Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dvmhs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-09T12:41:02.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

20 - The Second New Deal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2013

Paul D. Moreno
Affiliation:
Hillsdale College, Michigan
Get access

Summary

THE SECOND HUNDRED DAYS

The judicial setbacks of “Black Monday” accelerated a presidential move to the left. Roosevelt took several steps that alienated the business community. In 1934, Congress created the Securities and Exchange Commission, an agency to enforce the Securities Act of 1933. Roosevelt did away with air mail contracts, which had provided subsidies for private aviation firms. (Several crashes and deaths among Army pilot substitutes soon restored them.) The Communications Act of 1934 extended the Radio Act of 1927 and created a new agency to enforce it. The Railroad Retirement Act and amended Railway Labor Act added costs to that industry. Mounting deficits also indicated that Roosevelt’s initial fiscal concerns were gone; conservative Budget Director Lewis Douglas resigned in August 1934. New Deal opponents – including many of Roosevelt’s former allies – established the American Liberty League. The American Bar Association began a study of the growth of the administrative state, led by Roscoe Pound, who became increasingly hostile to New Deal bureaucracy. Even the soundly repudiated former president rejoined the political world with The Challenge to Liberty, which displayed a greater sympathy to old liberalism. At the same time, Roosevelt faced a growing challenge on the left – from Louisiana Governor Huey Long’s “Share Our Wealth” movement, the “social justice” campaign of Father Charles Coughlin, the old-age pension scheme of Francis Townshend, and the “End Poverty in California” campaign of Upton Sinclair. The unusually large midterm election gains for the president’s party did not indicate whether the electorate endorsed the president or his policies.

Type
Chapter
Information
The American State from the Civil War to the New Deal
The Twilight of Constitutionalism and the Triumph of Progressivism
, pp. 257 - 274
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Robinson, Glen O., “The Federal Communications Act: An Essay on Origins and Regulatory Purpose,” in A Legislative History of the Communications Act of 1934, ed. Paglin, Max D. (New York: Oxford, 1989), 3–5;Google Scholar
Leuchtenburg, William E, Franklin Delano Roosevelt and the New Deal, 1932–40 (New York: Harper & Row, 1963), 90, 147–50;Google Scholar
Wolfskill, George, Revolt of the Conservatives: A History of the American Liberty League, 1934–40 (Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1974 [1962]);Google Scholar
Schwarz, Jordan A., “Al Smith in the Thirties,”New York History 45 (1964), 316–30;Google Scholar
Wang, Jessica, “Imagining the Administrative State: Legal Pragmatism, Securities Regulation, and New Deal Liberalism,”Journal of Policy History 17 (2005), 271;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigdor, David, Roscoe Pound: Philosopher of Law (Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1974), 264–74;Google Scholar
Hull, N. E. H., Roscoe Pound and Karl Llewellyn: Searching for an American Jurisprudence (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997), 258.Google Scholar
Hoover, Herbert, The Challenge to Liberty, in American Individualism and the Challenge to Liberty (West Branch, IA: Herbert Hoover Presidential Library, 1989 [1934]), 67Google Scholar
Ekirch, Jr. Arthur A., The Decline of American Liberalism (New York: Atheneum, 1967), 283Google Scholar
Brinkley, Alan, Voices of Protest: Huey Long, Father Coughlin and the Great Depression (New York: Vintage, 1983);Google Scholar
Mitchell, Greg, The Campaign of the Century: Upton Sinclair’s E.P.I.C. Race and the Birth of Media Politics (New York: Random House, 1992);Google Scholar
Gordon, Colin, “Rethinking the New Deal,”Columbia Law Review 98 (1998), 2045–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, William H., “The Two New Deals: A Valid Concept?”Historian 28 (1966), 268–88;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leuchtenburg, William E., The F.D.R. Years: On Roosevelt and His Legacy (New York: Columbia University Press, 1995), 216–17.Google Scholar
Annual Message to Congress, 4 Jan. 1935, PP&A IV: 15
Social Security: A Documentary History, ed. DeWitt, Larry W. et al. (Washington: CQ Press, 2008), 65–70
Witte, Edwin W., The Development of Social Security: A Memorandum on the History of the Committee on Economic Security and Drafting and Legislative History of the Social Security Act (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1963), 203–04Google Scholar
Clark, Jane Perry, The Rise of a New Federalism: Federal-State Cooperation in the United States (New York: Russell & Russell, 1965 [1938]), 151–52, 164, 267Google Scholar
Quadango, Jill, The Color of Welfare: How Racism Undermined the War on Poverty (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994);Google Scholar
Donna, C. and Hamilton, Charles V., The Dual Agenda: The African-American Struggle for Civil Rights and Economic Equality (New York: Columbia University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Perkins, Frances, “The Roots of Social Security,” speech in Baltimore, 23 Oct. 1962
Friedman, Milton and Schwartz, Anna Jacobson, A Monetary History of the United States, 1867–1960 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963), 447, 691;Google Scholar
Chamberlain, Lawrence H., The President, Congress and Legislation (New York: Columbia University Press, 1946), 346.Google Scholar
Taus, Esther Rogoff, Central Banking Functions of the U.S. Treasury, 1789–1941 (New York: Russell & Russell, 1943), 218–20;Google Scholar
Timberlake, Richard H., Monetary Policy in the United States: An Intellectual and Institutional History (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993), 312.Google Scholar
Address, Vassar College, 26 Aug. 1933, PP&A II: 341
Message to Congress, 19 Jun. 1935, PP&A IV: 270; Brinkley, Voices of Protest, 80
Address, Witchita, 13 Oct. 1936, PP&A V: 462
Shlaes, Amity, The Forgotten Man: A New History of the Great Depression (New York: HarperCollins, 2007), 266Google Scholar
Hand, Samuel B., “Al Smith, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and the New Deal: Some Comments on Perspective,”Historian 27 (1965), 366–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushman, Barry, “Mr. Dooley and Mr. Gallup: Public Opinion and Constitutional Change in the 1930s,”Buffalo Law Review 50 (2002), 43Google Scholar
Cole, Harold L. and Ohanian, Lee E., “New Deal Policies and the Persistence of the Great Depression: A General Equilibrium Analysis,”Journal of Political Economy 112 (2004), 779–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorwin, Lewis L. and Wubnig, Arthur, Labor Relations Boards: The Regulation of Collective Bargaining Under the National Industrial Recovery Act (Washington: Brookings, 1935), 88Google Scholar
Brand, Donald R., Corporatism and the Rule of Law: A Study of the National Recovery Administration (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988), 237Google Scholar
National Labor Relations Board, Hearings before the Committee on Education and Labor, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. (Washington: G.P.O., 1935), 54
Press Conference, 15 Jun. 1934, PP&A III: 300
O’Brien, Ruth, Workers’ Paradox: The Republican Origins of New Deal Labor Policy (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1998), 178.Google Scholar
Fusfeld, Daniel R., The Economic Thought of Franklin D. Roosevelt and the Origins of the New Deal (New York: Columbia University Press, 1956), 48Google Scholar
McFarland, C. K., Roosevelt, Lewis, and the New Deal, 1933–40 (Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press, 1970), 47Google Scholar
Annual Message to Congress, 3 Jan. 1936, PP&A V: 8
Cunliffe, Marcus, Chattel Slavery and Wage Slavery: The Anglo-American Context, 1830–60 (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1979)Google Scholar
Brandeis Answers Gary,” New York Times, 30 Jan. 1912, p. 12
United States Steel Corporation, Hearings before the Committee of Investigation of United States Steel Corporation (Washington: G.P.O., 1912), 2842–43
Nash, Gerald D., “Franklin D. Roosevelt and Labor: The World War I Origins of Early New Deal Policy,”Labor History 1 (1960), 39–52;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keyserling, Leon H., “The Wagner Act: Its Origin and Current Significance,”George Washington Law Review 29 (1960), 202;Google Scholar
Chamberlain, , The President, Congress and Legislation, 174; “President Orders Speed on NRA and Wagner Bills,” New York Times, 25 May 1935, p. 1
Barenburg, Mark, “The Political Economy of the Wagner Act: Power, Symbol, and Workplace Cooperation,” Harvard Law Review 106 (1993), 1401–02, 1435, 1437;Google Scholar
Comparison of S. 2926 (73d Congress) and S. 1958 (74th Congress), 11 Mar. 1935, in National Labor Relations Board
Legislative History of the National Labor Relations Act, 2 vols. (Washington: G.P.O., 1959), 1341
National Labor Relations Board, Sen. Rpt. 573, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. (1 May 1935)
The Developing Labor Law: The Board, the Courts, and the National Labor Relations Act, ed. Morris, Charles J. et al. (Washington: Bureau of National Affairs, 1971), 28.
Roper, Daniel C., 20 Jun. 1935, DHRP VIII: 626; Peter H. Irons, The New Deal Lawyers (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1982), 231Google Scholar
Shesol, Jeff, Supreme Power: Franklin Roosevelt vs. the Supreme Court (New York: Norton, 2010), 422Google Scholar
Bernstein, Irving, Turbulent Years: A History of the American Worker, 1933–41 (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1970), 341;Google Scholar
Bellush, Bernard, The Failure of the NRA (New York: Norton, 1975), 172;Google Scholar
McKenna, Marian C., Franklin Roosevelt and the Great Constitutional War (New York: Fordham University Press, 2002), 193–95;Google Scholar
Gross, James A., The Making of the National Labor Relations Board: A Study in Economics, Politics, and the Law (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1974), 145.Google Scholar
Hawley, Ellis W., The New Deal and the Problem of Monopoly: A Study in Economic Ambivalence (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1966), 130–31;Google Scholar
“The Bituminous Coal Conservation Act of 1935,”Yale Law Journal 45 (1935), 293–314;CrossRef
Felton, John Richard, “Background of the Motor Carrier Act of 1935,” in Regulation and Deregulation of the Motor Carrier Industry, ed. Felton, and Anderson, Dale G. (Ames: Iowa State University, 1989);Google Scholar
Brody, David, “Section 8(a)(2) and the Origins of the Wagner Act,” in Restoring the Promise of American Labor Law, ed. Friedman, Sheldon et al. (Ithaca: I.L.R. Press, 1994), 33Google Scholar
Antoine, Theodore J., “How the Wagner Act Came to Be: A Prospectus,”Michigan Law Review 96 (1998), 2201–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Wagner Outlines New Deal Goals,” New York Times, 21 Dec. 1934, p. 3
“Wagner Outlines New ‘Bill of Rights,’” Wall Street Journal, 22 Dec. 1934
Freidel, Frank, Franklin D. Roosevelt: A Rendezvous with Destiny (Boston: Little, Brown, 1990), 195.Google Scholar
Annual Message to Congress, 3 Jan. 1936, PP&A V: 8
Address at Jackson Day Dinner, Washington, 8 Jan. 1936, PP&A V: 38
U.S. v. Butler, 297 U.S. 1 (1936), 61, 77, 62
Friedman, Richard D., “Switching Time and Other Thought Experiments: The Hughes Court and Constitutional Transformation,”University of Pennsylvania Law Review 142 (1994), 1896;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiecek, William M., The Lost World of Classical Legal Thought: Law and Ideology in America, 1886–1937 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998), 192.Google Scholar
The Autobiographical Notes of Charles Evans Hughes, ed. Danelski, David J. and Tulchin, Joseph S. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1973), 309;CrossRef
Keller, Morton, In Defense of Yesterday: James M. Beck and the Politics of Conservatism, 1861–1936 (New York: Coward-McCann, 1958), 266.Google Scholar
Maidment, Richard, “The New Deal Court Revisited,” in Nothing Else to Fear: New Perspectives on America in the Thirties, ed. Baskerville, Stephen W. and Willett, Ralph (Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, 1985), 55.Google Scholar
Leuchtenburg, William E., The Supreme Court Reborn: The Constitutional Revolution in the Age of Roosevelt (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995), 98;Google Scholar
Murphy, Paul L., “The New Deal Agricultural Program and the Constitution,”Agricultural History 29 (1955), 162.Google Scholar
Jones v. Securities & Exchange Commission, 298 U.S. 1 (1936), 23
Leuchtenburg, William E., “When the People Spoke, What Did They Say?: The Election of 1936 and the Ackerman Thesis,”Yale Law Journal 108 (1999), 2100, 2106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Jim, F.D.R.’s Folly: How Roosevelt and His New Deal Prolonged the Great Depression (New York: Crown Forum, 2003), 107;Google Scholar
McCraw, Thomas K., “With the Consent of the Governed: The SEC’s Formative Years,”Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 1 (1982), 346–70;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCraw, , Prophets of Regulation: Charles Francis Adams, Louis D. Brandeis, James M. Landis, Alfred E. Kahn (Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 1984), 216;Google Scholar
Stern, Robert L., “The Commerce Clause and the National Economy, 1933–46, Part Two,”Harvard Law Review 59 (1946), 926.Google Scholar
Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 297 U.S. 288 (1936), 357, 372
McCraw, Thomas K., T.V.A. and the Power Fight, 1933–40 (Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott, 1971), 116;Google Scholar
Lowitt, Richard, “The T.V.A., 1933–45,” in TVA: Fifty Years of Grass-Roots Bureaucracy, ed. Hargrove, Erwin C. and Conkin, Paul K. (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1983), 42–43;Google Scholar
Chandler, William U., The Myth of T.V.A.: Conservation and Development in the Tennessee Valley, 1933–83 (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1984), 36.Google Scholar
Opinions of Newton D. Baker and James M. Beck on the Constitutionality of the Tennessee Valley Authority Act (New York: Edison Electric Institute, 1935);
The T.V.A. Amendments, American Liberty League Document No. 37 (May, 1935)
To Samuel B. Hill, 6 Jul. 1935, PP&A IV: 297
“Cummings Doubts Coal Bill Is Legal,” New York Times, 6 Jul. 1935, p. 2
The Secret Diary of Harold L. Ickes: The First Thousand Days, 1933–36 (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1953), 524
Carter v. Carter Coal Co., 298 U.S. 238 (1936), 311
Maidment, Richard A., The Judicial Response to the New Deal: The US Supreme Court and Economic Regulation, 1934–36 (Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, 1991), 125–28.Google Scholar
Morehead v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo, 298 U.S. 587 (1936), 603–05
Chambers, John W., “The Big Switch: Justice Roberts and the Minimum-Wage Cases,”Labor History 10 (1969), 56;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasser, William, “Justice Roberts and the Constitutional Revolution of 1937 – Was There a ‘Switch in Time’?”Texas Law Review 78 (2000), 1365.Google Scholar
Ross, William G., The Chief Justiceship of Charles Evans Hughes, 1930–41 (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 2007), 93Google Scholar
Corwin, Edward S., who also called it “triple federalism” – Twilight of the Supreme Court: A History of Our Constitutional Theory (New Haven: Yale, 1934), 35Google Scholar
Mason, Alpheus T., Harlan Fiske Stone: Pillar of the Law (New York: Viking, 1956), 425–26Google Scholar
U.S. v. Curtiss-Wright Export Co., 299 U.S. 304 (1936), 316
Locke, John, Second Treatise of Government, ed. Macpherson, C. B. (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1980 [1690]), 77Google Scholar
Arkes, Hadley, The Return of George Sutherland: Restoring a Jurisprudence of Natural Rights (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994), 230Google Scholar
Lofgren, Charles A., “United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corporation: An Historical Reassessment,”Yale Law Journal 83 (1973), 1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Alfred H., Harbison, Winfred A., and Belz, Herman, The American Constitution: Its Origins and Development, 7th ed. (New York: Norton, 1991), 533–39Google Scholar
Weed, Clyde P., The Nemesis of Reform: The Republican Party During the New Deal (New York: Columbia University Press, 1995), 73, 86, 108;Google Scholar
Plesur, Milton, “The Republican Congressional Comeback of 1938,”Review of Politics 24 (1962), 526;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey, Ralph D., “Republican Propaganda in the 1936 Campaign,”Public Opinion Quarterly 1 (1937), 27–44;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leuchtenburg, William E., “Election of 1936,” in History of American Presidential Elections, 4 vols., ed. Schlesinger, Jr. Arthur M. et al. (New York: Chelsea House, 1971), III: 2813–16.Google Scholar
Friedman, Barry, The Will of the People: How Public Opinion Has Influenced the Supreme Court and Shaped the Meaning of the Constitution (New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 2009), 211.Google Scholar
“The Texts of Governor Landon’s Addresses at Madison Square Garden and Over the Radio,” New York Times, 30 Oct. 1936, p. 16; Leuchtenburg, “Election of 1936,” 2818; Leuchtenburg, “When the People Spoke,” 2092.
“The Keynote Speech,” New York Times 24 Jun. 1936, p. 16; Wolfskill, Revolt of the Conservatives, 158
Nomination Speech, Philadelphia, 27 Jun. 1936, PP&A V: 230
Best, Gary Dean, Pride, Prejudice, and Politics: Roosevelt versus Recovery (New York: Praeger, 1991), 132.Google Scholar
Creel, George, Rebel at Large: Recollections of Fifty Crowded Years (New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1947), 296Google Scholar
Milkis, Sidney, “FDR, the Economic Constitutional Order, and the New Politics of Presidential Leadership,” in The New Deal and the Triumph of Liberalism, ed. Milkis, and Mileur, Jerome M. (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2002), 39, 59;Google Scholar
Burns, James MacGregor, Roosevelt: The Lion and the Fox (New York: Harcourt, 1956), 272.Google Scholar
Ekirch, Arthur A., Jr., The Decline of American Liberalism (New York: Atheneum, 1967), 340;Google Scholar
Ribuffo, Leo, The Old Christian Right: The Protestant Far Right from the Great Depression to the Cold War (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1983), 178–224;Google Scholar
Cole, Wayne S., Roosevelt and the Isolationists (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1983), 529–37;Google Scholar
Ruetten, Richard T., “Burton K. Wheeler and the Montana Connection,”Montana 27 (1977), 14.Google Scholar
Moley, Raymond, After Seven Years (New York: Harper, 1939), 343.Google Scholar
Brinkley, Alan, The End of Reform: New Deal Liberalism in Recession and War (New York: Knopf, 1995), 17;Google Scholar
Cushman, Barry, “Mr. Dooley and Mr. Gallup: Public Opinion and Constitutional Change in the 1930s,”Buffalo Law Review 50 (2002), 73–74.Google Scholar
Dubofsky, Melvyn, “Not So ‘Turbulent Years’: Another Look at the American 1930’s,”Amerikastudien 24 (1979), 5–20.Google Scholar
Fine, Sidney, Sit-Down: The General Motors Strike of 1936–37 (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1969), 148;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, , “The General Motors Sit-Down Strike: A Re-Examination,”American Historical Review 70 (1965), 701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dick, William M., Labor and Socialism in America: The Gompers Era (Port Washington, NY: Kennikat, 1972), 31, 38;Google Scholar
Kirkland, Edward C., Industry Comes of Age: Business, Labor, and Public Policy, 1860–97 (Chicago: Quadrangle, 1961), 391;Google Scholar
Pope, Jim, “Worker Lawmaking, Sit Down Strikes, and the Shaping of American Industrial Relations, 1935–58,”Law and History Review 24 (2006), 22;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wettergreen, John A., “The Regulatory Policy of the New Deal,” in The New Deal and Its Legacy, ed. Eden, Robert (Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1989),206;Google Scholar
Perlman, Selig, “The Basic Philosophy of the American Labor Movement,”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 274 (1951), 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubofsky, , “Not So ‘Turbulent Years,’” 11. Even after the Supreme Court upheld the Wagner Act, it held that sit-down strikes were illegal, even if provoked by unfair employer labor practices – National Labor Relations Board v. Fansteel Metallurgical Corp., 306 U.S. 240 (1939)
Green, Leon, “The Case for the Sit-Down Strike,” New Republic, 24 Mar. 1937
“High Court Assailed at Labor Institute,” New York Times, 15 Jun. 1937
“What’s News,” Wall Street Journal, 27 Jan. 1937
“President Rebukes Sloan on Parley,” New York Times, 27 Jan. 1937
McClintock, H. L., “Injunctions against Sit-Down Strikes,”Iowa Law Review 23 (1938), 149–64Google Scholar
Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 85 F.2d 391 (1936)
Howard, J. Woodford, Jr., “Frank Murphy and the Sit-Down Strikes of 1937,”Labor History 1 (1960), 106;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derifield, Coreen, “Defining Peaceful Picketing: The Michigan Supreme Court and the Labor Injunction, 1900–40” (M.A. thesis, Western Michigan University, 2005).

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • The Second New Deal
  • Paul D. Moreno, Hillsdale College, Michigan
  • Book: The American State from the Civil War to the New Deal
  • Online publication: 05 May 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139507691.025
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • The Second New Deal
  • Paul D. Moreno, Hillsdale College, Michigan
  • Book: The American State from the Civil War to the New Deal
  • Online publication: 05 May 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139507691.025
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • The Second New Deal
  • Paul D. Moreno, Hillsdale College, Michigan
  • Book: The American State from the Civil War to the New Deal
  • Online publication: 05 May 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139507691.025
Available formats
×