Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T13:11:08.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2016

Peter Cane
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Controlling Administrative Power
An Historical Comparison
, pp. 521 - 565
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

A Public Service Ombudsman: A Consultation (Cabinet Office, London, 2015)
Aberbach, J.D., Keeping a Watchful Eye: The Politics of Congressional Oversight (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1990)
Aberbach, J.D., ‘What's Happened to the Watchful Eye?’ (2002) 29 Congress and the Presidency3Google Scholar
Aberbach, J.D., ‘The U.S. Federal Executive in an Era of Change’ (2003) 16 Governance373Google Scholar
Aberbach, J.D., Putnam, R.D. and Rockman, B.A., Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981)
Ackerman, B., We The People I: Foundations (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1991)
Ackerman, B., The Failure of the Founding Fathers: Jefferson, Marshall, and the Rise of Presidential Democracy (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2005)
Adams, C., ‘Freedom of Information and Parliamentary Departments’ (2014) 73 Australian Journal of Public Administration67Google Scholar
Adler, E.S. and Wilkerson, J.D., Congress and the Politics of Problem Solving (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012)
Adler, M., ‘The Idea of Proportionality in Dispute Resolution’ (2008) 30 Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law309Google Scholar
Alexander, L. and Schauer, F., ‘On Extrajudicial Constitutional Interpretation’ (1997) 110 Harvard Law Review1359Google Scholar
Allan, T.R.S., Law, Liberty and Justice: The Legal Foundations of British Constitutionalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993)
Allan, T.R.S., Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)
Allan, T.R.S., The Sovereignty of Law: Freedom, Constitution and the Common Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)
Allars, M., ‘The Commercialisation of Administrative Law’ in Kneebone, S. (ed.), Administrative Law and the Rule of Law: Still Part of the Same Package? (Canberra: Australian Institute of Administrative Law, 1999)
Allen, C.K., Law in the Making, 2nd edn (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1930)
Allen, C.K., Bureaucracy Triumphant (London: Oxford University Press, 1931)
Allen, C.K., Law and Orders: An Inquiry into the Nature and Scope of Delegated Legislation and Executive Powers in England (London: Stevens & Sons, 1947)
Allen, J, ‘Reading Blackstone in the Twenty-First Century and the Twenty-First Century through Blackstone’ in Prest, W. (ed.), Re-interpreting Blackstone's Commentaries: A Seminal Text in National and International Contexts (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014)
Allison, J.W.F., The English Historical Constitution: Continuity, Change and European Effects (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007)
Jr, A.C. Aman, ‘Administrative Law for a New Century’ in Taggart, M. (ed.), The Province of Administrative Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1997)
Amar, A.R., ‘The Bill of Rights as a Constitution’ (1991) 100 Yale Law Journal1131Google Scholar
Amar, A.R., The Bill of Rights: Creation and Reconstruction (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998)
Amar, A.R., America's Constitution: A Biography (New York: Random House, 2005)
Anderson, S., ‘Parliament’ in Cornish, W., Anderson, S., Cocks, R., Lobban, M., Polden, P. and Smith, K., The Oxford History of the Laws of England, vol. XI, The Legal System (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)
Anderson, S., ‘Public Law’ in Cornish, W., Anderson, S., Cocks, R., Lobban, M., Polden, P. and Smith, K., The Oxford History of the Laws of England, vol. XI, The Legal System (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)
Ansolabehere, S. and Jones, P.E., ‘Dyadic Representation’ in Edwards, G.C., Lee, F.E. and Schickler, E. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the American Congress (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)
Anthony, R.A., ‘Interpretive Rules, Policy Statements, Guidances, Manuals and the Like: Should Federal Agencies Use Them to Bind the Public?’ (1992) 41 Duke Law Journal1311Google Scholar
Appleby, G. and Webster, A, ‘Parliament's Role in Constitutional Interpretation’ (2014) 37 Melbourne University Law Review255Google Scholar
Arancibia, J., Judicial Review of Commercial Regulation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)
Argument, S., ‘Legislative Scrutiny in Australia: Wisdom to Export?’ (2011) 32 Statute Law Review116Google Scholar
Aroney, N., The Constitution of a Federal Commonwealth: The Making and Meaning of the Australian Constitution (Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 2009)
Aronson, M., ‘A Public Lawyer's Responses to Privatisation and Outsourcing’ in Taggart, M. (ed.), The Province of Administrative Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1997)
Aronson, M., ‘Subordinate Legislation: Lively Scrutiny or Politics in Seclusion’ (2011) 26 Australasian Parliamentary Review4Google Scholar
Aronson, M. and Groves, M., Judicial Review of Administrative Action, 5th edn (Sydney: Lawbook Co., 2013)
Aronson, M. and Whitmore, H., Public Torts and Contracts (Sydney: Law Book Company, 1982)
Arthurs, H.W., ‘Without the Law’: Administrative Justice and Legal Pluralism in Nineteenth-Century England (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1985)
Ashton, J., ‘15 Years of Whistleblowing Protection under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998: Are We Still Shooting the Messenger?’ (2015) Industrial Law Journal29Google Scholar
Asimow, M., ‘Delegated Legislation: United States and United Kingdom’ (1983) 3 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies253Google Scholar
Asimow, M., ‘Nonlegislative Rulemaking and Regulatory Reform’ [1985]Duke Law Journal381Google Scholar
Atiyah, P.S. and Summers, R.S., Form and Substance in Anglo-American Law: A Comparative Study of Legal Reasoning, Legal Theory, and Legal Institutions (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987)
Austin, R., ‘Freedom of Information: The Constitutional Impact’ in Jowell, J. and Oliver, D., The Changing Constitution, 4th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000)
Austin, R., ‘The Freedom of Information Act 2000: A Sheep in Wolf's Clothing?’ in Jowell, J. and Oliver, D. (eds.), The Changing Constitution, 6th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007)
Bach, S., Platypus and Parliament: The Australian Senate in Theory and Practice (Canberra: Department of the Senate, 2003)
Bagehot, W., The English Constitution (London: Fontana/Collins, 1963)
Bagley, N., ‘The Puzzling Presumption of Reviewability’ (2014) 127 Harvard Law Review1285Google Scholar
Bailey, K.H., ‘Administrative Legislation in the Commonwealth’ (1930) 4 Australian Law Journal7Google Scholar
Bailey, M.A., Maltzman, F. and Shipan, C.R., ‘The Amorphous Relationship between Congress and the Courts’ in Edwards, G.C., Lee, F.E. and Schickler, E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the American Congress (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)
Bailyn, B., The Origins of American Politics (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1969)
Baker, J.H., An Introduction to English Legal History, 4th edn (London: Butterworths LexisNexis, 2002)
Baldwin, R., ‘“The Next Steps”: Ministerial Responsibility and Government by Agency’ (1988) 51 Modern Law Review622Google Scholar
Baldwin, R., Cave, M. and Lodge, M., Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012)
Balla, S. and Deering, C.J., ‘Police Patrols and Fire Alarms: An Empirical Examination of the Legislative Preference for Oversight’ (2013) 40 Congress and the Presidency27Google Scholar
Barber, N.W., ‘Self-Defence for Institutions’ (2013) 72 Cambridge Law Journal558Google Scholar
Barber, N.W. and Young, A.L., ‘The Rise of Prospective Henry VIII Clauses and Their Implications for Sovereignty’ [2003] Public Law 112Google Scholar
Barker, A., ‘Political Responsibility for UK Prison Security: Ministers Escape Again’ (1998) 76 Public Administration1Google Scholar
Barker, K., Cane, P., Lunney, M. and Trindade, F., The Law of Torts in Australia, 5th edn (Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 2012)
Barnes, J., Overruled?: Legislative Overrides, Pluralism, and Contemporary Court-Congress Relations (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2004)
Barnes, J., ‘Bringing the Courts Back In: Interbranch Perspectives on the Role of Courts in American Politics and Policy Making’ (2007) 10 Annual Review of Political Science25Google Scholar
Barnett, D., ‘Statutory Corporations and “The Crown”’ (2005) 28 University of New South Wales Law Journal186Google Scholar
Barron, D.J. and Rakoff, T.D., ‘In Defense of Big Waiver’ (2013) 113 Columbia Law Review265Google Scholar
Barzelay, M., ‘Central Audit Institutions and Performance Auditing: A Comparative Study of Organizational Strategies in the OECD’ (1997) 10 Governance235Google Scholar
Bator, P.M., ‘Legalistic Constitutionalism and Our Ineffective Government’ in Crovitz, L.G. and Rabkin, J.A. (eds.), The Fettered Presidency: Legal Constraints on the Executive Branch (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute, 1989)
Beard, C.A., The Office of Justice of the Peace in England in its Origin and Development (New York: Burt Franklin, 1904)
Beatson, J., ‘Legislative Control of Administrative Rulemaking: Lessons from the British Experience?’ (1979) 12 Cornell International Law Journal199Google Scholar
Beck, J.M., Our Wonderland of Bureaucracy: A Study of the Growth of Bureaucracy in the Federal Government, and its Destructive Effect upon the Constitution, rev edn (New York: Macmillan, 1933)
Beck, J.R., ‘The False Claims Act and the English Eradication of Qui Tam Legislation’ (2000) 78 North Carolina Law Review541Google Scholar
Beermann, J.M., ‘The Reach of Administrative Law in the United States’ in Taggart, M. (ed.), The Province of Administrative Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1997)
Beermann, J.M., ‘Congressional Administration’ (2006) 43 San Diego Law Review61Google Scholar
Beermann, J.M., ‘Common Law and Statute Law in US Federal Administrative Law’ in Pearson, L., Harlow, C. and Taggart, M. (eds.), Administrative Law in a Changing State: Essays in Honour of Mark Aronson (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008)
Beermann, J.M., ‘End the Failed Chevron Experiment Now: How Chevron Has Failed and Why It Can and Should be Overruled’ (2010) 42 Connecticut Law Review779Google Scholar
Bennion, F.A.R., Bennion on Statutory Interpretation, 5th edn (London: LexisNexis, 2008)
Bennister, M. and Heffernan, R., ‘The Limits to Prime Ministerial Autonomy: Cameron and the Constraints of Coalition’ (2015) 68 Parliamentary Affairs25Google Scholar
Benton, M. and Russell, M., ‘Assessing the Impact of Parliamentary Oversight Committees: The Select Committees in the British House of Commons’ (2013) 6 Parliamentary Affairs772Google Scholar
Berger, R., ‘Standing to Sue in Public Actions: Is it a Constitutional Requirement?’ (1969) 78 Yale Law Journal816Google Scholar
Berger, R., Executive Privilege: A Constitutional Myth (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1974)
Bernstein, A., ‘Congressional Will and the Role of the Executive in Bivens Actions: What is Special about Special Factors?’ (2011) 45 Indiana Law Review719Google Scholar
Bernstein, M.H., Regulating Business by Independent Commission (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1955)
Bickel, R., ‘Controlling Immigration Litigation: The Commonwealth Perspective’ (2010) 63 Australian Institute of Administrative Law Forum40Google Scholar
Binder, S.A., ‘The Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock, 1947–96’ (1999) 93 American Political Science Review519Google Scholar
Binder, S.A., Stalemate: Causes and Consequences of Legislative Gridlock (Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2003)
Binkley, W.E., President and Congress (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1947)
Bird, J., ‘Regulating the Regulators: Accountability of Australian Regulators’ (2011) 35 Melbourne University Law Review739Google Scholar
Birkinshaw, P., Freedom of Information: The Law, the Practice and the Ideal, 4th edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010)
Birkinshaw, P., ‘Regulating Information’ in Jowell, J. and Oliver, D. (eds.), The Changing Constitution, 7th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)
Black, J., Muchlinski, P. and Walker, P. (eds.), Commercial Regulation and Judicial Review (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1998)
Blackham, A. and Williams, G., ‘The Appointment of Ministers from Outside of Parliament’ (2012) 40 Federal Law Review253Google Scholar
Blair, T., A Journey: My Political Life (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2010)
Boardman, A.E. and Vining, A.R., ‘P3s in North America: Renting the Money (in Canada), Selling the Roads (in the USA)’ in Hodge, G.A., Greve, C. and Boardman, A.E. (eds.), International Handbook on Public-Private Partnerships (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2010)
Bogdanor, V. (ed.), Joined-Up Government (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)
Borchard, E.M., ‘Government Liability in Tort’ (1924) 34 Yale Law Journal1Google Scholar
Borchard, E.M., ‘Government Liability in Tort’ (1924) 34 Yale Law Journal130Google Scholar
Borchard, E.M., ‘Government Liability in Tort’ (1926) 36 Yale Law Journal1Google Scholar
Borchard, E.M., ‘Government Liability in Tort’ (1926) 36 Yale Law Journal757Google Scholar
Borchard, E.M., ‘Government Liability in Tort’ (1926) 36 Yale Law Journal1039Google Scholar
Bottomley, S., ‘The Notional Legislator: The Australian Securities and Investments Commission's Role as a Law-Maker’ (2011) 39 Federal Law Review1Google Scholar
Boughey, J. and Weeks, G., ‘“Officers of the Commonwealth” in the Private Sector: Can the High Court Review Outsourced Exercises of Power?’ (2013) 36 University of New South Wales Law Journal316Google Scholar
Bovens, M., ‘Two Concepts of Accountability: Accountability as a Virtue and as a Mechanism’ (2010) 33 West European Politics946Google Scholar
Bowes, A. and Stanton, J., ‘The Localism Act 2011 and the General Power of Competence’ [2014] Public Law 392Google Scholar
Bradley, A.W. and Pinelli, C., ‘Parliamentarism’ in Rosenfeld, M. and Sajo, A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012)
Bradley, C.A. and Posner, A.E., ‘Presidential Signing Statements and Executive Power’ (2006) 23 Constitutional Commentary307Google Scholar
Bradshaw, K. and Pring, D., Parliament and Congress (London: Quartet Books, 1973)
Brand, P., ‘The Development of Parliament, 1215–1307’ in Jones, C. (ed.), A Short History of Parliament (Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 2009)
Brandis, G., ‘The Australian Senate and Responsible Government’ in Aroney, N., Prasser, S. and Nethercote, J.R., Restraining Elective Dictatorship: The Upper House Solution (Crawley: University of Western Australia Press, 2008)
Brazier, R., ‘Royal Assent to Legislation’ (2013) 126 Law Quarterly Review184Google Scholar
Bressman, L.S., ‘Procedures as Politics in Administrative Law’ (2007) 107 Columbia Law Review1749Google Scholar
Bressman, L.S., ‘Procedures as Politics in Administrative Law’ (2008) 108 Columbia Law Review Sidebar1Google Scholar
Brewer, J., The Sinews of Power: War, Money and the English State 1688–1783 (London: Unwin Hyman, 1989)
Breyer, S., ‘Judicial Review of Questions of Law and Policy’ (1986) 38 Administrative Law Review363Google Scholar
Breyer, S.G., Stewart, R.B., Sunstein, C.R. and Vermeule, A., Administrative Law and Regulatory Policy: Problems, Text, and Cases, 6th edn (New York: Aspen, 2006)
Briffault, R., ‘Our Localism: Part I, The Structure of Local Government Law’ (1990) 90 Columbia Law Review1Google Scholar
Brown, A.J., ‘Halfway House or Revolving Door: Corporatisation and Political Cycles in Western Democracy’ in Whincop, M.J. (ed.), From Bureaucracy to Business Enterprise: Legal and Policy Issues in the Transformation of Government Services (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2003)
Brown, R.G.S. and Steel, D.R., The Administrative Process in Britain, 2nd edn (London: Methuen & Co., 1979)
Brudney, J.L., Hebert, F.T. and Wright, D.S., ‘Reinventing Government in the American States: Measuring and Explaining Administrative Reform’ (1999) 59 Public Administration Review19Google Scholar
Bruff, H.H., Balance of Forces: Separation of Powers Law in the Administrative State (Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 2006)
Bruff, H.H., ‘The Incompatibility Principle’ (2007) 59 Administrative Law Review225Google Scholar
Burch, M. and Holliday, I., ‘The Prime Minister's and Cabinet Offices: An Executive Office in All But Name’ (1999) 52 Parliamentary Affairs32Google Scholar
Burke, T.F., Lawyers, Lawsuits, and Legal Rights: The Battle over Litigation in American Society (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2002)
Burnham, J. and Jones, G.W., ‘The Evolving Prime Minister's Office: 1868–1997’ in Rhodes, R.A.W. (ed.), Transforming British Government (Houndmills: Macmillan, 2000)
Burnham, W.D., ‘Party Systems and the Political Process’ in Chambers, W.N. and Burnham, W.D. (eds.), The American Party Systems: Stages of Political Development (New York: Oxford University Press, 1975)
Burton, L., ‘Why These Three? The Significance of the Selection of Remedies in Section 75(v) of the Australian Constitution’ (2014) 42 Federal Law Review253Google Scholar
Butlin, N.G., Barnard, A. and Pincus, J.J., Government and Capitalism: Public and Private Choice in Twentieth Century Australia (Sydney: George Allen & Unwin, 1982)
Caenegam, R.C. van, An Historical Introduction to Western Constitutional Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995)
Caiden, G.E., ‘The Independent Central Personnel Agency: The Experience of the Commonwealth Public Service of Australia’ (1964) 42 Public Administration133Google Scholar
Calabresi, S.G., ‘The Congressional Roots of Judicial Activism’ (2004) 20 Journal of Law and Policy577Google Scholar
Calabresi, S.G. and Prakash, S.B., ‘The President's Power to Execute the Laws’ (1994) 104 Yale Law Journal541Google Scholar
Callaghan, E.S., Dworkin, T.M. and Lewis, D., ‘Whistleblowing: Australian, UK, and US Approaches to Disclosure in the Public Interest’ (2004) 44 Virginia Journal of International Law879Google Scholar
Cameron, C.M., ‘The Presidential Veto’ in Edwards, G.C. III and Howell, W.G., The Oxford Handbook of the American Presidency (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009)
Campbell, A.I.L., ‘The Publication of Delegated Legislation’ [1982]Public Law569Google Scholar
Campbell, E., ‘Public Access to Government Documents’ (1967) 41 Australian Law Journal73Google Scholar
Cane, P., ‘Standing, Representation, and the Environment’ in Loveland, I. (ed.), A Special Relationship? American Influences on Public Law in the UK (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995)
Cane, P., An Introduction to Administrative Law, 3rd edn (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996)
Cane, P., ‘Review of Executive Action’ in Cane, P. and Tushnet, M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Legal Studies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003)
Cane, P., Administrative Tribunals and Adjudication (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2009)
Cane, P., Administrative Law, 5th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)
Cane, P., ‘Tort Law and Public Functions’ in Oberdiek, J. (ed.), Philosophical Foundations of The Law of Torts (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014)
Cane, P. and McDonald, L., Principles of Administrative Law: Legal Regulation of Governance, 2nd edn (Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 2012)
Carney, G., The Constitutional Systems of the Australian States and Territories (Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 2006)
Carpenter, D., ‘The Evolution of National Bureaucracy in the United States’ in Aberbach, J.D. and Peterson, M.A., The Executive Branch (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)
Carr, C.T., Delegated Legislation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1921)
Carrow, M.M., The Background of Administrative Law (Newark, NJ: Associated Lawyers Publishing Company, 1948)
Casper, G., ‘An Essay in Separation of Powers: Some Early Versions and Practices’ (1989) 30 William and Mary Law Review211Google Scholar
Cass, R.A., ‘Official Liability in America: Actors and Incentives’ in Bell, J. and Bradley, A.W. (eds.), Governmental Liability: A Comparative Study (London: UK National Committee of Comparative Law, 1991)
Castles, A.C., An Introduction to Australian Legal History (Sydney: The Law Book Company, 1971)
Jr, Z. Chafee, ‘Colonial Courts and the Common Law’ in Flaherty, D.H. (ed.), Essays in the History of Early American Law (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1969)
Chafetz, J., ‘Congress's Constitution’ (2012) 160 University of Pennsylvania Law Review715Google Scholar
Chambers, W.N., ‘Party Development and the American Mainstream’ in Chambers, W.N. and Burnham, W.D (eds.), The American Party Systems: Stages of Political Development (New York: Oxford University Press, 1975)
Chapman, N.S. and McConnell, M.W., ‘Due Process as Separation of Powers’ (2012) 121 Yale Law Journal1672Google Scholar
Chemerinsky, E., ‘Against Sovereign Immunity’ (2001) 53 Stanford Law Review1201Google Scholar
Chester, N., The English Administrative System, 1780–1870 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981)
Chrimes, S.B., English Constitutional History, 3rd edn (London: Oxford University Press, 1965)
Christensen, T. and Laegreid, P., ‘The Whole-of-Government Approach to Public Sector Reform’ (2007) 67 Public Administration Review1059Google Scholar
Clapham, A., Human Rights in the Private Sphere (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993)
Clayton, C.W., ‘Separate Branches – Separate Politics: Judicial Enforcement of Congressional Intent’ (1995) 109 Political Science Quarterly843Google Scholar
Clinton, J.D., Bertelli, A., Grose, C.R., Lewis, D.E. and Nixon, D.C., ‘Separated Powers in the United States: The Ideology of Agencies, Presidents, and Congress’ (2012) 56 American Journal of Political Science341Google Scholar
Clinton, J.D., Lewis, D.E. and Selin, J.L., ‘Influencing the Bureaucracy: The Irony of Congressional Oversight’ (2014) 58 American Journal of Political Science387Google Scholar
Clinton, J.D., Lewis, D.E. and Selin, J.L., Code of Practice on Access to Government Information (London: 1994)
Clinton, J.D., Lewis, D.E. and Selin, J.L., Code of Practice on Consultation (London: 2008)
Coglianese, C., ‘Assessing Consensus: The Promise and Performance of Negotiated Rulemaking’ (1997) 46 Duke Law Journal1255Google Scholar
Cohen, D. and Strauss, P.L., ‘Congressional Review of Agency Regulations’ (1997) 49 Administrative Law Review95Google Scholar
Cohen, M., ‘When Judges have Reasons Not to give Reasons: A Comparative Law Approach’ (2015) 72 Washington and Lee Law Review483Google Scholar
Collins, H., Regulating Contracts (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999)
Cooper, P.J., By Order of the President: The Use and Abuse of Executive Direct Action (Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press, 2002)
Cornell, S. and Leonard, G., ‘The Consolidation of the Early Federal System, 1791–1812’ in Grossberg, M. and Tomlins, C. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Law in America(New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008), vol. I
Cornford, T., ‘Legal Remedies Against the Crown and its Officers Before and After M’ in Sunkin, M. and Payne, S. (eds.), The Nature of the Crown: A Legal and Political Analysis (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999)
Cornish, W., ‘Government and People’ in Cornish, W., Anderson, S., Cocks, R., Lobban, M., Polden, P. and Smith, K., The Oxford History of the Laws of England, vol. XI, The Legal System (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)
Cornish, W., ‘Sources of Law’ in Cornish, W., Anderson, S., Cocks, R., Lobban, M., Polden, P. and Smith, K., The Oxford History of the Laws of England, vol. XI, The Legal System (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)
Corwin, E.S., Liberty Against Government: The Rise, Flowering and Decline of a Famous Juridical Concept (Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press, 1948)
Cox, A., ‘Executive Privilege’ (1974) 122 University of Pennsylvania Law Review1383Google Scholar
Craig, B.H., ‘Wishing the Legislative Veto Back: A False Hope for Executive Flexibility’ in Crovitz, L.G. and Rabkin, J. (eds.), The Fettered Presidency: Legal Constraints on the Executive Branch (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 1989)
Craig, P.P., Public Law and Democracy in the United Kingdom and the United States of America (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990)
Craven, G.J., ‘Legislative Action by Subordinate Authorities and the Requirement of a Fair Hearing’ (1988) 16 Melbourne University Law Review569Google Scholar
Crawford, J. and Opeskin, B., Australian Courts of Law, 4th edn (Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 2004)
Cross, F., ‘Shattering the Fragile Case for Judicial Review of Rulemaking’ (1999) 85 Virginia Law Review1243Google Scholar
Cross, R., Bell, J. and Engle, G., Statutory Interpretation, 3rd edn (London: Butterworths, 1995)
Cuellar, M.-F., ‘Administrative War’ (2014) 82 George Washington Law Review1343Google Scholar
Daintith, T. and Page, A., The Executive in the Constitution: Structure, Autonomy, and Internal Control (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999)
Daly, P., ‘Justiciability and the “Political Question” Doctrine’ [2010]Public Law160Google Scholar
Daly, P., ‘Deference on Questions of Law’ (2011) 74 Modern Law Review694Google Scholar
Damaska, M.R., The Faces of Justice and State Authority: A Comparative Approach to the Legal Process (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1986)
Damgaard, B. and Lewis, J.M., ‘Accountability and Citizen Participation’ in Bovens, M., Goodin, R.E. and Schillemans, T. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014)
Datla, K. and Revesz, R.L., ‘Deconstructing Independent Agencies (and Executive Agencies)’ (2013) 98 Cornell Law Review769Google Scholar
Davies, A.C.L., Accountability: A Public Law Analysis of Government by Contract (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)
Davies, A.C.L., The Public Law of Government Contracts (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008)
Davies, A.C.L., ‘Beyond New Public Management: Problems of Accountability in the Modern Administrative State’ in Bamforth, N. and Leyland, P. (eds.), Accountability in the Contemporary Constitution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)
Davis, F., ‘Judicialization of Administrative Law: The Trial-Type Hearing and the Changing Status of the Hearing Officer’ [1977] Duke Law Journal390Google Scholar
Desan, C.A., ‘Remaking Constitutional Tradition at the Margin of Empire: The Creation of Legislative Adjudication in Colonial New York’ (1998) 16 Law and History Review257Google Scholar
Desan, C.A., ‘The Constitutional Commitment to Legislative Adjudication in the Early American Tradition’ (1998) 111 Harvard Law Review1381Google Scholar
Dicey, A.V., ‘The Development of Administrative Law in England’ (1915) 31 Law Quarterly Review148Google Scholar
Dicey, A.V., An Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 10th edn (London: Macmillan, 1959)
Dickinson, M.J., ‘The Executive Office of the President: The Paradox of Politicization’ in Aberbach, J.D. and Paterson, M.A., The Executive Branch (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)
Dippel, H., ‘Blackstone's Commentaries and the Origins of Modern Constitutionalism’ in Prest, W. (ed.), Re-interpreting Blackstone's Commentaries: A Seminal Text in National and International Contexts (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014)
Dixon, O., ‘The Law and the Constitution’ (1935) 51 Law Quarterly Review590Google Scholar
Dixon, O., Jesting Pilate and Other Papers and Addresses (Melbourne: The Law Book Company, 1965)
Dixon, O., ‘The Common Law as an Ultimate Constitutional Foundation’ in Dixon, O., Jesting Pilot and Other Papers and Addresses (Melbourne: The Law Book Co, 1965)
Dobbs, D.B., Hayden, P.T. and Bublick, E.M., The Law of Torts, 2nd edn (St Paul, MN: West, 2011)
Dotan, Y., ‘Making Consistency Consistent’ (2005) 57 Administrative Law Review995Google Scholar
Dowding, K., ‘The Prime Ministerialisation of the British Prime Minister’ (2013) 66 Parliamentary Affairs617Google Scholar
Dowding, K. and Kang, W.-T., ‘Ministerial Resignations 1945–97’ (1998) 76 Public Administration411Google Scholar
Drewry, G., ‘Next Steps: The Pace Falters’ [1990]Public Law322Google Scholar
Drewry, G., ‘The Executive: Towards Accountable Government and Effective Governance?’ in Jowell, J. and Oliver, D. (eds.), The Changing Constitution, 7th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)
Drewry, G. (ed.), The New Select Committees, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989)
Drewry, G. and Butcher, T., The Civil Service Today, 2nd edn (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988)
Drinkwater, D., ‘Parliamentary Scrutiny of the Australian Public Service’ in Wanna, J., Lindquist, E.A. and Marshall, P. (eds.), New Accountabilities, New Challenges (Canberra: ANU Press, 2015)
Duffy, J.F., ‘Administrative Common Law in Judicial Review’ (1998) 77 Texas Law Review113Google Scholar
Dunleavy, P., ‘The United Kingdom: Paradoxes of an Ungrounded Statism’ in Castles, F.G. (ed.), The Comparative History of Public Policy (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1898)
Dunleavy, P., The Future of Joined-up Services (London: 2020 Public Services Trust, 2010)
Durack, P., ‘The Rise and Rise of Administrative Law: An Attorney-General's Perspective 1977–1983’ (2001) 8 Australian Journal of Administrative Law147Google Scholar
Duxbury, N., Elements of Legislation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013)
Dyson, K., The State Tradition in Western Europe: A Study of an Idea and Institution (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1980)
Dyzenhaus, D. and Taggart, M., ‘Reasoned Decisions and Legal Theory’ in Edlin, D.E. (ed.), Common Law Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007)
Edgar, A., ‘Judicial Review of Public Consultation Processes: A Safeguard Against Tokenism?’ (2013) 24 Public Law Review209Google Scholar
Edgar, A., ‘Public and Private Interests in Australian Administrative Law’ (2013) 36 University of New South Wales Law Journal202Google Scholar
Edgar, A., ‘Judicial Review of Delegated Legislation: Why Favour Substantive Review over Procedural Review?’ in Bell, J., Elliott, M., Varuhas, J. and Murray, P. (eds.), Public Law Adjudication in Common Law Systems: Process and Substance (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2016)
Jr, C.F. Edley, Administrative Law: Rethinking Judicial Control of Bureaucracy (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1990)
Edlin, D.E., ‘A Constitutional Right to Judicial Review: Access to Courts and Ouster Clauses in England and the United States’ (2009) 57 American Journal of Comparative Law67Google Scholar
Eichbaum, C. and Shaw, R., ‘Introduction’ in Eichbaum, C. and Shaw, R. (eds.), Partisan Appointees and Public Servants: An International Analysis of the Role of Political Adviser (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2010)
Eisenberg, M.A., The Nature of the Common Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988)
Eisgruber, C.L., ‘The Most Competent Branches: A Response to Professor Paulsen’ (1994) 83 Georgetown Law Journal347Google Scholar
Elliott, E.D., ‘Chevron Matters: How the Chevron Doctrine Redefined the Roles of Congress, Courts and Agencies in Environmental Law’ (2005) 16 Villanova Environmental Law Journal1Google Scholar
Elliott, H., ‘The Functions of Standing’ (2008) 61 Stanford Law Review459Google Scholar
Elliott, M., ‘Beyond the European Convention: Human Rights and the Common Law’ (2015) 68 Current Legal Problems85Google Scholar
Else-Mitchell, R., ‘Delegated and Sub-Delegated Legislation’ (1943) 17 Australian Law Journal75Google Scholar
Endicott, T., ‘Questions of Law’ (1998) 114 Law Quarterly Review292Google Scholar
Epp, C.R., Making Rights Real: Activists, Bureaucrats, and the Creation of the Legalistic State (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2009)
Epstein, D. and O'Halloran, S., Delegating Powers: A Transaction Cost Politics Approach to Policy Making under Separate Powers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)
Erdos, D., ‘Elite Supply “Blockages” and the Failure of National Bill of Rights Initiative in Australia: A Comparative Westminster Analysis’ (2008) 46 Commonwealth and Comparative Politics341Google Scholar
Erdos, D., ‘Postmaterialist Social Constituencies and Political Triggers: Explaining Bill of Rights Genesis in Internally Stable, Advanced Democracies’ (2009) 62 Political Science Quarterly798Google Scholar
Erdos, D., ‘Smoke but No Fire? The Politics of a “British” Bill of Rights’ (2010) 81 Political Quarterly188Google Scholar
Erdos, D., ‘The Rudd Government's Rejection of an Australian Bill of Rights: A Stunted Case of Aversive Constitutionalism?’ (2012) 65 Parliamentary Affairs359Google Scholar
Jr, W.N. Eskridge, ‘Spinning Legislative Supremacy’ (1989) 78 Georgetown Law Journal319Google Scholar
Eskridge, W.N., ‘The New Textualism’ (1990) 37 UCLA Law Review621Google Scholar
Jr, W.N. Eskridge, ‘Overriding Supreme Court Statutory Interpretation Decisions’ (1991) 101 Yale Law Journal331Google Scholar
Jr, W.N. Eskridge, ‘All About Words: Early Understandings of the “Judicial Power” in Statutory Interpretation, 1776–1806’ (2001) 101 Columbia Law Review990Google Scholar
Jr, W.N. Eskridge, ‘America's Statutory “Constitution”’ (2007) 41 UC Davis Law Review1Google Scholar
Jr, W.N. Eskridge, ‘Vetogates and American Public Law’ (2015) 31 Journal of Law, Economics and Organization756Google Scholar
Jr, W.N. Eskridge and Baer, L.E., ‘The Continuum of Deference: Supreme Court Treatment of Statutory Interpretations from Chevron to Hamdan’ (2008) 96 Georgetown Law Journal1083Google Scholar
Evans, D., ‘Pork Barrel Politics’ in Edwards, G.C., Lee, F.E. and Schickler, E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the American Congress (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)
Evans, S. and Williams, J., ‘Appointing Australian Judges: A New Model’ (2008) 30 Sydney Law Review295Google Scholar
Fabbrini, S., ‘The Semi-Sovereign American Prince: The Dilemma of an Independent President in a Presidential System of Government’ in Poguntke, T. and Webb, P., The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)
Jr, R.H. Fallon, ‘Individual Rights and the Powers of Government’ (1993) 27 Georgia Law Review343Google Scholar
Jr, R.H. Fallon, Implementing the Constitution (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001)
Jr, R.H. Fallon, The Dynamic Constitution: An Introduction to American Constitutional Law and Practice, 2nd edn (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013)
Jr, R.H. Fallon, Meltzer, D.J. and Shapiro, D.L., Hart and Wechsler's The Federal Courts and the Federal System (Westbury, NY: Foundation Press, 1996)
Farber, D.A., ‘Legislative Constitutionalism in a System of Judicial Supremacy’ in Bauman, R.W. and Kahana, T., The Least Examined Branch: The Role of Legislatures in the Constitutional State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006)
Farhang, S., The Litigation State: Public Regulation and Private Lawsuits in the US (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010)
Farhang, S., ‘Legislative-Executive Conflict and Private Statutory Litigation in the United States: Evidence from Labor, Civil Rights, and Environmental Law’ (2012) 37 Law and Social Inquiry657Google Scholar
Fawcett, P. and Gay, O., ‘The United Kingdom’ in Eichbaum, C. and Shaw, R., Partisan Appointees and Public Servants: An International Analysis of the Role of the Political Adviser (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2010)
Feaver, D. and Sheehy, B., ‘The Political Division of Regulatory Labour: A Legal Theory of Agency Selection’ (2015) 35 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies153Google Scholar
Feinstein, B.D., Congressional Control of Administrative Agencies (SSRN, 2015), available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2304497
Feldman, D., ‘The Human Rights Act 1998 and Constitutional Principles’ (1999) 19 Legal Studies165Google Scholar
Feldman, D., ‘The Nature and Significance of “Constitutional” Legislation’ (2013) 129 Law Quarterly Review343Google Scholar
Field, M.A., ‘Sources of Law: The Scope of Federal Common Law’ (1986) 99 Harvard Law Review881Google Scholar
Finer, S.E., The History of Government from the Earliest Times, vol. III, Empires, Monarchies and the Modern State (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997)
Fink, H.P. and Tushnet, M.V., Federal Jurisdiction: Policy and Practice (Charlottesville, VA: The Michie Company, 1984)
Finn, M. and Seldon, A., ‘Constitutional Reform Since 1997: The Historian's Perspective’ in Qvortrup, M. (ed.), The British Constitution: Continuity and Change, A Festschrift for Vernon Bogdanor (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013)
Finn, P., Law and Government in Colonial Australia (Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1987)
Finn, P., ‘Claims Against the Government’ in Essays on Law and Government, vol. 2, The Citizen and the State in the Courts (North Ryde: LBC Information Services, 1996)
Fisher, L., ‘The Legislative Veto: Invalidated, It Survives’ (1993) Law and Contemporary Problems273Google Scholar
Fisher, L., The Politics of Shared Power: Congress and the Executive, 4th edn (College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press, 1998)
Fisher, L., ‘Committee Controls of Agency Decisions’ (Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, 2005)
Fitzgerald, R., ‘ACOSS on the 20th Anniversary of the Commonwealth Ombudsman’ in Twenty Years of the Commonwealth Ombudsman, 1977–1997 (Canberra: Commonwealth Ombudsman's Office, 1997)
Fix-Fierro, H. and Salazar-Ugarte, P., ‘Presidentialism’ in Rosenfeld, M. and Sajo, A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012)
Flaherty, M.S., ‘The Most Dangerous Branch’ (1996) 105 Yale Law Journal1725Google Scholar
Flinders, M., Delegated Governance and the British State: Walking Without Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008)
Foote, E.V., ‘Statutory Interpretation or Public Administration: How Chevron Misconceives the Functions of Agencies and Why it Matters’ (2007) 59 Administrative Law Review673Google Scholar
Fordham, M., Judicial Review Handbook, 5th edn (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008)
Freedman, J.O., Crisis and Legitimacy: The Administrative Process and American Government (London: Cambridge University Press, 1978)
Freeman, J., ‘The Contracting State’ (2000) 28 Florida State Law Review155Google Scholar
Freeman, J., ‘Extending Public Law Norms Through Privatization’ (2003) 116 Harvard Law Review1285Google Scholar
Freeman, J. and Rossi, J., ‘Agency Coordination in Shared Regulatory Space’ (2012) 125 Harvard Law Review1131Google Scholar
Friedmann, W., ‘The Planned State and the Rule of Law’ (1948) 22 Australian Law Journal162Google Scholar
Friedmann, W., Principles of Australian Administrative Law (Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 1950)
Friendly, H.J., The Federal Administrative Agencies The Need for Better Definition of Standards (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962)
Friendly, H.J., ‘Some Kind of Hearing’ (1975) 123 University of Pennsylvania Law Review1267Google Scholar
Gageler, S., ‘Foundations of Australian Federalism and the Role of Judicial Review’ (1987) 17 Federal Law Review161Google Scholar
Gageler, S., ‘The Underpinnings of Judicial Review of Administrative Action: Common Law or Constitution?’ (2000) 28 Federal Law Review303Google Scholar
Gageler, S., ‘Beyond the Text: A Vision of the Structure and Function of the Constitution’ (2009) 32 Australian Bar Review138Google Scholar
Gageler, S., ‘Impact of Migration Law on the Development of Australian Administrative Law’ (2010) 17 Australian Journal of Administrative Law92Google Scholar
Gageler, S., ‘The Master of Words: Who Chooses Statutory Meaning?’ in Connolly, A.J. and Stewart, D. (eds.), Public Law in the Age of Statutes: Essays in Honour of Dennis Pearce (Annandale: The Federation Press, 2015)
Galligan, D.J., Discretionary Powers: A Legal Study of Official Discretion (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986)
Galligan, D.J., Due Process and Fair Procedures: A Study of Administrative Procedures (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996)
Galnoor, I., ‘What Do We Know about Government Secrecy?’ in Galnoor, I. (ed.), Government Secrecy in Democracies (New York: New York University Press, 1977)
Gardner, J., ‘Criminals in Uniform’ in Duff, R.A., Farmer, L., Marshall, S.E., Renzo, M. and Tadros, V. (eds.), The Constitution of Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012)
Gee, G., Hazell, R., Malleson, K. and O'Brien, P., The Politics of Judicial Independence in the UK's Changing Constitution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015)
Gellhorn, W., When Americans Complain: Governmental Grievance Procedures (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1966)
Gerring, J., Thacker, S. and Moreno, C., ‘Are Parliamentary Systems Better?’ (2009) 42 Comparative Political Studies327Google Scholar
Geyh, C.G., When Courts and Congress Collide: The Struggle for Control of the American Judicial System (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2008)
Gilardi, F., Delegation in the Regulatory State: Independent Regulatory Agencies in Western Europe (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2008)
Given-Wilson, C., ‘The House of Lords, 1307–1529’ in Jones, C. (ed.), A Short History of Parliament (Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 2009)
Gleeson, J.T. and Yezerski, R.A., ‘The Separation of Powers and the Unity of the Common Law’ in Gleeson, J.T., Watson, J.A. and Higgins, R.C.A. (eds.), Historical Foundations of Australian Law, vol. I, Institutions, Concepts and Personalities (Sydney: The Federation Press, 2013)
Glenn, H.P., ‘Divided Justice? Judicial Structures in Federal and Confederal States’ (1995) 46 South Carolina Law Review819Google Scholar
Glenn, H.P., On Common Laws (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)
Glover, J.M., ‘The Structural Role of Private Enforcement Mechanisms in Public Law’ (2012) 53 William and Mary Law Review1137Google Scholar
Gluck, A.R. and Bressman, L.S., ‘Statutory Interpretation from the Inside: An Empirical Study of Congressional Drafting, Delegation and Canons, Part I’ (2013) 65 Stanford Law Review901Google Scholar
Godwin, A., ‘Merit and its Merits in the Public Service: Are We Confusing the Baby with the Bathwater?’ (2011) 70 Australian Journal of Public Administration318Google Scholar
Goldberg, H.M., ‘Tort Liability for Federal Government Actions in the United States: An Overview’ in Fairgrieve, D., Andenas, M. and Bell, J., Tort Liability of Public Authorities in Comparative Perspective (London: BIICL, 2002)
Goldsmith, J. and Manning, J.F., ‘The President's Completion Power’ (2006) 115 Yale Law Journal2280Google Scholar
Goldsmith, S. and Eggers, W.D., Governing by Network: The New Shape of the Public Sector (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2004)
Goldsworthy, J., The Sovereignty of Parliament: History and Principle (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999)
Goldsworthy, J., ‘Kable, Kirk and Judicial Statesmanship’ (2014) 40 Monash Law Review75Google Scholar
Goodin, R.E., ‘Institutionalizing the Public Interest: The Defense of Deadlock and Beyond?’ (1996) 90 American Political Science Review331Google Scholar
Gordley, J., ‘Comparative Law and Legal History’ in Reimann, M. and Zimmermann, R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006)
Gordon, R., Better to Serve the Public: Proposals to Restructure, Reform, Review and Reinvigorate Public Services Ombudsmen (October 2014), available at www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/416656/Robert_Gordon_Review.pdf
Gough, J.W., Fundamental Law in English Constitutional History (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1955)
Grad, F.P., ‘The Ascendancy of Legislation: Legal Problem Solving in Our Time’ (1984–85) 9 Dalhousie Law Journal228Google Scholar
Graham, A. and Roberts, A., ‘The Agency Concept in North America: Failure, Adaptation and Incremental Change’ in Pollitt, C. and Talbot, C. (eds.), Unbundled Government: A Critical Analysis of the Global Trend to Agencies, Quangos and Contractualisation (London: Routledge, 2004)
Greene, J.P., ‘Law and the Origins of the American Revolution’ in Grossberg, M. and Tomlins, C. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Law in America (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008), vol. I
Greer, P., Transforming Central Government (Buckingham: Open University Press, 1994)
Gregory, R. and Painter, M., ‘Parliamentary Select Committees and Public Management Reform in Australasia’ (2003) 106 Canberra Bulletin of Public Administration63Google Scholar
Griffin, S.M., ‘The United States of America’ in Oliver, D. and Fusaro, C., How Constitutions Change: A Comparative Study (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011)
Griffith, G. and Kennett, G., ‘Judicial Federalism’ in Opeskin, B. and Wheeler, F., The Australian Federal Judicial System (Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 2000)
Griffith, J.A.G., ‘The Crichel Down Affair’ (1955) 18 Modern Law Review557Google Scholar
Grisinger, J.L., The Unwieldy American State: Administrative Politics Since the New Deal (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012
Groves, M., ‘Substantive Legitimate Expectations in Australian Administrative Law’ (2008) Melbourne University Law Review 470Google Scholar
Groves, M., ‘The Duty to Inquire in Tribunal Proceedings’ (2011) 33 Sydney Law Review177Google Scholar
Gummow, W.M.C., ‘The Constitution: Ultimate Foundation of Australian Law?’ (2005) 79 Australian Law Journal167Google Scholar
Guttman, D., ‘Inherently Governmental Functions and the New Millennium: The Legacy of Twentieth-Century Reform’ in Stanton, T.H. and Ginsburg, B., Making Government Manageable: Executive Organization and Management in the Twenty-First Century (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004)
Haber, S., Efficiency and Uplift: Scientific Management in the Progressive Era 1890–1920 (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1964)
Lord, Hailsham, ‘Elective Dictatorship’, The Listener, 21 October 1976, 496
Hall, K.L. (ed.), Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States, 2nd edn (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005)
Halligan, J, ‘The Australian Public Service: Redefining Boundaries’ in Halligan, J. (ed.), Civil Service Systems in Anglo-American Countries (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2003)
Halligan, J, ‘Anglo-American Systems: Easy Diffusion’ in Raadschelders, J.C.N., Toonen, T.A.J. and Meer, F.M. Vander (eds.), The Civil Service in the 21st Century (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007)
Halligan, J, ‘Reintegrating Government in Third Generation Reforms in Australia and New Zealand’ (2007) 22 Public Policy and Administration217Google Scholar
Halligan, J., Miller, R. and Power, J., Parliament in the Twenty-first Century: Institutional Reform and Emerging Roles (Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 2007)
Hamer, D., ‘Parliament and Government: Striking the Balance’ in Disney, J. and Nethercote, J.R., The House of Capital Hill: Parliament, Politics and Power in the National Capital (Sydney: The Federation Press, 1996)
Hamilton, A., Madison, J. and Jay, J., The Federalist Papers (Goldman, L. (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008)
Hansard Society Measured or Makeshift: Parliamentary Scrutiny of the European Union (London: Hansard Society, 2013)
Harden, I., The Contracting State (Buckingham: Open University Press, 1992)
Harlow, C. and Rawlings, R., ‘Promoting Accountability in Multilevel Governance: A Network Approach’ (2007) 13 European Law Journal542Google Scholar
Harlow, C. and Rawlings, R., Law and Administration, 3rd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009)
Harris, B., ‘The House of Commons, 1707–1800’ in Jones, C. (ed.), A Short History of Parliament (Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 2009)
Hart, H.L.A., The Concept of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962)
Hart, J., ‘President and Prime Minister: Convergence or Divergence?’ (1991) 44 Parliamentary Affairs208Google Scholar
Hart, W.E. and Hart, W.O., An Introduction to the Law of Local Government and Administration (London: Butterworth & Co., 1934)
Harter, P.J., ‘Assessing the Assessors: The Actual Performance of Negotiated Rulemaking’ (2000) 9 New York University Environmental Law Journal32Google Scholar
Hayhurst, J.D. and Wallington, P., ‘The Parliamentary Scrutiny of Delegated Legislation’ [1988] Public Law 547Google Scholar
Hayne, K.M., ‘Deference: An Australian Perspective’ [2011] Public Law 75Google Scholar
Hazell, R., ‘Freedom of Information in Australia, Canada and New Zealand’ (1989) 67 Public Administration189Google Scholar
Hazell, R., Chalmers, M. and Russell, M., ‘Pre-Appointment Scrutiny Hearings in the British House of Commons: All Bark, or Some Bite?’ (2012) 18 Journal of Legislative Studies222Google Scholar
Hazell, R., Worthy, B. and Glover, M., The Impact of the Freedom of Information Act on Central Government in the UK: Does FOI Work? (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010)
Hazell, R. and Yong, B., The Politics of Coalition: How the Conservative-Liberal Democrat Government Works (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2012)
Heclo, H., A Government of Strangers: Executive Politics in Washington (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1977)
Hector, L.J., ‘Problems of the CAB and the Independent Regulatory Commissions’ (1960) 68 Yale LJ931Google Scholar
Heffernan, R. and Webb, P., ‘The British Prime Minister: Much More Than “First Among Equals”?’ in Poguntke, T. and Webb, P., The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)
Hellowell, M, ‘The UK's Private Finance Initiative: History, Evaluation, Prospects’ in Hodge, G.A., Greve, C. and Boardman, A.E. (eds.), International Handbook on Public-Private Partnerships (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2010)
Henderson, E.G., Foundations of English Administrative Law: Certiorari and Mandamus in the Seventeenth Century (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1963)
Henrietta, J.A., ‘Magistrates, Common Law Lawyers, Legislators: The Three Legal Systems of British America’ in Grossberg, M. and Tomlins, C. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Law in America (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008), vol. I
Hetherington, M.J., ‘Review Article: Putting Polarization in Perspective’ (2009) 39 British Journal of Political Science413Google Scholar
Hewart, G., The New Despotism (London, Ernest Benn, 1929)
Hill, A., ‘In Defense of Our Law of Sovereign Immunity’ (2001) 42 Boston College Law Review485Google Scholar
Hill, G., ‘Private Law Actions Against the Government, Part 1: Removing the Government's Immunity from Suit in Federal Cases’ (2006) 30 Melbourne University Law Review716Google Scholar
Hill, G., ‘Private Law Actions Against the Government, (Part 2: Two Unresolved Questions about Section 64 of the Judiciary Act’ (2006) 29(3) University of New South Wales Law Journal1Google Scholar
Hill, L.B., ‘The Ombudsman Revisited: Thirty Years of Hawaiian Experience’ (2002) 62 Public Administration Review24Google Scholar
Hirschl, R., ‘The Question of Case Selection in Comparative Constitutional Law’ (2005) 53 American Journal of Comparative Law125Google Scholar
Hodge, G.A. and Duffield, C.F., ‘The Australian PPP Experience: Observations and Reflections’ in Hodge, G.A.,Greve, C. and Boardman, A.E. (eds.), International Handbook on Public-Private Partnerships (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2010)
Hogg, P.W., ‘Victoria's Crown Proceedings Act’ (1970) 7 Melbourne University Law Review342Google Scholar
Hogue, H.B., Presidential Reorganization Authority: History, Recent Initiatives, and Options for Congress (Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, 2012)
Hogwood, B.W., Judge, D. and McVicar, M., ‘Agencies and Accountability’ in Rhodes, R.A.W. (ed.), Transforming British Government, vol. I, Changing Institutions (Houndmills: Macmillan, 2000)
Holdsworth, W.S., ‘The History of Remedies Against the Crown’ (1922) 38 Law Quarterly Review141Google Scholar
Holdsworth, W.S., Essays in Law and History (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1946)
Holloway, I., ‘Sir Francis Forbes and the Earliest Australian Public Law Cases’ (2004) 22 Law and History Review209Google Scholar
Holtzoff, A., ‘The Handling of Claims Against the Federal Government’ (1942) 9 Law and Contemporary Problems311Google Scholar
Hood, C., Scott, C., James, O., Jones, G. and Travers, T., Regulation Inside Government: Waste-Watchers, Quality Police and Sleaze-Busters (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999)
Horn, M.J., The Political Economy of Public Administration: Institutional Choice in the Public Sector (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995)
Horwitz, M.J., The Transformation of American Law, 1780–1860 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977)
Horwitz, M.J., ‘The History of the Public/Private Distinction’ (1982) 130 University of Pennsylvania Law Review1423Google Scholar
Howell, W.G., Power Without Persuasion: The Politics of Direct Presidential Action (Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2003)
Howell, W.G. and Ahmed, F.Z., ‘Voting for the President: The Supreme Court During War’ (2012) 30 Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization39Google Scholar
Hoyos, R.J., ‘Who are “the People”?’, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2633349
Huber, J.D. and Shipan, C.R., Deliberate Discretion: The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002)
Hughes, G., ‘Common Law Systems’ in Morrison, A.B. (ed.), Fundamentals of American Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996)
Hunt, M., ‘The Joint Committee on Human Rights’ in Horne, A., Drewry, G. and Oliver, D. (eds.), Parliament and the Law (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2013)
Huntington, S.P., Political Order in Changing Societies (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1968)
Ibbetson, D., ‘Historical Research in Law’ in Cane, P. and Tushnet, M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Legal Studies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003)
Ibbetson, D., ‘Custom in Medieval Law’ in Perreau-Saussine, A. and Murphy, J.B., The Nature of Customary Law: Legal, Historical and Philosophic Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007)
Ilbert, C., Legislative Methods and Forms (London: Clarendon Press, 1901)
Irving, H., ‘Making the Federal Commonwealth, 1890–1901’ in Bashford, A. and Macintyre, S. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Australia, vol. I, Indigenous and Colonial Australia (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013)
Jackson, R., The Chief: The Biography of Gordon Hewart, Lord Chief Justice of England 1922–1940 (London: George G. Harrap & Co., 1959)
Jackson, V.C., ‘Suing the Federal Government: Sovereignty, Immunity, and Judicial Independence’ (2003) 35 George Washington International Law Journal521Google Scholar
Jaffe, L.L., ‘Suits Against Governments and Officers: Sovereign Immunity’ (1963) 27 Harvard Law Review1Google Scholar
Jaffe, L.L. and Henderson, E.G., ‘Judicial Review and the Rule of Law: Historical Origins’ (1956) 72 Law Quarterly Review345Google Scholar
James, O., ‘Executive Agencies and Joined-Up Government in the UK’ in Pollitt, C. and Talbot, C. (eds.), Unbundled Government: A Critical Analysis of the Global Trend to Agencies, Quangos and Contractualisation (London: Routledge, 2004)
Jeffries, J.C., ‘The Liability Rule for Constitutional Torts’ (2013) 99 Virginia Law Review207Google Scholar
Jensen, C.B. and McGrath, R.J., ‘Making Rules about Rulemaking: A Comparison of Presidential and Parliamentary Systems’ (2011) 64 Political Research Quarterly656Google Scholar
Jenson, D.C., ‘From Deference to Restraint: Using the Chevron Framework to Evaluate Presidential Signing Statements’ (2007) 91 Minnesota Law Review1908Google Scholar
Johnsen, D.E., ‘Functional Departmentalism and Nonjudicial Interpretation: Who Determines Constitutional Meaning?’ (2004) 67 Law and Contemporary Problems105Google Scholar
Johnson, C. and Talbot, C., ‘The UK Parliament and Performance: Challenging or Challenged?’ (2007) 73 International Review of Administrative Sciences113Google Scholar
Jones, C. (ed.), A Short History of Parliament (Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 2009)
Josev, T., ‘The Late Arrival of the Judicial Activism Debate in Australian Public Discourse’ (2013) 24 Public Law Review17Google Scholar
Judge, D., The Parliamentary State (London: Sage Publications, 1993)
Kagan, E., ‘Presidential Administration’ (2001) 114 Harvard Law Review2245Google Scholar
Kagan, R.A., Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001)
Katyal, N.K., ‘Internal Separation of Powers: Checking Today's Most Dangerous Branch from Within’ (2006) 115 Yale Law Journal2314Google Scholar
Katz, R.S., ‘The United States: Divided Government and Divided Parties’ in Blondel, J. and Cotta, M. (eds.), Party and Government: An Inquiry into the Relationship between Governments and Supporting Parties in Liberal Democracies (Houndmills: Macmillan, 1996)
Keeton, G.W., The Passing of Parliament (London: Ernest Benn, 1952)
Keller, M., America's Three Regimes: A New Political History (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007)
Keller, M., ‘Powers and Rights: Two Centuries of American Constitutionalism’ (1987) 74 Journal of American History675Google Scholar
Kercher, B., An Unruly Child: A History of Law in Australia (St Leonards: Allen and Unwin, 1995)
Kerwin, C.M. and Furlong, S.R., Rulemaking: How Government Agencies Write Law and Make Policy, 4th edn (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2010)
Kettl, D.F., Sharing Power: Public Governance and Private Markets (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1993)
Kettl, D.F., The Global Public Management Revolution, 2nd edn (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2005)
Kettl, D.F., ‘Managing Boundaries in American Administration: The Collaborative Imperative’ (2006) 66 Public Administration Review10Google Scholar
Kian, S., ‘The Path of the Constitution: The Original System of Remedies, How it Changed, and How the Court Responded’ (2012) 87 New York University Law Review132Google Scholar
Kinley, D., ‘Crown Immunity: A Lesson from Australia?’ (1990) 53 Modern Law Review819Google Scholar
Klafter, C.E., ‘The Americanization of Blackstone's Commentaries’ in Cawthon, E.A. and Narrett, D.E. (eds.), Essays on English Law and the American Experience (College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press, 1994)
Klijn, E.H. and Koopenjam, J.F.M., ‘Accountable Networks’ in Bovens, M., Goodin, R.E. and Schillemans, T. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014)
Knott, J.H. and Miller, G.J., ‘When Ambition Checks Ambition: Bureaucratic Trustees and the Separation of Powers’ (2008) 38 American Review of Public Administration387Google Scholar
Koppell, J.G.S., The Politics of Quasi-Government: Hybrid Organizations and the Dynamics of Bureaucratic Control (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003)
Korn, J., ‘The Legislative Veto and the Limits of Public Choice Analysis’ (1995) Political Science Quarterly 873Google Scholar
Kovacs, K.E., ‘Revealing Redundancy: The Tension Between Sovereign Immunity and Nonstatutory Review’ (2005) 54 Drake Law Review77Google Scholar
Krause, G.A., ‘Legislative Delegation of Authority to Bureaucratic Agencies’ in Durant, R.F. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of American Bureaucracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)
Krause, R.S. and Gregory, F.M., ‘Comments on Proposed Amendments to Section 3 of the Administrative Procedure Act: The Freedom of Information Bill’ (1964–65) 40 Notre Dame Lawyer417Google Scholar
Krent, H.J., ‘Reconceptualizing Sovereign Immunity’ (1992) 45 Vanderbilt Law Review1529Google Scholar
Krent, H.J., ‘Federal Agency Ombuds: The Costs, Benefits, and Countenance of Confidentiality’ (2000) 52 Administrative Law Review17Google Scholar
Krent, H.J. and Shenkman, E.G., ‘Of Citizen Suits and Citizen Sunstein’ (1993) 91 Michigan Law Review1793Google Scholar
Kriner, D. and Schwartz, L., ‘Divided Government and Congressional Investigations’ (2008) Legislative Studies Quarterly 295Google Scholar
Lacey, N. and Soskice, D., ‘Why are the Truly Disadvantaged American, When the UK is Bad Enough? A Political Economy Analysis of Local Autonomy in Criminal Justice, Education, Residential Zoning’, SSRN, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2264749
Landis, J.M., The Administrative Process (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1938)
Lanham, D., ‘Delegated Legislation and Publication’ (1974) 37 Modern Law Review510Google Scholar
Larcombe, F.A., The Development of Local Government in New South Wales (Melbourne: FW Cheshire, 1961)
Larkin, P. and Uhr, J., ‘Bipartisanship and Bicameralism in Australia's “War on Terror”: Forcing Limits on the Extension of Executive Power’ (2009) 15 Journal of Legislative Studies239Google Scholar
Lawson, C., ‘The Legal Structures of Responsible Government and Ministerial Responsibility’ (2011) 35 Melbourne Law Review1005Google Scholar
Seuer, A. Le, ‘Three Strikes and it's Out? The UK Government's Strategy to Oust Judicial Review from Immigration and Asylum Decision-making’ [2004] Public Law 225Google Scholar
Seuer, A. Le, ‘Parliamentary Accountability and the Judicial System’ in Bamforth, N. and Leyland, P. (eds.), Accountability in the Contemporary Constitution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)
Leddy, N.J., ‘Determining Deference: Examining When Courts Should Defer to Agency Use of Presidential Signing Statements’ (2007) 59 Administrative Law Review869Google Scholar
Lee, F.P., ‘The Origins of Judicial Control of Federal Executive Action’ (1948) 36 Georgetown Law Journal287Google Scholar
Lee, H.P. and Campbell, E., The Australian Judiciary, 2nd edn (Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 2013)
Lee, J.M., Jones, G.W. and Burnham, J., At the Centre of Whitehall: Advising the Prime Minister and Cabinet (Houndmills: Macmillan Press, 1998)
Lee, Y.S., ‘The Judicial Theory of a Reasonable Public Servant’ (2004) 64 Public Administration Review425Google Scholar
Leeming, M., ‘Common Law Within Three Federations’ (2007) 18 Public Law Review186Google Scholar
Leeming, M., Resolving Conflicts of Laws (Sydney: Federation Press, 2011)
Leeming, M., Authority to Decide: The Law of Jurisdiction in Australia (Sydney: Federation Press, 2013)
Sir, A. Leggatt, Tribunals for Users: One System, One Service (London, 2001)
Leigh, I., ‘Bias, Necessity and the Convention’ [2002] Public Law 407Google Scholar
Leigh, I., ‘The Changing Nature of Local and Regional Democracy’ in Jowell, J. and Oliver, D. (eds.), The Changing Constitution, 7th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)
Leopold, P., ‘Letters To and From “Next Steps” Agency Chief Executives’ [1994] Public Law 214Google Scholar
Levin, R.M., ‘“Vacation” at Sea: Judicial Remedies and Equitable Discretion in Administrative Law’ (2003) 53 Duke Law Journal291Google Scholar
Levinson, D.J. and Pildes, R.H., ‘Separation of Parties, not Powers’ (2006) 119 Harvard Law Review2312Google Scholar
Levy, J., Strengthening Parliament's Powers of Scrutiny? An Assessment of the Introduction of Public Bill Committees (London: The Constitution Unit, 2009)
Levy, J., ‘Public Bill Committees, An Assessment: Scrutiny Sought; Scrutiny Gained’ (2010) 63 Parliamentary Affairs534Google Scholar
Levy, L.W., ‘The Original Constitution as a Bill of Rights’ (1992) 9 Constitutional Commentary163Google Scholar
Lewis, D.E., Presidents and the Politics of Agency Design: Political Insulation in the United States Government Bureaucracy, 1946–1997 (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003)
Lewis, D.E., ‘The Adverse Consequences of the Politics of Agency Design for Presidential Management in the United States: The Relative Durability of Insulated Agencies’ (2004) 34 British Journal of Political Science377Google Scholar
Lewis, D.E., The Politics of Presidential Appointments: Political Control and Bureaucratic Performance (Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2008)
Lewis, D.E. and Selin, J.L., Sourcebook of United States Executive Agencies (Administrative Conference of the United States, 2012)
Ley, A.J., ‘The Costs and Benefits of American Policy-Making Venues’ (2014) 48 Law and Society Review91Google Scholar
Light, P.C., Monitoring Government: Inspectors General and the Search for Accountability (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1993)
Light, P.C., Thickening Government: Federal Hierarchy and the Diffusion of Accountability (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1995)
Light, P.C., The True Size of Government (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1999)
Linos, K., The Democratic Foundations of Policy Diffusion (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013)
Lipshutz, B., ‘Justice Thomas and the Originalist Turn in Administrative Law’ (2015) 125 Yale Law Journal Forum94Google Scholar
Loughlin, M., ‘Restructuring of Central-Local Relations’ in Jowell, J. and Oliver, D. (eds.), The Changing Constitution, 4th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000)
Loveday, P., Martin, A.W. and Parker, R.S., The Emergence of the Australian Party System (Sydney: Hale & Iremonger, 1977)
Lovell, C.R., English Constitutional and Legal History: A Survey (New York: Oxford University Press, 1962)
Lovell, G.I., Legislative Deferrals: Statutory Ambiguity, Judicial Power, and American Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003)
Lowi, T.J., ‘Party, Policy, and Constitution in America’ in Chambers, W.N. and Burnham, W.D. (eds.), The American Party Systems: Stages of Political Development (New York: Oxford University Press, 1975)
LSE GV314 Group, ‘New Life at the Top: Special Advisers in British Government’ (2012) 65 Parliamentary Affairs715
Lubbers, J.S., A Guide to Federal Agency Rulemaking, 4th edn (Chicago, IL: American Bar Association, 2006)
Lubbers, J.S., ‘The Transformation of the US Rulemaking Process: For Better or Worse’ (2008) 43 Ohio Northern University Law Review469Google Scholar
Lucy, R., The Australian Form of Government (Melbourne: Macmillan, 1985)
Lumb, R.D., The Constitutions of the Australian States (St Lucia: University of Queensland Press, 1977)
Macey, J.R., ‘Organizational Design and Political Control of Administrative Agencies’ (1992) 8 Journal of Law, Economics and Organization93Google Scholar
Magill, M.E., ‘Agency Choice of Policymaking Form’ (2004) 71 University of Chicago Law Review1383Google Scholar
Magill, M.E., ‘Standing for the Public: A Lost History?’ (2009) 95 Virginia Law Review1131Google Scholar
Maier, P., American Scripture: Making the Declaration of Independence (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1998)
Maitland, F.W., The Constitutional History of England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1908)
Malcolm, D., ‘The Limitations, if Any, on the Powers of Parliament to Delegate the Power to Legislate’ (1992) 66 Australian Law Journal247Google Scholar
Maley, M., ‘Australia’ in Eichbaum, C. and Shaw, R., Partisan Appointees and Public Servants: An International Analysis of the Role of the Political Adviser (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2010)
Manning, J.F., ‘Constitutional Structure and Judicial Deference to Agency Interpretations of Agency Rules’ (1996) 96 Columbia Law Review612Google Scholar
Manning, J.F., ‘Chevron and Legislative History’ (2014) 82 George Washington Law Review1517Google Scholar
Marisam, J., ‘The President's Agency Selection Powers’ (2013) 65 Administrative Law Review821Google Scholar
Marshall, G., ‘Due Process in England’ in Pennock, J.R. and Chapman, J.W. (eds.), Due Process (New York: New York University Press, 1977)
Marshall, W.P., ‘The Limits of Congress's Authority to Investigate the President’ (2004) 4 University of Illinois Law Review781Google Scholar
Masterman, R. and Murkens, J.E.K., ‘Skirting Supremacy and Subordination: The Constitutional Authority of the United Kingdom Supreme Court’ [2013] Public Law 80Google Scholar
Martimort, D., ‘The Life Cycle of Regulatory Agencies: Dynamic Capture and Transaction Costs’ (1999) 66 Review of Economic Studies929Google Scholar
Martin, D.S., ‘Management Consultancy’ in Ferlie, E., Lynn, L.E. Jr and Pollitt, C., The Oxford Handbook of Public Management (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)
Mashaw, J.L., ‘The Management Side of Due Process: Some Theoretical and Litigation Notes on the Assurance of Accuracy, Fairness, and Timeliness in the Adjudication of Social Welfare Claims’ (1974) 59 Cornell Law Review772Google Scholar
Mashaw, J.L., Due Process in the Administrative State (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1985)
Mashaw, J.L., ‘Explaining Administrative Process: Normative, Positive, and Critical Stories of Legal Development’ (1990) 6 Journal of Law, Economics and Organization267Google Scholar
Mashaw, J.L., ‘Improving the Environment of Agency Rulemaking: An Essay on Management, Games and Accountability’ (1994) 57 Law and Contemporary Problems185Google Scholar
Mashaw, J.L., Greed, Chaos and Governance: Using Public Choice to Improve Public Law (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1997)
Mashaw, J.L., ‘Small Things Like Reasons are Put in a Jar: Reason and Legitimacy in the Administrative State’ (2001) 70 Fordham Law Review17Google Scholar
Mashaw, J.L., ‘Norms, Practices, and the Paradox of Deference: A Preliminary Inquiry into Agency Statutory Interpretation’ (2005) 57 Administrative Law Review501Google Scholar
Mashaw, J.L., ‘Agency-Centered or Court-Centered Administrative Law? A Dialogue with Richard Pierce on Agency Statutory Interpretation’ (2007) 59 Administrative Law Review889Google Scholar
Mashaw, J.L., Creating the Administrative Constitution: The Lost One Hundred Years of American Administrative Law (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2012)
Mashaw, J.L., Merrill, R.A. and Shane, P.M., Administrative Law: The American Public Law System, Cases and Materials, 6th edn (St Paul, MN: West, 2003)
Massangale, E.W., Fundamentals of Federal Contract Law (New York: Quorum Books, 1991)
Masterman, R., The Separation of Powers in the Contemporary Constitution: Judicial Competence and Independence in the United Kingdom (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011)
Mayer, K.R., With the Stroke of a Pen: Executive Orders and Presidential Power (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001)
Mayhew, D.R., Congress: The Electoral Connection, 2nd edn (with Foreword by D.R. Arnold) (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004)
McCrudden, C., Buying Social Justice: Equality, Government Procurement and Legal Change (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007)
McCubbins, M.D., Noll, R.G. and Weingast, B.R., ‘Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control’ (1987) 3 Journal of Law, Economics and Organization243Google Scholar
McCubbins, M.D., Noll, R.G. and Weingast, B.R., ‘Structure and Process, Politics and Policy: Administrative Arrangements and the Political Control of Agencies’ (1989) 75 Virginia Law Review431Google Scholar
McCubbins, M.D. and Schwartz, T., ‘Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms’ (1984) 28 American Journal of Political Science165Google Scholar
McDonald, L., ‘Rethinking Unreasonableness Review’ (2014) 25 Public Law Review117Google Scholar
McDonald, L., ‘Inadequacy of Justification as a Basis for Judicial Review in Australia: Process and Substance?’, paper delivered at Cambridge Public Law Conference, September 2014
McGarity, T.O., ‘Some Thoughts on “Deossifying” the Rulemaking Process’ (1992) 41 Duke Law Journal1385Google Scholar
McGeary, M.N., ‘Congressional Investigations: Historical Development’ (1951) 18 University of Chicago Law Review425Google Scholar
McGehee, L.P., Due Process of Law Under the Federal Constitution (Northport, Long Island, NY: Edward Thompson Co., 1906)
McGuire, M., ‘Collaborative Public Management: Assessing What We Know and How We Know It’ (2006) 66 Public Administration Review33Google Scholar
McIlwain, C.H., The High Court of Parliament and Its Supremacy: An Historical Essay on the Boundaries Between Legislation and Adjudication in England (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1910)
McLean, J., ‘Crown in Contract and Administrative Law’ (2004) 24 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies129Google Scholar
McLean, J., Searching for the State in British Legal Thought: Competing Conceptions of the Public Sphere (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012)
McMillan, J., ‘Re-Thinking the Separation of Powers’ (2010) 38 Federal Law Review423Google Scholar
McMinn, W.G., A Constitutional History of Australia (Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 1979)
McNollgast, , ‘Positive and Normative Models of Procedural Rights: An Integrative Approach to Administrative Procedures’ (1990) 6 Journal of Law, Economics and Organization307Google Scholar
McNollgast, , ‘The Political Origins of the Administrative Procedure Act’ (1999) 15 Journal of Law, Economics, and Organisation180Google Scholar
McNollgast, and Rodriguez, D.R., ‘Administrative Law Agonistes’ (2008) 108 Columbia Law Review Sidebar15Google Scholar
Meagher, D., ‘The Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011 and the Courts’ (2014) 42 Federal Law Review1Google Scholar
Meier, K.J. and Hill, G.C., ‘Bureaucracy in the Twenty-First Century’ in Ferlie, E., Lynn, L.E. Jr and Pollitt, C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Management (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)
Melnick, R.S., ‘The Politics of Partnership’ (1985) 45 Public Administration Review653Google Scholar
Melnick, R.S., ‘Administrative Law and Bureaucratic Reality’ (1992) 44 Administrative Law Review245Google Scholar
Melnick, R.S., ‘The Courts, Jurisprudence, and the Executive Branch’ in Aberbach, J.D. and Peterson, M.A. (eds.), The Executive Branch (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)
Mendelson, N.A., ‘Six Easy Ways to Increase Contractor Accountability’ in Freeman, J. and Minow, M. (eds.), Government by Contract: Outsourcing and American Democracy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009)
Merrill, T.W., ‘The Common Law Powers of Federal Courts’ (1985) 52 University of Chicago Law Review1Google Scholar
Merrill, T.W., ‘Public Contracts, Private Contracts, and the Transformation of the Constitutional Order’ (1987) 37 Case Western Reserve Law Review597Google Scholar
Merrill, T.W., ‘Capture Theory and the Courts: 1967–1983’ (1997) 72 Chicago-Kent Law Review1039Google Scholar
Merrill, T.W., ‘The Accardi Principle’ (2006) 74 George Washington Law Review569Google Scholar
Merrill, T.W., ‘The Origins of American-style Judicial Review’ in Rose-Ackerman, S. and Lindseth, P.L. (eds.), Comparative Administrative Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2010)
Merrill, T.W., ‘Article III, Agency Adjudication, and the Origins of the Appellate Review Model of Administrative Law’ (2011) 111 Columbia Law Review939Google Scholar
Metzger, G.E., ‘Privatization as Delegation’ (2003) 103 Columbia Law Review1367Google Scholar
Metzger, G.E., ‘The Interdependent Relationship between Internal and External Separation of Powers’ (2009) 59 Emory Law Journal423Google Scholar
Metzger, G.E., ‘Ordinary Administrative Law as Constitutional Common Law’ (2010) 110 Columbia Law Review479Google Scholar
Meyerson, D., ‘Rethinking the Constitutionality of Delegated Legislation’ (2003) 11 Australian Journal of Administrative Law45Google Scholar
Michaels, J.D., ‘An Enduring, Evolving Separation of Powers’ (2015) 115 Columbia Law Review515Google Scholar
Michaels, J.D., ‘Running Government Like a Business…Then and Now’ (2015) 128 Harvard Law Review1152Google Scholar
Michaels, R., ‘The Functional Method of Comparative Law’ in Reimann, M. and Zimmermann, R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006)
Miles, T.J. and Sunstein, C.R., ‘Do Judges Make Regulatory Policy? An Empirical Investigation of Chevron’ (2006) 73 University of Chicago Law Review823Google Scholar
Miller, C.A., ‘The Forest of Due Process of Law: The American Constitutional Tradition’ in Pennock, J.R. and Chapman, J.W. (eds.), Due Process (New York, CT: New York University Press, 1977)
Miller, D., ‘The Competitive Model of Democracy’ in Duncan, G. (ed.), Democratic Theory and Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983)
Miller, G.P., ‘Rights and Structure in Constitutional Law’ (1991) Social Philosophy and Policy196Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice, The Governance of Britain, Review of the Executive Royal Prerogative Powers: Final Report (2009)
Moe, R.C., ‘The Emerging Federal Quasi Government: Issues of Management and Accountability’ (2001) 61 Public Administration Review, 290Google Scholar
Moe, R.C., ‘Governance Principles: The Neglected Basis of Federal Management’ in Stanton, T.H. and Ginsberg, B. (eds.), Making Government Manageable: Executive Organization and Management in the Twenty-First Century (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004)
Moe, T.M. and Caldwell, M., ‘The Institutional Foundations of Democratic Government: A Comparison of Presidential and Parliamentary Systems’ (1994) 150 Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics171Google Scholar
Moe, T.M. and Howell, W.G., ‘The Presidential Power of Unilateral Action’ (1999) 15 Journal of Law, Economics and Organization132Google Scholar
Monaghan, H.P., ‘Marbury and the Administrative State’ (1983) 83 Columbia Law Review1Google Scholar
Monk, D., ‘Committee Inquiries in the Australian Parliament and their Influence on Government: Government Acceptance of Recommendations as a Measure of Parliamentary Performance’ (2012) 18 Journal of Legislative Studies137Google Scholar
Moran, M., The British Regulatory State: High Modernism and Hyper-Innovation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003)
Moreno, P.D., The American State from the Civil War to the New Deal: The Twilight of Constitutionalism and the Triumph of Progressivism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013)
Mosher, F.C., The GAO: The Quest for Accountability in American Government (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1979)
Moulton, L. and Anherier, H.K., ‘Public-Private Partnerships in the United States’ in Osborne, S.P. (ed.), Public-Private Partnerships: Theory and Practice in International Perspective (London: Routledge, 2000)
Mulgan, R., ‘Auditors-General: Cuckoos in the Managerialist Nest?’ (2001) 60(2) Australian Journal of Public Administration24Google Scholar
Mulgan, R., ‘Public Accountability of Provider Agencies: The Case of the Australian “Centre-link”’ (2002) 68 International Review of Administrative Sciences45Google Scholar
Mulgan, R., Holding Power to Account: Accountability in Modern Democracies (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003)
Mulgan, R., ‘Government Accountability for Outsourced Services’ (2006) 65 Australian Journal of Public Administration48Google Scholar
Mulgan, R., ‘The Accountability Priorities of Australian Parliamentarians’ (2008) 67 Australian Journal of Public Administration457Google Scholar
Mulgan, R., ‘Accountability Deficits’ in Bovens, M., Goodin, R.E. and Schillemans, T. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014)
Mulvany, J.F., ‘Delegated and Sub-Delegated Legislation: Some Further Aspects’ (1943) 17 Australian Law Journal119Google Scholar
Murray, P., ‘Process, Substance and the History of Error of Law Review’, paper delivered at the Cambridge Public Law Conference, September 2014
Neely, R., How Courts Govern America (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1981)
Nelson, W.E., The Roots of American Bureaucracy 1830–1900 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982)
Neustadt, R.E., Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents: The Politics of Leadership from Roosevelt to Reagan (New York: Free Press, 1990)
Nolan, D., ‘Negligence and Human Rights Law: The Case for Separate Development’ (2013) 76 Modern Law Review286Google Scholar
Nolan, D.R., ‘Sir William Blackstone and the New American Republic: A Study of Intellectual Impact’ (1976) 51 New York University Law Review731Google Scholar
Note, ‘Delegated National Security Legislation by the States’ (1942) 16 Australian Law Journal61
Note, ‘The Transition to Peace’ (1945) 19 Australian Law Journal101
Note, ‘Context-Sensitive Deference to Presidential Signing Statements’ (2006) 120 Harvard Law Review597
Note, ‘Developments in the Law: Presidential Authority’ (2012) 125 Harvard Law Review1057
Novak, W.J., The People's Welfare: Law and Regulation in Nineteenth-Century America (Chapel Hill, NC and London: University of North Carolina Press, 1996)
Novak, W.J., ‘The Myth of the “Weak” American State’ (2008) 113 American Historical Review752Google Scholar
Novak, W.J., ‘Public-Private Governance: A Historical Introduction’ in Freeman, J. and Minow, M. (eds.), Government by Contract: Outsourcing and American Democracy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009)
O'Connor, S.D., ‘Reflections on Preclusion of Judicial Review in England and the United States’ (1986) 27 William and Mary Law Review643Google Scholar
Oleszek, W.J., Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process, 9th edn (Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 2014)
Oliver, D., Constitutional Reform in the UK (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003)
Oliver, D., ‘The United Kingdom’ in Oliver, D. and Fusaro, C., How Constitutions Change: A Comparative Study (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011)
Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T., Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector (Addison-Wesley Publishing Co, 1992)
Owens, J.E., ‘Congressional Acquiescence to Presidentialism in the US “War on Terror”’ (2009) 15 Journal of Legislative Studies147Google Scholar
Owens, J.E. and Loomis, B.A., ‘Qualified Exceptionalism: The US Congress in Comparative Perspective’ (2006) 12 Journal of Legislative Studies258Google Scholar
Page, A., ‘Regulating the Regulator: A Lawyer's Perspective on Accountability and Control’ in Ferran, E. and Goodhart, C.A.E. (eds.), Regulating Financial Services and Markets in the Twenty-First Century (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001)
Page, E.C., Political Authority and Bureaucratic Power: A Comparative Analysis (Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books, 1985)
Page, E.C., Governing by Numbers (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001)
Page, E.C., ‘The Civil Servant as Legislator: Law Making in British Administration’ (2003) 81 Public Administration651Google Scholar
Page, E.C., ‘Has the Whitehall Model Survived?’ (2010) 76 International Review of Administrative Sciences407Google Scholar
Page, E.C., Policy Without Politicians: Bureaucratic Influence in Comparative Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012)
Page, E.C., and Jenkins, B., Policy Bureaucracy: Government with a Cast of Thousands (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)
Pares, R., King George III and the Politicians (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1953)
Parris, H., Constitutional Bureaucracy (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1969)
Paterson, A., Final Judgment: The Last Law Lords and the Supreme Court (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013)
Paulsen, M.S., ‘The Most Dangerous Branch: Executive Power to Say What the Law Is’ (1994) 83 Georgetown Law Journal217Google Scholar
Payling, S., ‘The House of Commons, 1307–1529’ in Jones, C. (ed.), A Short History of Parliament (Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 2009)
Peacey, J., ‘The House of Lords and the “Other House”, 1640–1660’ in Jones, C. (ed.), A Short History of Parliament (Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 2009)
Pearce, D., ‘The Commonwealth Ombudsman: The Right Office in the Wrong Place’ in Creyke, R. and McMillan, J. (eds.), The Kerr Vision of Australian Administrative Law: At the Twenty-Five Year Mark (Canberra: Australian Institute of Administrative Law, 1998)
Pearce, D., Administrative Appeals Tribunal, 3rd edn (Australia: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2013)
Pearce, D. and Argument, S., Delegated Legislation in Australia, 4th edn (Australia: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2012)
Pearce, D.C. and Geddes, R.S., Statutory Interpretation in Australia, 7th edn (Australia: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2011)
Jr, W.F. Pedersen, ‘Formal Records and Informal Rulemaking’ (1975) 85 Yale Law Journal38Google Scholar
Peters, B.G., ‘The Failure of Managerial Reform in a Managerial Society: Public Sector Reform in the United States’ in Hesse, J.J., Hood, C. and Peters, B.G. (eds.), Paradoxes in Public Sector Reform: An International Comparison (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2003)
Peters, B.G., ‘Public Administration in the United States: Anglo-American, Just American, or Which American?’ in Painter, M. and Peters, B.G. (eds.), Tradition and Public Administration (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010)
Peters, B.G., ‘The United States’ in Eichbaum, C. and Shaw, R. (eds.), Partisan Appointees and Public Servants: An International Analysis of the Role of the Political Adviser (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2010)
Pfander, J.E., ‘Sovereign Immunity and the Right to Petition: Toward a First Amendment Right to Pursue Judicial Claims against the Government’ (1997) 91 Northwestern University Law Review899Google Scholar
Pfiffner, J.P., ‘Dysfunctional Politics in the United States: Origins and Consequences’, Australian Senate Occasional Lecture, 19 July 2013, available at www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Public_Information_and_Events/occalect/transcripts/~/media/934FA1BF8C83424ABE86A95EB2D58351.ashx
Jr, R.J. Pierce, ‘Chevron and its Aftermath: Judicial Review of Agency Interpretations of Statutory Provisions’ (1988) 41 Vanderbilt Law Review301Google Scholar
Jr, R.J. Pierce, ‘Rulemaking and the Administrative Procedure Act’ (1996) 32 Tulsa Law Journal185Google Scholar
Jr, R.J. Pierce, ‘How Agencies Should Give Meaning to the Statutes They Administer: A Response to Mashaw and Strauss’ (2007) 59 Administrative Law Review197Google Scholar
Jr, R.J. Pierce, Shapiro, S.A. and Verkuil, P.R., Administrative Law and Process, 5th edn (New York: Foundation Press, 2009)
Pildes, R.H., ‘Institutional Formalism and Realism in Constitutional and Public Law’ [2014] Supreme Court Review 1Google Scholar
Plucknett, T.F.T., Legislation of Edward I (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1949)
Polden, P., ‘Local Courts’ in Cornish, W., Anderson, S., Cocks, R., Lobban, M., Polden, P. and Smith, K., The Oxford History of the Laws of England, vol. XI, The Legal System (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)
Pollitt, C., Managerialism and the Public Services: Cuts or Cultural Change in the 1990s, 2nd edn (Oxford: Blackwell, 1993)
Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G., Public Management Reform, A Comparative Analysis: New Public Management, Governance and the Neo-Weberian State, 3rd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)
Poole, T., ‘Judicial Review at the Margins: Law, Power, and Prerogative’ (2010) 60 University of Toronto Law Journal81Google Scholar
Port, F.J., Administrative Law (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1929)
Posner, E.A. and Vermeule, A., ‘Interring the Nondelegation Doctrine’ (2002) 69 Chicago Law Review1721Google Scholar
Postema, G.J., Bentham and the Common Law Tradition (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989)
Postema, G.J., ‘Melody and Law's Mindfulness of Time’ (2004) 17 Ratio Juris203Google Scholar
Jr, L.A. Powe, The Supreme Court and the American Elite, 1789–2008 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009)
Power, M., The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997)
Power, M., ‘The Theory of the Audit Explosion’ in Ferlie, E., Lynn, L.E. Jr and Pollitt, C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Management (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)
Priel, D., ‘The Indirect Influence of Politics on Tort Liability of Public Authorities in English Law’ (2013) 47 Law and Society Review169Google Scholar
Prindle, D., ‘The Invisible Hand of James Madison’ (2004) 15 Constitutional Political Economy223Google Scholar
Pritchett, C.H., Congress Versus the Supreme Court 1957–1960 (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1961)
Prosser, T., Nationalised Industries and Public Control (Oxford: Blackwell, 1986)
Prosser, T., The Regulatory Enterprise: Government, Regulation and Legitimacy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)
Prosser, T., The Economic Constitution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014)
Quick, J. and Garran, R., Commentaries on the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia (Sydney: Angus and Robertson, 1901)
Rabin, R.L., ‘Federal Regulation in Historical Perspective’ (1986) 38 Stanford Law Review1189Google Scholar
Rabkin, J.A., ‘The Secret Life of the Private Attorney General’ (1998) 61 Law and Contemporary Problems179Google Scholar
Radin, B.A., ‘The Government Performance and Results Act and the Tradition of Federal Management Reform: Square Pegs in Round Holes?’ (2000) 10 Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory111Google Scholar
Rakove, J.N., ‘Confederation and Constitution’ in Grossberg, M. and Tomlins, C. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Law in America (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008), vol. I
Raso, C.N., ‘Strategic or Sincere? Analyzing Agency Use of Guidance Documents’ (2010) 119 Yale Law Journal782Google Scholar
Raso, C.N. and Eskridge, W.N., ‘Chevron as a Canon, not a Precedent: An Empirical Study of What Motivates Justices in Agency Deference Cases’ (2010) 110 Columbia Law Review1727Google Scholar
Rawlings, R., ‘Review, Revenge and Retreat’ (2005) 68 Modern Law Review378Google Scholar
Redish, M.H. and Marshall, L.C., ‘Adjudicatory Independence and the Values of Procedural Due Process’ (1986) 95 Yale Law Journal455Google Scholar
Redlich, J. and Hirst, F.W., The History of Local Government in England, 2nd edn (London: Macmillan, 1970)
Reinert, A.A., ‘Measuring the Success of Bivens Litigation and its Consequences for the Individual Liability Model’ (2010) 62 Stanford Law Review809Google Scholar
Reinert, A.A. and Mulligan, L.N., ‘Asking the First Question: Reframing Bivens after Minneci’ (2013) 90 Washington University Law Review1471Google Scholar
Reinert, A.A. and Mulligan, L.N., Report of Committee on Ministers’ Powers (Cmd 4060, 1932)
Reinert, A.A. and Mulligan, L.N., Report of the Attorney-General's Committee on Administrative Procedure (Washington, 1941)
Reinert, A.A. and Mulligan, L.N., Report of the Commonwealth Administrative Review Committee (Parliamentary Paper No. 144 of 1971)
Reinert, A.A. and Mulligan, L.N., Report of the President's Committee on Administrative Management (Brownlow Committee) (Washington: US Government Printing Office, 1937)
Reinert, A.A. and Mulligan, L.N., Report of the Royal Commission on the Constitution (Canberra: Commonwealth Government Printer, 1929)
Rhodes, R.A.W., ‘Old Institutionalisms’ in Rhodes, R.A.W., Binder, S.A. and Rockman, B.A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006)
Richards, D. and Smith, M.J., Governance and Public Policy in the United Kingdom (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002)
Richards, M.J., Smith, J.L. and Kritzer, H.M., ‘Does Chevron Matter?’ (2006) 28 Law and Policy444Google Scholar
Roberts, A., ‘Performance-based Organizations: Assessing the Gore Plan’ (1997) 57 Public Administration Review465Google Scholar
Robertson, K.G., Public Secrets: A Study in the Development of Government Secrecy (London: Macmillan, 1982)
Robinson, G.O., ‘Access to Government Information: The American Experience’ (1983) 14 Federal Law Review35Google Scholar
Robson, W.A., Justice and Administrative Law (London: Macmillan, 1928)
Robson, W.A., ‘Administrative Law’ in Ginsberg, M. (ed.), Law and Opinion in England in the 20th Century (London: Stevens & Sons, 1959)
Rodriguez, D.B. and Weingast, B.R., ‘The “Reformation of Administrative Law” Revisited’ (2015) 31 Journal of Law, economics and Organization782Google Scholar
Romzek, B.S. and Dubnick, M.J., ‘Accountability in the Public Sector: Lessons from the Challenger Tragedy’ (1987) 47 Public Administration Review227Google Scholar
Rose, R., ‘Giving Direction to Government in Comparative Perspective’ in Aberbach, J.D. and Peterson, M.A., The Executive Branch (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)
Rose-Ackerman, S., Egidy, S. and Fowkes, J., Due Process of Lawmaking: The United States, South Africa, Germany and the European Union (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015)
Rosenberg, M., Congressional Review of Agency Rulemaking: An Update and Assessment of the Congressional Review Act after a Decade (Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, 2008)
Rosenberg, M., The Critical Need for Effective Congressional Review of Agency Rules: Background and Considerations for Incremental Reform (Administrative Conference of the United States, 2012)
Rosenbloom, D.H., ‘Public Administration and the Judiciary: The “New Partnership”’ (1987) 47 Public Administration Review75Google Scholar
Rosenbloom, D.H., Building a Legislative-Centered Public Administration (Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press, 2000)
Rosenbloom, D.H., ‘Retrofitting the Administrative State to the Constitution: Congress and the Judiciary's Twentieth-Century Progress’ (2000) 60 Public Administration Review39Google Scholar
Rosenbloom, D.H., O'Leary, R. and Chanin, J., Public Administration and Law, 3rd edn (Boca Raton, Fl: CRC Press, 2010)
Rourke, F.E., Secrecy and Publicity: Dilemmas of Democracy (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press, 1961)
Roux, T., ‘Reinterpreting “The Mason Court Revolution”: An Historical Institutionalist Account of Judge-Driven Constitutional Transformation in Australia’ (2015) 43 Federal Law Review1Google Scholar
Rowat, D.C., ‘The American Distortion of the Ombudsman Concept and its Influence in Canada’ (2007) 50 Canadian Public Administration42Google Scholar
Rubin, E.L., ‘Due Process and the Administrative State’ (1984) 72 California Law Review1044Google Scholar
Rubin, E.L., ‘It's Time to Make the Administrative Procedure Act Administrative’ (2003) 89 Cornell Law Review95Google Scholar
Rudalevige, A., ‘The Executive Branch and the Legislative Process’ in Aberbach, J.D. and Peterson, M.A. (eds.), The Executive Branch (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)
Ruddock, P., ‘Narrowing of Judicial Review in the Migration Context’ (1997) 15 Australian Institute of Administrative Law Forum13Google Scholar
Rush, M., ‘Engaging with the Enemy: The Parliamentary Participation of Party Leaders, 1945–2010’ (2014) 67 Parliamentary Affairs751Google Scholar
Russell, M.“Never Allow a Crisis Go to Waste”: The Wright Committee Reforms to Strengthen the House of Commons’ (2011) 64 Parliamentary Affairs612Google Scholar
Russell, M. and Benton, M., Selective Influence: The Policy Impact of House of Commons Select Committees (London: The Constitution Unit, 2011)
Rydon, J., ‘Some Problems of Combining the British and American Elements in the Australian Constitution’ (1985) 23 Commonwealth and Comparative Politics67Google Scholar
Saalfield, T., ‘The United Kingdom: Still a Single “Chain of Command”? The Hollowing Out of the “Westminster Model”’ in Strom, K., Müller, W.C. and Bergman, T. (eds.), Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003)
Salamon, L.M. (ed.), The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002)
Sanders, E., ‘Historical Institutionalism’ in Rhodes, R.A.W., Binder, S.A. and Rockman, B.A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006)
Saunders, C., The Constitution of Australia: A Contextual Analysis (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011)
Saunders, C., ‘The Scope of Executive Power’ (2013) 59 Papers on Parliament15Google Scholar
Sayles, G.O., The Functions of the Medieval Parliament of England (London: Hambledon Press, 1988)
Sayre, W.S., ‘Bureaucracies: Some Contrasts in Systems’ (1964) 10 Indian Journal of Public Administration219Google Scholar
Scalia, A., ‘The Doctrine of Standing as an Essential Element of the Separation of Powers’ (1983) 17 Suffolk University Law Review881Google Scholar
Schaffer, B.B., ‘The Idea of the Ministerial Department: Bentham, Mill and Bagehot’ (1957) 11 Australasian Journal of Politics and History60Google Scholar
Scher, S., ‘Conditions for Legislative Control’ (1963) 25 Journal of Politics526Google Scholar
Schick, A., ‘Politics Through Law: Congressional Limitations on Executive Discretion’ in King, A. (ed.), Both Ends of the Avenue: The Presidency, the Executive Branch and Congress in the 1980s (Washington DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 1983)
Schickler, E., ‘The Development of the Congressional Committee System’ in Edwards, G.C., Lee, F.E. and Schickler, E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the American Congress (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)
Schiller, R.E., ‘Enlarging the Administrative Polity: Administrative Law and the Changing Definition of Pluralism, 1945–1970’ (2000) 53 Vanderbilt Law Review1389Google Scholar
Schiller, R.E., ‘Rulemaking's Promise: Administrative Law and Legal Culture in the 1960s and 1970s’ (2001) 53 Administrative Law Review1139Google Scholar
Schroedel, J.R., Congress, The President and Policymaking: A Historical Analysis (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1994)
Schwartz, B., Law and the Executive in Britain: A Comparative Study (New York: New York University Press, 1949)
Schwartz, B., An Introduction to American Administrative Law, 2nd edn (London: Pitman, 1962)
Schwartz, B., ‘The United States: The Doctrine of Executive Privilege’ in Galnoor, I. (ed.), Government Secrecy in Democracies (New York: New York University Press, 1977)
Schwartz, B. and Wade, H.W.R., Legal Control of Government: Administrative Law in Britain and the United States (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972)
Schweber, H., The Creation of American Common Law, 1850–1880: Technology, Politics, and the Construction of Citizenship (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)
Schuck, P.H., Suing Government: Citizen Remedies for Official Wrongs (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1983)
Schuck, P.H. and Kochevar, S., ‘Reg Neg Redux: The Careeer of a Procedural Reform’ (2014) 15 Theoretical Inquiries in Law417Google Scholar
Scott, C., ‘Accountability in the Regulatory State’ (2000) 27 Journal of Law and Society38Google Scholar
Scott, C., ‘Private Regulation of the Public Sector: A Neglected Facet of Contemporary Governance’ (2002) 29 Journal of Law and Society56Google Scholar
Scott, C., ‘Speaking Softly Without Big Sticks: Meta-Regulation and Public Sector Audit’ (2003) 25 Law and Policy203Google Scholar
Scott, C., ‘Spontaneous Accountability’ in Dowdle, M.W. (ed.), Public Accountability: Designs, Dilemmas and Experiences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006)
Scott, C., ‘Regulatory Governance and the Challenge of Constitutionalism’ in Oliver, D., Prosser, T. and Rawlings, R. (eds.), The Regulatory State: Constitutional Implications (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)
Searchinger, T., ‘The Procedural Due Process Approach to Administrative Discretion: The Courts’ Inverted Analysis’ (1986) 95 Yale Law Journal1017Google Scholar
Seaward, P., ‘The House of Commons, 1660–1707’ in Jones, C. (ed.), A Short History of Parliament (Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 2009)
Seddon, N., Government Contracts: Federal, State and Local, 5th edn (Sydney: Federation Press, 2013)
Sedley, S., ‘The Long Sleep’ in Andenas, M. and Fairgrieve, D. (eds.), Tom Bingham and the Transformation of the Law: A Liber Amicorum (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009)
Seidenfeld, M., ‘The Irrelevance of Politics for Arbitrary and Capricious Review’ (2012) 90 Washington University Law Review141Google Scholar
Selway, B., ‘The Source and Nature of the Liability in Tort of Australian Governments’ [2002]Tort Law Review14Google Scholar
Shapiro, M., Who Guards the Guardians? Judicial Control of Administration (Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1988)
Shapiro, S.A. and Glicksman, R.L., ‘Congress, the Supreme Court, and the Quiet Revolution in Administrative Law’ [1988] Duke Law Journal 819Google Scholar
Shapiro, S.A. and Levy, R.E., ‘Heightened Scrutiny of the Fourth Branch: Separation of Powers and the Requirement of Adequate Reasons for Agency Decisions’ [1987] Duke Law Journal 387Google Scholar
Shapiro, S.A. and Murphy, R.W., ‘Eight Things Americans Can't Figure Out About Controlling Administrative Power’ (2009) 61 Administrative Law Review (Special Issue) 5Google Scholar
Sharp, M.P., ‘The Classical American Doctrine of “The Separation of Powers”’ (1934) 2 University of Chicago Law Review385Google Scholar
Shepherd, G.S., ‘Fierce Compromise: The Administrative Procedure Act Emerges from New Deal Politics’ (1996) 90 Northwestern University Law Review1557Google Scholar
Shepsle, K.A., ‘Rational Choice Institutionalism’ in Rhodes, R.A.W., Binder, S.A. and Rockman, B.A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008)
Shimomura, F.D., ‘The History of Claims against the United States: The Evolution from a Legislative toward a Judicial Model of Payment’ (1985) 45 Louisiana Law Review625Google Scholar
Shipan, C.R., Designing Judicial Review: Interest Groups, Congress and Communications Policy (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1997)
Short, J.L., ‘The Political Turn in American Administrative Law: Power, Rationality, and Reasons’ (2012) 61 Duke Law Journal1811Google Scholar
Sieghart, M.A., Government by Decree: A Comparative Study of the History of the Ordinance in English and French Law (London: Stevens and Sons, 1950)
Sinnar, S., ‘Protecting Rights from Within? Inspectors General and National Security Oversight’ (2013) 65 Stanford Law Review1027Google Scholar
Skelcher, C., ‘Public-Private Partnerships and Hybridity’ in Ferlie, E., Lynn, L.L. and Pollitt, C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Management (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)
Skowronek, S., Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities 1877–1920 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982)
Smith, D.L., ‘The House of Lords, 1529–1629’ in Jones, C. (ed.), A Short History of Parliament (Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 2009)
Smith, J.L., ‘Congress Opens the Courthouse Doors: Statutory Changes to Judicial Review under the Clean Air Act’ (2005) 58 Political Research Quarterly139Google Scholar
Smith, M.J., ‘Prime Ministers, Ministers and Civil Servants in the Core Executive’ in Rhodes, R.A.W. (ed.), Transforming British Government, vol. I, Changing Institutions (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000)
Smith, S.A. de, ‘Wrongs and Remedies in Administrative Law’ (1952) 15 Modern Law Review189Google Scholar
Smith, S.S., Roberts, J.M. and Wielen, R.J. Vander, The American Congress, 8th edn (New York, Cambridge University Press, 2013)
Smyth, M., ‘The Duty to Inquire in Merits Review Tribunals’ (2010) 34 Melbourne University Law Review230Google Scholar
Snell, R. and Upcher, J., ‘Freedom of Information and Parliament: A Limited Accountability Tool for a Key Constituency?’ (2002) 100 Freedom of Information Review35Google Scholar
Spigelman, J.J., ‘The Integrity Branch of Government’ in Pearce, D. (ed.), Australian Institute of Administrative Law National Lecture Series on Administrative Law No. 2 (Canberra: Australian Institute of Administrative Law, 2004)
Stack, K.M., ‘The Statutory Fiction of Judicial Review of Administrative Action’ in Forsyth, C., Elliott, M., Jhaveri, S., Scully-Hill, A. and Ramsden, M. (eds.), Effective Judicial Review: A Cornerstone of Good Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)
Stack, K.M., ‘Interpreting Regulations’ (2012) 111 Michigan Law Review355Google Scholar
Stebbings, C., Legal Foundations of Tribunals in Nineteenth Century England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006)
Stellios, J., ‘The Constitutional Jury: “A Bulwark of Liberty”?’ (2005) 27 Sydney Law Review113Google Scholar
Stellios, J., The Federal Judicature: Chapter III of the Constitution, Commentary and Cases (Australia: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2010)
Stellios, J., ‘Exploring the Purposes of Section 75(v) of the Constitution’ (2011) 34 University of New South Wales Law Journal70Google Scholar
Stellios, J., ‘The Centralisation of Judicial Power Within the Australian Federal System’ (2014) 42 Federal Law Review357Google Scholar
Stellios, J., Zines's The High Court and the Constitution, 6th edn (Sydney: Federation Press, 2015)
Stevens, R., Law and Politics: The House of Lords as a Judicial Body, 1800–1976 (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1978)
Stevens, R., The English Judges: Their Role in the Constitution (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2002)
Stewart, M. and Jager, H., ‘The Australian Parliamentary Budget Office: Shedding Light on the Dark Arts of Budgeting’ (2013) 24 Public Law Review267Google Scholar
Stewart, R.B., ‘The Reformation of American Administrative Law’ (1975) 88 Harvard Law Review1667Google Scholar
Strauss, P.L., ‘Formal and Functional Approaches to Separation-of-Powers: A Foolish Inconsistency?’ (1987) 72 Cornell Law Review488Google Scholar
Strauss, P.L., ‘When the Judge is Not the Primary Official with Responsibility to Read: Agency Interpretation and the Problem of Legislative History’ (1990) 66 Chicago-Kent Law Review321Google Scholar
Strauss, P.L., Administrative Justice in the United States, 2nd edn (Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 2002)
Strauss, P.L., ‘Overseer or “The Decider”? The President in Administrative Law’ (2007) 75 George Washington Law Review696Google Scholar
Strauss, P.L., ‘Rule-making and the American Constitution’ in Oliver, D., Prosser, T. and Rawlings, R. (eds.), The Regulatory State: Constitutional Implications (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)
Strauss, P.L., ‘Deference is Too Confusing: Let's Call Them “Chevron Space” and “Skidmore Weight”’ (2012) 112 Columbia Law Review1143Google Scholar
Strom, K, ‘Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies’ (2000) 37 European Journal of Political Research261Google Scholar
Strom, K, ‘Parliamentary Democracy and Delegation’ in Strom, K., Müller, W.C. and Bergman, T. (eds.), Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003)
Stubbs, M., ‘A Brief History of the Judicial Review of Legislation under the Australian Constitution’ (2012) 40 Federal Law Review227Google Scholar
Subramanian, V., ‘Specialists in British and Australian Government: A Study in Contrast’ (1963) 41 Public Administration357Google Scholar
Subramanian, V., ‘The Relative Status of Specialists and Generalists: An Attempt at a Comparative Historical Explanation’ (1968) 46 Public Administration331Google Scholar
Sunkin, M. and Payne, S. (eds.), The Nature of the Crown: A Legal and Political Analysis (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999)
Sunstein, C.R., ‘Political Economy, Administrative Law: A Comment’ (1990) 6 Journal of Law, Economics and Organization299Google Scholar
Sunstein, C.R., ‘Nondelegation Canons’ (2000) 67 University of Chicago Law Review315Google Scholar
Sunstein, C.R., ‘Beyond Marbury: The Executive's Power to Say What the Law Is’ (2006) 115 Yale Law Journal2580Google Scholar
Sunstein, C.R., ‘Chevron Step Zero’ (2006) 92 Virginia Law Review187Google Scholar
Sunstein, C.R., ‘The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs: Myths and Realities’ (2013) 126 Harvard Law Review1838Google Scholar
Supperstone, M., Goudie, J. and Walker, P., Judicial Review, 4th edn (Lexis Nexis UK, 2010)
Taggart, M., ‘“Australian Exceptionalism” in Judicial Review’ (2008) 36 Federal Law Review1Google Scholar
Talbot, C. and Johnson, C., ‘Seasonal Cycles in Public Management: Disaggregation and Re-aggregation’ (2007) 27 Public Money and Management53Google Scholar
Taratoot, C.D., ‘Review of Administrative Law Judge Decisions by Political Appointees of NLRB 1991–2006’ (2013) 23 Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory551Google Scholar
Tatham, S.J., The Unusual Remedy of Remand Without Vacatur (Administrative Conference of the United States, 2014)
Terrill, G., Secrecy and Openness: The Federal Government from Menzies to Whitlam and Beyond (Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 2000)
Thiel, S. van and Leeuw, F.L., ‘The Performance Paradox in the Public Sector’ (2002) 25 Public Performance and Management Review267Google Scholar
Thomas, P.G., The House of Commons in the Eighteenth Century (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971)
Thomas, P.G., ‘United Kingdom: The Prime Minister and Parliament’ (2004) 10 Journal of Legislative Studies4Google Scholar
Thomas, P.G., ‘Parliament Scrutiny of Government Performance in Australia’ (2009) 68 Australian Journal of Public Administration373Google Scholar
Thomas, R., The British Philosophy of Administration: A Comparison of British and American Ideas 1900–1939 (London: Longman, 1978)
Thompson, D.F., Restoring Responsibility: Ethics in Government, Business, and Healthcare (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005)
Thompson, E. and Tillotson, G., ‘Caught in the Act: The Smoking Gun View of Ministerial Responsibility’ (1999) 58(1) Australian Journal of Public Administration48Google Scholar
Thompson, J.R., ‘The Clinton Reforms and the Administrative Ascendancy of Congress’ (2001) 31 American Review of Public Administration249Google Scholar
Thornhill, C., A Sociology of Constitutions: Constitutions and State Legitimacy in Historical-Sociological Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011)
Tidmarch, J. and Murray, B.J., ‘A Theory of Federal Common Law’ (2006) 100 Northwestern University Law Review585Google Scholar
Tiersma, P.M., ‘The Textualization of Precedent’ (2007) 82 Notre Dame Law Review1187Google Scholar
Tomkins, A., Public Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003)
Tooby, J. and Cosmides, L., ‘The Psychological Foundations of Culture’ in Barkow, J.H., Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. (eds.), The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992)
Tsebelis, G., Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2002)
Tudor, P., ‘Secondary Legislation: Second Class or Crucial?’ (2000) 21 Statute Law Review149Google Scholar
Turpin, C. and Tomkins, A., British Government and the Constitution, 6th edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007)
Tushnet, M., Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999)
Tushnet, M., The Constitution of the United States of America: A Contextual Analysis, 2nd edn (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2015)
Twining, W., Karl Llewellyn and the Realist Movement (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1985)
Twining, W., ‘Reflections on Law in Context’ in Cane, P. and Stapleton, J. (eds.), Essays for Patrick Atiyah (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991)
Twomey, A., The Chameleon Crown: The Queen and Her Australian Governors (Sydney: Federation Press, 2006)
Twomey, A., The Australia Acts 1986: Australia's Statutes of Independence (Sydney: Federation Press, 2010)
Twomey, A., ‘An Obituary for s. 25 of the Constitution’ (2012) 23 Public Law Review125Google Scholar
Tyler, T.R., Why People Obey the Law (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006)
United States Government Accountability Office, Report to Congressional Committees, Inspectors General: Reporting on Independence, Effectiveness, and Expertise (GAO-11–770, September 2011)
Uslander, E.M. and Zittel, T., ‘Comparative Legislative Behavior’ in Rhodes, R.A.W., Binder, S.A. and Rockman, B.A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006)
Verkuil, P.R., ‘Privatizing Due Process’ (2005) 57 Administrative Law Review963Google Scholar
Verkuil, P.R., ‘Public Law Limitations on Privatization of Government Functions’ (2006) 84 North Carolina Law Review297Google Scholar
Verkuil, P.R., Outsourcing Sovereignty: Why Privatization of Government Functions Threatens Democracy and What We Can Do About It (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007)
Vermeule, A., ‘Conventions of Agency Independence’ (2013) 113 Columbia Law Review1163Google Scholar
Vermeule, A., Deference and Due Process (2015), available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2611149
Vibert, F., The Rise of the Unelected: Democracy and the New Separation of Powers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007)
Vile, M.J.C., ‘Presidential and Parliamentary Systems’ in Lepawsky, A. (ed.), The Prospect for Presidential-Congressional Government (Berkeley, CA: Institute of Governmental Studies, 1977)
Vile, M.J.C., Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers, 2nd edn (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 1998)
Vincent-Jones, P., The New Public Contracting: Regulation, Responsiveness and Relationality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006)
Vogel, D., National Styles of Regulation: Environmental Policy in Great Britain and the United States (Ithaca, NYCornell University Press, 1986)
Wade, H.W.R., Towards Administrative Justice (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1963)
Wait, M., ‘The Slumbering Sovereign: Sir Owen Dixon's Common Law Constitution Revisited’ (2001) 29 Federal Law Review57Google Scholar
Waldron, J., ‘Separation of Powers in Thought and Practice’ (2013) 54 Boston College Law Review433Google Scholar
Walker, C.J., ‘Inside Agency Interpretation’ (2015) 67 Stanford Law Review999Google Scholar
Walker, D.M., Inspectors General: Enhancing Federal Accountability, Testimony Before Subcommittee on Government Efficiency and Financial Management, Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives (United States General Accounting Office, 8 October 2003)
Waller, P. and Chalmers, M., An Evaluation of Pre-Appointment Scrutiny Hearings (London: The Constitution Unit, 2010)
Wanna, J., ‘New Zealand's Westminster Trajectory: Archetypal Transplant to Maverick Outlier’ in Patapan, H., Wanna, J. and Weller, P. (eds.), Westminster Legacies: Democracy and Responsible Government in Asia, Australasia and the Pacific (Sydney: University of New South Wales Press, 2005)
Wanna, J., Ryan, C. and Ng, C., From Accounting to Accountability: A Centenary History of the Australian National Audit Office (Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin, 2001)
Wanna, J. and Weller, P., ‘Traditions of Australian Governance’ (2003) 81 Public Administration63Google Scholar
Warren, K.F., Administrative Law in the Political System, 5th edn (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2011)
Watkins, R.D., The State as a Party Litigant (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press, 1927)
Watts, K.A., ‘Proposing a Place for Politics in Arbitrary and Capricious Review’ (2009) 119 Yale Law Journal2Google Scholar
Wawro, G.J., ‘The Supermajority Senate’ in Edwards, G.C., Lee, F.E. and Schickler, E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the American Congress (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)
Weeks, G., ‘The Use and Enforcement of Soft Law by Australian Public Authorities’ (2014) 42 Federal Law Review181Google Scholar
Weiner, M.C., ‘Note: In the Wake of Whitewater: Executive Privilege and the Institutionalized Conflict Element of Separation of Powers’ (1996) 12 Journal of Law and Politics775Google Scholar
Weis, L.K., ‘What Comparativism Tells Us About Originalism’ (2013) 11 International Journal of Comparative Law842Google Scholar
West, W.F., ‘Inside the Black Box: The Development of Proposed Rules and the Limits of Procedural Controls’ (2009) 41 Administration and Society576Google Scholar
West, W.F. and Raso, C., ‘Who Shapes the Rulemaking Agenda? Implications for Bureaucratic Responsiveness and Bureaucratic Control’ (2013) 23 Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory495Google Scholar
Wettenhall, R., ‘Public Ownership in Australia’ (1965) 36 Political Quarterly426Google Scholar
Wettenhall, R., ‘Corporations and Corporatisation: An Administrative History Perspective’ (1995) 6 Public Law Review7Google Scholar
Wettenhall, R., ‘The Rising Popularity of the Government-Owned Company in Australia: Problems and Issues’ (1998) 18 Public Administration and Development243Google Scholar
Wettenhall, R., ‘Non-Departmental Public Bodies’ in Aulich, C. and Wettenhall, R. (eds.), Howard's Second and Third Governments (Sydney: UNSW Press, 2005)
Wettenhall, R., ‘Non-Departmental Public Bodies Under the Howard Governments’ (2007) 66 Australian Journal of Public Administration62Google Scholar
Wettenhall, R., ‘Non-Departmental Public Bodies as a Focus for Machinery-of-Government Change’ in Aulich, C. and Wettenhall, R. (eds.), Howard's Fourth Government (Sydney: UNSW Press, 2008)
Wettenhall, R., ‘Continuity and Change in the Outer Public Service’ in Aulich, C. and Evans, M. (eds.), The Rudd Government: Australian Commonwealth Administration 2007–10 (Canberra: ANU E Press, 2010)
Wheeler, F., ‘Original Intent and the Doctrine of Separation of Powers in Australia’ (1996) 7 Public Law Review96Google Scholar
Wheeler, F., ‘The Doctrine of Separation of Powers and Constitutionally Entrenched Due Process in Australia’ (1997) 23 Monash University Law Review248Google Scholar
White, F. and Hollingsworth, K., Audit, Accountability and Government (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999)
White Paper, Open Government (London, 1993)
White Paper, Your Right to Know: The Government's Proposals for a Freedom of Information Act (London, 1997)
Whittington, K.E., Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy: The Presidency, the Court, and Constitutional Leadership in US History (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007)
Wiecek, W.M., ‘The Origin of the United States Court of Claims’ (1968) 20 Administrative law Review387Google Scholar
Wilberg, H., ‘Deference on Relevance and Purpose? Wrestling with the Law/Discretion Divide’ in Wilberg, H. and Elliott, M. (eds.), The Scope and Intensity of Substantive Review: Traversing Taggart's Rainbow (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2015)
Wilks, S., ‘Boardization and Corporate Governance in the UK as a Response to Depoliticization and Failing Accountability’ (2007) 22 Public Policy and Administration443Google Scholar
Willis, J., The Parliamentary Powers of English Government Departments (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1933)
Willson, F.M.G., ‘Ministries and Boards: Some Aspects of Administrative Development Since 1832’ (1955) 33 Public Administration43Google Scholar
Wilson, G.K., ‘Congress in Comparative Perspective’ (2009) 89 Boston University Law Review827Google Scholar
Wilson, J.Q., Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It (Basic Books, 1989)
Wood, B.D., ‘Agency Theory and the Bureaucracy’ in Durant, R.F. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of American Bureaucracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)
Wood, B.D. and Waterman, R.W., ‘The Dynamics of Political Control of the Bureaucracy’ (1991) 85 American Political Science Review801Google Scholar
Woodhouse, D., ‘Ministerial Responsibility: Something Old, Something New’ [1997]Public Law262Google Scholar
Woolf, H., Jowell, J., Seuer, A. Le, Donnelly, C. and Hare, I., De Smith's Judicial Review, 7th edn (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2013)
Woolhandler, A., ‘Patterns of Official Immunity and Accountability’ (1987) 37 Case Western Reserve Law Review396Google Scholar
Woolhandler, A. and Nelson, C., ‘Does History Defeat Standing Doctrine?’ (2004) 102 Michigan Law Review689Google Scholar
Workman, S., The Dynamics of Bureaucracy in the US Government: How Congress and Federal Agencies Process Information and Solve Problems (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015)
Worthy, B., ‘A Powerful Weapon in the Right Hands? How Members of Parliament have Used Freedom of Information in the UK’ (2014) 67 Parliamentary Affairs783Google Scholar
Wraith, R.E. and Hutchesson, P.G., Administrative Tribunals (London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd, 1973)
Yackee, J.W. and Yackee, S.W., ‘Administrative Procedures and Bureaucratic Performance: Is Federal Rule-making “Ossified”?’ (2009) 20 Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory261Google Scholar
Yackee, J.W. and Yackee, S.W., ‘Divided Government and US Federal Rulemaking’ (2009) 3 Regulation and Governance128Google Scholar
Yackee, J.W. and Yackee, S.W., ‘Testing the Ossification Thesis: An Empirical Investigation of Federal Regulatory Volume and Speed, 1950–1990’ (2012) George Washington Law Review1414
Yackee, S.W., ‘The Politics of Ex Parte Lobbying: Pre-Proposal Agenda Building and Blocking during Agency Rulemaking’ (2011) 22 Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory373Google Scholar
Yalof, D.A., ‘The Presidency and the Judiciary’ in Nelson, M. (ed.), The Presidency and the Political System, 9th edn (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2009)
Yong, B. and Hazell, R., Putting Goats Amongst the Wolves: Appointing Ministers from Outside Parliament (London: The Constitution Unit, UCL, 2011)
Yong, B. and Hazell, R., Special Adviser: Who They Are, What They Do and Why They Matter (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014)
Yoo, C.S., Calabresi, S.G. and Colangelo, A., ‘The Unitary Executive in the Modern Era, 1945–2004’ (2005) 90 Iowa Law Review601Google Scholar
Yoo, J.C., ‘Who Measures the Chancellors Foot? The Inherent and Remedial Authority of the Federal Courts’ (1996) 84 California Law Review1121Google Scholar
Young, E.A., ‘Taming the Most Dangerous Branch: The Scope and Accountability of Executive Power in the United States’ in Craig, P. and Tomkins, A. (eds.), The Executive and Public Law: Power and Accountability in Comparative Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006)
Young, E.A., ‘The Constitution Outside the Constitution’ (2007) 117 Yale Law Journal408Google Scholar
Zackin, E., Looking for Rights in All the Wrong Places (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2013)
Zaring, D., ‘Reasonable Agencies’ (2010) 96 Virginia Law Review135Google Scholar
Zifcak, S., New Managerialism: Administrative Reform in Whitehall and Canberra (Buckingham: Open University Press, 1994)
Zines, L., ‘The Common Law in Australia: Its Nature and Constitutional Significance’ (2004) 32 Federal Law Review337Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Peter Cane, Australian National University, Canberra
  • Book: Controlling Administrative Power
  • Online publication: 05 March 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316550878.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Peter Cane, Australian National University, Canberra
  • Book: Controlling Administrative Power
  • Online publication: 05 March 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316550878.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Peter Cane, Australian National University, Canberra
  • Book: Controlling Administrative Power
  • Online publication: 05 March 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316550878.016
Available formats
×