Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T18:15:41.848Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - Lexis

from Part III - Spanish Morphosyntax and Meaning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2018

Kimberly L. Geeslin
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Get access

Summary

Pragmatics researchers study language in interaction, language users, and the process of making and interpreting meaning. Pragmatic competence, a crucial component of communicative competence, entails knowledge of interactionally-appropriate linguistic resources (i.e., pragmalinguistic competence) and the ability to appropriately navigate the culturally-embedded social perceptions that underlie performance and interpretation of interaction (i.e., sociopragmatic competence). Speech acts (e.g., requests) are an essential element of pragmalinguistic competence and are an important building block of interaction. These acts do not occur in isolation, thus their use must take into account culturally-bound interactive expectations. Politeness models have been of particular interest to Spanish pragmatics researchers. So-called universal models of politeness, focused on the protection of individual social value, do not adequately account for the community-centric culture frequently found in the Spanish-speaking world. In fact, speech acts that might be considered threatening in and English-speaking context (e.g., advice-giving) are used to build solidarity in some Spanish-speaking contexts (Hernández-Flores, 1999). While speech act theory and politeness theory do not comprise the entirety of Spanish pragmatics, they provide a lens for examining the rich pragmatic variation that occurs in Spanish-speaking contexts.
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acquaviva, Paolo (2014). The Roots of Nominality, the Nominality of Roots. In Alexiadou, A. et al. (eds.), The Syntax of Roots and the Roots of Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3356.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Grant (2016). Spanish Unspecified Objects as Null Incorporated Nouns. Probus, 28, 165230.Google Scholar
Asher, Nicholas (2011). Lexical Meaning in Context. A Web of Words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beavers, John (2010). The Structure of Lexical Meaning: Why Semantics Really Matters. Language, 86, 821864.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit (2005). Structuring Sense, Vol. 1: In Name Only; Vol. 2: The Normal Course of Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio (1999). El nombre común. In Bosque, I. and Demonte, V. (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Vol. 1. Madrid: Espasa, pp. 375.Google Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio (2004). REDES: Diccionario combinatorio del español contemporáneo. Madrid: Ediciones SM.Google Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio (2012). On the Lexical Integrity Hypothesis and its (In)accurate Predictions. Iberia, 4 (1), 140173.Google Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio and Masullo, Pascual José (1998). On Verbal Quantification in Spanish. In Fullana, O. and Roca, F. (eds.), Studies on the Syntax of Central Romance Languages. Girona: Universitat de Girona, pp. 963.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro (1998). Plurality of Mass Nouns and the Notion of “Semantic Parameter.” In Rothstein, S. (ed.), Events and Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 53104.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cuervo, María Cristina (2003). Datives at Large (Doctoral dissertation). MIT.Google Scholar
de Belder, Marijke (2008). Size Matters: Towards a Syntactic Decomposition of Countability. In Abner, Natasha and Bishop, Jason (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla, pp. 116122.Google Scholar
de Miguel, Elena (1999). El aspecto léxico. In Bosque, I. and Demonte, V. (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Vol. 2. Madrid: Espasa, pp. 29773060.Google Scholar
de Miguel, Elena (ed.) (2009). Panorama de la lexicología. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Demonte, Violeta (1999). El adjetivo: Clases y usos. La posición del adjetivo en el sintagma nominal. In Bosque, I. and Demonte, V. (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Vol. 1. Madrid: Espasa, pp. 129215.Google Scholar
Demonte, Violeta (2006). Qué es sintáctico y qué es léxico en la interfaz entre sintaxis y léxico-semántica: Hipótesis y conjeturas. Signo y Seña, 15, 1741.Google Scholar
Depraetere, Ilse (1995). On the Necessity of Distinguishing between (Un)boundedness and (A)telicity. Linguistics and Philosophy, 18, 119.Google Scholar
Dowty, David (1979). Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Espinal, María Teresa, Macià, Josep, Mateu, Jaume, and Quer, Josep (2014). Semántica. Madrid: Akal.Google Scholar
Fábregas, Antonio, Marín, Rafael, and McNally, Louise (2012). From Psych Verbs to Nouns. In Demonte, V. and McNally, L. (eds.), Telicity, Change, and State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 162184.Google Scholar
Ghomeshi, Jila and Massam, Diane (eds.). (2012). Count and Mass across Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Grimm, Scott (2012). Number and Individuation (Doctoral dissertation). Stanford University.Google Scholar
Gumiel-Molina, Silvia, Moreno-Quibén, Norberto, and Pérez-Jiménez, Isabel (2015). Comparison Classes and the Relative/Absolute Distinction: A Degree-Based Compositional Account of the ser/estar Distinction. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 33, 9551001.Google Scholar
Gumiel-Molina, Silvia and Pérez-Jiménez, Isabel (2012). Aspectual Composition in <ser/estar+Adjective> Structures: Adjectival Scalarity and Verbal Aspect In Copular Constructions. Borealis 1, (1), 3362.Google Scholar
Hale, Ken and Keyser, Samuel J. (1993). On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations. In Hale, K. and Keyser, S. J. (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 53109.Google Scholar
Hale, Ken and Keyser, Samuel J. (2002). Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi (2005). How do Verbs Get their Names? Denominal Verbs, Manner Incorporation and the Ontology of Verb Roots in English. In Erteschik-Shir, N. and Rapoport, T. (eds.), The Syntax of Aspect. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 4264.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi (2014). On the Identity of Roots. Theoretical Linguistics, 40, 225276.Google Scholar
Husband, Matthew (2012). On the Compositional Nature of States. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray (1990). Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray (1991). Part and Boundaries. Cognition, 41, 945.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher (2007). Vagueness and Grammar: The Semantics of Relative and Absolute Gradable Adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy, 30, 145.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher and McNally, Louise (2005). Scale Structure, Degree Modification, and the Semantics of Gradable Predicates. Language, 81, 345381.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul (1997). Remarks on Denominal Verbs. In Alsina, A., Bresnan, J., and Sells, P. (eds.), Argument Structure. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 473499.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred (1989). Nominal Reference, Temporal Constitution and Quantification in Event Semantics. In Benthem, B. R., and Boas, P. V. E. (eds.), Semantics and Contextual Expressions. Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 75115.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred (1995). Common Nouns: A Contrastive Analysis of Chinese and English. In Carlson, G. and Pelletier, J. (eds.), The Generic Book. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 398–411.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth (1999). Objecthood: An Event Structure Perspective. In Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society 35, Vol. 1: The Main Session. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 223247.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth and Rappaport Hovav, Malka (1995). Unaccusativity: At the Syntax–Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth and Rappaport Hovav, Malka (2005). Argument Realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Lisa (2010). Arguments for Pseudo-Resultative Predicates. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 28, 135182.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Jonathan (2008). The Syntax of Inner Aspect. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec (1997). No Escape from Syntax: Don’t Try Morphological Analysis in the Privacy of Your Own Lexicon. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, 4 (2), 201225.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec (2013). Verbal Argument Structure: Events and Participants. Lingua, 130, 152168.Google Scholar
Marín, Rafael and McNally, Louise (2011). Inchoativity, Change of State, and Telicity: Evidence from Spanish Psychological Reflexive Verbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 29, 467502.Google Scholar
Martí, Luisa (2011). Implicit Indefinite Objects: Grammar, not Pragmatics (MS). Queen Mary, University of London. Available from ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/001317 (last access December 4, 2017).Google Scholar
Mateu, Jaume (2002). Argument Structure: \Syntax–Semantics Interface (Doctoral dissertation). Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Mendikoetxea, Amaya (1999). Construcciones inacusativas y pasivas. In Bosque, I. and Demonte, V. (eds.) Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Vol. 2. Madrid: Espasa, pp. 15751629.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven (1989). Learnability and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher (2008). Structuring Sense, Volume I: In Name Only and Structuring Sense, Volume II: The Normal Course of Events (Review). Language, 84, 343369.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James (1995). The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian (2008). Verb Meaning and the Lexicon. A First-Phase Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Real Academia Española (2009). Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Serrano-Dolader, David (1999). La derivación verbal y la parasíntesis. In Bosque, I. and Demonte, V. (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Vol. 3. Madrid: Espasa, pp. 46834755.Google Scholar
Spalek, Alexandra (2014). Verb Meaning and Combinatory Semantics: A Corpus-Based Study of Spanish Change of State Verbs (Doctoral dissertation). Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar
Stechow, Arnim von (1996). The Different Readings of Wieder “Again”: A Structural Account. Journal of Semantics, 13, 87138.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard (1985). Lexicalization Patterns: Semantic Structure in Lexical Forms. In Shopen, T. (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57–149.Google Scholar
Toledo, Assaf and Sassoon, Galit (2011). Absolute vs. Relative Adjectives – Variance Within vs. Between Individuals. Proceedings of SALT, 21, 135154.Google Scholar
Verkuyl, Henk (1993). A Theory of Aspectuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter (1997). Cause and Structure of Verbs. Linguistic Inquiry, 28, 2768.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Lexis
  • Edited by Kimberly L. Geeslin, Indiana University
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Spanish Linguistics
  • Online publication: 13 August 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316779194.021
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Lexis
  • Edited by Kimberly L. Geeslin, Indiana University
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Spanish Linguistics
  • Online publication: 13 August 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316779194.021
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Lexis
  • Edited by Kimberly L. Geeslin, Indiana University
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Spanish Linguistics
  • Online publication: 13 August 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316779194.021
Available formats
×