Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T04:08:38.999Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Faith and reason

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2013

Nicholas Adams
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Nicholas Boyle
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Liz Disley
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Nicholas Adams
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Get access

Summary

This essay has as its focus Hegel's contribution to our contemporary thinking about the relation between theology and philosophy, through an engagement with two of his most fascinating discussions. The first is his account of ‘The Enlightenment struggle against superstition’ in the Phenomenology of Spirit; the second is his retrieval of Anselm's ontological argument in the Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion. This discussion exhibits in some ways a curious lack of impact of Idealism in contemporary thinking, in an area where Hegel has a distinctive and compelling – yet unfulfilled – contribution to make.

Discussions of ‘faith’ and ‘reason’ have two principal and rival ways of arranging their material: either historically or taxonomically. An historical account, looking at the Christian tradition, might discuss the relation between faith and reason in Augustine, Thomas, Descartes, Leibniz, Kant and Hegel, and then show how modern (especially Protestant) theological traditions take up these conceptions of the relation between faith and reason, including Luther, Calvin, Schleiermacher, Barth, ‘theology after Wittgenstein’, reformed epistemology, radical orthodoxy and so on. A taxonomical account might divide approaches into those that treat faith and reason as opposed, as hierarchically related, as complementary or as identical; it might look at topics such as proofs for the existence of God, philosophical defences of doctrinal claims, conceptions of the university disciplines of theology and of philosophy. Whether one takes the historical or the taxonomical route some account will be needed of how terms such as fides, ratio, intellectio, Glaube, Vernunft, Verstand, faith, reason, understanding are handled in the various thinkers, texts or forms of thinking under consideration.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Impact of Idealism
The Legacy of Post-Kantian German Thought
, pp. 194 - 218
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kojève, Alexandre, Introduction to the Reading of Hegel, Queneau, R. and Bloom, Allan (eds.), trans. Nichols, J (New York: Cornell University Press, 1980), 3–30Google Scholar
Hegel on Logic and Religion: The Reasonableness of Christianity (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992), 105–18
Hegel, G. W. F., Gesammelte Werke, ed. Bonsiepen, W. and Heede, R. (Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1980) [hereafter GW], IX, 293–6Google Scholar
Stolzenberg, Jürgen, ‘Hegel's critique of the Enlightenment’, in Westphal, Kenneth (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009), 197Google Scholar
Adams, Nicholas, ‘The absolute idea’, in The Eclipse of Grace: Divine and Human Action in Hegel (Oxford: Blackwell-Wiley, 2013), 117–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funkenstein, Amos, Theology and the Scientific Imagination (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986)Google Scholar
Buckley, Michael, At the Origins of Modern Atheism (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1987)Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen, Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990)Google Scholar
Milbank, John, Theology and Social Theory (Oxford: Blackwell, 1990)Google Scholar
Barth, Karl, Anselm: fides quaerens intellectum, trans. Robertson, I. (London: SCM, 1960)Google Scholar
Davies, Brian, ‘Anselm and the ontological argument’, in Davies, B. and Leftow, B. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Anselm (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 157–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×