Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Berent, I., Vaknin-Nusbaum, V., Balaban, E., & Galaburda, A. M. (2012). Dyslexia impairs speech recognition but can spare phonological competence. PLoS One, 7, e44875.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Berlin, R. (1887). Eine Besondere Art der Wortblindheit (Dyslexie). Wiesbaden: J. F. Bergmann.Google Scholar

Bowyer-Crane, C., Snowling, M. J., Duff, F. J. et al. (2008). Improving early language and literacy skills: Differential effects of an oral language versus a phonology with reading intervention. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 49(4), 422–432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419–421.Google Scholar

Brady, S., & Shankweiler, D. (Eds.) (1991). Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Bryant, P. E., & Impey, L. (1986). The similarities between normal readers and developmental and acquired dyslexics. Cognition, 24, 121–137.Google Scholar

Castles, A., & Coltheart, M. (1993). Varieties of developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 47, 149–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chapman, J. W., & Tunmer, W. E. (2016). Is Reading Recovery an effective intervention for students with reading difficulties? A critique of the i3 scale-up study. Reading Psychology, 37(7), 1025–1042.Google Scholar

Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In Underwood, G. (Ed.), Strategies of information processing (pp. 151–216). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Coltheart, M. (1987). Varieties of developmental dyslexia: A comment on Bryant and Impey. Cognition, 27, 97–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589–608.Google Scholar

Critchley, M. (1970). The dyslexic child. London: Heinemann Medical Books.Google Scholar

Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R. G. (1976). Rapid automatized naming (R.A.N.): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 14, 471–479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ellis, N. C., & Hooper, A. M. (2001). Why learning to read is easier in Welsh than in English: Orthographic transparency effects evinced with frequency-matched tests. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 571–599.Google Scholar

Flesch, R. (1955). Why Johnnie can’t read: And what you can do about it. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar

Fletcher, J. M. (2009). Dyslexia: The evolution of a scientific concept. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 15, 501–508.Google Scholar

Frith, U., Wimmer, H., & Landerl, K. (1998). Differences in phonological recoding in German- and English-speaking children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 31–54.Google Scholar

Geudens, A., & Sandra, D. (2003). Beyond implicit phonological knowledge: No support for an onset-rime structure in children’s explicit phonological awareness. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 157–182.Google Scholar

Goswami, U. (2011). A temporal sampling framework for developmental dyslexia. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(1), 3–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Goswami, U., Gombert, J., & de Barrera, F. (1998). Children’s orthographic representation and linguistic transparency: Nonsense word reading in English, French and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 19–52.Google Scholar

Goswami, U., Huss, M., Mead, N., Fosker, T., & Verney, J. P. (2012). Perception of patterns of musical beat distribution in phonological developmental dyslexia: Significant longitudinal relations with word reading and reading comprehension. Cortex, 49(5), 1363–1376.Google Scholar

Goswami, U., Porpodas, C., & Wheelwright, S. (1997). Children’s orthographic representations in English and Greek. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 12(3), 273–292.Google Scholar

Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review, 106(3), 491–528.Google Scholar

Hay, J., & Bauer, L. (2007). Phoneme inventory size and population size. Language, 83, 388–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinshelwood, J. (1917). Congenital word blindness. London: H K. Lewis & Co.Google Scholar

Johnston, R., & Watson, J. (2007). Teaching synthetic phonics. Exeter, UK: Learning Matters.Google Scholar

Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). Reading in different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In Frost, R. & Katz, L. (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 67–84). Amsterdam: Elsevier North Holland Press.Google Scholar

Kessler, B. (2003). Is English spelling chaotic? Misconceptions concerning its irregularity. Reading Psychology, 24, 267–289.Google Scholar

Kessler, B., & Treiman, R. (1997). Syllable structure and the distribution of phonemes in English syllables. Journal of Memory and Language, 37(3), 295–311.Google Scholar

Kussmaul, A. (1877). Diseases of the nervous system and disturbances of speech. In von Ziemssen, H. (Ed.), Cylopedia of the practice of medicine (pp. 770–778). New York: William Wood.Google Scholar

Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Fischer, F. W., & Carter, B. (1974). Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young child. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18(2) 201–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Livingstone, M. S., Rosen, G. D., Drislane, F. W., & Galaburda, A. M. (1991). Physiological and anatomical evidence for a magnocellular defect in developmental dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 88(18), 7943–7947.Google Scholar

Lovett, M. W., Steinbach, K. A., & Frijters, J. C. (2000). Remediating the core deficits of developmental reading disability: A double-deficit perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(4), 334–358.Google Scholar

Lyon, G. R., & Moats, L. C. (1997). Critical conceptual and methodological considerations in reading intervention research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 578–588.Google Scholar

Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2003). A definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manis, F. R., Seidenberg, M. S., Doi, L. M., McBride-Chang, C., & Petersen, A. (1996). On the bases of two subtypes of developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 58(2), 157–195.Google Scholar

May, H., Sirinides, P. M., Gray, A., & Goldsworthy, H. (2016). Reading Recovery: An Evaluation of the Four-Year i3 Scale-Up. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education. http://repository.upenn.edu/cpre_researchreports/81Google Scholar

Morris, R. D., Lovett, M. W., Wolf, M. et al. (2010). Multiple-component remediation for developmental reading disabilities: IQ, socioeconomic status, and race as factors in remedial outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(2), 99–127.Google Scholar

Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Drucker, K. T. (2012). PIRLS 2011 International Results in Reading. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.Google Scholar

National Institute of Child Health and Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. NIH Publication No. 00–4754. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. www.nichd.nih.gov/sites/default/files/publications/pubs/nrp/Documents/report.pdf.Google Scholar

Nation’s Report Card (2015). National achievement level results. Online source. Nation’s Report Card. www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading_math_2015/.Google Scholar

Norton, E. S., & Wolf, M. (2011). Rapid automatized naming (RAN) and reading fluency: Implications for understanding and treatment of reading disabilities. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 427–452.Google Scholar

Orton, S. (1925). Word blindness in school children. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 14, 581–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orton, S. T. (1929). The three levels of cortical elaboration to certain psychiatric symptoms. American Journal of Psychiatry, 8, 647–659.Google Scholar

Patel, T. K., Snowling, M. J., & de Jong, P. F. (2004). A cross-linguistic comparison of children learning to read in English and Dutch. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 785–797.Google Scholar

Patterson, K. E., & Marcel, A. J. (1977). Aphasia, dyslexia and the phonological coding of written words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29(2), 307–318.Google Scholar

Perfetti, C. A., & Harris, L. (2017). Learning to read English. In Verhoeven, L. & Perfetti, C. A. (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 347–370). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pringle Morgan, W. (1896). A case of congenital word blindness. British Medical Journal, 2, 1378.Google Scholar

Rack, J. P., Snowling, M. J., & Olson, R. K. (1992). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 27(1), 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ramus., F. (2003). Developmental dyslexia: Specific phonological deficit or general sensorimotor dysfunction? Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13, 212–218.Google Scholar

Ramus, F., Rosen, S, Dakin, S. C. et al. (2003). Theories of developmental dyslexia: Insights from a multiple case study of dyslexic adults, Brain, 126(1), 841–865.Google Scholar

Ramus, F., & Szenkovits, G. (2008). What phonological deficit? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(1), 129–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Resnick, D., & Resnick, L. (1977). The nature of literacy: An historical exploration. Harvard Educational Review, 47(3), 370–385.Google Scholar

Rezaie, R., Simos, P. G., Fletcher, J. M. et al. (2011). Temporo-parietal brain activity as a longitudinal predictor of response to educational interventions among middle school struggling readers. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17, 875–885.Google Scholar

Rutter, M., Caspi, A., Fergusson, D. et al. (2004). Sex differences in developmental reading disability: New findings from 4 epidemiological studies. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 291, 2007–2012.Google Scholar

Scarborough, H. S. (1998). Predicting the future achievement of second graders with reading disabilities: Contributions of phonemic awareness, verbal memory, rapid naming, and IQ. Annals of Dyslexia, 48, 115–136.Google Scholar

Schatschneider, C., Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Carlson, C. D., & Foorman, B. R. (2004). Kindergarten prediction of reading skills: A longitudinal comparative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 265–282.Google Scholar

Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523–568.Google Scholar

Serniclaes, W., Van Heghe, S., Mousty, P., Carré, R., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2004). Allophonic mode of speech perception in dyslexia. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87, 336–361.Google Scholar

Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 143–174.Google Scholar

Shallice, T., Warrington, E. K., & McCarthy, R. (1983). Reading without semantics. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 35(1), 111–138.Google Scholar

Share, D. L. (2008). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and the practice: The perils of overreliance on an ‘outlier’ orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 584–615.Google Scholar

Shaywitz, B. A., Shaywitz, S. E., Blachman, B. A. et al. (2004). Development of left occipito-temporal systems for skilled reading in children after a phonologically-based intervention. Biological Psychiatry, 55(9), 926–933.Google Scholar

Simos, P. G., Fletcher, J. M. Sarkari, S. et al. (2007). Altering the brain circuits for reading through intervention: A magnetic source imaging study. Neuropsychology, 21(4), 485–496.Google Scholar

Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.) (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.Google Scholar

Snowling, M. J. (2015). The dyslexia debate. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 20, 127–128.Google Scholar

Snowling, M. J., Stackhouse, J., & Rack, J. P. (1986). Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia: A developmental analysis. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3, 309–339.Google Scholar

Stanovich, K. E. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21(10), 590–604.Google Scholar

Stein, J., & Walsh, V. (1997). To see but not to read: The magnocellular theory of dyslexia. Trends in Neuroscience, 20(4), 147–152.Google Scholar

Swanson, H. L., Trainin, G., Necoechea, D. M., & Hammill, D. D. (2003). Rapid naming, phonological awareness, and reading: A meta-analysis of the correlation evidence. Review of Educational Research, 73, 407–440.Google Scholar

Tallal, P. (2004). Improving language and literacy is a matter of time. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 721–728.Google Scholar

Temple, E., Deutsch, G. K., Poldrack, R. A. et al. (2003). Neural deficits in children with dyslexia ameliorated by behavioral remediation: Evidence from functional MRI. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(5), 2860–2865.Google Scholar

Torgesen, J. (2005). Remedial interventions for students with dyslexia: National goals and current accomplishments. In Richardson, S. O. & Gilger, J. (Eds.), Research-based education and intervention: What we need to know. Baltimore, MD: International Dyslexia Association.Google Scholar

Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Burgess, S., & Hecht, S. (1997). Contributions of phonological awareness and rapid automatic naming ability to the growth of word-reading skills in second-to fifth-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(2), 161–195.Google Scholar

Turkeltaub, P. E., Gareau, L., Flowers, D. L., Zeffiro, T. A., & Eden, G. F. (2003). Development of neural mechanisms for reading. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 767–773.Google Scholar

Vaughan, S., Denton, C. A., & Fletcher, J. M. (2010). Why intensive interventions are necessary for students with severe reading difficulties. Psychology in the Schools, 47(5), 432–444.Google Scholar

Vellutino, F. R. (1981). Dyslexia: Theory and research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Wimmer, H., & Goswami, U. (1994). The influence of orthographic consistency on reading development: Word recognition in English and German children. Cognition, 51, 91–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wolf, M. (1991). Naming speed and reading: The contribution of the cognitive neurosciences. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 123–141.Google Scholar

Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 1–24.Google Scholar

Wolf, M., Miller, L., & Donnelly, K. (2000). Retrieval, automaticity, vocabulary elaboration, orthography (RAVE-O): A comprehensive, fluency-based reading intervention program. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(4), 375–386.Google Scholar

Yoon, H-K., Bolger, D. J., Kwon, O-S., & Perfetti, C. A. (2002). Subsyllabic units in reading: A difference between Korean and English. In Verhoeven., L., Elbro, C., & Reitsma, P. (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 139–163). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Altarelli, I., Leroy, F., & Monzalvo, K. et al. (2014). Planum temporale asymmetry in developmental dyslexia: Revisiting an old question. Human Brain Mapping, 37, 5717–5735.Google Scholar

Altarelli, I., Monzalvo, K., Iannuzzi, S., Fluss, J., Billard, C., Ramus, F., & Dehaene-Lambertz, G. (2013). A functionally guided approach to the morphometry of occipitotemporal regions in developmental dyslexia: Evidence for differential effects in boys and girls. Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 11296–11301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bertrand, D., Fluss, J., Billard, C., & Ziegler, J. C. (2010). Efficacité, sensibilité, spécificité: Comparaison de différents tests de lecture. L’Année Psychologique, 110, 299–320.Google Scholar

Bogliotti, C., Serniclaes, W., Messaoud-Galusi, S., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2008). Discrimination of speech sounds by dyslexic children: Comparisons with chronological age and reading level controls. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 101, 137–175.Google Scholar

Bosse, M. L., Tainturier, M. J., & Valdois, S. (2007). Developmental dyslexia: The visual attention span deficit hypothesis. Cognition, 104, 198–230.Google Scholar

Bryant, P., & Impey, L. (1986). The similarities between normal readers and developmental and acquired dyslexics. Cognition, 24, 124–137.Google Scholar

Casalis, S. (2003). The delay-type in developmental dyslexia: Reading processes. Current Psychology Letters: Behavior, Brain, & Cognition, 10(1). http://journals.openedition.org/cpl/95Google Scholar

Casalis, S., Colé, P., & Sopo, D. (2004). Morphological awareness in developmental dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 114–138.Google Scholar

Casalis, S., Leuwers, C., & Hilton, H. (2013). Syntactic comprehension in reading and listening: A study in French dyslexic children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46, 201–219.Google Scholar

Castles, A., & Coltheart, M. (1993). Varieties of developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 47, 149–180.Google Scholar

Catach, N. (2001). Histoire de l’orthographe française. Paris, France: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar

Chang, E. F., Rieger, J. W., Johnson, K., Berger, M. S., Barbaro, N. M., & Knight, R. T. (2010). Categorical speech representation in human superior temporal gyrus. Nature Neuroscience, 13, 1428–1432.Google Scholar

Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. C. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256.Google Scholar

Deacon, S. H., Desrochers, A., & Levesque, K. (2017). Learning to read French. In Perfetti, C. & Verhoeven, L. (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 243–269). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dehaene, S. (2014). Reading in the brain revised and extended: Response to comments. Mind & Language, 29, 320–335.Google Scholar

Dehaene, S., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Gentaz, E., Huron, C., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2011). Apprendre à lire: Des sciences cognitives à la salle de classe. Paris, France: Editions Odile Jacob.Google Scholar

Dehaene, S., Pegado, F., & Braga, L. W. et al. (2010). How learning to read changes the cortical networks for vision and language. Science, 330, 1359–1364.Google Scholar

Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Pallier, C., Serniclaes, W., Sprenger-Charolles, L., Jobert, A., & Dehaene, S. (2005). Neural correlates of switching from auditory to speech perception. NeuroImage, 24, 21–33.Google Scholar

Delattre, P. (1965). Comparing the phonetic features of English, French, German and Spanish. Heidelberg, Germany: Jumius Gross Verlag.Google Scholar

Doignon-Camus, N., Seigneuric, A., Perrier, E., Sisti, A., & Zagar, D. (2012). Evidence for a preserved sensitivity to orthographic redundancy and an impaired access to phonological syllables in French developmental dyslexic. Annals of Dyslexia, 63, 117–132.Google Scholar

Dufor, O., Serniclaes, W., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Démonet, J. F. (2007). Top-down processes during auditory phoneme categorization in dyslexia: A PET study. Neuroimage, 34, 1692–1707.Google Scholar

Dufor, O., Serniclaes, W., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Démonet, J. F. (2009). Left pre-motor cortex and allophonic speech perception in dyslexia: A PET study. Neuroimage, 46, 241–248.Google Scholar

Ecalle, J., Magnan, A., Bouchafa, H., & Gombert, J. E. (2009). Computer-based training with ortho-phonological units in dyslexic children: New investigations. Dyslexia, 15, 218–238.Google Scholar

Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Willows, D. M., Schuster, B. V., Yaghoub‐Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 250–283.Google Scholar

Expertise collective INSERM. (2007). Dyslexie, dysorthographie, dyscalculie: Bilan des données scientifiques. Paris, France: Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM).Google Scholar

Fayol, M., Thenevin, M. G., Jarousse, J. P., & Totereau, C. (1999). From learning to teaching to learn French written morphology. In Nunes, T. (Ed.), Learning to read: An integrated view from research and practice (pp. 43–64). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Génard, N., Mousty, P., Alegria, J., Leybaert, J., & Morais, J. (1998). Methods to establish subtypes of developmental dyslexia. In Reitsma, P. & Verhoeven, L. (Eds.), Problems and interventions in literacy development (pp. 163–176). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gentaz, E., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Theurel, A. (2015). Differences in the predictors of reading comprehension in first graders from low socio-economic status families with either good or poor decoding skills. PLos One, 10(3), e0119581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gentaz, E., Sprenger-Charolles, L., Theurel, A., & Colé, P. (2013). Reading comprehension in a large cohort of French first graders from low socio-economic status families: A 7-month longitudinal study. PLos One, 8(11), e78608.Google Scholar

Goswami, U. (2015). Sensory theories of developmental dyslexia: Three challenges for research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16, 43–54.Google Scholar

Goswami, U., Gombert, J. E., & Barrera, L. F. (1998). Children’s orthographic representations and linguistic transparency: Nonsense word reading in English, French and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 19–52.Google Scholar

Grainger, J., Bouttevin, S., Truc, C., Bastien, M., & Ziegler, J. C. (2003). Word superiority pseudoword superiority and learning to read: A comparison of dyslexic and normal readers. Brain and Language, 87, 432–440.Google Scholar

Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. C. (2011). A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 54. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054.Google Scholar

Habib, M., Rey, V., Daffaure, V., Camps, R., Espesser, R., Joly-Pottuz, B., & Démonet, J. F. (2002). Phonological training in children with dyslexia using temporally modified speech: A three-step pilot investigation. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 37, 289–308.Google Scholar

Lallier, M., Thierry, G., & Tainturier, M. J. (2013). On the importance of considering individual profiles when investigating the role of auditory sequential deficits in developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 126, 121–127.Google Scholar

Lassus-Sangosse, D., N’guyen-Morel, M. A., & Valdois, S. (2008). Sequential or simultaneous visual processing deficit in developmental dyslexia. Vision Research, 48, 979–988.Google Scholar

Lefavrais, P. (1967). Test de l’Alouette. Paris, France: Les Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée (ECPA).Google Scholar

Lehongre, K., Morillon, B., Giraud, A. L., & Ramus, F. (2013). Impaired auditory sampling in dyslexia: Further evidence from combined fMRI and EEG. Frontiers in Human Neurosciences, 7, 454. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00454.Google Scholar

Lehongre, K., Ramus, F., Villiermet, N., Schwartz, D., & Giraud, A. L. (2011). Altered low-g sampling in auditory cortex accounts for the three main facets of dyslexia. Neuron, 72, 1080–1090.Google Scholar

Lété, B., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Colé, P. (2004). MANULEX: A grade-level lexical database from French elementary school readers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 156–166.Google Scholar

Lobier, M., Peyrin, C., Pichat, C., Le Bas, J. F. & Valdois, S. (2014). Visual processing of multiple elements in the dyslexic brain: Evidence for a superior parietal dysfunction. Frontiers in Human Neurosciences, 8, 479. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00479.Google Scholar

Lobier, M., Zoubrinetzky, R., & Valdois, S. (2012). The visual attention span deficit in dyslexia is visual and not verbal. Cortex, 48, 768–773.Google Scholar

Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2003). A definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 1–14.Google Scholar

Magnan, A., Ecalle, J., Veuillet, E., & Collet, L. (2004). The effects of an audio-visual training program in dyslexic children. Dyslexia, 10, 131–140.Google Scholar

Mahé, G., Bonnefond, A., & Doignon-Camus, N. (2013). Is the impaired N170 print tuning specific to developmental dyslexia? A matched reading-level study with poor readers and dyslexics. Brain and Language, 127, 539–544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mahé, G., Bonnefond, A., Gavens, N., Dufour, A., & Doignon-Camus, N. (2012). Impaired visual expertise for print in french adults with dyslexia as shown by N170 tuning. Neuropsychologia, 50, 3200–3206.Google Scholar

Maïonchi-Pino, N., Taki, Y., & Yokoyama, S. et al. (2013). Is the phonological deficit in developmental dyslexia related to impaired phonological representations and to universal phonological grammar? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115, 53–73.Google Scholar

Manis, F. R., Seidenberg, M. S., Doi, L. M., McBride-Chang, C., & Peterson, A. (1996). On the basis of two subtypes of developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 58, 157–195.Google Scholar

Martin, J., Colé, P., Leuwers, C., Casalis, S., Zorman, M., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2010). Reading in French-speaking adults with dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 60, 238–264.Google Scholar

Maurer, U., Blau, V. C., Yoncheva, Y. N., & McCandliss, B. (2010). Development of visual expertise for reading: Rapid emergence of visual familiarity for an artificial script. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35, 404–422.Google Scholar

Melby-Lervåg, M., Lyster, S. A. H., & Hulme, C. (2012). Phonological skills and their role in learning to read: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 322–352.Google Scholar

Messaoud-Galusi, S., Hazan, V., & Rosen, S. (2011). Investigating speech perception in children with dyslexia: Is there evidence of a consistent deficit in individuals? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, 1682–1701.Google Scholar

Metsala, J. L., Stanovich, K. E., & Brown, G. D. A. (1998). Regularity effects and the phonological deficit model of reading disabilities: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 279–293.Google Scholar

Mody, M. (2003). Rapid auditory processing deficits in dyslexia: A commentary on two differing views. Journal of Phonetics, 31, 529–539.Google Scholar

Monzalvo, K., Fluss, J., Billard, C., Dehaene, S., & Dehaene-Lambertz, G. (2012). Cortical networks for vision and language in dyslexic and normal children of variable socio-economic status. Neuroimage, 61, 258–274.Google Scholar

Noordenbos, M. W., Segers, E., Mitterer, H., Serniclaes, W., & Verhoeven, L. (2013a). Neural evidence of the 501 allophonic mode of speech perception in adults with dyslexia. Clinical Neurophysiology, 124, 1151–1162.Google Scholar

Noordenbos, M. W., Segers, E., Serniclaes, W., & Verhoeven, L. (2013b). Neural evidence of allophonic perception in children at risk for dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 50, 2010–2017.Google Scholar

Pacton, S., Fayol, M., & Perruchet, P. (2005). Children’s implicit learning of graphotactic and morphological regularities. Child Development, 76, 324–339.Google Scholar

Paulesu, E., Démonet, J. F., & Fazio, F. et al. (2001). Dyslexia, Cultural diversity and Biological unity. Science, 291, 2165–2167.Google Scholar

Peereman, R., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Messaoud-Galusi, S. (2013). The contribution of morphology to the consistency of spelling-to-sound relations: A quantitative analysis based on French elementary school readers. L’Année Psychologique, 213, 113–133.Google Scholar

Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357–383. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888430701530730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Piquard-Kipffer, A., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2013). Early predictors of future reading skills: A follow-up of French-speaking children from the beginning of kindergarten to the end of the second grade (age 5 to 8). L’Année Psychologique, 113, 491–521.Google Scholar

Quémart, P., & Casalis, S. (2015). Visual processing of derivational morphology in children with developmental dyslexia: Insights from masked priming. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 345–376.Google Scholar

Ramus, F. (2003). Developmental dyslexia: Specific phonological deficit or general sensorimotor dysfunction? Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13, 212–218.Google Scholar

Ramus, F., & Szenkovits, G. (2008). What phonological deficit? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 129–141.Google Scholar

Reilhac, C., Jucla, M., Iannuzzi, S., Valdois, S., & Démonet, J. F. (2012). Effect of orthographic processes on letter identity and letter-position encoding in dyslexic children. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 154. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00154.Google Scholar

Ruff, S., Cardebat, D., Marie, N., & Démonet, J. F. (2002). Enhanced response of the left frontal cortex to slowed down speech in dyslexia: An fRMI study. Neuroreport, 13, 1285–1289.Google Scholar

Serniclaes, W., Collet, G., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2015). Review of neural rehabilitation programs for dyslexia: How can an allophonic system be changed into a phonemic one? Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 190. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Serniclaes, W., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2015). Reading impairment: From behavior to brain. In Bahr, R. & Silliman, E. (Eds.), Handbook of communication disorders (pp. 34–45). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Serniclaes, W., Sprenger-Charolles, L., Carré, R., & Demonet, J. F. (2001). Perceptual discrimination of speech sounds in developmental dyslexia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 384–399.Google Scholar

Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218.Google Scholar

Shaywitz, S. A., Gruen, J., Mody, M., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2009). Dyslexia. In Schwartz, R. G. (Ed.), The handbook of child language disorders (pp. 115–139). Boca Raton, FL: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2003). Reading acquisition: Cross linguistic data. In Nunes, T. & Bryant, P. (Eds.), Handbook of children’s literacy (pp. 43–66). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Sprenger-Charolles, L., Colé, P., Kipffer-Piquard, A., Pinton, F., & Billard, C. (2009). Reliability and prevalence of an atypical development of phonological skills in French-speaking dyslexics. Reading and Writing, 22, 811–842.Google Scholar

Sprenger-Charolles, L., Colé, P., Lacert, P., & Serniclaes, W. (2000). On subtypes of developmental dyslexia: Evidence from processing time and accuracy scores. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 88–104.Google Scholar

Sprenger-Charolles, L., Colé, P., & Serniclaes, W. (2006). Reading acquisition and developmental dyslexia (Essays in developmental psychology). New-York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Sprenger-Charolles, L., Siegel, L. S., Béchennec, D., & Serniclaes, W. (2003). Development of phonological and orthographic processing in reading aloud, in silent reading, and in spelling: A four-year longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 84, 194–217.Google Scholar

Sprenger-Charolles, L., Siegel, L. S., Jiménez, J. E., & Ziegler, J. C. (2011). Prevalence and reliability of phonological, surface, and mixed profiles in dyslexia: A review of studies conducted in languages varying in orthographic depth. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 498–501.Google Scholar

Stanovich, K. E., Siegel, L. S., & Gottardo, A. (1997). Converging evidence for phonological and surface subtypes of reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 114–127.Google Scholar

Strong, G. K., Torgerson, C. J., Torgerson, D., & Hulme, C. (2011). A systematic meta-analytic review of evidence for the effectiveness of the “Fast ForWord” language intervention program. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52, 224–235.Google Scholar

Szenkovits, G., & Ramus, F. (2005). Exploring dyslexics’ phonological deficit I: Lexical versus sub-lexical and input versus output processes. Dyslexia, 11, 253–268.Google Scholar

Valdois, S., Bosse, M. L., & Tainturier, M. J. (2004). Cognitive correlates of developmental dyslexia: Review of evidence for a selective visual attentional deficit. Dyslexia, 10, 1–25.Google Scholar

Tallal, P. (1980). Auditory temporal perception, phonics, and reading disabilities in children. Brain and Language, 9, 182–198.Google Scholar

Talli, I., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Stavrakaki, S. (2015). Is there an overlap between specific language impairment and developmental dyslexia? New insights from French. In Stavrakaki, S. (Ed.), Language acquisition and language disorders (pp. 57–88). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Bus, A. G. (1994). Meta-analytic confirmation of the nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 266–275.Google Scholar

Ziegler, J. C., Castel, C., Pech-Georgel, C., George, F., Alario, F. X., & Perry, C. (2008). Developmental dyslexia and the dual route model of reading: Simulating individual differences and subtypes. Cognition, 107, 151–178.Google Scholar

Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ziegler, J. C., Pech-Georgel, C., Dufau, S., & Grainger, J. (2010). Rapid processing of letters, digits, and symbols: What purely visual-attentional deficit in developmental dyslexia? Developmental Science, 13, F8–F14.Google Scholar

Ziegler, J. C., Pech-Georgel, C., George, F., & Lorenzi, C. (2009). Speech-perception-in-noise deficits in dyslexia. Developmental Science, 12, 732–745.Google Scholar

Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., & Coltheart, M. (2003). Speed of lexical and nonlexical processing in French: The case of the regularity effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 947–953.Google Scholar

Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., & Zorzi, M. (2014). Modelling reading development through phonological decoding and self-teaching: Implications for dyslexia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369, 20120397.Google Scholar

Zoubrinetzky, R., Bielle, F., & Valdois, S. (2014). New insights on developmental dyslexia subtypes: Heterogeneity of mixed reading profiles. PLoS One, 9(6), e99337.Google Scholar

Bekebrede, J., van der Leij, A., Plakas, A., Share, D., & Morfidi, E. (2010). Dutch dyslexia in adulthood: Core features and variety. Scientific Studies of Reading, 14, 183–210.Google Scholar

Blomert, L. (2005). Dyslexie in Nederland: Theorie, praktijk en beleid [Dyslexia in The Netherlands: theory, practice and policy]. Amsterdam: Nieuwezijds Publishers.Google Scholar

Blomert, L. (2006). Protocol dyslexie diagnostiek en behandeling [Protocol dyslexia diagnosis and treatment]. Amsterdam: CVZ.Google Scholar

Blomert, L. (2011). The neural signature of orthographic-phonological binding in successful and failing reading development. Neuroimage, 57, 695–703.Google Scholar

Blomert, L., & Froyen, D. (2010). Multi-sensory learning and learning to read. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 77, 195–204.Google Scholar

Blomert, L., & Willems, G. (2010). Is there a causal link from a phonological awareness deficit to reading failure in children at familial risk for dyslexia? Dyslexia, 16, 300–317.Google Scholar

Boets, B., Ghesquière, P., van Wieringen, A., & Wouters, J. (2007). Speech perception in preschoolers at family risk for dyslexia: Relations with low-level auditory processing and phonological ability. Brain and Language, 101, 19–30.Google Scholar

Boets, B., Op de Beeck, H. P., & Vandermosten, M. et al. (2013). Intact but less accessible phonetic representations in adults with dyslexia. Science, 342, 1251–1254.Google Scholar

Boets, N., De Smedt, B., & Cleuren, L. et al. (2010). Towards a further characterization of phonological and literacy problems in children with dyslexia. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28, 5–31.Google Scholar

Booij, G. (1977). Dutch morphology: A study of word formation in generative grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Bosman, A. M. T., & Van Orden, G. C. (1997). Why spelling is more difficult than reading. In Perfetti, C. A., Rieben, L., & Fayol, M. (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across languages (pp. 173–194). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Cordewener, K. A. H., Bosman, A. M. T., & Verhoeven, L. (2015). Implicit and explicit instruction: The case of spelling acquisition. Written Language & Literacy, 18, 121–152.Google Scholar

de Bree, E. H., Wijnen, F. N. K., & Gerrits, P. A. M. (2010). Non-word repetition and literacy in Dutch children at-risk of dyslexia and children with SLI: Results of the follow-up study. Dyslexia, 16, 36–44.Google Scholar

de Graaff, S., Bosman, A. M. T., Hasselman, F., & Verhoeven, L. (2009). Benefits of systematic phonics instruction. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 318–333.Google Scholar

de Jong, P. F., & Messbauer, V. C. S. (2011). Orthographic context and the acquisition of orthographic knowledge in normal and dyslexic readers. Dyslexia, 17, 107–122.Google Scholar

de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (1999). Specific contributions of phonological abilities to early reading acquisition: Results from a Dutch latent variable longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 450–476.Google Scholar

de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (2003). Developmental changes in the manifestation of a phonological deficit in dyslexic children learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 22–40.Google Scholar

Dumont, J. J. (1971). Leerstoornissen [Learning disabilities]. Rotterdam: Lemniscaat.Google Scholar

Dumont, J. J. (1984). Lees- en spellingproblemen [Reading and spelling difficulties]. Rotterdam: Lemniscaat.Google Scholar

Dumont, J. J. (1991). Dyslexie: Theorie, diagnostiek en behandeling [Dyslexia: Theory, diagnostics and treatment]. Rotterdam: Lemniscaat.Google Scholar

Eleveld, M. (2005). At risk for dyslexia: The role of phonological abilities, letter knowledge (Doctoral dissertation). Groningen: University of Groningen.Google Scholar

Gijsel, M. A. R., Bosman, A. M. T., & Verhoeven, L. (2006). Kindergarten risk factors, cognitive factors, and teacher judgments as predictors of early reading in Dutch. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 558–571.Google Scholar

Health Council of the Netherlands. (1995). Dyslexia: Definition and treatment (publication no. 1995/15). The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands.Google Scholar

Keuning, J., & Verhoeven, L. (2007). Screening for word reading and spelling problems in elementary school: An item response theory approach. Education & Child Psychology, 24, 42–56.Google Scholar

Keuning, J., & Verhoeven, L. (2008). Spelling development throughout the elementary grades: The Dutch case. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 459–470.Google Scholar

Marinus, E., & de Jong, P. F. (2008). The use of sublexical clusters in normal reading and dyslexic readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 253–280.Google Scholar

Marinus, E., & de Jong, P. F. (2011). Dyslexic and typical-reading children use vowel digraphs as perceptual units in reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 504–516.Google Scholar

Noordenbos, M. W., Segers, P. C. J., Serniclaes, W., Mitterer, H. A., & Verhoeven, L. T. W. (2012a). Allophonic mode of speech perception in Dutch children at risk for dyslexia: A longitudinal study. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33, 1469–1483.Google Scholar

Noordenbos, M. W. Segers, P. C. J., Serniclaes, W., Mitterer, H. A., & Verhoeven, L. T. W. (2012b). Neural evidence of allophonic perception in children at risk for dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 50, 2010–2017.Google Scholar

Noordenbos, M. W., Segers, P. C. J., Wagensveld, B., & Verhoeven, L. T. W. (2013). Aberrant N400 responses to phonological overlap during rhyme judgements in children at risk for dyslexia. Brain Research, 1537, 233–243.Google Scholar

Nunn, A. (1998). Dutch orthography. Utrecht: Center for Language Studies.Google Scholar

Patel, T. K., Snowling, M. J., & de Jong, P. F. (2004). A cross-linguistic comparison of children learning to read in English and Dutch. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 785–797.Google Scholar

Perfetti, C. A. (1997). The psycholinguistics of spelling and reading. In Perfetti, C. A., Rieben, L. & Fayol, M. (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across languages (pp. 21–38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Pugh, K. R., Landi, N., & Preston, J. L. et al. (2013). The relationship between phonological and auditory processing and brain organization in beginning readers. Brain and Language, 125, 173–183.Google Scholar

Ramus, F. (2004). Neurobiology of dyslexia: A reinterpretation of the data. Trends in Neurosciences, 27, 720–726.Google Scholar

Ramus, F. (2014). Neuroimaging sheds new light on the phonological deficit in dyslexia. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 274–275.Google Scholar

Regtvoort, A. G. F. M., & van der Leij, A. (2007). Early intervention with children of dyslexic parents: Effects of computer-based reading instruction at home on literacy acquisition. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 35–53.Google Scholar

Rispens, J. E., McBride-Chang, C., & Reitsma, P. (2008). Morphological awareness and early and advanced word recognition and spelling in Dutch: A cross-sectional study. Reading and Writing, 21, 587–607.Google Scholar

Schaars, M. M. H., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2017). Word decoding development during phonics instruction in children at risk for dyslexia. Dyslexia, 23, 141–160.Google Scholar

Serniclaes, W. (2011). Allophonic perception in dyslexia: An overview. Escritos de Psicología, 4, 25–34.Google Scholar

Steenbeek-Planting, E. G., van Bon, W. H., & Schreuder, R. (2013). Instability of children’s reading errors in bisyllabic words: The role of context-sensitive spelling rules. Learning and Instruction, 26, 59–70.Google Scholar

Stichting Dyslexie Nederland. (2008). Diagnose en behandeling van dyslexie (4th ed.) [Diagnosis and remediation of dyslexia]. Bilthoven, the Netherlands: Stichting Dyslexie Nederland.Google Scholar

Stichting Dyslexie Nederland. (2016). Diagnose en behandeling van dyslexie (5th ed.) [Diagnosis and remediation of dyslexia]. Bilthoven, the Netherlands: Stichting Dyslexie Nederland.Google Scholar

Tijms, J. (2011). Effectiveness of computer-based treatment for dyslexia in a clinical care setting: Outcomes and moderators. Educational Psychology, 31, 873–896.Google Scholar

Tijms, J., Hoeks, J. J. W. M., Paulussen-Hoogeboom, M. C., & Smolenaars, A. J. (2003). Long-term effects of a psycholinguistic treatment for dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading, 26, 121–140.Google Scholar

Tilanus, E. A. T., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2013). Diagnostic profiles of children with developmental disabilities in a transparent orthography. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 4194–4202.Google Scholar

Tilanus, E. A. T., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2016). Responsiveness to intervention in children with dyslexia. Dyslexia, 22, 214–232.Google Scholar

van Bergen, E., de Jong, P. F., Plakas, A., Maassen, B., & van der Leij, A. (2012). Child and parental literacy levels within families with a history of dyslexia. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53, 28–36.Google Scholar

van Bergen, E., de Jong, P. F., Regtvoort, A. et al. (2011). Dutch children at family risk of dyslexia: Precursors, reading development, and parental effects. Dyslexia, 17, 2–18.Google Scholar

van den Boer, M., van Bergen, E., & de Jong, P. F. (2015). The specific relation of visual attention span with reading and spelling in Dutch. Learning and Individual Differences, 39, 141–149.Google Scholar

van den Bos, K. P. (2008). Word-reading development, the double-deficit hypothesis, and the diagnosis of dyslexia. Educational and Child Psychology, 25, 51–69.Google Scholar

van den Bos, K. P., Zijlstra, B. J. H., & lutje Spelberg, H. C. (2002). Life-span data on continuous naming speeds of numbers, letters, colors, and pictured objects, and word-reading speed. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 25–49.Google Scholar

van den Bos, K. P., Zijlstra, B. J. H., & van den Broeck, W. (2003). Specific relations between alphanumeric-naming speed and reading speeds of monosyllabic and multisyllabic words. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 407–430.Google Scholar

van den Broeck, W., & Geudens, A. (2012). Old and new ways to study characteristics of reading disability: The case of the nonword-reading deficit. Cognitive Psychology, 65, 414–456.Google Scholar

van den Broeck, W., Geudens, A., & van den Bos, K. P. (2010). The nonword-reading deficit of disabled readers: A developmental interpretation. Developmental Psychology, 46, 717–734.Google Scholar

van den Bunt, M., Groen, M., Ito, T. et al. (2017). Increased response to altered auditory feedback in dyslexia: A weaker sensorimotor magnet implied in the phonological deficit. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60, 654–667.Google Scholar

van der Kleij, S. W., Segers, E., Groen, M. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2017). Response to intervention as a predictor of long-term reading outcomes in children with dyslexia. Dyslexia, 23, 268–282.Google Scholar

van der Leij, A. (1998). Leesproblemen en dyslexie [Reading problems and dyslexia]. Rotterdam: Lemniscaat.Google Scholar

van der Leij, A. (2013). Dyslexia and early intervention: What did we learn from the Dutch dyslexia programme? Dyslexia, 19, 241–255.Google Scholar

van der Leij, A., & Morfidi, E. (2006). Core deficits and variable differences in Dutch poor readers learning English. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 74–90.Google Scholar

van der Leij, A., van Bergen, E., van Zuijen, T. et al. (2013). Precursors of developmental dyslexia: An overview of the longitudinal Dutch dyslexia programme study. Dyslexia, 19, 191–213Google Scholar

van Gorp, K., Segers, P. C. J. & Verhoeven, L. T. W. (2017). Enhancing decoding efficiency in poor readers via a word identification game. Reading Research Quarterly, 52, 105–123.Google Scholar

van Otterloo, S. G., & van der Leij, A. (2009). Dutch home-based pre-reading intervention with children at familial risk of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 59, 169–195.Google Scholar

van Otterloo, S. G., van der Leij, A., & Henrichs, L. F. (2009). Early home-based intervention in the Netherlands for children at familial risk of dyslexia. Dyslexia, 15, 187–217.Google Scholar

Vandermosten, M., Boets, B., & Luts, H. et al. (2011). Impairments in speech and nonspeech sound categorization in children with dyslexia are driven by temporal processing difficulties. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 593–603.Google Scholar

Vandermosten, M., Vanderauwera, J., & Theys, C. et al. (2015). A DTI tractography study in pre-readers at risk for dyslexia. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 8–15.Google Scholar

Verhoeven, L. (2017). Learning to read Dutch. In Verhoeven, L. & Perfetti, C. (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 323–346). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Verhoeven, L., & Keuning, J. (2018). The nature of developmental dyslexia in a transparent orthography. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22, 7–23.Google Scholar

Verhoeven, L., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2006). Learnability of graphotactic rules in visual word identification. Learning and Instruction, 16, 538–548.Google Scholar

Verhoeven, L., Schreuder, R., & Haarman, V. (2006). Prefix identification in the reading of Dutch bisyllabic words. Reading and Writing, 19, 651–668.Google Scholar

Verhoeven, L., & van Leeuwe, J. (2009). Modeling the growth of word decoding skills: Evidence from Dutch. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 205–223.Google Scholar

Verhoeven, L. & van Leeuwe, J. (2011). Role of gender and linguistic diversity in word decoding development. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 359–367.Google Scholar

Verhoeven, L., van Leeuwe, J., Irausquin, R., & Segers, E. (2016). The unique role of lexical accessibility in predicting kindergarten emergent literacy. Reading and Writing, 29, 591–608.Google Scholar

Vloedgraven, J. & Verhoeven, L. (2007). Screening of phonological awareness in the early elementary grades: An IRT approach. Annals of Dyslexia, 57, 33–50.Google Scholar

Vloedgraven, J. & Verhoeven, L. (2009). The nature of phonological awareness throughout the elementary grades: An item response theory perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 161–169.Google Scholar

Wentink, H., & Verhoeven, L. (2001). Protocol leesproblemen en dyslexie in de onderbouw [Protocol reading problems in the lower primary grades]. Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Expertisecentrum Nederlands.Google Scholar

Wentink, H., & Verhoeven, L. (2004). Protocol leesproblemen en dyslexie in de bovenbouw [Protocol reading problems in the upper primary grades]. Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Expertisecentrum Nederlands.Google Scholar

Ziegler, J. C., Castel, C., Pech-Georgel, C., George, F., Alario, F. X., & Perry, C. (2008). Developmental dyslexia and the dual route model of reading: Simulating individual differences and subtypes. Cognition, 107, 151–178.Google Scholar

Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., & Zorzi, M. (2014). Modelling reading development through phonological decoding and self-teaching: Implications for dyslexia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 369, 20120397.Google Scholar

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar

Borkowski, J., & Muthukrishna, N. (1992). Moving metacognition into the classroom: “Working models” and effective strategy teaching. In Pressley, M., Harris, K. R., & Guthrie, J. T. (Eds.), Promoting academic competence and literacy in school (pp. 477–501). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Bosse, M.-L., Tainturier, M.-J., & Valdois, S. (2007). Developmental dyslexia: The visual attention span deficit hypothesis. Cognition, 104, 198–230.Google Scholar

Bruck, M., & Waters, G. (1988). An analysis of the spelling errors of children who differ in their reading and spelling skills. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 77–92.Google Scholar

Caravolas, M. (2017). Learning to read Czech and Slovak. In Verhoeven, L. & Perfetti, C. (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 371–392). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Caravolas, M., Lervåg, A., Defior, S., Seidlová Málková, G., & Hulme, C. (2013). Different patterns, but equivalent predictors, of growth in reading in consistent and inconsistent orthographies. Psychological Science, 24, 1398–1407.Google Scholar

Caravolas, M., Lervåg, A., & Mousikou, P. et al. (2012). Common patterns of prediction of literacy development in different alphabetic orthographies. Psychological Science, 23, 678–686.Google Scholar

Caravolas, M., & Mikulajová, M. (2008). Effects of letter-sound consistency, letter-form complexity, and frequency in learning canonical and contextually conditioned letter spellings in Slovak. Phonetica Pragensia, 11, 21–30.Google Scholar

Caravolas, M., Mikulajová, M., & Vencelová, L. (2008a). Spelling of Slovak children with dyslexia. Paper presented at the International Conference of the British Dyslexia Association, Harrogate, UK.Google Scholar

Caravolas, M., Mikulajová, M., & Vencelová, L. (2008b). Súbor testov na hodnotenie pravopisných schopností pre škoslkú a klinickú prax [Battery of tests for the assessment of spelling skills for school and clinical practice]. Bratislava, Slovakia: Slovenská asociácia logopédov.Google Scholar

Caravolas, M., & Samara, A., (2015). Learning to read and spell words in different writing systems. In Pollatsek, A. & Treiman, R. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199324576.013.21.Google Scholar

Caravolas, M., & Volín, J. (2001). Phonological spelling errors among dyslexic children learning a transparent orthography: The case of Czech. Dyslexia, 7, 229–245.Google Scholar

Caravolas, M., & Volín, J. (2005). Baterie diagnostických testů gramotnostních dovedností pro žáky 2. až 5. ročníků ZŠ [Battery of diagnostic tests of literacy skills for pupils in 2nd to 5th grade]. Prague: IPPP ČR.Google Scholar

Caravolas, M., Volín, J., & Hulme, C. (2005). Phoneme awareness is a key component of alphabetic literacy skills in consistent and inconsistent orthographies: Evidence from Czech and English children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 107–139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cimlerová, P., Pokorná, D., & Chalupová, E. (2007). Diagnostika specifických poruch učení u adolescentů a dospělých osob [Diagnosis of specific reading disorders in adolescents and adults].Prague: IPPP ČR.Google Scholar

Edfeldt, W. A. (1968). Reverzní test [Reversals test]. Bratislava: Psychodiagnostika.Google Scholar

Frith, U. (1980). Unexpected spelling problems. In Frith, U. (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Frostig, M. (1972). Vývojový test zrakového vnímání [Developmental test of visual perception]. Bratislava: Psychodiagnostika.Google Scholar

Froyen, D., Willems, G., & Blomert, L. (2010). Evidence for a specific cross-modal association deficit in dyslexia: An electrophysiological study of letter-speech sound processing. Developmental Science, 14, 635–648.Google Scholar

Furnes, B., & Samuelsson, S. (2011). Phonological awareness and rapid automatized naming predicting early development in reading and spelling: Results from a cross-linguistic longitudinal study. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 85–95.Google Scholar

Gebhardtová, D. (1994). Výsledky výzkumu dětí se specifickými vývojovými poruchami v oblasti čtení a psaní [Results of research on children with specific developmental disorders in reading and spelling]. In Kucharská, A., Slavíková, I., & Lepová, R. (Eds.), Specifické poruchy učení a chování [Specific disorders of learning and behavior]. Prague: IPPP ČR.Google Scholar

Georgiou, G. K., Parrila, R., & Liao, C. H. (2008). Rapid naming speed and reading across languages that vary in orthographic consistency. Reading and Writing, 21, 885–903.Google Scholar

Goulandris, N. (2003). Dyslexia in different languages: Cross-linguistic comparisons. London: Whurr.Google Scholar

Hulme, C., Caravolas, M., Málková, G., & Brigstocke, S. (2005). Phoneme isolation ability is not simply a consequence of letter-sound knowledge. Cognition, 97, B1–B11.Google Scholar

International Dyslexia Association. (2002). Definition of dyslexia. http://eida.org/definition-of-dyslexia/.Google Scholar

Kessler, B., & Caravolas, M. (2011). Weslalex: West Slavic lexicon of child-directed printed words. http://spell.psychology.wustl.edu/weslalex.Google Scholar

Kirby, J. R., Georgiou, G. K., Martinussen, R., & Parrila, R. (2010). Naming speed and reading: From prediction to instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 341–362.Google Scholar

Kirby, J. R., Parrila, R. K., & Pfeiffer, S. L. (2003). Naming speed and phonological awareness as predictors of reading development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 453–464.Google Scholar

Košč, L. (1987). Patopsychológia učenia a jej neuropsychologické základy [Pathology of learning and its neuropsychological foundations]. Bratislava: SPN.Google Scholar

Kučera, H., & Monroe, G. K. (1968). A comparative, quantitative phonology of Russian, Czech, and German. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Kucharská, A. (2014). Rizika vzniku dyslexie [Risks of developing dyslexia]. Habilitační práce. Prague: PedF UK v Praze.Google Scholar

Kucharská, A., & Barešová, P. (2012). Vývojová dynamika čtení v analyticko-syntetické metodě čtení a metodě genetické v 1. a 2. třídě a její uplatnění v poradenské diagnostice [The dynamics of reading development in the analytic-synthetic versus the genetic methods in 1st and 2nd grade, and their validity for clinical diagnosis]. Pedagogika, 62(1–2), 65–80.Google Scholar

Kucharská, A., Seidlová, M., Sotáková, H. et al. (2014). Porozumění čtenému I. Typický vývoj porozumění čtenému – východiska, témata, zdroje (kritická analýza) [Reading Comprehension I. Typical development of reading comprehension – perspectives, themes, tools (critical analysis)]. Prague, Czech Republic: Pedagogical Faculty – Charles University.Google Scholar

Landerl, K., Ramus, F., & Moll, K. et al. (2013). Predictors of developmental dyslexia in European orthographies with varying complexity. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54, 686–694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Landerl, K., Wimmer, H., & Frith, U. (1997). The impact of orthographic consistency on dyslexia: A German-English comparison. Cognition, 63, 315–334.Google Scholar

Lervåg, A., & Hulme, C. (2009). Rapid automatized naming (RAN) taps a mechanism that places constraints on the development of early reading fluency. Psychological Science, 20, 1040–1048.Google Scholar

Matějček, Z. (1959). Klinický obraz dyslektického dieťaťa [Clinical profile of the dyslexic child]. Psychológia a patopsychológia dieťaťa, 1(2), 83–86.Google Scholar

Matějček, Z. (1961). Školní selhání některých dětí normálního nadání [Scholastic failure of some children with normal abilities]. Československá pediatrie, 16(10), 877–882.Google Scholar

Matějček, Z. (1978). Vývojové poruchy čtení [Developmental disorders of learning]. Prague: SPN.Google Scholar

Matějček, Z. (1995). Dyslexie: specifické poruchy čtení [Dyslexias: specific disorder of reading]. Jinočany, Czech Republic: H&H.Google Scholar

Mertin, V. (2008). Reakce na intervenci – nové kritérium při diagnostice specifických poruch učení [Response to intervention – New criteria in diagnosing specific disorders of learning]. Pražské sociálně vědní studie, Psychologická řada PSY-22. Prague: FSV UK a FF UK.Google Scholar

Míka, J. (1982). Orientační test dynamické praxe [Orientational test of dynamic practice]. Bratislava: Psychodiagnostika.Google Scholar

Mikulajová, M. (2010). Metódy diagnostiky dyslexie [Methods of diagnosing dyslexia]. CD nosič. Bratislava: Mabag.Google Scholar

Mikulajová, M., Nováková Schöffelová, M., Tokárová, O., & Dostálová, A. (2016). Trénink jazykových schopností podle D. B. Elkonina [Training of language abilities according to D. B. Elkonin]. 2nd ed. Prague: Centrum Rozum, V.O.S.Google Scholar

Mikulajová, M., Tokárová, O., & Sümegiová, Z. (2014). Tréning fonematického uvedomovania podľa D. B. Eľkonina [Training of phoneme awareness according to D.B. Elkonin]. 2nd ed. Bratislava: Dialóg, spol. s r.o.Google Scholar

Mikulajová, M., Váryová, B., Vencelová, L., Caravolas, M., & Škrabáková, G. (2012). Čítanie, písanie a dyslexia (s testami a normami) [Reading, writing and dyslexia (with tests and norms]. Bratislava: Slovenská asociácia logopédov.Google Scholar

Mikulajová, M. & Velecká, A. (2012). Profil slovenských dětí s „dyslexií” z pohledu jejich čtenářských schopností. Pedagogika, 62(1–2), 137–149.Google Scholar

Mladá, P. (1996). Zbývá jen málo – chtít pochopit, aneb dyslexie na 2. stupni ZŠ. [All that remains is to want to understand, or, dyslexia in the second grade of elementary school]. In Kucharská, A. (Ed.), Specifické poruchy učení a chování 1996 (pp. 61–64.). Prague: Portál.Google Scholar

Moll, K., & Landerl, K. (2009). Double dissociation between reading and spelling deficits. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 359–382.Google Scholar

Moll, K., Loff, A., & Snowling, M. (2013). Cognitive endophenotypes of dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17, 385–397. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2012.736439.Google Scholar

Moll, K., Ramus, F., & Bartling, et al. (2014). Cognitive mechanisms underlying reading and spelling development in five European orthographies. Learning and Instruction, 29, 65–77. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.09.003.Google Scholar

Moll, K., Thompson, P. A., & Mikulajová, M. et al. (2016). Precursors of reading difficulties in Czech and Slovak children at-risk of dyslexia. Dyslexia, 22, 120–136. doi: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1002/dys.1526.Google Scholar

Pardel, T. (1966). Písaná reč, jej vývin a poruchy u detí [Written language, its development and disorders]. Bratislava: SPN.Google Scholar

Pennington, B. F. (2006). From single to multiple deficit models of developmental disorders. Cognition, 101, 385–413.Google Scholar

Pennington, B. F., & Lefly, D. L. (2001). Early reading development in children at family risk for dyslexia. Child Development, 72, 816–833. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00317 .Google Scholar

Schatschneider, C., Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Carlson, C. D., & Foorman, B. R. (2004). Kindergarten prediction of reading skills: A longitudinal comparative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 265–282.Google Scholar

Schöffelová, M., & Mikulajová, M. (2012). Vývoj různých aspektů čtení ve slovenštině [The development of various aspects of reading in Slovak]. Pedagogika, 1–2, 111–125.Google Scholar

Seidlová Málková, G., & Caravolas, M. (2013). Baterie testů fonologických schopností, BTFS [Battery of tests of phonological abilities]. Prague: Národní ústav pro vzdělávání.Google Scholar

Share, D. (2008). On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 584–615.Google Scholar

Snowling, M. J., Gallagher, A., & Frith, U. (2003). Family risk of dyslexia is continuous: individual differences in the precursors of reading skill. Child Development, 74, 358–373. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.7402003.Google Scholar

Snowling, M. J., & Hulme, C. (2012). Annual research review: The nature and classification of reading disorders – A commentary on proposals for DSM-5. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53, 593–607.Google Scholar

Sokolová, M., Musilová, K., & Slančová, D. (2005). Slovenčina a čeština (Synchrónne porovnanie s cvičeniami) [Slovak and Czech (Synchronic comparison with exercises)]. Bratislava: FF UK.Google Scholar

Švancarová, D., & Kucharská, A. (2001). Test rizika poruch čtení a psaní pro rané školáky [Test of risk of disorders in reading and writing for young school children].Prague: Scientia.Google Scholar

Tiefenbacherová, B. (2014). Možnosti stimulácie morfo-syntaktických schopností v predškolskom veku [Approaches to the stimulation of morphosyntactic abilities in the preschool years]. Master’s thesis. Bratislava: Pedagogical Faculty, Comenius University.Google Scholar

Torppa, M., Lyytinen, P., Erskine, J., Eklund, K., & Lyytinen, H. (2010). Language development, literacy skills, and predictive connections to reading in Finnish children with and without familial risk for dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 308–321. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022219410369096.Google Scholar

Torppa, M., Poikkeus, A.-M., Laakso, M.-L., Eklund, K., & Lyytinen, H. (2006). Predicting delayed letter knowledge development and its relation to grade 1 reading achievement among children with and without familial risk for dyslexia. Developmental Psychology, 42, 1128–1142.Google Scholar

Váryová, B. (2012). Skúšky čítania pre mladší školský vek [Tests of reading for the younger school years]. In Mikulajová, M., Váryová, B., Vencelová, L., Caravolas, M., & Škrabáková, G. (Eds.). Čítanie, písanie a dyslexia (s testami a normami) [Reading, writing and dyslexia (with tests and norms)] (pp. 126–159). Bratislava: Slovenská asociácia logopédov.Google Scholar

Vencelová, L., & Kapalková, S. (2014). Východiská tvorby novej inovatívnej metodiky výučby slovenského jazyka v 1. ročníku základnej školy [The scope of the new innovative method in Slovak language arts curriculum for grade 1]. Logopaedica XVII, 105–117.Google Scholar

Vencelová, L., & Mikulajová, M. (2010). Čítanie a pravopis po slovensky hovoriacich dyslektických detí – porovnávacia štúdia [Reading and spelling of Slovak-speaking children with dyslexia – Comparative study]. Psychológia a patopsychológia dieťaťa, 45 (3), 215–228.Google Scholar

Wimmer, H. (1993). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 1–33.Google Scholar

Wimmer, H., Mayringer, H., & Landerl, K. (2000). The double-deficit hypothesis and difficulties in learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 668–680.Google Scholar

Aro, M. (2017). Learning to read Finnish. In Verhoeven, L. & Perfetti, C. (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 416–436). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.Google Scholar

Brem, S., Bach, S., & Kucian, K. et al. (2010). Brain sensitivity to print emerges when children learn letter–speech sound correspondences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 7939–7944.Google Scholar

Guttorm, T., Leppänen, P., Hämäläinen, J., Eklund, K., & Lyytinen, H. (2010). Newborn event-related potentials predict poorer pre-reading skills in children with dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 391–401.Google Scholar

Heikkilä, R., Aro, M., Närhi, V., Westerholm, J., & Ahonen, T. (2013). Does training in syllable recognition improve reading speed? A computer-based trial with poor readers from second and third grade. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17, 398–414.Google Scholar

Holopainen, L., Ahonen, T., & Lyytinen, H. (2001). Predicting delay in reading achievement in a highly transparent language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 3(4), 401–413.Google Scholar

Huemer, S., Aro, M., Landerl, K., & Lyytinen, H. (2010). Repeated reading of syllables among Finnish-speaking children with poor reading skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 14, 317–340.Google Scholar

Ketonen, R. (2010). Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research, 0075–4625, 404. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar

Kirjavainen, T., Pulkkinen, J., & Jahnukainen, M. (2013). Erityisopetuksen muutostrendit perusopetuksessa 2000-luvulla [The trends of change in special education after year 2000]. Valtiontalouden tarkastusvirasto [National Audit Office of Finland]. https://docplayer.fi/10162284-Erityisopetuksen-muutostrendit-perusopetuksessa-2000-luvulla.html. Accessed January 25, 2015.Google Scholar

Kujala, T., Karma, K., & Ceponiene, R. et al. (2001). Plastic neural changes and reading improvement caused by audiovisual training in reading-impaired children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 10509–10514.Google Scholar

Leppänen, P. H. T., Hämäläinen, J. A., & Salminen, H. et al. (2010). Brain event-related potentials reveal atypical processing of sound frequency and the subsequent association with later literacy skills in children with familial dyslexia. Cortex, 46, 1362–1376.Google Scholar

Lyytinen, H., Erskine, J., Hämäläinen, J., Torppa, M., & Ronimus, M. (2015). Dyslexia – Early identification and prevention: Highlights from the Jyväskylä Longitudinal Study of Dyslexia. Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 2, 330–338.Google Scholar

Lyytinen, H., Erskine, J., Kujala, J., Ojanen, E., & Richardson, U. (2009). In search of a science-based application: A learning tool for reading acquisition. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50, 668–675.Google Scholar

Malin, A., Sulkunen, S., & Laine, K. (2013). PIAAC 2012. Kansainvälisen aikuistutkimuksen ensituloksia [PIAAC 2012. The survey of adult skills]. Helsinki: Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriön julkaisuja, 19.Google Scholar

Official Statistics of Finland. (2014). Special education. Share of students having received special support diminished [e-publication]. Helsinki: Statistics Finland. www.tilastokeskus.fi/til/erop/2013/erop_2013_2014–06-12_tie_001_en.html. Accessed January 25, 2015.Google Scholar

Oksanen, A.-M. (2012). Auditiivisen ja kielellisen harjoittelun vaikutus kolmannella luokalla olevien heikkojen lukijoiden lukutaitoon. Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research, 443. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar

Poskiparta, E., Niemi, P., & Vauras, M. (1999). Who benefits from training in linguistic awareness in the first grade, and what components show training effects? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 437–446.Google Scholar

Richardson, U., Leppänen, P. H. T., Leiwo, M., & Lyytinen, H. (2003). Speech perception of infants with high familial risk for dyslexia differ at the age of 6 months. Developmental Neuropsychology, 23, 385–397.Google Scholar

Richardson, U., & Lyytinen, H. (2014). The GraphoGame method: The theoretical and methodological background of the technology-enhanced learning environment for learning to read. Human Technology, 10, 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saine, N. L., Lerkkanen, M.-K., Ahonen, T., Tolvanen, A., & Lyytinen, H. (2011). Computer-assisted remedial reading intervention for school beginners at-risk for reading disability. Child Development, 82, 1013–1028.Google Scholar

Akhutina, T. V. (2006). Nejropsihologicheskij podhod k izucheniyu trudnostej pis’ma i chteniya [Neuropsychological approach to analyzing reading and writing difficulties]. Paper presented at the conference “Rannyaya diagnostika, profilaktika i korrekciya narushenij pis’ma i chteniya: materialy II mezhdunarodnoj konferencii Rossijskoj associacii disleksii.”Google Scholar

Akhutina, T. V., & Pronina, E. A. (2015). Ocenka sostoyaniya regulyacii aktivacii u pervoklassnikov s pomoshch’yu metodiki RAN/RAS [Assessment of brain activation regulation in first-graders via RAN/RAS test]. Nacional’nyj psihologicheskij zhurnal, 1, 61–69.Google Scholar

Akhutina, T. V., & Pylaeva, N. M. (2008). Preodolenie trudnostej ucheniya: nejropsihologicheskij podhod [Overcoming learning disabilities: the neuropsychological approach]. St Petersburg: Piter.Google Scholar

Barabanova, S. YU. (2014). Psihologo-pedagogicheskie osnovy po okazaniyu pomoshchi detyam v formirovanii navyka beglogo chteniya [Psychological-pedagogical foundations of intervention for reading fluency in children]. Municipal’noe obrazovanie: innovacii i eksperiment, 3, 24–27.Google Scholar

Bezrukikh, M. M., Adamovskaya, O. N., & Ivanov, V. V. (2017). Osobennosti zritel’nogo vospriyatiya i okulomotornoj aktivnosti u pervoklassnikov pri chtenii tekstov razlichnoj slozhnosti [Characteristics of visual perception and oculomotor activity in first-graders while reading texts of various difficulty]. Fiziologiya cheloveka, 43, 56–65.Google Scholar

Beten’kova, N., Goreckij, V., & Fonin, D. (2004). Azbuka. Dlya pervogo klassa chetyrekhletnej nachal’noj shkoly [Alphabet. For the first grade of primary school] (3rd ed.). St Petersburg: SpecLit, Planeta znanij.Google Scholar

Bondarko, L. V. (1998). Fonetika sovremennogo russkogo yazyka [Phonetics of modern Russian language]. St Petersburg: St Petersburg State University.Google Scholar

Boulware‐Gooden, R., Joshi, R. M., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2015). The role of phonology, morphology, and orthography in English and Russian spelling. Dyslexia, 21, 142–161.Google Scholar

Chirkina, G. V., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2014). Tracking citations: A science detective story. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7, 366–373. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022219412471995.Google Scholar

Chirkina, G. V., Rusetskaya, M. N., & Rossijskaya, E. N. (Eds.). (2011). Kognitivnoe i kommunikativnoe razvitie shkol’nikov s disleksiej: integral’nyj podhod [Development of cognition and communication in students with dyslexia: integration approach]. Moscow: Nacional’nyj knizhnyj centr.Google Scholar

Chirkina, G. V., Rusetskaya, M. N., & Rossijskaya, E. N. (Eds.). (2009). Variativnye strategii soprovozhdeniya uchashchihsya s narusheniyami pis’ma i chteniya [Various strategies of intervention for students with reading and writing disabilities]. Moscow: RDA, MGPU, URAO IKP.Google Scholar

CK VKP. (1936). Postanovlenie CK VKP(b) ot 04.07.1936 o pedologicheskih izvrashcheniyah v sisteme NARKOMPROSOV (Act on pedological perversions in the system of NARKOMPROS). Moscow. http://pravo.levonevsky.org/baza/soviet/sssr6510.htm.Google Scholar

Cubberley, P. (2002). Russian: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dmitrova, E. D., Dubrovinskaya, N. V., Lukashevich, I. P., Machinskaya, R. I., & Shklovskij, V. M. (2005). Osobennosti mozgovogo obespecheniya verbal’nyh processov u detej s trudnostyami pis’ma i chteniya [Features of cerebral support of verbal processes in children with dysgraphia and dyslexia]. Fiziologiya cheloveka, 31, 5–12.Google Scholar

Elkonin, D. B. (1988). How to teach children to read. Advances in Psychology, 49, 387–426.Google Scholar

Grigorenko, E. L. (1998). Russian “defectology”: Anticipating perestroika in the field. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 193–207.Google Scholar

Grigorenko, E. L. (2003). Matryoshka, matryozhka, or motryoshka: The difficulty of mastering reading and spelling in Russian. In Goulandris, N. (Ed.), Dyslexia in different languages: A cross-linguistic comparison (pp. 92–111). London: Whurr Publishers.Google Scholar

Grigorenko, E. L. (2005). If John were Ivan: Would he fail in reading? In Joshi, R. M. & Aaron, P. G. (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 303–320). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Grigorenko, E. L. (2010). Report on the Russian language for the World Dyslexia Forum. www.dyslexia-international.org/WDF/Files/WDF2010-Grigorenko-paper.pdf.Google Scholar

Grigorenko, E. L. (2011a). Gramotnost’ shkol’nika; eyo ocenka uchitelem, samim shkol’nikom i ob“ektivnymi testami [Literacy of students: its evaluation provided by a teacher, student and direct testing]. Mir Obrazovaniya, 3, 119–125.Google Scholar

Grigorenko, E. L. (2011b). Universal’nye prediktory gramotnosti. Universal’ny li oni i dlya russkogo yazyka? [Universal predictors of literacy. Are they universal in the context of Russian language?] Novoe v Psihologo-pedagogicheskih Issledovaniyah, 4, 63–68.Google Scholar

Grigorenko, E. L. (2011c). Etap «dochteniya», ego harakteristiki i ih rol’ v ovladenii chteniem [The stage of “pre-reading,” its characteristics and their role in mastering reading]. Voprosy psihologii, 6, 122–130.Google Scholar

Grigorenko, E. L. (2012). Ponimanie prochitannogo shkol’nikami i ego prediktory [Pupils’ reading comprehension its predictors]. Psihologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie, 1, 65–74.Google Scholar

Grigorenko, E. L., & Elliott, D. D. (2012). Chtenie o chtenii [Reading about reading]. Voronezh: Ayist.Google Scholar

Grigorenko, E. L., Kornev, A. N., Rakhlin, N., & Krivulskaya, S. (2011). Reading-related skills, reading achievement, and inattention: A correlational study. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 10, 140–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grigorenko, E. L., & Kornilova, T. V. (1997). The resolution of the nature-nurture controversy by Russian psychology: Culturally biased or culturally specific? In, R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, (Eds.), Intelligence, heredity, and environment (pp. 393–439). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Karpova, N., Granik, G., & Kabardov, M. (Eds.). (2013). Issledovaniya chteniya i gramotnosti v Psihologicheskom institute za 100 let: Hrestomatiya [Studies of reading and literacy carried out at the Psychological Institute of the Russian Academy of Education in a hundred years]. Moscow: Russkaya shkol’naya bibliotechnaya associaciya.Google Scholar

Kerek, E., & Niemi, P. (2012). Grain-size units of phonological awareness among Russian first graders. Written Language & Literacy, 15, 80–113. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/wll.15.1.05ker.Google Scholar