Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-19T19:21:58.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Fundamentals and Physical Principles of Remote Sensing

from Section Two - Remote Sensing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2016

Derek Eamus
Affiliation:
University of Technology, Sydney
Alfredo Huete
Affiliation:
University of Technology, Sydney
Qiang Yu
Affiliation:
University of Technology, Sydney
Get access

Summary

An understanding of the physical principles of how electromagnetic energy interacts with the Earth's surface is essential for accurate interpretations and effective use of remote sensing images and datasets. In this chapter we highlight the main physical processes of radiant energy interactions with the Earth's surface as they relate to satellite measurements and the generation of remote sensing imagery for use in ecology and environmental sciences.

Fundamentals of the Remote Sensing Signal

Remote sensing is defined as the acquisition of information about the biophysical state and condition of the Earth's surface through non-contact, sensor-based observations. The information is transmitted from the surface to the sensor in the form of electromagnetic radiation, providing us the opportunity to detect or ‘sense’ this signal and derive information about the health, structure, and condition of objects on the land surface from afar.

The electromagnetic signal may be solar energy that is reflected from the Earth's surface or it may be emitted energy coming from the Earth's surface itself, irrespective of the presence or absence (night time) of sunlight (Fig. 5.1). Thermal and microwave radiation are two examples of emitted energy commonly measured by remote sensing. In certain cases, the signal received at a sensor may be a combination of solar-reflected and self-emitted energy, which may be useful, for example, in the detection of fires when portions of the shortwave infrared are detected. Alternatively, an ‘active’ sensor system generates the energy that interacts with the Earth's surface, which is then detected by the same sensor system, as in the case of Radar (Radio Detection and Ranging) and Lidar (Light Detection and Ranging) remote sensing (Fig. 5.1).

Regardless of the type of electromagnetic signal, the energy received and detected by remote sensing provides valuable information that can be used to interpret and characterize the physical, chemical, and biologic state and condition of the surface, along with surface processes involving soils, vegetation, water, and land-use activities. Although, in remote sensing we focus primarily on the measurement and information content of the electromagnetic radiation, this signal may be coupled with other energy terms to yield estimates of evapotranspiration, photosynthesis, and soil moisture content.

Type
Chapter
Information
Vegetation Dynamics
A Synthesis of Plant Ecophysiology, Remote Sensing and Modelling
, pp. 167 - 183
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Deering, DW, Eck, TF and Banerjee, D, (1999). Characterization of the reflectance anisotropy of three boreal forest canopies in spring-summer. Remote Sensing of Environment 67(2), 205–229.Google Scholar
Dickinson, RE, Pinty, B, Verstaete, MM, (1990). Relating surface albedos in GCM to remotely sensed data. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 52(1–2), 109–131.Google Scholar
Gutman, G, Ohring, G, Tarpley, D and Ambriozak, R, (1989). Albedo of the U.S. Great Plains as determined from NOAA-9 AVHRR data. Journal of Climate 2, 608–617.Google Scholar
Henderson-Sellers, A, and Wilson, MF, (1982). High resolution planetary albedos–values and variability. Remote Sensing of Environment 12, 479–484Google Scholar
Holben, B and Fraser, RS, (1993). Red and near-infrared sensor response to off-nadir viewing. International Journal of Remote Sensing 5, 145–160.Google Scholar
Kaufman, YJ, (1987). Atmospheric effect on spectral signature measurements. Advances in Space Research 7(11), 203–206.Google Scholar
Kaufman, YJ and Tanré, D, (1996). Strategy for direct and indirect methods for correcting the aerosol effect on remote sensing: From AVHRR to EOS-MODIS. Remote Sensing of Environment 55(1), 65–79.Google Scholar
Kimes, DS and Deering, DW, (1992). Remote sensing of surface hemispherical reflectance (albedo) using pointable multispectral imaging spectroradiometers. Remote Sensing of Environment 39(2), 85–94.Google Scholar
Pinker, RT, Laszlo, I, Goodrich, D and Pandithurai, G, (2000). Satellite estimates of surface radiative fluxes for the extended San Pedro Basin: sensitivity to aerosols. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 105(1–3), 43–54.Google Scholar
Ranson, KJ, Irons, JR and Daughtry, CST, (1991). Surface albedo from bidirectional reflectance. Remote Sensing of Environment 35(2–3), 201–211.Google Scholar
Schaaf, CB, Gao, F, Strahler, AH, Lucht, W and Li, X, (2002). First operational BRDF, albedo nadir reflectance products from MODIS. Remote Sensing of Environment 83(1–2), 135–148.Google Scholar
Slater, PN, 1980. Remote Sensing, Optics and Optical Systems. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
Vermote, EF, Saleous, NZ ElJustice, CO, Kaufman, YJ, Privette, JL. Remer, JL and Roger, L and Tanré, D, (2002). Atmospheric correction of MODIS data in the visible to middle infrared: first results. Remote Sensing of Environment 83(1–2), 97–111.Google Scholar
Walthall, CL, Kim, MWilliams, DL, Meeson, BW, Agbu, PA, Newcomer, JA and Levine, ER, (1993). Data sets for modeling: A retrospective collection of bidirectional reflectance and forest ecosystems dynamics multisensor aircraft campaign data sets. Remote Sensing of Environment 46(3), 340–346.Google Scholar
Walthall, CL, Norman, JM, Welles, JM, Campbell, G and Blad, BL, (1985). Simple equation to approximate the bi-directional reflectance from vegetative canopies and bare soil surfaces. Applied Optics 24, 383–387.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×