Asher, C., Mahoney, J. M., & Mahoney, J. T. (2005). Toward a property rights foundation for a stakeholder theory of the firm. Journal of Management and Governance, 9(1): 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1): 20–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barney, J. B. (1986). Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science, 32(10): 1231–1241.Google Scholar

Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99–118.Google Scholar

Barney, J. B. (2018). Why resource-based theory’s model of profit appropriation must incorporate a stakeholder perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 39: 3305–3325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barney, J. B. & Harrison, J. S. (2018). Stakeholder theory at the crossroads. Business & Society, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Berman, S. L., & Johnson-Cramer, M. E. (2017). Stakeholder theory: Seeing the field through the forest. Business & Society.Google Scholar

Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5): 488–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blau, P. M., & Scott, W. R. (1962). Formal organizations: A comparative approach. San Francisco: Scott, Foreman.Google Scholar

Bosse, D. A., Phillips, R. A., & Harrison, J. S. (2009). Stakeholders, reciprocity, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4): 447–456.Google Scholar

Brickson, S. L. (2007). Organizational identity orientation: The genesis of the role of the firm and distinct forms of social value. Academy of Management Review, 32(3): 864–888.Google Scholar

Brickson, S. L. (2005). Organizational identity orientation: Forging a link between organizational identity and organizations’ relations with stakeholders. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(4): 576–609.Google Scholar

Bridoux, F. & Stoelhorst, J. W. (2014). Microfoundations for stakeholder theory: Managing stakeholders with heterogeneous motives. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1): 107–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bridoux, F. & Stoelhorst, J. W. (2016). Stakeholder relationships and social welfare: A behavioral theory of contributions to joint value creation. Academy of Management Review, 41(2): 229–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bundy, J., Vogel, R., & Zachary, M. (2018). Organization-stakeholder fit: A dynamic theory of cooperation, compromise, and conflict between an organization and its stakeholders. Strategic Management Journal, 39: 476–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bundy, J., Shropshire, C., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2013). Strategic cognition and issue salience: Toward an explanation of firm responsiveness to stakeholder concerns. Academy of Management Review, 38(3): 352–376.Google Scholar

Choi, J., & Wang, H. (2009). Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(8): 895–907.Google Scholar

Clarkson Centre for Business Ethics. (1999). Principles of Stakeholder Management. Toronto: University of Toronto. Reproduced in 2002, Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(1): 256–264.Google Scholar

Coff, R. W. (1999). When competitive advantage doesn’t lead to performance: The resource-based view and stakeholder bargaining power. Organization Science 10(2): 119–133.Google Scholar

Crane, A., and Ruebottom, T. (2011). Stakeholder theory and social identity: Rethinking stakeholder identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Devinney, T. M., McGahan, A. M., & Zollo, M. (2013). A research agenda for global stakeholder strategy. Global Strategy Journal, 3: 325–337.Google Scholar

Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 65–91.Google Scholar

de Luque, M. S., Washburn, N. T., Waldman, D. A., & House, R. J. (2008). Unrequited profit: How stakeholder and economic values relate to subordinate perceptions of leadership and firm performance. Administrative Science Quarterly 53: 626–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4): 660–679.Google Scholar

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14: 532–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elms, H., Johnson-Cramer, M. E., & Berman, S. L. (2011). Bounding the world’s miseries: Corporate responsibility and Freeman’s stakeholder theory. In Phillips, R. A., ed., Stakeholder theory: Impact and prospects, pp.1–53. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E. (1994). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation. In Beauchamp, T. L. & Bowie, N. E., eds., Ethical Theory and Business, pp. 66–67. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E. (1999). Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 233–236.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E. (2017). Five challenges to stakeholder theory: A report on research in progress. In Wasieleski, D. M. & Weber, J., eds., Stakeholder management, pp. 1–20. United Kingdom: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Garcia-Castro, R. and Aguilera, R. V. (2015). Incremental value creation and appropriation in a world with multiple stakeholders. Strategic Management Journal, 36: 137–147.Google Scholar

Garcia-Castro, R., & Francoeur, C. (2016). When more is not better: Complementaries, costs and contingencies in stakeholder management. Strategic Management Journal, 37: 406–424.Google Scholar

Gibbons, R. (2005). Four formal (izable) theories of the firm? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 58(2): 200–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gioia, D. A. (1999). Practicability, paradigms, and problems in stakeholder theorizing. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 228–232.Google Scholar

Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3): 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9: 193–206.Google Scholar

Harrison, J. S., Bosse, D. A., & Phillips, R. A. (2010). Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31(1): 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2013). Stakeholder theory, value, and firm performance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(1): 97–124.Google Scholar

Harrison, J. S., & van der Laan Smith, J. (2015). Responsible accounting for stakeholders. Journal of Management Studies, 52: 935–960.Google Scholar

Hatherly, D., Mitchell, R. K., Mitchell, J. R., & Lee, J. H. (2018). Reimagining profits and stakeholder capital to address tensions among stakeholders. Business & Society. Published online December 14, 2017.Google Scholar

Heminway, J. M. (2017). Shareholder wealth maximization as a function of statutes, decisional law, and organic documents. Washington & Lee Law Review, 74, 939.Google Scholar

Henisz, W. J., Dorobantu, S., & Nartey, L. J. (2014). Spinning gold: The financial returns to stakeholder engagement. Strategic Management Journal, 35 (12): 1727–1748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, C. W., & Jones, T. M. (1992). Stakeholder‐agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2): 131–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2): 125–139.Google Scholar

James, W. (1907/1981). Pragmatism, Kuklick, B., ed. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar

Jones, T. M., & Felps, W. (2013). Stakeholder happiness enhancement: A neo-utilitarian objective for the modern corporation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(3): 349–379.Google Scholar

Jones, T. M., & Wicks, A. C. (1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 206–222.Google Scholar

Ketokivi, M & Mahoney, J. T. (2016). Transaction Cost Economics As a Constructive Stakeholder Theory, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 15(1): 123–138.Google Scholar

Korschun, D. (2015). Boundary-spanning employees and relationships with external stakeholders: A social identity approach. Academy of Management Review, 40(4): 611–629.Google Scholar

Langley, A., & Abdallah, C. (2011). Templates and turns in qualitative studies of strategy and management. Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, 6: 105–140.Google Scholar

Laplume, A. O., Sonpar, K., & Litz, R. A. (2008). Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management, 34(6): 1152–1189.Google Scholar

Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2001). People and profits?: The search for a link between a company’s social and financial performance. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Mattingly, J. E. (2017). Corporate social performance: A review of empirical research examining the corporation-society relationship using Kinder, Lydenberg, Domini Social Ratings Data. Business & Society, 56: 796–839.Google Scholar

Meeker, B. F. (1971). Decisions and exchange. American Sociological Review, 36: 485–495.Google Scholar

Merton, R. K. (1957/1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Miles, S. (2012). Stakeholder: essentially contested or just confused? Journal of Business Ethics, 108(3): 285–298.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R. K., Van BurenIII, H. J., Greenwood, M., & Freeman, R. E. (2015). Stakeholder inclusion and accounting for stakeholders. Journal of Management Studies, 52(7): 851–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nason, R. S., Bacq, S., & Gras, D.. (2018). A Behavioral Theory of Social Performance: Social Identity and Stakeholder Expectations, Academy of Management Review, 43(2): 259–283.Google Scholar

Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). Evolutionary theory of economic change. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ogden, S., and Watson, R.. (1999). Corporate performance and stakeholder management: Balancing shareholder and customer interests in the U.K. privatized water industry. Academy of Management Journal 42(5): 526–536.Google Scholar

Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., and Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies 24(3): 403–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ouchi, W. G. (1980). Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phillips, R. (2003). Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar

Phillips, R., Berman, S., Elms, H., & Johnson-Cramer, M. (2010). Strategy, stakeholders and managerial discretion. Strategic Organization, 8(2): 176–83.Google Scholar

Phillips, R., Berman, S., Elms, H., & Johnson-Cramer, M. (2011). Stakeholder orientation, managerial discretion and Nexus rents. In Phillips, R., ed., Stakeholder Theory: Impact and Prospects. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Phillips, R., Freeman, R. E., and Wicks, A. C. (2003). What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4): 479–502.Google Scholar

Porter, M. (1985). Competitive Advantage. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., & Sauter-Sachs, S. (2002). Redefining the corporation: Stakeholder management and organizational wealth. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Preston, L. E., and Sapienza, H. J. (1990). Stakeholder management and corporate performance. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19(4): 361–375.Google Scholar

Priem, R. (2007). A consumer perspective on value creation. Academy of Management Review, 32: 219–235.Google Scholar

Rowley, T., & Berman, S. (2000). A brand new brand of corporate social performance. Business & Society, 39(4): 397–418.Google Scholar

Santos, F. M., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2005). Organizational boundaries and theories of organization. Organization Science, 16(5): 491–508.Google Scholar

Sisodia, R., Wolfe, D. B., & Sheth, J. (2007). Firms of endearment: How world-class companies profit from passion and purpose. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.Google Scholar

Staw, B. M. (1976). Knee deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16: 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Treviño, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (1999). The stakeholder research tradition: Converging theorists – not convergent theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 222–227.Google Scholar

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185: 1124–1131.Google Scholar

Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Walsh, J. P. (2005). Book review essay: Taking stock of stakeholder management. Academy of Management Review, 30(2): 426–438.Google Scholar

Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Wicks, A. C., and Harrison, J. S. (2017). Toward a more productive dialogue between stakeholder theory and strategic management. In Wasieleski, D. M. & Weber, J., eds., Stakeholder management, pp. 249–274. United Kingdom: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar

Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Williamson, O. E., & Bercovitz, J. (1996). The modern corporation as an efficiency instrument: The comparative contracting perspective. In Kaysen, C., ed., The American Corporation Today, pp. 327–359. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Zenger, T. R., Felin, T., & Bigelow, L. (2011). Theories of the firm–market boundary. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1): 89–133.Google Scholar

Anderson, E. (2018). Dewey’s Moral Philosophy. In Zalta, E. N., ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall Edition). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/dewey-moral/.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . (1941). Nicomachean Ethics. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Batagelj, V. (2003). Efficient algorithms for citation network analysis. arXiv Preprint cs/0309023. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0309023Google Scholar

Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5): 488–506.Google Scholar

Bosse, D. A., Phillips, R. A., & Harrison, J. S. (2009). Stakeholders, reciprocity, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4): 447–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bundy, J., Shropshire, C., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2013). Strategic cognition and issue salience: Toward an explanation of firm responsiveness to stakeholder concerns. Academy of Management Review, 38(3): 352–376.Google Scholar

Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4): 39–48.Google Scholar

Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 92–117.Google Scholar

de Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2011). Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences: Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 65–91.Google Scholar

Field, R. (2017). John Dewey. The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Peer Reviewed). Retrieved from http://www.iep.utm.edu.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2007). Managing for stakeholders: Survival, reputation, and success. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & Colle, S. de. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E., & Phillips, R. A. (2002). Stakeholder theory: A libertarian defense. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(3): 331–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2006). Stakeholders: Theory and practice. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 191–205.Google Scholar

Fukuyama, F. (1996). Trust: Human nature and the reconstitution of social order. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4): 777–798.Google Scholar

Godfrey, P. C., & Hatch, N. W. (2006). Researching corporate social responsibility: An agenda for the 21st Century. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(1): 87–98.Google Scholar

Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4): 315–327.Google Scholar

Hall, M., Millo, Y., & Barman, E. (2015). Who and what really counts? Stakeholder prioritization and accounting for social value. Journal of Management Studies, 52(7): 907–934.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. (2002). Being and time. New York: HarperSanFrancisco.Google Scholar

Hill, C. W. L., & Jones, T. M. (1992). Stakeholder agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29, 131–154.Google Scholar

Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2): 125–139.Google Scholar

Hummon, N. P., & Dereian, P. (1989). Connectivity in a citation network: The development of DNA theory. Social Networks, 11(1): 39–63.Google Scholar

Hummon, N. P., Dorian, P., & Freeman, L. C. (1990). Analyzing the structure of the centrality-productivity literature created between 1948 and 1979. Knowledge, 11(4): 459–480.Google Scholar

James, W. (1891). The moral philosopher and the moral life. The International Journal of Ethics, 1(3): 330–354.Google Scholar

Jensen, M. C. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2): 235–256.Google Scholar

Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2): 404–437.Google Scholar

Jones, T. M., & Wicks, A. C. (1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 206–221.Google Scholar

Kim, C. W., & Mauborgne, R. (1998). Procedural justice, strategic decision making, and the knowledge economy. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4): 323–338.Google Scholar

King, B. (2008). A social movement perspective of stakeholder collective action and influence. Business and Society, 47, 21–49.Google Scholar

King, B. G., & Soule, S. A. (2007). Social movements as extra-institutional entrepreneurs: The effect of protests on stock price returns. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3): 413–442.Google Scholar

Lévinas, E., & Nemo, P. (1985). Ethics and infinity. Lancaster, UK: Gazelle Book Services.Google Scholar

Liu, J. S., & Lu, L. Y. (2012). An integrated approach for main path analysis: Development of the Hirsch index as an example. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(3): 528–542.Google Scholar

Mackey, A., Mackey, T. B., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review, 32, 817–835.Google Scholar

Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2): 268–305.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 853–886.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R. K., Van Buren, H. J., Greenwood, M., & Freeman, R. E. (2015). Stakeholder inclusion and accounting for stakeholders. Journal of Management Studies, 52(7): 851–877.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R. K., Weaver, G. R., Agle, B. R., Bailey, A. D., & Carlson, J. (2016). Stakeholder agency and social welfare: Pluralism and decision making in the multi-objective corporation. Academy of Management Review, 41(2): 252–275.Google Scholar

Noland, J., & Phillips, R. (2010). Stakeholder engagement, discourse ethics and strategic management. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1): 39–49.Google Scholar

Parmar, B. L., Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Purnell, L., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Academy of Management Annals, 4(0), 403.Google Scholar

Phillips, R. (2003). Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar

Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., & Sachs, S. (2002). Redefining the corporation: Stakeholder management and organizational wealth. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rawls, J., & Kelly, E. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Reid, E. M., & Toffel, M. W. (2009). Responding to public and private politics: Corporate disclosure of climate change strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 30(11): 1157–1178.Google Scholar

Rorty, R. (1992). The linguistic turn: Essays in philosophical method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 887–910.Google Scholar

Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Talisse, R. B., & Aikin, S. F. (2008). Pragmatism: A guide for the perplexed. London; New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Umphress, E. E., Bingham, J. B., & Mitchell, M. S. (2010). Unethical behavior in the name of the company: the moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(4): 769.Google Scholar

Whetten, D. A. (2002). Modelling-as-theorizing: A systematic methodology for theory development. In Partington, D., ed., Essential skills for management research, 2nd ed., pp. 45–71. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Wilson, J. Q. (1997). The moral sense. New York: Free Press Paperback.Google Scholar

Wood, D. J., & Logsdon, J. M. (2002). Business citizenship: From individuals to organizations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12, 59–94.Google Scholar

Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20(4): 441–464.Google Scholar

Adler, P. S. (2007). The future of critical management studies: A paleo-Marxist critique of labour process theory. Organization Studies, 28(9): 1313–1345.Google Scholar

Aktouf, O. (1992). Management and theories of organizations in the 1990s: Toward a critical radical humanism? Academy of Management Review, 17(3): 407–431.Google Scholar

Alvesson, M., Bridgman, T., & Willmott, H. (2009). The Oxford handbook of critical management studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Antonacopoulou, E. P., & Méric, J. (2005). A critique of stake-holder theory: Management science or a sophisticated ideology of control? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 5(2): 22–33.Google Scholar

Arvidsson, A. (2009). The ethical economy: Towards a post-capitalist theory of value. Capital & Class, 33(1): 13–29. doi: 10.1177/030981680909700102.Google Scholar

Arvidsson, A. (2010). Speaking out: The ethical economy: New forms of value in the information society? Organization, 17(5): 637–644. doi: 10.1177/1350508410372512.Google Scholar

Asher, C. C., Mahoney, J. M., & Mahoney, J. T. (2005). Towards a property rights foundation for a stakeholder theory of the firm. Journal of Management & Governance, 9(1): 5–32.Google Scholar

Australian Law Reform Commission. (1986). Recognition of Aboriginal Customary Laws at Common Law. www.alrc.gov.au/publications/report-31Google Scholar

Banerjee, S. B. (2000). Whose land is it anyway? National interest, indigenous stakeholders and colonial discourses: The case of the Jabiluka uranium mine. Organization & Environment, 13(1): 3–38.Google Scholar

Banerjee, S. B., & Prasad, A. (2008). Introduction to the special issue on “Critical reflections on management and organizations: A postcolonial perspective.” Critical Perspectives on International Business, 4(2/3): 90–98.Google Scholar

Barnard, C. I. (1968). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard university press.Google Scholar

Bauman, Z. (1993). Postmodern ethics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Benson, J. K. (1977). Organizations: A dialectical view. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22 (1): 1–21.Google Scholar

Benhabib, S. (1985). The generalized and the concrete other: The Kohlberg-Gilligan controversy and feminist theory. Praxis International, 5(4): 402–424.Google Scholar

Berle, A. A., & Means, G. G. C. (1991). The modern corporation and private property. New York: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Beck, C. (2016). Earth hour: Do we still need the lights-out protest? The Christian Science Monitor, March 19, A2.Google Scholar

Bevan, D., & Werhane, P. (2011). Stakeholder theory. In Painter-Morland, M. & ten Bos, R., eds., Business ethics and continental philosophy, pp. 37–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bhabha, H. K. (2012). The location of culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Boltanski, L. & Chiapello, E. (2005). The new spirit of capitalism, trans. Gregory Elliott. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Boussebaa, M. (2015). Professional service firms, globalisation and the new imperialism. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(8): 1217–1233.Google Scholar

Bowen, H. W. (2005). The business of empire: The East India Company and imperial Britain, 1756–1833. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bowen, H. R. (2013). Social responsibilities of the businessman. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.Google Scholar

Boyacigiller, N., & Adler, N. (1991). The parochial dinosaur: Organization science in a global context. Academy of Management Review, 16: 262–290.Google Scholar

Braverman, H. (1998). Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Bridgman, T. (2007). Reconstituting relevance: Exploring possibilities for management educators’ critical engagement with the public. Management Learning, 38(4): 425–439.Google Scholar

Buchholz, R. A., & Rosenthal, S. B. (2005). Toward a contemporary conceptual framework for stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 58(3): 137–148.Google Scholar

Budd, J. W., & Bhave, D. (2008). Values, ideologies, and frames of reference in industrial relations. In Bacon, N., Heery, E., Fiorito, J., & Blyton, P., eds., The Sage Handbook of Industrial Relations, pp. 92–112. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Burrell, G. (1988). Modernism, post modernism and organizational analysis: The contribution of Michel Foucault. Organization Studies, 9(2): 221–235.Google Scholar

Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Calás, M. B., & Smircich, L. (1991). Voicing seduction to silence leadership. Organization Studies, 12(4): 567–601.Google Scholar

Calás, M. B., Smircich, L., & Holvino, E. (2014). Theorizing gender-and-organization: changing times … changing theories? In The Oxford handbook of gender and organizations, pp. 53–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Chatterjee, P. (2004). The politics of the governed: Reflections on popular politics in most of the world. New York; Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Clegg, S. (2015). Foreword. In Prasad, A., Prasad, P., Mills, A. J., & Mills, J. H., eds., The Routledge companion to critical management studies, pp. xiii-xiv. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Crane, A., & Ruebottom, T. (2011). Stakeholder theory and social identity: Rethinking stakeholder identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1): 77–87.Google Scholar

De Beauvoir, S. (1988). The second sex. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Delphy, C. (1984). Close to home: A materialist analysis of women’s oppression. London, Hutchinson.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 65–91.Google Scholar

Elms, H., Johnson-Cramer, M. E., & Berman, S. L. (2011). Bounding the world’s miseries: Corporate responsibility and Freeman’s stakeholder theory. In Stakeholder theory: Impact and prospects, 1–38. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Erlichman, H. J. (2010). Conquest, tribute, and trade: The quest for precious metals and the birth of globalization. New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar

Ferguson, K. (1984). The feminist case against bureaucracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Fox, A. (1974). Beyond contract: Work, power and trust relations. London: Faber.Google Scholar

Foster, J. B., & Burkett, P. (2001). Marx and the dialectic of organic/inorganic relations: A rejoinder to Salleh and Clark. Organization & Environment, 14(4): 451–462.Google Scholar

Frenkel, M. (2008). The multinational corporation as a third space: Rethinking international management discourse on knowledge transfer through Homi Bhabha. Academy of Management Review, 33(4): 924–942.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409–421.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E., & Gilbert, D. R. (1992). Business, Ethics and Society: A Critical Agenda. Business & Society, 31(1): 9–17.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E., & Phillips, R. A. (2002). Stakeholder theory: A libertarian defense. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(3): 331–349.Google Scholar

Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 191–205.Google Scholar

Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2008) Diverse economies: Performative practices for “other worlds,” Progress in Human Geography 32(5): 613–32.Google Scholar

Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Goodpaster, K. E. (1991). Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1(1): 53–73.Google Scholar

Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4): 315–327.Google Scholar

Greenwood, M., & Anderson, E. (2009). “I used to be an employee but now I am a stakeholder” Implications of labelling employees as stakeholders. Asia Pacific Human Resource Journal, 47(2): 186–200.Google Scholar

Greenwood, M., & Freeman, R. E. (2011). Ethics and HRM: The contribution of stakeholder theory. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 30(3/4): 269–292.Google Scholar

Haigh, N., & Griffiths, A. (2009). The natural environment as a primary stakeholder: The case of climate change. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(6): 347–371.Google Scholar

Heath, J., & Norman, W. (2004). Stakeholder theory, corporate governance and public management: What can the history of State-Run Enterprises teach us in the post-Enron era? Journal of Business Ethics, 53(3): 247–265. doi: 10.1023/B: BUSI.0000039418.75103.edGoogle Scholar

Ingvaldsen, J. A. (2015). Organizational learning: Bringing the forces of production back in. Organization Studies, 36(4): 423–443.Google Scholar

Jack, G., Westwood, R., Srinivas, N., & Sardar, Z. (2011). Deepening, broadening and re-asserting a postcolonial interrogative space in organization studies. Organization 18(3): 275–302.Google Scholar

James, C. L. R. (1983). Beyond a boundary. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar

Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2): 404–437.Google Scholar

Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Kazmi, B. A., Leca, B., & Naccache, P. (2016). Is corporate social responsibility a new spirit of capitalism? Organization, 23(5): 742–762.Google Scholar

Kenny, K. (2009). Heeding the stains: Lacan and organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22(2): 214–228.Google Scholar

Klein, N. (2007). The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Koen, S. (1984). Feminist workplaces: Alternative models for the organization of work. PhD dissertation, Union for Experimenting Colleges, University of Michigan Dissertation Information Service.Google Scholar

Laclau, E. & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar

McVea, J. F., & Freeman, R. E. (2005). A names-and-faces approach to stakeholder management: How focusing on stakeholders as individuals can bring ethics and entrepreneurial strategy together. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(1): 57–69.Google Scholar

Maclean, M., Harvey, C., & Kling, G. (2014). Pathways to power: Class, hyper-agency and the French corporate elite. Organization Studies, 35(6): 825–855.Google Scholar

Marens, R. (2016). Giving the devils their due: What Marxian historiography can contribute to management history. In Academy of Management Proceedings (vol. 2016, no. 1, p. 10142). Academy of Management.Google Scholar

Marquetti, A. A. (2003). Analyzing historical and regional patterns of technical change from a classical-Marxian perspective. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 52(2): 191–200.Google Scholar

McKenna, S. (2011). A critical analysis of North American business leaders’ neocolonial discourse: Global fears and local consequences, Organization, 18(3): 387–399.Google Scholar

McKinlay, A., Carter, C., Pezet, E., & Clegg, S. (2010). Using Foucault to make strategy. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(8): 1012–1031.Google Scholar

Mennicken, A., & Miller, P. (2014). Michel Foucault and the administering of lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mir, R., Calás, M., & Smircich, L. (1999). Global technoscapes and silent voices: Challenges to theorizing global cooperation. In Cooperrider, D. & Dutton, J., eds., Organizational Dimensions of Global Change, pp. 270–290. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Mir, R. Marens, R., & Mir, A. (2008). The corporation and its fragments: Corporate citizenship and the legacies of imperialism. In Scherer, A. & Palazzo, G., eds., The handbook of corporate citizenship, pp. 819–852. London: Edward Elgar Press.Google Scholar

Mir, R & Mir, A. (2012). Organizational change as imperialism. In Boje, D., Burnes, B., & Hassard, J., eds., Routledge companion to organizational change, pp. 425–439. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mir, R., Mir, A., & Wong, D. (2006). Diversity: The cultural logic of global capital? In Konrad, A., Prasad, P., & Pringle, J., eds., Handbook of workplace diversity, pp.167–188. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Towards a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 853–886.Google Scholar

Mohanty, C. T. (1988). Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Feminist Review, (30): 61–88.Google Scholar

Moriceau, J.-L. (2005). Faceless figures: Is a socially responsible decision possible? In Bonnafous-Boucher, M. & Pesqueux, Y., eds., Stakeholder theory: A European perspective, (pp. 89–103). Basingstoke, UK: PalgraveGoogle Scholar

Moriarty, J. (2014). The connection between stakeholder theory and stakeholder democracy. Business & Society, 53(6): 820–852.Google Scholar

Morsing, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility as strategic auto‐communication: On the role of external stakeholders for member identification. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(2): 171–182.Google Scholar

Nelson, J. (2003). Once more, with feeling: Feminist economics and the ontological question. Feminist Economics, 9 (1): 109–118.Google Scholar

Noland, J., & Phillips, R. (2010). Stakeholder engagement, discourse ethics and strategic management. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1): 39–49.Google Scholar

Nord, W. (1977). A Marxist critique of humanistic psychology. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 17 (1): 75–83.Google Scholar

Parsons, R. (2008). We are all stakeholders now. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 4(2): 99–126.Google Scholar

Perrow, C. (1972). Complex organizations: A critical essay. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar

Phillips, R. (1997). Stakeholder theory and a principle of fairness. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7(1): 51–66.Google Scholar

Phillips, R., Freeman, R. E., & Wicks, A. C. (2003). What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4): 479–502.Google Scholar

Prasad, A. (1997a). The colonizing consciousness and representation of the Other: A postcolonial critique of the discourse of oil. In Prasad, P., Mills, A., Elmes, M., & Prasad, A., eds., Managing the organizational melting pot: Dilemmas of workplace diversity, pp. 285–311. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Prasad, A. (1997b). Provincializing Europe: Towards a post-colonial reconstruction: A critique of Baconian science as the last strand of imperialism. Studies in Cultures, Organizations and Societies 3: 91–117.Google Scholar

Prasad, A., Prasad, P., Mills, A. J., & Mills, J. H. (2015). The Routledge companion to critical management studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Prashad, V. (2008). The darker nations: A people’s history of the Third World. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar

Radhakrishnan, R (1994). Postmodernism and the rest of the world. Organization, 1(2): 305–340.Google Scholar

Radhakrishnan, R. (1996). The changing subject and the politics of theory. In Diasporic mediations: Between home and location, (pp. 68–92). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Roloff, J. (2008). A life cycle model of multi‐stakeholder networks. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17(3): 311–325.Google Scholar

Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 887–910.Google Scholar

Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar

Sandberg, S. (2013). Lean in: Women, work, and the will to lead. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Sanders, R. L. (1997). If Marx had been a business process reengineer … Information Management, 31(2): 58–72.Google Scholar

Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4): 1096–1120.Google Scholar

Slinger, G. (1999). Spanning the gap: The theoretical principles that connect stakeholder policies to business performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 7: 136–151.Google Scholar

Smith, C. & Willmott., H. (1991). The new middle class and the labour process. In Smith, C. R. & Willmott, H., eds., White-collar work: The non-manual labour process, pp. 13–34. London: Springer.Google Scholar

Spicer, A., & Banerjee, S. (2016). Governance: Changing conceptions of the corporation. In Mir, R., Willmott, H., & Greenwood, M., eds., The Routledge companion to philosophy in organization studies, (pp. 403–411). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Spivak, G. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In Nelson, C. & Grossberg, L., eds., Marxism and the interpretation of culture, pp. 271–313. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, E. (1997). The defects of stakeholder theory. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 5(1): 3–10.Google Scholar

Stinchcombe, A. L. (1995). Sugar island slavery in the age of Enlightenment: The political economy of the Caribbean world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Stone, K. (1974). The origins of job structures in the steel industry. Review of Radical Political Economics, 6(2): 113–73.Google Scholar

Stoney, C., & Winstanley, D. (2001). Stakeholding: Confusion or utopia? Mapping the conceptual terrain. The Journal of Management Studies, 38(5): 603–626.Google Scholar

Tadajewski, M., Maclaran, P., & Parsons, E. (Eds.). (2011). Key concepts in critical management studies. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Tatli, A. (2012). On the power and poverty of critical (self) reflection in critical management studies: A comment on Ford, Harding and Learmonth. British Journal of Management, 23(1): 22–30.Google Scholar

Valian, V. (1999). Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Van Buren III, H. (2001). If fairness is the problem, is consent the solution? Integrating ISCT and stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(3): 481–499.Google Scholar

Van Buren III, H. (2016). Capital as a neglected, yet essential, topic for organization studies. In Mir, R., Willmott, H., & Greenwood, M., eds., The Routledge companion to philosophy in organization studies, (pp. 293–300). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Van Buren III, H. & Greenwood, M. (2009). Stakeholder voice: A problem, a solution, and a challenge for managers and academics. Philosophy of Management, 8(3): 15–23.Google Scholar

Weitzner, D. (2007). Deconstruction revisited: Implications of theory over methodology. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16(1): 43–54.Google Scholar

Wicks, A. C., Gilbert, J., Daniel, R., & Freeman, R. E. (1994). A feminist reinterpretation of the stakeholder concept. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4): 475.Google Scholar

Whyte, W. F., & Whyte, K. K. (1991). Making Mondragon: The growth and dynamics of the worker cooperative complex. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Wollstonecraft, M. (1999). A vindication of the rights of woman. Boston: Thomas and Andrews Press.Google Scholar

Yuthas, K., & Dillard, J. F. (1999). Ethical development of advanced technology: A postmodern stakeholder perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 19(1), 35–49.Google Scholar

Adams, M., & Hardwick, P. (1998). An analysis of corporate donations: UK evidence. Journal of Management Studies, 35(5): 641–654.Google Scholar

Agle, B. R., Donaldson, T., Freeman, E., Jensen, M., Mitchell, R. K., & Wood, D. J. (2008). Dialogue: Toward superior stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(2): 153–190.Google Scholar

Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5): 507–525.Google Scholar

Ahlstedt, L., & Jahnukainen, I. (1971). Yritysorganisaatio Yhteistoiminnan Ohjausjaerjestelmaenae. Helsinki: Weilin + Goeoes.Google Scholar

Alkhafaji, A. F. (1989). A Stakeholder Approach to Corporate Governance: Managing in a Dynamic Environment, New York: Quorum Books.Google Scholar

Arthur, W. B. (1994). Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Arthur, W. B. (1996). Increasing returns and the two worlds of business. Harvard Business Review, 74(4): 100–109Google Scholar

Bansal, P. (2003). From issues to actions: The importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environmental issues. Organization Science, 14(5): 510–527.Google Scholar

Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4): 717–736.Google Scholar

Barley, S. R., & Kunda, G. (2001). Bringing work back in. Organization Science, 12(1): 76–95.Google Scholar

Barney, J. B. (2016). Why strategic management scholars must adopt a stakeholder perspective. Unpublished manuscript presented at the 2016 International Association for Business and Society Annual Meeting, Park City, UT, June 17, 2016. Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the Indian School of Business, the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, the 2016 BYU-University of Utah Winter Strategy Conference, the University of Tennessee, the University of Southern California, The University of California at Irvine, Baruch College, The Strategic Management Society’s 2015 “Stakeholder Theory at a Crossroads” conference held at Zion’s National Park, and at the 2015 Academy of Management Meetings.Google Scholar

Barney, J. B. (2018). Why resource-based theory must adopt a stakeholder perspective. Strategic Management Journal, forthcoming. Retrieved from https://sites.insead.edu/facultyresearch/research/file.cfm?fid=59440.Google Scholar

Barraquier, A. (2013). A group identity analysis of organizations and their stakeholders: Porosity of identity and mobility of attributes. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(1): 45–62.Google Scholar

Black, J. A., & Boal, K. (1994). Strategic resources: Traits, configurations and paths to sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S2): 131–148.Google Scholar

Bowen, H. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman, New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Bowie, N. (1988). The moral obligations of multinational corporations. In Luper-Foy, S., ed., Problems of International Justice, pp. 97–113. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Brammer, S., & Millington, A. I. (2003a). The effect of stakeholder preferences, organizational structure and industry type on corporate community involvement. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(3): 213–226.Google Scholar

Brammer, S., & Millington, A. I. (2003b). The evolution of corporate charitable contributions in the UK between 1989 and 1999: Industry structure and stakeholder influences. Business Ethics: A European Review, 12(3): 216–228.Google Scholar

Brenner, S. N. (1993). The stakeholder theory of the firm and organizational decision making: Some propositions and a model. In Pasquero, J. & Collins, D., eds., Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society, pp. 205–210. San Diego: International Association for Business and Society.Google Scholar

Brenner, S. N. (1995). Stakeholder theory of the firm: Its consistency with current management techniques. In Näsi, J., ed., Understanding stakeholder thinking, pp. 19–31. Helsinki: LSR-Jukaisut Oy.Google Scholar

Bridoux, F., & Stoelhorst, J. W. (2014). Microfoundations for stakeholder theory: Managing stakeholders with heterogeneous motives. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1): 107–125.Google Scholar

Calton, J. M., & Lad, L. J. (1995). Social contracting as a trust-building process of network governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 5(2): 271–295.Google Scholar

Cameron, K. S. (1986). Effectiveness as paradox: Consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness. Management Science, 32(5): 539–553.Google Scholar

Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497–505.Google Scholar

Carroll, A. B (1989). Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management. Cincinnati: South-Western.Google Scholar

Carroll, A. B. (1993). Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management, 2nd edn. Cincinnati: South-Western.Google Scholar

Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2015). Business and Society: Ethics, Sustainability, and Stakeholder Management, 9th edn. Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar

Carter, S. M. (2006). The interaction of top management group, stakeholder, and situational factors on certain corporate reputation management activities. Journal of Management Studies, 43(5): 1145–1176.Google Scholar

Clarkson, M. B. E. (1994). A risk based model of stakeholder theory. Proceedings of the Second Toronto Conference on Stakeholder Theory. Toronto: Centre for Corporate Social Performance & Ethics, University of Toronto.Google Scholar

Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 92–117.Google Scholar

Cornell, B., & Shapiro, A. C. (1987). Corporate stakeholders and corporate finance. Financial Management, 16(1): 5–14.Google Scholar

Cragg, W., & Greenbaum, A. (2002). Reasoning about responsibilities: Mining company managers on what stakeholders are owed. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(3): 319–335.Google Scholar

Daft, R. L., Sormunen, J., & Parks, D. (1988). Chief executive scamming, environmental characteristics, and company performance: An empirical study. Strategic Management Journal, 9(2): 123–139.Google Scholar

Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1): 20–47.Google Scholar

Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? California Management Review, 2, 70–76.Google Scholar

Deegan, C., & Rankin, M. (1999). The environmental reporting expectations gap: Australian evidence, British Accounting Review, 31(3): 313–346.Google Scholar

Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 65–91.Google Scholar

Driscoll, K., & Starik, M. (2004). The primordial stakeholder: Advancing the conceptual consideration of stakeholder status for the natural environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(1): 55–73.Google Scholar

Dunham, L. D., Freeman, R. E., & Liedtka, J. (2006). Enhanced stakeholder practice: A particularized exploration of community. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(1): 23–42.Google Scholar

Eesley, C., & Lenox, M. J. (2006). Firm responses to secondary stakeholder action. Strategic Management Journal, 27(8): 765–781.Google Scholar

Evan, W. M., & Freeman, R. E. (1988). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In Beauchamp, T. L. & Bowie, N., eds., Ethical Theory and Business, pp. 75–84. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Etzioni, A. (1988). The Moral Dimensions. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Fassin, Y. (2009). The stakeholder model redefined. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(1): 113–135.Google Scholar

Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1984). Social Cognition: From Brains to Culture. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Fiss, P. C. (2007). A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4): 1180–1198.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4): 409–421.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E., & Evan, W. M. (1990). Corporate governance: A stakeholder interpretation. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19: 337–359.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E., & Gilbert, D. R. (1987). Managing stakeholder relationship. In Sethi, S. P. & Falbe, C. M., eds., Business and society: Dimensions of Conflict and Cooperation, pp. 397–423. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2007). Managing for stakeholders: Reputation, survival and success, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3): 93–94.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and the corporate objective revisited. Organization Science, 15(3): 364–369.Google Scholar

Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 191–205.Google Scholar

Frooman, J., & Murrell, A. J. (2005). Stakeholder influence strategies: The roles of structural and demographic determinants. Business & Society, 44(1): 3–31.Google Scholar

Galunic, D. C., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1994). Reviewing the strategy-structure-performance paradigm. Research in Organizational Behavior, 16: 215–255.Google Scholar

Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6): 781–795.Google Scholar

Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4): 777–798.Google Scholar

Harrison, J. S., Bosse, D. A., & Phillips, R. A. (2010). Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31(1): 58–74.Google Scholar

Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2014). Stakeholder theory, value and firm performance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(1): 97–124.Google Scholar

Hendry, J. (2005). Stakeholder influence strategies: An empirical exploration. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(1): 79–99.Google Scholar

Heugens, P., van den Bosch, F., & van Riel, C. (2002). Stakeholder integration: Building mutually enforcing relationships. Business & Society, 41(1): 36–60Google Scholar

Hill, C. W., & Jones, T. M. (1992). Stakeholder-agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2): 131–154.Google Scholar

Hosmer, L. T., & Kiewitz, C. K. (2005). Organizational justice: A behavioral science concept with critical implications for business ethics and stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(1): 67–91.Google Scholar

Husted, B. W. (1998). Organizational justice and the management of stakeholder relations. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(6): 643–651.Google Scholar

Ibarra, H., & Barbulescu, R. (2010). Identity as narrative: Prevalence, effectiveness, and consequences of narrative identity work in macro work role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 35(1): 135–154.Google Scholar

Jensen, M. C. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2): 235–256.Google Scholar

Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5): 564–576.Google Scholar

Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2): 404–437.Google Scholar

Kaler, J. (2002). Morality and strategy in stakeholder identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(1):91–100.Google Scholar

Kochan, T. A., & Rubinstein, S. A. (2000). Toward a stakeholder theory of the firm: The Saturn partnership. Organization Science, 11(4): 367–386.Google Scholar

Kreiner, G. E., Hollensbe, E. C., & Sheep, M. L. (2009). Balancing borders and bridges: Negotiating the work-home interface via boundary work tactics. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4): 704–730.Google Scholar

Langtry, B. (1994). Stakeholders and the moral responsibilities of business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4): 431–443.Google Scholar

Lawrence, A. T., & Weber, J. (2016). Business and society: Stakeholders, ethics, public policy, 15th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar

Lawrence, P., & Lorsch, J. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly, 12: 1–47.Google Scholar

Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In Clegg, S. R., Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Nord, W. R., eds., Handbook of organization studies, 2nd edn., pp. 215–254. London, UK: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Lee, J. H. (2015). Stakeholder work and value creation stakeholder engagement: An integrative framework. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas.Google Scholar

Lee, J. H., & Mitchell, R. K. (2013). Stakeholder work and stakeholder research. Presented at the 2013 International Association for Business Society Annual Meeting, Portland, Oregon.Google Scholar

Logsdon, J. M., & Wood, D. J. (2002). Business citizenship: From domestic to global level of analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2): 155–187.Google Scholar

Maignan, I., Ferrell, O. C., & Hult, G. T. M. (1999). Corporate citizenship: Cultural antecedents and business benefits. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27: 455–469.Google Scholar

Marens, R., & Wicks, A. (1999). Getting real: Stakeholder theory, managerial practice, and the general irrelevance of fiduciary duties owed to shareholders. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9(2): 273–293Google Scholar

Marin, A., Mitchell, R. K., & Lee, J. H. (2015). The vulnerability and strength duality in ethnic business: A model of stakeholder salience and social capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(2): 271–289.Google Scholar

Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1): 166–179.Google Scholar

Matty, D. (2011). Enterprise architecture shapes stakeholder salience influence on enterprise value-creation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Meyer, A. D., Tsui, A. S., & Hinings, C. R. (1993). Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6): 1175–1195.Google Scholar

Miller, D. (1986). Configurations of strategy and structure: A synthesis. Strategic Management Journal, 7(3): 233–249.Google Scholar

Mintzberg, H. (1980). Structures in 5’s: A synthesis of the research on organization design. Management Science, 26(3): 322–341.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R. K. (2002). Entrepreneurship and stakeholder theory. The Ruffin Series of the Business Ethics Quarterly, 3: 175–196.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R. K. (2003). Assessing stakeholder interests in prosperity and cultural well-being – Appendix A. In Nyce, C., ed., Masters in Our Own House: The Path to Prosperity and Cultural Well-being, pp. 163–182. Terrace, BC: Skeena Native Development Society.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., Chrisman, J. J., & Spence, L. J. (2011). Toward a theory of stakeholder salience in family firms. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(2): 235–255.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Towards a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 853–886.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R. K., Lee, J. H., & Agle, B. R. (2017). Stakeholder prioritization work: The role of stakeholder salience in stakeholder research. In Weber, J. & Wasieleski, D., eds., Business and Society 360 Book Series on Stakeholder Management, vol. 1, pp. 123–157. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R. K., Robinson, R. E., Marin, A., Lee, J. H., & Randolph, A. F. (2013). Spiritual identity, stakeholder attributes, and family business workplace spirituality stakeholder salience. Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 10(3): 215–252.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R. K., Van Buren, H. J. III, Greenwood, M., Freeman, R. E. (2015). Stakeholder inclusion and accounting for stakeholders. Journal of Management Studies, 52(7): 851–877.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R. K., Weaver, G. R., Agle, B. R., Bailey, A. D., & Carlson, J. (2016). Stakeholder agency and social welfare: Pluralism and decision making in the multi-objective corporation. Academy of Management Review, 41(2): 252–275.Google Scholar

Näsi, J. (1995). What is stakeholder thinking? A snapshot of a social theory of the firm. In Näsi, J., ed., Understanding Stakeholder Thinking, pp. 19–32. Helsinki: LSR-Julkaisut Oy.Google Scholar

Neubaum, D. O., & Zahra, S. A. (2006). Institutional ownership and corporate social performance: The moderating effects of investment horizon, activism, and coordination. Journal of Management, 32(1): 108–131.Google Scholar

Pajunen, K. (2006). Stakeholder influences in organizational survival. Journal of Management Studies, 43(6): 1261–1288.Google Scholar

Phillips, N., & Lawrence, T. B. (2012). The turn to work in organization and management theory: Some implications for strategic organization. Strategic Organization, 10(3): 223–230.Google Scholar

Phillips, R. A. (2003). Stakeholder legitimacy. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7(1): 51–66.Google Scholar

Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., & Stringer, L. C. (2009). Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5): 1933–1949.Google Scholar

Rhenman, E. (1964). Foeretagsdemokrati och Foeretagsorganisation, Stockholm: Thule.Google Scholar

Roethlisberger, F. J., & Dickson, W. J. (1939). Management and the worker, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rumelt, R. P. (1987). Theory, strategy, and entrepreneurship. In Teece, D., ed., The competitive challenge, pp. 137–158. Boston: Ballinger.Google Scholar

Savage, G. T., Nix, T. H., Whitehead, C. J., & Blair, J. D. (1991). Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders. Academy of Management Executive, 5(2): 61–75.Google Scholar

Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4): 899–931.Google Scholar

Schwartz, M. S. (2006). God as a managerial stakeholder? Journal of Business Ethics, 66(2–3): 291–306.Google Scholar

Scott, S. G., & Lane, V. R. (2000). A stakeholder approach to organizational identity. Academy of Management Review, 25(1): 43–62.Google Scholar

Sharma, S., & Henriques, I. 2005. Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest services industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2): 159–180.Google Scholar

Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Slack, T., & Parent, M. M. (2006). Understanding sport organizations: The application of organization theory, 2nd edn. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar

Snider, J., Hill, R. P., & Martin, D. (2003). Corporate social responsibility in the 21st century: A view from the world’s most successful firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 48(2): 175–187.Google Scholar

Snow, D. A., & Anderson, L. (1987). Identity work among the homeless: The verbal construction and avowal of personal identities. American Journal of Sociology, 92(6): 1336–1371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stanford memo. (1963). Stanford Research Institute (SRI) internal memorandum as cited in Freeman and Reed (1983) and Freeman (1984, pp. 31–33).Google Scholar

Starik, M. (1994). Essay by Mark Starik. pp. 89–95 of the Toronto conference: Reflections on stakeholder theory. Business & Society, 33(1): 82–131.Google Scholar

Tantalo, C., & Priem, R. L. (2016). Value creation through stakeholder synergy. Strategic Management Journal, 37(2): 314–329.Google Scholar

Taylor, F. W. (1911). The principles of scientific management. New York: Harper and Bros.Google Scholar

Thompson, J. K., Wartick, S. L., & Smith, H. L. (1991). Integrating corporate social performance and stakeholder management: Implications for a research agenda in small business. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 12(1): 207–230.Google Scholar

Ulmer, R. R., & Sellnow, T. L. (2000). Consistent questions of ambiguity in organizational crisis communication: Jack in the box as a case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(2): 143–155.Google Scholar

Venkataraman, S. (2002). Stakeholder value equilibration and the entrepreneurial process. The Ruffin Series of the Society of Business Ethics Quarterly, 3: 45–58.Google Scholar

Weber, M. (1968). Economy and society, Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Weitzner, D., & Deutsch, Y. (2015). Understanding motivation and social influence in stakeholder prioritization. Organization Studies, 36(10): 1337–1360.Google Scholar

Wicks, A. C., Gilbert, D. R. Jr., & Freeman, R. E. (1994). Toward a substantive definition of the corporate issue construct: A review and synthesis of the literature. Business and Society, 33(3): 293–311.Google Scholar

Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4): 691–718.Google Scholar