Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T08:45:34.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Operative Laparoscopy

from Section 2 - Gynecologic Surgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2018

Lisa Keder
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Martin E. Olsen
Affiliation:
East Tennessee State University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Gynecologic Care , pp. 58 - 66
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Medeiros, L. R., Rosa, D. D., Bozzetti, M. C. et al. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for benign ovarian tumor. Coch Database of Sys Rev 2009:CD004751.Google Scholar
Papasakelariou, C., Saunders, D., De La Rosa. Comparative study of laparoscopic oophorectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1995; 2(4): 407–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lundorff, P., Hahlin, M., Thorburn, B. et al. Adhesion formation after laparoscopic surgery in tubal pregnancy: a randomized trial versus laparotomy. Fertil Steril 1991; 55(5): 911–15.Google Scholar
Ivarsson, M. L., Holmdahl, L., Franzen, G., Risberg, B.. Cost of bowel obstruction resulting from adhesions. Eur J Surg 1997; 163(9): 679–84.Google Scholar
Vergote, I., De Brabanter, J., Fyles, A. et al. Prognostic importance of degree of differentiation and cyst rupture in stage I invasive epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Lancet 2001; 357: 176–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gomel, V.. Laparoscopy. Can Med Assoc J 1974; 111(2): 167–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Sisodia, R.M., Del Carmen, M.G., Boruta, D.M.. Role of minimally invasive surgery in the management of adnexal masses. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2015; 58(1): 6675.Google Scholar
Broach, A. N., Mansuria, S. M., Sanfilippo, J.. Pediatric and adolescent gynecologic laparoscopy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2009; 52(3): 380–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rieger, M. M., Santos, X. M., Sangi-Haghpeykar, H. et al. Laparoscopic outcomes for pelvic pathology in children and adolescents among patients presenting to the pediatric and adolescent gynecology service. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2015; 28(3): 157–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, T., Selanders, J.. Incidental appendectomy – yes or no? A retrospective case study and review of the literature. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 1998; 6: 30–7.Google Scholar
Gustofson, R., Kim, N., Liu, S. et al. Endometriosis and the appendix: a case series and comprehensive review of the literature. Fertil Steril 2006; 86: 298303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turrentine, F. E., Wang, H., Simpson, V. B., Jones, R. S.. Surgical risk factors, morbidity, and mortality in elderly patients. J Am Coll Surg 2006; 203: 865–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qaseem, A., Snow, V., Fitterman, N. et al. Risk assessment for and strategies to reduce perioperative pulmonary complications for patients undergoing noncardiothoracic surgery: a guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144(8): 575–80.Google Scholar
Parker, D. Y., Burke, J. J. II, Gallup, D. G.. Gynecological surgery in octogenarians and nonagenarians. A J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190(5): 1401–3.Google Scholar
Scheib, S. A., Tanner, E. III, Green, I. C. et al. Laparoscopy in the morbidly obese patient: physiologic considerations and surgical techniques to optimize success. J Min Invas Gynecol 2009; 21(2): 182–95.Google Scholar
Bensley, R. P., Schermerhorn, M. L., Hurks, R. et al. Risk of late-onset adhesions and incisional hernias after surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 216(6): 1159–67.Google Scholar
Agarwala, N., Liu, C. Y.. Safe entry techniques during laparoscopy: Left upper quadrant entry using the ninth intercostal space: a review of 918 procedures. J Min Invas Gynecol 2005; 12(1): 5561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bohmer, A. B., Wappler, F., Zwissler, B.. Preoperative risk assessment: from routine tests to individualized investigation. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2014; 111(25): 437–46.Google Scholar
Manley, S., de Kelaita, G., Joseph, N. J. et al. Preoperative pregnancy testing in ambulatory surgery: incidence and impact of positive results. Anes 1995; 83(4): 690–3.Google ScholarPubMed
Philips, P. A., Amaral, J. A.. Abdominal access complications in laparoscopic surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2001; 192(4): 525–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nordestgaard, A. G., Bodily, K. C., Obsorne, R. W.. Major vascular injuries during laparoscopic procedures. Am J Surg 1995; 169: 543–5.Google Scholar
Coskun, F., Salman, M. A.. Anesthesia for operative endoscopy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2001; 13(4): 371–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Antibiotic prophylaxis for gynecologic procedures. Practice Bulletin No. 104, May 2009a.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Prevention of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Practice Bulletin No. 84, August 2007.Google Scholar
Geerts, W. H., Pineo, G. F., Heit, J. A. et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest 2004; 124(Suppl): 338400S.Google Scholar
Abbott, C. Sutton. History of power sources in endoscopic surgery. J Min Invas Gynecol 2013; 20: 271–8.Google Scholar
Law, K., Lyons, S.. Comparative studies of energy sources in gynecologic laparoscopy. J Min Invas Gynecol 2013; 20: 308–18.Google Scholar
Ahmad, G., Gent, D., Henderson, D, O’Flynn, H, Phillips, K, Watson, A. Laparoscopic entry techniques. Cochrane Database Sys Rev 2015(8): CD006583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006583.pub4.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. M Complications in laparoscopy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1977; 15: 157–62.Google Scholar
Levinson, C.. Laparoscopy is easy – except for the complications: a review with suggestions. J Rep Med 1974; 5: 187–94.Google Scholar
Chapron, C Pierre, F Harchaoui, Y et al. Gastrointestinal injuries during gynaecological laparoscopy. Hum Reprod 1999 Feb; 14(2): 333–7.Google Scholar
Findley, A. D., Solnik, M. J. Prevention and management of urologic injury during gynecologic laparoscopy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2016; 28: 323–8.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×