Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T12:05:53.463Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Public law values in the common law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2015

Mark Aronson
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales, Australia
Mark Elliott
Affiliation:
St Catharine's College, Cambridge
David Feldman
Affiliation:
Downing College, Cambridge
Get access

Summary

A chapter on public law values in the common law is contingent at a number of junctures. ‘Public law values’ implies a separate ‘public law’, which is a term with no standardised meaning. Indeed, the very existence of a public–private divide is hotly debated, let alone whether it makes sense to talk of a single distinction, or multiple distinctions drawn for different purposes. If one puts those debates to one side and accepts that it is sometimes useful to assign laws into ‘public’ or ‘private’ domains, one finds further debates about the nature and utility of identifying specifically public law ‘values’, as opposed, say, to public law rights or political values.

There are as many different definitions of public law as there are reasons for asking why we might want to categorise a law as public or private, and whether categorisation serves any purpose beyond the academy's convenience of designing workable curriculums. Certainly, most practitioners (even those expert in judicial review matters) would characterise their practices in ways other than ‘public’ or ‘private’ law – they might, for example, describe themselves as child welfare or migration lawyers. Practitioners frequently draw another distinction, describing judicial review applications as ‘public law’ and claims for damages for exactly the same underlying administrative action as ‘private law’.

Any choice between the ‘public’ and ‘private’ labels is important to the actual litigants only if its procedural or substantive consequences matter, and this chapter will note several serious consequences whose rationales are hard to defend. Ideally, what should count are the reasons for asking why one might want to distinguish between public and private law, or between the values of public and private law.

This chapter will leave out of account laws that Parliament enacts for the public benefit, but that apply only to private sector actors or behaviour, obvious examples being the greater parts of statutory criminal law, and market competition law. Indeed, this chapter will deal with statutory law only so far as its underlying values have spilled over into the common law's public realms. Statutes are in one sense always enacted to advance a current perception of the public interest. Also omitted will be any discussion of what remains of the common law of crime and related police powers, although these have been classified as ‘public’ (but not necessarily ‘public law’) since Blackstone's time.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, J., A Continental Distinction in the Common Law: a Historical and Comparative Perspective on English Public Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Oliver, D., Common Values and the Public-Private Divide (London: Butterworths, 1999)Google Scholar
Poole, T., ‘The Reformation of English Administrative Law’ (2009) 68 Cambridge Law Journal142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taggart, M. (ed.), The Province of Administrative Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1997)Google Scholar
Varuhas, J., ‘The Reformation of English Administrative Law? “Rights”, Rhetoric and Reality’ (2013) 72 Cambridge Law Journal369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolf, H., ‘Droit Public – English Style’ [1995] Public Law57
Woolf, H., ‘Public Law – Private Law: Why the Divide? A Personal View’ [1986] Public Law220

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×