Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-19T17:26:30.965Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - An Overview of Remote Sensing

from Section Two - Remote Sensing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2016

Derek Eamus
Affiliation:
University of Technology, Sydney
Alfredo Huete
Affiliation:
University of Technology, Sydney
Qiang Yu
Affiliation:
University of Technology, Sydney
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The surveillance of the Earth and its terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, land use activities and snow and ice cover constitute the broad framework of ‘remote sensing’, defined as discerning information about the Earth's surface from afar without direct physical contact. Remote sensing employs non-destructive measurement techniques for monitoring the Earth's structurally and functionally diverse landscapes in a consistent and robust manner.

From early days, aerial photography from balloons and airplanes was widely adopted for its synoptic viewing of vast and often inaccessible areas. This greatly facilitated spatial surveys and monitoring of our ecosystems, soils, hydrologic features and land cover conditions. Today we routinely observe the entire Earth as a planet utilising spacecraft sensors that circle the Earth every 90 minutes and remote sensing technologies have become widely integrated within ecosystem sciences and agriculture and natural resource management communities (Kerr and Ostrevsky 2003).

Satellite data offer unprecedented capabilities to capture spatial and temporal details of dynamic ecosystems, functional processes and characterisation of ecosystem structure and biological properties (Pettorelli et al. 2005; Glenn et al. 2008). When properly integrated with ecological principles and models, remote sensing is a powerful tool for landscape process studies, ecosystem assessments of health and productivity and vegetation -climate interactions at local-to-global scales. This has enabled new discoveries about our planet and has improved our understanding of its state, health and functioning (e.g. Lefsky et al. 2002, Tucker et al. 2005; Fig. 4.1).

In this book the principles of remote sensing and their application to ecophysiological and environmental studies are coupled to modelling of landscape-atmosphere interactions within the Earth science community. We address the recent challenges in biosphere science, climate change, diminishing biologic diversity, large-scale droughts and land sustainability. These issues have exerted increasingly complex demands for more quantitative, longer-term and accurate satellite-based remote sensing data to better diagnose ecosystem health and status and assess how the Earth is changing over time (Fig. 4.2).

A Framework of Remote Sensing

Remote sensing encompasses a multitude of activities that include the development, operations and calibration of satellite sensor systems; data acquisition and storage; image interpretation and analyses; and visualisation of spatial data.

Type
Chapter
Information
Vegetation Dynamics
A Synthesis of Plant Ecophysiology, Remote Sensing and Modelling
, pp. 155 - 166
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asner, GP, Hughes, RF, Vitousek, PM, Knapp, DE, Kennedy-Bowdoin, T, Boardman, J, Martin, RE, Eastwood, M, Green, RO, (2008). Invasive plants transform the three-dimensional structure of rain forests. Proceedings of the National Academy Sciences 105 (11), 4519–4523.
Baumgardner, MF, Silva, LF, Biehl, LL and Stoner, ER, (1985). Reflectance properties of soils. Advances in Agronomy 38, 1–44.Google Scholar
Cohen, WB, Maiersperger, TK, Yang, ZQ, Gower, ST, Turner, DP, Ritts, WD, Berterretche, M and Running, SW, (2003). Comparisons of land cover and LAI estimates derived from ETM+ and MODIS for four sites in North America: a quality assessment of 2000/2001 provisional MODIS products. Remote Sensing of Environment 88, 233–255.Google Scholar
Foody, GM and Curran, PJ, (1994). Estimation of tropical forest extent and regeneration stage using remotely sensed data. Journal of Biogeography 21, 223–244.Google Scholar
Glenn, EP, Huete, AR, Nagler, PL and Nelson, SG, (2008). Relationship between remotely-sensed vegetation indices, canopy attributes and plant physiological processes: What vegetation indices can and cannot tell us about the landscape. Sensors 8, 2136–2160.Google Scholar
Kerr, JT and Ostrovsky, M, (2003). From space to species: ecological applications for remote sensing. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18, 299–305.Google Scholar
Lefsky, MA, Cohen, WB, Parker, GG and Harding, DJ, (2002). Lidar remote sensing for ecosystem studies. BioScience 52, 19–30.Google Scholar
Liang, L and Schwartz, M, (2009). Landscape phenology: an integrative approach to seasonal vegetation dynamics. Landscape Ecology 24, 465–472.Google Scholar
Pettorelli, N, Vik, JO, Mysterud, A, Gaillard, J-MTucker, CJ and Stenseth, NC, (2005). Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20, 503–510.Google Scholar
Running, SW, Baldocchi, DD, Turner, DP, Gower, ST, Bakwin, PS and Hibbard, KA, (1999). A global terrestrial monitoring network integrating tower fluxes, flask sampling, ecosystem modeling and EOS satellite data. Remote Sensing of Environment 70, 108–127.Google Scholar
Tollefson, J, (2009). Climate: Counting carbon in the Amazon. Nature 461, 1048.Google Scholar
Turner, W, Spector, S, Gardiner, N, Fladeland, M, Sterling, E, Steininger, M, (2003). Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18(6), 306–314.
Ustin, SL, Roberts, DA, Gamon, JAAsner, GP and Green, RO, (2004). Using imaging spectroscopy to study ecosystem processes and properties. BioScience 54, 523–534.Google Scholar
Zhang, X, Friedl, MA, Schaaf, CB, Strahler, AH, Hodges, JFC, Gao, F. Reed, BC and Huete, A, (2003). Monitoring vegetation phenology using MODIS. Remote Sensing of Environment 84, 471–475.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×