Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T18:03:27.045Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Comparison of phylogenetic trees and search for a central trend in the “Forest of Life”

from PART III - Evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Eugene V. Koonin
Affiliation:
National Institutes of Health, USA
Pere Puigbò
Affiliation:
National Institutes of Health, USA
Yuri I. Wolf
Affiliation:
National Institutes of Health, USA
Pavel Pevzner
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Ron Shamir
Affiliation:
Tel-Aviv University
Get access

Summary

The widespread exchange of genes among prokaryotes, known as horizontal gene transfer (HGT), is often considered to “uproot” the Tree of Life (TOL). Indeed, it is by now fully clear that genes in general possess different evolutionary histories. However, the possibility remains that the TOL concept can be reformulated and remains valid as a statistical central trend in the phylogenetic “Forest of Life” (FOL). This chapter describes a computational pipeline developed to chart the FOL by comparative analysis of thousands of phylogenetic trees. This analysis reveals a distinct, consistent phylogenetic signal that is particularly strong among the Nearly Universal Trees (NUTs), which correspond to genes represented in all or most of the organisms analyzed. Despite the substantial amount of apparent HGT seen even among the NUTs, these gene transfers appear to be distributed randomly and do not obscure the central tree-like trend.

The crisis of the Tree of Life in the age of genomics

The Tree of Life (TOL) is one of the dominant concepts in biology, starting from the famous single illustration in Darwin's Origin of Species to twenty-first century undergraduate textbooks. For approximately a century, beginning with the first, tentative trees published by Haeckel in the 1860s and up to the foundation of molecular evolutionary analysis by Zuckerkandl, Pauling, and Margoliash in the early 1960s, phylogenetic trees were constructed on the basis of comparing phenotypes of organisms. Thus, by design, every constructed tree was an “organismal” or “species” tree; that is, a tree was assumed to reflect the evolutionary history of the corresponding species.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×