Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Series Editor’s Preface
- Preface
- 1 Constructivist Processes in Adolescent Development
- Part I Biological And Cognitive Perspective
- 2 Structural Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Typically Developing Children and Adolescents
- 3 Adolescent Risk Taking: A Social Neuroscience Perspective
- 4 What Are the Cognitive Skills Adolescents Need for Life in the Twenty-First Century?
- 5 Hypothetical Thinking in Adolescence: Its Nature, Development, and Applications
- PART II Social and Contextual Perspective
- Index
- References
5 - Hypothetical Thinking in Adolescence: Its Nature, Development, and Applications
from Part I - Biological And Cognitive Perspective
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 October 2011
By
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Series Editor’s Preface
- Preface
- 1 Constructivist Processes in Adolescent Development
- Part I Biological And Cognitive Perspective
- 2 Structural Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Typically Developing Children and Adolescents
- 3 Adolescent Risk Taking: A Social Neuroscience Perspective
- 4 What Are the Cognitive Skills Adolescents Need for Life in the Twenty-First Century?
- 5 Hypothetical Thinking in Adolescence: Its Nature, Development, and Applications
- PART II Social and Contextual Perspective
- Index
- References
Summary
It is the mark of an intelligent mind to be able to
entertain an idea without necessarily accepting it.
– Aristotle
Classic theories of human development characterize adolescence as a period of an awakening of new, powerful, and pervasive abilities and talents. Such was the claim of G. Stanley Hall (1904, cited in Grinder 1969, p. 358) who noted that “adolescence is ... the only point of departure for the superanthropoid that man is to become.” Similarly, Piaget (1972; Inhelder & Piaget, 1958) held that adolescence is the period in which new and powerful forms of reasoning emerge. These abilities and talents are so novel that both G. Stanley Hall (1904; and, see Grinder, 1969) and Jean Piaget (Piaget, 1972; Inhelder & Piaget, 1958) identify a context and a period of time for the nascent adult to cultivate these skills. These abilities are so encompassing that they are thought to result in fundamental changes in how teens think, forever transforming their views of themselves, others, and the world (Erikson, 1968; Kohlberg, 1984; Selman, 1980).
In this chapter, I explore hypothetical thinking as one of the novel, powerful, and pervasive achievements of adolescence that fundamentally impacts and alters them. Specifically, I examine the nature of hypothetical thinking, its process of development, and applications in the life of adolescents. Hypothetical thinking places a premium on what Aristotle cited as the mark of an intelligent mind – the ability to entertain an idea without necessarily accepting it. Central to hypothetical thinking is the ability to assume, suppose, or stipulate as true claims that may conflict with what is accepted as true about the world. The ability to treat ideas as if they were true is implicated in a variety of significant human endeavors, from systematically testing a hypothesis, logically reasoning about an argument, constructing a possible world, regretting one’s life choices, or reacting to a pretend enactment. These examples point to one of the most curious things about hypothetical reasoning. It is implicated in spontaneous and playful pursuits such as pretense, and in formal and serious intellectual activities such as logic or science.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Adolescent Vulnerabilities and OpportunitiesDevelopmental and Constructivist Perspectives, pp. 86 - 114Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
References
2008 Holding in mind conflicting information: Pretending, working memory, and executive controlJournal of Cognition and Development 9 390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2011 Misconceptions and conceptual change in undergraduate students’ understanding of psychology as a sciencePsychology Learning and Teaching 10 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1996 Young children’s memory for the true and pretend identities of objects used in object-substitution pretenseDevelopmental Psychology 32 479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1996 The development of evidence evaluation skillsCognitive Development 11 523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2009 Awareness and irrationality: College students’ awareness of their irrational judgments on gambling tasksThe Journal of Psychology 143 293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2005 The development of judgment and decision-making in children and adolescenceMahwah, NJErlbaumGoogle Scholar
2009 The effect of perspective on misconceptions in psychology: A test of conceptual change theoryThe Journal of Instructional Psychology 36 289Google Scholar
2008 A dual-process account of the development of scientific reasoning: The nature and development of metacognitive intercession skillsCognitive Development 23 452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2005 Reasoning about make-believe and hypothetical suppositions: Towards a theory of belief-contravening reasoningCognitive Development 20 545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2009 Is understanding regret dependent on developments in counterfactual thinking?British Journal of Developmental Psychology 27 505CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2006 Children’s thinking about counterfactuals and future hypotheticals as possibilitiesChild Development 77 413CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2002 Children’s understanding of the pretence-reality distinction: A review of current theory and evidenceDevelopmental Science 5 397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2002 Human creativity: Its evolution, its cognitive basis, and its connections with childhood pretenceBritish Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1988 The effect of make-believe play on deductive reasoningBritish Journal of Developmental Psychology 6 207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1990 The influence of the imagination on reasoning in young childrenBritish Journal of Developmental Psychology 8 305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1991 Development of formal reasoning during successive peer interactionsDevelopmental Psychology 27 277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1993 Children’s strategies in solving two- and three-dimensional combinatorial problemsJournal for Research in Mathematics Education 24 255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2006 The heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning: Extension and evaluationPsychonomic Bulletin and Review 13 378CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2007 Hypothetical thinking: Dual processes in reasoning and judgmentNew YorkThe Psychology PressGoogle Scholar
1988 Combinatorial problem solving capacity of childrenZ.D.M. International Reviews on Mathematical Education 5 1Google Scholar
2007 The conceptual underpinnings of pretense: Pretending is not ‘behaving-as-if’Cognition 105 103CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1995 The experience of regret: What, when, and whyPsychological Review 102 379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1969 The concept of adolescence in the genetic psychology of G. Stanley HallChild Development 40 355CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2009 Associations among false belief understanding, counterfactual reasoning, and executive functionThe British Journal of Developmental Psychology 27 681CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2004 Reality compared with its alternatives: Age differences in judgments of regret and reliefDevelopmental Psychology 40 764CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2008 Children’s understanding of anticipatory regret and disappointmentCognition and Emotion 22 815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1993 Young children’s understanding of pretenseMonographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1996 Children’s use of counterfactual thinking in causal reasoningCognition 61 233CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1982 Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biasesNew YorkCambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003 http://www.slate.com/id/2089163
2004 Connecting scientific reasoning and causal inferenceJournal of Cognition and Development 5 261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2006 Handbook of child psychology: Child psychology in practiceHoboken, NJJohn Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
1987 Pretense and representation: The origins of “theory of mind”Psychological Review 94 412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2001 Pretend play as Twin Earth: A social-cognitive analysisDevelopmental Review 21 495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1989 Reasoning with contrary-to-fact propositionsJournal of Experimental Child Psychology 47 398CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2009 Proceedings of the 31th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science SocietyAustin, TXCognitive Science SocietyGoogle Scholar
1998 Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2. Cognition, perception, and languageNew YorkWileyGoogle Scholar
2005 Adolescent psychological development: Rationality, morality, and identityMahwah, NJErlbaumGoogle Scholar
1999 Developmental sequences in class reasoning and propositional reasoningJournal of Experimental Child Psychology 74 69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1972 Intellectual evolution from adolescence to adulthoodHuman Development 15 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2010 Counterfactual reasoning: Developing a sense of “nearest possible world”Child Development 81 376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1999 The role of imagination in facilitating deductive reasoning in 2-, 3- and 4-year-oldsCognition 72 1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1998 Are errors in false belief tasks symptomatic of a broader difficulty with counterfactuality?Cognitive Development 13 73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1979 Further examinations of formal operational reasoning abilitiesChild Development 50 478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1980 Control of variables and propositional reasoning in early adolescenceThe Journal of Genetic Psychology 103 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2009 Repetitive regret, depression, and anxiety: Findings from a nationally representative surveyJournal of Social & Clinical Psychology 28 671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1993 Reflecting on scientifc thinking: Children’s understanding of the hypothesis-evidence relationChild Development 64 1617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2007 When thinking hurts: Attachment, rumination, and post-relationship adjustmentPersonal Relationships 14 351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2009 The aftermath of rash action: Sleep-interfering counterfactual thoughts and emotionsEmotion 9 549CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2007 Serious fun: Preschoolers engage in more exploratory play when evidence is confoundedDevelopmental Psychology 43 1045CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2007 Preschool children learn about causal structure from conditional interventionsDevelopmental Science 10 322CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2009 The development of possibility judgment within and across domainsCognitve Development 24 293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2007 Improbable or impossible? How children reason about the possibility of extraordinary eventsChild Development 78 1015CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2006 What does Batman think about SpongeBob? Children’s understanding of the fantasy/fantasy distinctionCognition 101 9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2000 Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debateBehavioral and Brain Sciences 23 645CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2009 Young children separate multiple pretend worldsDevelopmental Science 12 699CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1995 The fictional mind: Young children’s understanding of pretense, imagination and dreamsDevelopmental Review 15 172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1997 Thinking about fantasy: Are children fundamentally different thinkers and believers from adults?Child Development 68 991CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2009 Young children understand multiple pretend identities in their object playBritish Journal of Developmental Psychology 27 385CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2007 The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and middle schoolDevelopmental Review 27 172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7
- Cited by