Management Journal, 35(12): 1727–1748.Google Scholar
Hitt, M. A., Beamish, P. W., Jackson, S. E., & Mathieu, J. E. (2007). Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels: Multilevel research in management. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6): 1385–1399.Google Scholar
Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31(2): 386–408.Google Scholar
Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. The Academy of Management Review, 20(2): 404–437.Google Scholar
Kozlowski, S. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal and emergent processes. In Kleine, K. J. & Kozlowski, S. J., eds., Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions and new directions, pp. 3–90. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 853–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nartey, L., Dorobantu, S., & Henisz, W. J. (2017). A participatory approach to stakeholder engagement: Defining a hierarchy of strategic action. Working paper, University of South Carolina.Google Scholar
Nartey, L., Henisz, W. J., & Dorobantu, S. (2017). Status climbing versus bridging: Multinational stakeholder engagement strategies. Strategy Science, 3(2): 367–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nartey, L., & Teegen, H. (2017). A convening model to enhance value creation and pluralistic appropriation in large-scale investment projects. Working paper, University of South Carolina.Google Scholar
Rousseau, D. M., & Fried, Y. (2001). Editorial: Location, location, location: Contextualizing organizational research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(1): 1–13.Google Scholar
Simon, H.A. (1972). Theories of bounded rationality. In McGuire, C. & Radner, R., eds., Decision and organization. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. S. (2006). Contextualization in Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review, 2(1): 1–13.Google Scholar
Welch, C., Piekkari, R., Plakoyiannaki, E., & Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, E. (2011). Theorising from case studies: Towards a pluralist future for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5): 740–762.Google Scholar
Yin, R. K. (2002). Applications of case study research, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar