Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-26vmc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T05:55:01.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Acting Together

Representations and Coordination Processes

from Part III - Thinking, Perceiving and Acting with Others

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2016

Sukhvinder S. Obhi
Affiliation:
McMaster University, Ontario
Emily S. Cross
Affiliation:
Bangor University
Get access

Summary

Abstract

Human life involves and requires joint action. Coordinating our actions with others not only gives rise to cultural products that individuals could not achieve alone, such as the Egyptian pyramids or the performance of a symphony. Rather, everyday life also has us engage in many joint actions, from folding a sheet together to having a conversation. How do people manage to act together in a coordinated way? In this chapter, we consider this question in terms of the cognitive mechanisms underlying joint action, focusing on real-time interactions in dyads or small groups. To illustrate what we are aiming to explore, think of two people who are loading shopping bags into the trunk of a car. At times, they each take a rather light bag from the shopping cart, move towards the trunk and then coordinate who is setting their bag down first, and where. At other moments, they carry heavy bags together, making sure to lift and set these down at the same time. As this shows, performing a joint action often requires adapting one’s own actions to what another person is doing. In this chapter, we first introduce some key concepts that have been highlighted in previous accounts of joint action, briefly addressing shared intentions, commitment and representations of joint goals. The main part focuses on coordination mechanisms – cognitive processes and mental representations that make performing joint actions of the kind described above possible. Specifically, we will review findings from experimental studies that shed light on general coordination strategies, representations of joint abilities and tasks, mechanisms of predicting own and others’ actions, and non-verbal communication through action. We will conclude by discussing ways in which different coordination mechanisms might be combined to allow co-actors to take on complementary roles.

Type
Chapter
Information
Shared Representations
Sensorimotor Foundations of Social Life
, pp. 216 - 235
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aglioti, S. M., Cesari, P., Romani, M., & Urgesi, C. (2008). Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players. Nature Neuroscience, 11(9), 11091116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atmaca, S., Sebanz, N., Prinz, W., & Knoblich, G. (2008). Action co-representation: The joint SNARC effect. Social Neuroscience, 3(3–4), 410420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barresi, J., & Moore, C. (1996). Intentional relations and social understanding. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 107154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baus, C., Sebanz, N., de la Fuente, V., Branzi, F. M., Martin, C., & Costa, A. (2014). On predicting others’ words: Electrophysiological evidence of prediction in speech production. Cognition, 133, 395407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bicho, E., Erlhagen, W., Louro, L., & Costa e Silva, E. (2011). Neuro-cognitive mechanisms of decision making in joint action: A human–robot interaction study. Human Movement Science, 30(5), 846868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böckler, A., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2012). Effects of a coactor’s focus of attention on task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(6), 14041415.Google ScholarPubMed
Bosga, J., & Meulenbroek, R. G. J. (2007). Joint-action coordination of redundant force contributions in a virtual lifting task. Motor Control, 11, 235258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratman, M. E. (1992). Shared cooperative activity. Philosophical Review, 101, 327341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratman, M. E. (2009). Modest sociality and the distinctiveness of intention. Philosophical Studies, 114(1), 149165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, S. E. (2005). How conversation is shaped by visual and spoken evidence. In Trueswell, J. & Tanenhaus, M. (Eds.), Approaches to studying world-situated language use: Bridging the language-as-product and language-as-action traditions. Cambridge: MIT Press, 95129.Google Scholar
Brennan, S. E., Chen, X., Dickinson, C. A., Neider, M. B., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2008). Coordinating cognition: The costs and benefits of shared gaze during collaborative search. Cognition, 106, 14651477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brownell, C. A. (2011). Early developments in joint action. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2, 193211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butterfill, S. (2012). Joint action and development. Philosophical Quarterly, 62(246), 2347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D., Grèzes, J., Passingham, R., & Haggard, P. (2005). Action observation and acquired motor skills: An fMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 12431249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carpenter, M. (2009). Just how joint is joint action in infancy? Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 380392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Krych, M. A. (2004). Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 6281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constable, M. D., Kritikos, A., & Bayliss, A. P. (2011). Grasping the concept of personal property. Cognition, 119(3), 430437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cummins, F., Li, C., & Wang, B. (2013). Coupling among speakers during synchronous speaking in English and Mandarin. Journal of Phonetics, 41(6), 432441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, T., Riley, M., Shockley, K., & Cummins-Sebree, S. (2010). Perceiving affordances for joint actions. Perception, 39(12), 16241644.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doerrfeld, A., Sebanz, N., & Shiffrar, M. (2012). Expecting to lift a box together makes the load look lighter. Psychological Research, 76, 467475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dolk, T., Hommel, B., Prinz, W., & Liepelt, R. (2013). The (not so) social Simon effect: A referential coding account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(5), 12481260.Google ScholarPubMed
Dragan, A., Lee, K., & Srinivasa, S. (2013). Legibility and predictability of robot motion. In 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction (HRI). www.ri.cmu.edu/pub_files/2013/3/legiilitypredictabilityIEEE.pdf.Google Scholar
Dragan, A., & Srinivasa, S. (2013). Generating legible motion. Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems. www.ri.cmu.edu/pub_files/2013/6/legibility_analysis.pdf.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. (2013). Relationship thinking: Agency, enchrony, and human sociality. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eskenazi, T., Doerrfeld, A., Logan, G. D., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2013). Your words are my words: Effects of acting together on encoding. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 10261034.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Francois, D., Powell, S., & Dautenhahn, K. (2009). A long-term study of children with autism playing with a robotic pet: Taking inspirations from non-directive play therapy to encourage children’s proactivity and initiative-taking. Interaction Studies, 10(3), 324373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallese, V., Keysers, C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2004). A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(9), 396403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Georgiou, I., Becchio, C., Glover, S., & Castiello, U. (2007). Different action patterns for cooperative and competitive behaviour. Cognition, 102, 415433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, M. (1992). On social facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, M. (2006). Rationality in collective action. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 36(1), 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goebl, W., & Palmer, C. (2009). Synchronization of timing and motion among performing musicians. Music Perception, 26(5), 427438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. (1999). The role of gesture in communication and thinking. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(11), 419429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grush, R. (2004). The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 377442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guagnano, D., Rusconi, E., & Umiltà, C. A. (2010). Sharing a task or sharing space? On the effect of the confederate in action coding in a detection task. Cognition, 114(3), 348355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
He, X., Lever, A. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (2011). Interpersonal memory-based guidance of attention is reduced for ingroup members. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3), 429438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffman, G., & Ju, W. (2014). Designing robots with movement in mind. Journal of Human–Robot Interaction, 1(1), 7895.Google Scholar
Hommel, B., Colzato, L. S., & van den Wildenberg, W. P. M. (2009). How social are task representations? Psychological Science, 20, 794–798.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hostetter, A. B. (2011). When do gestures communicate? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 297315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Humphreys, G. W., & Bedford, J. (2011). The relations between joint action and theory of mind: A neuropsychological analysis. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 357369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iacoboni, M., Molnar-Szakacs, I., Gallese, V., Buccino, G., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Grasping the intentions of others with one’s own mirror neuron system. PLoS Biology, 3(3), 529535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iani, C., Anelli, F., Nicoletti, R., Arcuri, L., & Rubichi, S. (2011). The role of group membership on the modulation of joint action. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 439445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keller, P. E., Knoblich, G., & Repp, B. H. (2007). Pianists duet better when they play with themselves: On the possible role of action simulation in synchronization. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 102111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knoblich, G., & Jordan, J. S. (2003). Action coordination in groups and individuals: Learning anticipatory control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(5), 10061016.Google ScholarPubMed
Knudsen, B., & Liszkowski, U. (2013). One-year-olds warn others about negative action outcomes. Journal of Cognition and Development, 14(3), 424436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konvalinka, I., Vuust, P., Roepstorff, A., & Frith, C. D. (2010). Follow you, follow me: Continuous mutual prediction and adaptation in joint tapping. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(11), 22202230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kourtis, D., Knoblich, G., Wozniak, M., & Sebanz, N. (2014). Attention allocation and task representation during joint action planning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(10), 22752286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kourtis, D., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2013). Predictive representation of other people’s actions in joint action planning: An EEG study. Social Neuroscience, 8, 3142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kröger, B. J., Kopp, S., & Lowit, A. (2010). A model for production, perception, and acquisition of actions in face-to-face communication. Cognitive Processing, 11, 187205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krych-Appelbaum, M., Law, J. B., Jones, D., Barnacz, A., Johnson, A., & Keenan, J. P. (2007). ‘I think I know what you mean’: The role of theory of mind in collaborative communication. Interaction Studies, 8(2), 267280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liepelt, R., Schneider, J. C., Aichert, D. S., Wöstmann, N., Dehning, S., et al. (2012). Action blind: Disturbed self–other integration in schizophrenia. Neuropsychologia, 50, 37753780.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loehr, J., Kourtis, D., Vesper, C., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2013). Monitoring individual and joint action outcomes in duet music performance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(7), 10491061.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loehr, J. D., & Palmer, C. (2011). Temporal coordination between performing musicians. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(11), 21532167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manera, V., Becchio, C., Cavallo, A., Sartori, L., & Castiello, U. (2011). Cooperation or competition? Discriminating between social intentions by observing prehensile movements. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 547556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marsh, K. L., Johnston, L., Richardson, M. J., & Schmidt, R. C. (2009). Toward a radically embodied, embedded social psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 12171225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClung, J. S., Jentzsch, I., & Reich, S. D. (2013). Group membership affects spontaneous mental representation: Failure to represent the out-group in a joint action task. PLoS ONE, 8(11): e79178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, M., Bekkering, H., Haartsen, R., Stapel, J. C., & Hunnius, S. (2015). The role of action prediction and inhibitory control for joint action coordination in toddlers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 139, 203220.Google Scholar
Mottet, D., Guiard, Y., Ferrand, T., & Bootsma, R. J. (2001). Two-handed performance of a rhythmical Fitts task by individuals and dyads. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(6), 12751286.Google ScholarPubMed
Müller, B. C. N., Kühn, S., van Baaren, R. B., Dotsch, R., Brass, M., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2011). Perspective taking eliminates differences in co-representation of out-group members’ actions. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 423428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pecenka, N., & Keller, P. (2011). The role of temporal prediction abilities in interpersonal sensorimotor synchronization. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 505515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pezzulo, G., & Dindo, H. (2011). What should I do next? Using shared representations to solve interaction problems. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 613630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pezzulo, G., Donnarumma, F., & Dindo, H. (2013). Human sensorimotor communication: A theory of signaling in online social interactions. PLoS One, 8(11), e79876.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 329347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9(2), 129154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radke, S., de Lange, F., Ullsperger, M., & de Bruijn, E. (2011). Mistakes that affect others: An fMRI study on processing of own errors in a social context. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 405413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, V. (2008). How infants know minds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Repp, B. H. (2005). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of the tapping literature. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(6), 969992.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, M. J., Harrison, S. J., May, R., Kallen, R. W., & Schmidt, R. C. (2011). Self-organized complementary coordination: Dynamics of an interpersonal collision-avoidance task. BIO Web of Conferences, 1, 00075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L., & Baron, R. M. (2007). Judging and actualizing intrapersonal and interpersonal affordances. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(4), 845859.Google ScholarPubMed
Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature, 2, 661670.Google ScholarPubMed
Roberts, M. E., & Goldstone, R. L. (2011). Adaptive group coordination and role differentiation. PLoS One, 6(7), e22377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruys, K. I., & Aarts, H. (2010). When competition merges people’s behavior: Interdependency activates shared action representations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 11301133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacheli, L., Tidoni, E., Pavone, E., Aglioti, S., & Candidi, M. (2013). Kinematics fingerprints of leader and follower role-taking during cooperative joint actions. Experimental Brain Research, 226(4), 473486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santamaria, J. P., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2011). Etiquette and effort: Holding doors for others. Psychological Science, 22(5), 584588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sartori, L., Becchio, C., & Castiello, U. (2011). Cues to intention: The role of movement information. Cognition, 119, 242252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schelling, T. C. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R., Fitzpatrick, P., Caron, R., & Mergeche, J. (2011). Understanding social motor coordination. Human Movement Science, 30, 834845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, R. C., & Richardson, M. J. (2008). Dynamics of interpersonal coordination. In Fuchs, A. & Jirsa, V. K. (Eds.), Coordination: Neural, behavioral and social dynamics. Berlin: Springer, 281308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2003). Representing others’ actions: Just like one’s own? Cognition, 88, B11B21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., Prinz, W., & Wascher, E. (2006). Twin peaks: An ERP study of action planning and control in coacting individuals. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(5), 859870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., Stumpf, L., & Prinz, W. (2005b). Far from action blind: Representation of others’ actions in individuals with autism. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 433454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., Sebanz, N. & Prinz, W. (2005a). How two share a task: Corepresenting stimulus–response mappings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(6), 12341246.Google Scholar
Steels, L. (2003). Evolving grounded communication for robots. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(7), 308312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stenzel, A., Chinellato, E., Bou, M. A. T., del Pobil, Á. P., Lappe, M., & Liepelt, R. (2012). When humanoid robots become human-like interaction partners: Corepresentation of robotic actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(5), 10731077.Google ScholarPubMed
Stern, D. N. (2002). The first relationship: Infant and mother. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tollefsen, D. (2005). Let’s pretend! Children and joint action. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 35, 7597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 675735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trevarthen, C. (1979). Communication and cooperation in early infancy: A description of primary intersubjectivity. In Bullowa, M. (Ed.), Before speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 321343.Google Scholar
Tsai, C.-C., Kuo, W.-J., Hung, D. L., & Tzeng, O. J. L. (2008). Action co-representation is tuned to other humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(11), 20152024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsai, J. C.-C., Kuo, W.-J., Jing, J.-T., Hung, D. L., & Tzeng, O. J.-L. (2006). A common coding framework in self–other interaction: Evidence from joint action task. Experimental Brain Research, 175, 353362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsai, J. C.-C., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2011). The GROOP effect: Groups mimic group actions. Cognition, 118, 135140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vesper, C., Butterfill, S., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2010). A minimal architecture for joint action. Neural Networks, 23(8–9), 9981003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vesper, C., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2014). Our actions in my mind: Motor imagery of joint action. Neuropsychologia, 55, 115121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vesper, C., & Richardson, M. J. (2014). Strategic communication and behavioral coupling in asymmetric joint action. Experimental Brain Research, 232(9), 29452956.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vesper, C., Schmitz, L., Safra, L., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2016). The role of shared visual information for joint action coordination. Cognition, 153, 118–123.Google Scholar
Vesper, C., Soutschek, A., & Schubö, A. (2009). Motion coordination affects movement parameters in a joint pick-and-place task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(12), 24182432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vesper, C., van der Wel, R., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2011). Making oneself predictable: Reduced temporal variability facilitates joint action coordination. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 517530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vesper, C., van der Wel, R. P., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2013b). Are you ready to jump? Predictive mechanisms in interpersonal coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(1), 4861.Google ScholarPubMed
Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Brown, S. (2007). On the linear relation between the mean and the standard deviation of a response time distribution. Psychological Review, 114(3), 830841.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wenke, D., Atmaca, S., Holländer, A., Liepelt, R., Baess, P., & Prinz, W. (2011). What is shared in joint action? Issues of co-representation, response conflict, and agent identification. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2(2), 147172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilf, E. (2013). Toward an anthropology of computer-mediated, algorithmic forms of sociality. Current Anthropology, 54(6), 716739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin, 131(3), 460473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolpert, D. M., Doya, K., & Kawato, M. (2003). A unifying computational framework for motor control and interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 358, 593602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×