Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-26T02:12:17.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

II.G.16 - Llamas and Alpacas

from II.G - Important Foods from Animal Sources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Kenneth F. Kiple
Affiliation:
Bowling Green State University, Ohio
Get access

Summary

The llama (Lama glama) and alpaca (Lama pacos) are among the few domesticated ungulates whose most important function has not been that of providing food for the people who control them. The llama has been kept primarily as a beast of burden, whereas the more petite alpaca is most valued as a source of an extraordinarily fine fleece. These South American members of the camel family may share a common biological ancestry from the guanaco (Lama guanicoe), for although they have long been designated as separate species, the closeness of the relationship is reflected in fertile offspring when they crossbreed. An alternative point of view now gaining in popularity is that the alpaca descended from the vicuña (Lama vicugna), since both animals are about the same size (44 to 65 kilograms [kg]) and both have the capacity to regenerate their incisor teeth. The distribution of both the llama and the alpaca has been traditionally centered in the Andean Highlands of Peru and Bolivia, with peripheral populations of the former in Chile, Argentina, and Ecuador. In the past three decades growing interest has increased their population on other continents, especially in North America.

Camelid Meat as Human Food

Both animals have been an important source of food in the part of the central Andes where husbandry has been most intensive. In neither case, however, are they raised primarily for their flesh, which is consumed after their most valued functions diminish with age. However, llamas possibly had a more important meat function in the pre-Pizarro Andes before the introduction of European barnyard creatures. The movement of herds from the highlands to the coast could have been a way both to transport goods and to move protein-on-the hoof to the more densely populated coast, where at the time, meat was much rarer than in the highlands (Cobo 1956). David Browman (1989) suggested that when camelid utilization in the highlands expanded northward, starting around 1000 B.C., and long before the Inca civilization was established, meat production appeared to have been the most important use of these animals. But whether of primary or secondary importance, the protein and fat supplied by this meat have contributed to the health of the animals’ Andean keepers, whose diet consists mainly of starch.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brotherston, Gordon. 1989. Andean pastoralism and Inca ideology. In The walking larder, ed. Clutton-Brock, J.. Boston.Google Scholar
Browman, David L. 1974. Pastoral nomadism in the Andes. Current Anthropology 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browman, David L. 1989. Origins and development of Andean pastoralism: An overview of the past 6,000 years. In The walking larder, ed. Clutton-Brock, J.. Boston.Google Scholar
Bustinza Choque, A. Victor. 1984. The Camelidae of South America. In The camelid: An all-purpose animal, 2 vols., ed. Cockrill, W. Ross. Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
Calderón-Viacava, L., Cazorla-Talleri, A., and León-Barua, R.. 1971. Incidencia de malabsorción de lactosa en jovenes Peruanos sanos. Acta Gastroentereologica Latinamericana 3.Google Scholar
Calle Escobar, Rigoberto. 1984. Animal breeding and production of American camelids. Lima.Google Scholar
Cardozo, G. Armando. 1954. Los auqenidos. La Paz.Google Scholar
Carter, William E. 1975. Bolivia: A profile. New York.Google Scholar
Cobo, Bernabe. [1890–93]1956. Historia del nuevo mundo. 2 vols. Madrid.Google Scholar
Fernandez, F. M., and Oliver, G.. 1988. Proteins present in llama milk. I. Quantitative aspects and general characteristics. Milchwissenschaft 43.Google Scholar
Figueroa, Rolando B., Melgar, E., Jo, N., and Garcia, O. L.. 1971. Intestinal lactase deficiency in an apparently normal Peruvian population. American Journal of Digestive Diseases 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flannery, Kent V., Marcus, Joyce, and Reynolds, Robert G.. 1989. The flocks of the Wamani: A study of llama herders on the punas of Ayacucho, Peru. San Diego.Google Scholar
Flores Ochoa, Jorge A. 1968. Los pastores de Paratia. Mexico City.Google Scholar
Gade, Daniel W. 1969. The llama, alpaca and vicuna: Fact vs. fiction. Journal of Geography 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, Eduard. 1896. Die Haustiere und ihre Beziehungen zur Wirtschaft des Menschen. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Miller, George R. 1977. Sacrificio y benéfico de camelidos en el sur del Peru. In Pastores de puna: Uywamichiq punarunakuna, ed. Ochoa, Jorge Flores. Lima.Google Scholar
Moro, S. Manuel. 1952–6. Contribución al estudio de la leche de las alpacas. Revista de la Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria 7–11.Google Scholar
Novoa, C., and Wheeler, Jane C.. 1984. Lama and alpaca. In Evolution of domesticated animals, ed. Mason, Ian L.. New York.Google Scholar
Orlove, Benjamin. 1977. Alpacas, sheep, and men. New York.Google Scholar
Sauer, Carl O. 1952. Agricultural origins and dispersals. New York.Google Scholar
Simoons, Frederick J. 1973. New light on ethnic differences in adult lactose intolerance. American Journal of Digestive Diseases 18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sumar, Julio. 1988. Present and potential role of South American camelids in the high Andes. Outlook on Agriculture 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Tschudi, J. J. 1848. Travels in Peru during the years 1838–1842. New York.Google Scholar
Walton, William. 1811. An historical and descriptive account of the four species of Peruvian sheep called “carneros de la tierra.” London.Google Scholar
Webster, Steven. 1973. Pastoralism in the South Andes. Ethnology 2.Google Scholar
Wing, Elizabeth. 1975. Hunting and herding in the Peruvian Andes. In Archaeozoological studies, ed. Clason, A. T.. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×