Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T02:13:18.455Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The US system of government

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2016

Peter Cane
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Get access

Summary

Colonial antecedents

In England, the first six decades of the eighteenth century were a period of relative political stability after the upheavals of the seventeenth. There was a rough balance of power between the monarchy and Parliament. By contrast, the politics of the American colonies at this time were characterised by instability and factional rivalry. Superficially, the systems of government in the colonies resembled that in England, consisting of an executive governor (who was, in the royal colonies, technically the Monarch's representative but in practice the representative of the British Government), a legislature consisting of a representative assembly and an upper chamber, and a system of local courts. Moreover, just as in Britain legislative sovereignty resided in the Monarch-in-Parliament, so (the argument ran) in the colonies it resided in the Monarch acting in concert with the various colonial legislatures. However, significant differences lay beneath the facial similarities. On the one hand, the formal powers of the governors in relation to the legislature and the judiciary were significantly greater than those of the English Monarch. On the other hand, because the electoral systems in the various colonies were relatively more democratic than the electoral system in England, and because governors were often significantly constrained by instructions from the British Government in London, the executive was politically weak.

The institutional beneficiaries of that weakness were the colonial legislatures. Just as the post-Revolutionary English Parliament claimed a monopoly of the power to impose taxation (and, more generally, to legislate) on the basis that it represented the people, so colonial legislatures now claimed a monopoly of power to impose taxation (and, more generally, to legislate – at least on matters of local concern) in their respective territories:

[T]hrough precedent and custom [they were] able to establish their authority and status as…the most important institutions in the colonial constitutions…[and] largely to neutralize the prerogative…The result was the continuing fragility of royal power in the colonies.

However, the power of these democratically elected assemblies was not universally applauded. During the period of Confederation after the Declaration of Independence in 1776, colonial legislatures committed various ‘excesses’ that generated ‘fear of the danger to minority interests, and particularly property, from popular rule’.

Type
Chapter
Information
Controlling Administrative Power
An Historical Comparison
, pp. 58 - 111
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • The US system of government
  • Peter Cane, Australian National University, Canberra
  • Book: Controlling Administrative Power
  • Online publication: 05 March 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316550878.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • The US system of government
  • Peter Cane, Australian National University, Canberra
  • Book: Controlling Administrative Power
  • Online publication: 05 March 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316550878.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • The US system of government
  • Peter Cane, Australian National University, Canberra
  • Book: Controlling Administrative Power
  • Online publication: 05 March 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316550878.004
Available formats
×