Book contents
- Developmental Dyslexia across Languages and Writing Systems
- Developmental Dyslexia across Languages and Writing Systems
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Developmental Dyslexia across Languages and Writing Systems
- 2 Developmental Dyslexia in English
- 3 Developmental Dyslexia in French
- 4 Developmental Dyslexia in Dutch
- 5 Developmental Dyslexia in Czech and Slovak
- 6 Developmental Dyslexia in Finnish
- 7 Developmental Dyslexia in Russian
- 8 Developmental Dyslexia in Hebrew
- 9 Developmental Dyslexia in Japanese
- 10 Developmental Dyslexia in Chinese
- Part II Cross-Linguistic Perspectives on Developmental Dyslexia
- Epilogue
- Index
- References
4 - Developmental Dyslexia in Dutch
from Part I - Developmental Dyslexia across Languages and Writing Systems
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 September 2019
Book contents
- Developmental Dyslexia across Languages and Writing Systems
- Developmental Dyslexia across Languages and Writing Systems
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Developmental Dyslexia across Languages and Writing Systems
- 2 Developmental Dyslexia in English
- 3 Developmental Dyslexia in French
- 4 Developmental Dyslexia in Dutch
- 5 Developmental Dyslexia in Czech and Slovak
- 6 Developmental Dyslexia in Finnish
- 7 Developmental Dyslexia in Russian
- 8 Developmental Dyslexia in Hebrew
- 9 Developmental Dyslexia in Japanese
- 10 Developmental Dyslexia in Chinese
- Part II Cross-Linguistic Perspectives on Developmental Dyslexia
- Epilogue
- Index
- References
Summary
Although Dutch can be considered a transparent orthography, a substantial number of children in the Netherlands suffer from severe reading and spelling problems. Over the past decades, research has focused on the question of how problems with learning to read and spell in Dutch can best be understood. Importantly, policymakers have recognized the results of ongoing research efforts and protocols are now being followed nationwide for the diagnosis of developmental dyslexia and conduct of interventions.
In this chapter, we start with a short introduction to the Dutch language and its orthography. We then review what is known about the processes of learning to read and spell in Dutch as evidenced by research with typical children (see also Verhoeven, 2017). Next, we sketch the historical and cultural context leading up to the identification of problems with learning to read in Dutch and the diagnosis of developmental dyslexia in the Netherlands.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Bekebrede, J., van der Leij, A., Plakas, A., Share, D., & Morfidi, E. (2010). Dutch dyslexia in adulthood: Core features and variety. Scientific Studies of Reading, 14, 183–210.Google Scholar
Blomert, L. (2005). Dyslexie in Nederland: Theorie, praktijk en beleid [Dyslexia in The Netherlands: theory, practice and policy]. Amsterdam: Nieuwezijds Publishers.Google Scholar
Blomert, L. (2006). Protocol dyslexie diagnostiek en behandeling [Protocol dyslexia diagnosis and treatment]. Amsterdam: CVZ.Google Scholar
Blomert, L. (2011). The neural signature of orthographic-phonological binding in successful and failing reading development. Neuroimage, 57, 695–703.Google Scholar
Blomert, L., & Froyen, D. (2010). Multi-sensory learning and learning to read. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 77, 195–204.Google Scholar
Blomert, L., & Willems, G. (2010). Is there a causal link from a phonological awareness deficit to reading failure in children at familial risk for dyslexia? Dyslexia, 16, 300–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boets, B., Ghesquière, P., van Wieringen, A., & Wouters, J. (2007). Speech perception in preschoolers at family risk for dyslexia: Relations with low-level auditory processing and phonological ability. Brain and Language, 101, 19–30.Google Scholar
Boets, B., Op de Beeck, H. P., & Vandermosten, M. et al. (2013). Intact but less accessible phonetic representations in adults with dyslexia. Science, 342, 1251–1254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boets, N., De Smedt, B., & Cleuren, L. et al. (2010). Towards a further characterization of phonological and literacy problems in children with dyslexia. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28, 5–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Booij, G. (1977). Dutch morphology: A study of word formation in generative grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Bosman, A. M. T., & Van Orden, G. C. (1997). Why spelling is more difficult than reading. In Perfetti, C. A., Rieben, L., & Fayol, M. (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across languages (pp. 173–194). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Cordewener, K. A. H., Bosman, A. M. T., & Verhoeven, L. (2015). Implicit and explicit instruction: The case of spelling acquisition. Written Language & Literacy, 18, 121–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Bree, E. H., Wijnen, F. N. K., & Gerrits, P. A. M. (2010). Non-word repetition and literacy in Dutch children at-risk of dyslexia and children with SLI: Results of the follow-up study. Dyslexia, 16, 36–44.Google Scholar
de Graaff, S., Bosman, A. M. T., Hasselman, F., & Verhoeven, L. (2009). Benefits of systematic phonics instruction. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 318–333.Google Scholar
de Jong, P. F., & Messbauer, V. C. S. (2011). Orthographic context and the acquisition of orthographic knowledge in normal and dyslexic readers. Dyslexia, 17, 107–122.Google Scholar
de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (1999). Specific contributions of phonological abilities to early reading acquisition: Results from a Dutch latent variable longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 450–476.Google Scholar
de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (2003). Developmental changes in the manifestation of a phonological deficit in dyslexic children learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumont, J. J. (1984). Lees- en spellingproblemen [Reading and spelling difficulties]. Rotterdam: Lemniscaat.Google Scholar
Dumont, J. J. (1991). Dyslexie: Theorie, diagnostiek en behandeling [Dyslexia: Theory, diagnostics and treatment]. Rotterdam: Lemniscaat.Google Scholar
Eleveld, M. (2005). At risk for dyslexia: The role of phonological abilities, letter knowledge (Doctoral dissertation). Groningen: University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Gijsel, M. A. R., Bosman, A. M. T., & Verhoeven, L. (2006). Kindergarten risk factors, cognitive factors, and teacher judgments as predictors of early reading in Dutch. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 558–571.Google Scholar
Health Council of the Netherlands. (1995). Dyslexia: Definition and treatment (publication no. 1995/15). The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Keuning, J., & Verhoeven, L. (2007). Screening for word reading and spelling problems in elementary school: An item response theory approach. Education & Child Psychology, 24, 42–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keuning, J., & Verhoeven, L. (2008). Spelling development throughout the elementary grades: The Dutch case. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 459–470.Google Scholar
Marinus, E., & de Jong, P. F. (2008). The use of sublexical clusters in normal reading and dyslexic readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 253–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marinus, E., & de Jong, P. F. (2011). Dyslexic and typical-reading children use vowel digraphs as perceptual units in reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 504–516.Google Scholar
Noordenbos, M. W., Segers, P. C. J., Serniclaes, W., Mitterer, H. A., & Verhoeven, L. T. W. (2012a). Allophonic mode of speech perception in Dutch children at risk for dyslexia: A longitudinal study. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33, 1469–1483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noordenbos, M. W. Segers, P. C. J., Serniclaes, W., Mitterer, H. A., & Verhoeven, L. T. W. (2012b). Neural evidence of allophonic perception in children at risk for dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 50, 2010–2017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noordenbos, M. W., Segers, P. C. J., Wagensveld, B., & Verhoeven, L. T. W. (2013). Aberrant N400 responses to phonological overlap during rhyme judgements in children at risk for dyslexia. Brain Research, 1537, 233–243.Google Scholar
Patel, T. K., Snowling, M. J., & de Jong, P. F. (2004). A cross-linguistic comparison of children learning to read in English and Dutch. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 785–797.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. (1997). The psycholinguistics of spelling and reading. In Perfetti, C. A., Rieben, L. & Fayol, M. (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across languages (pp. 21–38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Pugh, K. R., Landi, N., & Preston, J. L. et al. (2013). The relationship between phonological and auditory processing and brain organization in beginning readers. Brain and Language, 125, 173–183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramus, F. (2004). Neurobiology of dyslexia: A reinterpretation of the data. Trends in Neurosciences, 27, 720–726.Google Scholar
Ramus, F. (2014). Neuroimaging sheds new light on the phonological deficit in dyslexia. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 274–275.Google Scholar
Regtvoort, A. G. F. M., & van der Leij, A. (2007). Early intervention with children of dyslexic parents: Effects of computer-based reading instruction at home on literacy acquisition. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 35–53.Google Scholar
Rispens, J. E., McBride-Chang, C., & Reitsma, P. (2008). Morphological awareness and early and advanced word recognition and spelling in Dutch: A cross-sectional study. Reading and Writing, 21, 587–607.Google Scholar
Schaars, M. M. H., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2017). Word decoding development during phonics instruction in children at risk for dyslexia. Dyslexia, 23, 141–160.Google Scholar
Serniclaes, W. (2011). Allophonic perception in dyslexia: An overview. Escritos de Psicología, 4, 25–34.Google Scholar
Steenbeek-Planting, E. G., van Bon, W. H., & Schreuder, R. (2013). Instability of children’s reading errors in bisyllabic words: The role of context-sensitive spelling rules. Learning and Instruction, 26, 59–70.Google Scholar
Stichting Dyslexie Nederland. (2008). Diagnose en behandeling van dyslexie (4th ed.) [Diagnosis and remediation of dyslexia]. Bilthoven, the Netherlands: Stichting Dyslexie Nederland.Google Scholar
Stichting Dyslexie Nederland. (2016). Diagnose en behandeling van dyslexie (5th ed.) [Diagnosis and remediation of dyslexia]. Bilthoven, the Netherlands: Stichting Dyslexie Nederland.Google Scholar
Tijms, J. (2011). Effectiveness of computer-based treatment for dyslexia in a clinical care setting: Outcomes and moderators. Educational Psychology, 31, 873–896.Google Scholar
Tijms, J., Hoeks, J. J. W. M., Paulussen-Hoogeboom, M. C., & Smolenaars, A. J. (2003). Long-term effects of a psycholinguistic treatment for dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading, 26, 121–140.Google Scholar
Tilanus, E. A. T., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2013). Diagnostic profiles of children with developmental disabilities in a transparent orthography. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 4194–4202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilanus, E. A. T., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2016). Responsiveness to intervention in children with dyslexia. Dyslexia, 22, 214–232.Google Scholar
van Bergen, E., de Jong, P. F., Plakas, A., Maassen, B., & van der Leij, A. (2012). Child and parental literacy levels within families with a history of dyslexia. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53, 28–36.Google Scholar
van Bergen, E., de Jong, P. F., Regtvoort, A. et al. (2011). Dutch children at family risk of dyslexia: Precursors, reading development, and parental effects. Dyslexia, 17, 2–18.Google Scholar
van den Boer, M., van Bergen, E., & de Jong, P. F. (2015). The specific relation of visual attention span with reading and spelling in Dutch. Learning and Individual Differences, 39, 141–149.Google Scholar
van den Bos, K. P. (2008). Word-reading development, the double-deficit hypothesis, and the diagnosis of dyslexia. Educational and Child Psychology, 25, 51–69.Google Scholar
van den Bos, K. P., Zijlstra, B. J. H., & lutje Spelberg, H. C. (2002). Life-span data on continuous naming speeds of numbers, letters, colors, and pictured objects, and word-reading speed. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 25–49.Google Scholar
van den Bos, K. P., Zijlstra, B. J. H., & van den Broeck, W. (2003). Specific relations between alphanumeric-naming speed and reading speeds of monosyllabic and multisyllabic words. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 407–430.Google Scholar
van den Broeck, W., & Geudens, A. (2012). Old and new ways to study characteristics of reading disability: The case of the nonword-reading deficit. Cognitive Psychology, 65, 414–456.Google Scholar
van den Broeck, W., Geudens, A., & van den Bos, K. P. (2010). The nonword-reading deficit of disabled readers: A developmental interpretation. Developmental Psychology, 46, 717–734.Google Scholar
van den Bunt, M., Groen, M., Ito, T. et al. (2017). Increased response to altered auditory feedback in dyslexia: A weaker sensorimotor magnet implied in the phonological deficit. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60, 654–667.Google Scholar
van der Kleij, S. W., Segers, E., Groen, M. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2017). Response to intervention as a predictor of long-term reading outcomes in children with dyslexia. Dyslexia, 23, 268–282.Google Scholar
van der Leij, A. (1998). Leesproblemen en dyslexie [Reading problems and dyslexia]. Rotterdam: Lemniscaat.Google Scholar
van der Leij, A. (2013). Dyslexia and early intervention: What did we learn from the Dutch dyslexia programme? Dyslexia, 19, 241–255.Google Scholar
van der Leij, A., & Morfidi, E. (2006). Core deficits and variable differences in Dutch poor readers learning English. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 74–90.Google Scholar
van der Leij, A., van Bergen, E., van Zuijen, T. et al. (2013). Precursors of developmental dyslexia: An overview of the longitudinal Dutch dyslexia programme study. Dyslexia, 19, 191–213Google Scholar
van Gorp, K., Segers, P. C. J. & Verhoeven, L. T. W. (2017). Enhancing decoding efficiency in poor readers via a word identification game. Reading Research Quarterly, 52, 105–123.Google Scholar
van Otterloo, S. G., & van der Leij, A. (2009). Dutch home-based pre-reading intervention with children at familial risk of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 59, 169–195.Google Scholar
van Otterloo, S. G., van der Leij, A., & Henrichs, L. F. (2009). Early home-based intervention in the Netherlands for children at familial risk of dyslexia. Dyslexia, 15, 187–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vandermosten, M., Boets, B., & Luts, H. et al. (2011). Impairments in speech and nonspeech sound categorization in children with dyslexia are driven by temporal processing difficulties. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 593–603.Google Scholar
Vandermosten, M., Vanderauwera, J., & Theys, C. et al. (2015). A DTI tractography study in pre-readers at risk for dyslexia. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 8–15.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L. (2017). Learning to read Dutch. In Verhoeven, L. & Perfetti, C. (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 323–346). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L., & Keuning, J. (2018). The nature of developmental dyslexia in a transparent orthography. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22, 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, L., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2006). Learnability of graphotactic rules in visual word identification. Learning and Instruction, 16, 538–548.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L., Schreuder, R., & Haarman, V. (2006). Prefix identification in the reading of Dutch bisyllabic words. Reading and Writing, 19, 651–668.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L., & van Leeuwe, J. (2009). Modeling the growth of word decoding skills: Evidence from Dutch. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 205–223.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L. & van Leeuwe, J. (2011). Role of gender and linguistic diversity in word decoding development. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 359–367.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L., van Leeuwe, J., Irausquin, R., & Segers, E. (2016). The unique role of lexical accessibility in predicting kindergarten emergent literacy. Reading and Writing, 29, 591–608.Google Scholar
Vloedgraven, J. & Verhoeven, L. (2007). Screening of phonological awareness in the early elementary grades: An IRT approach. Annals of Dyslexia, 57, 33–50.Google Scholar
Vloedgraven, J. & Verhoeven, L. (2009). The nature of phonological awareness throughout the elementary grades: An item response theory perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 161–169.Google Scholar
Wentink, H., & Verhoeven, L. (2001). Protocol leesproblemen en dyslexie in de onderbouw [Protocol reading problems in the lower primary grades]. Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Expertisecentrum Nederlands.Google Scholar
Wentink, H., & Verhoeven, L. (2004). Protocol leesproblemen en dyslexie in de bovenbouw [Protocol reading problems in the upper primary grades]. Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Expertisecentrum Nederlands.Google Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., Castel, C., Pech-Georgel, C., George, F., Alario, F. X., & Perry, C. (2008). Developmental dyslexia and the dual route model of reading: Simulating individual differences and subtypes. Cognition, 107, 151–178.Google Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., & Zorzi, M. (2014). Modelling reading development through phonological decoding and self-teaching: Implications for dyslexia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 369, 20120397.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by