Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T17:12:46.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Conclusions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Matthew Soberg Shugart
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
John M. Carey
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Get access

Summary

This book has been devoted to the study of those democratic constitutional designs in which there are two agents of the electorate. The common idealtypical parliamentary regimes have only one such agent, the assembly, which in Linz's expression, is “the only democratically legitimated institution” (Linz 1987:5). Many other democratic regimes provide for two agents of the electorate, one of which is the assembly, while the other is a president with some power over the composition of governments or legislation, or both. Wherever the electorate has two agents, it becomes critical for the relative powers to be spelled out clearly in the constitution. We have seen a great range of powers provided in actual constitutions featuring popularly elected presidents.

In considering different constitutional designs, we have stressed that among the purposes of democratic institutions is to provide what Powell (1989) refers to as “citizen control” over representatives. Citizens may control their representatives through elections according to two basic models. The first provides that voters should have the ability to assess clear responsibility on the part of an incumbent government and either return it to power or toss it out in favor of an alternative government. Institutions that provide voters this form of control are deemed to provide electoral efficiency. A second basic model of citizen control assumes that voters should have a large menu of partisan choices from which to select, in order that nearly every voter has a party close to his or her ideal policy point.

Type
Chapter
Information
Presidents and Assemblies
Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics
, pp. 273 - 287
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Conclusions
  • Matthew Soberg Shugart, University of California, San Diego, John M. Carey, University of California, San Diego
  • Book: Presidents and Assemblies
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173988.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Conclusions
  • Matthew Soberg Shugart, University of California, San Diego, John M. Carey, University of California, San Diego
  • Book: Presidents and Assemblies
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173988.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Conclusions
  • Matthew Soberg Shugart, University of California, San Diego, John M. Carey, University of California, San Diego
  • Book: Presidents and Assemblies
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173988.013
Available formats
×