Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T17:26:53.938Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - An Introduction to Plant Structure and Ecophysiology

from Section One - Plant Ecophysiology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2016

Derek Eamus
Affiliation:
University of Technology, Sydney
Alfredo Huete
Affiliation:
University of Technology, Sydney
Qiang Yu
Affiliation:
University of Technology, Sydney
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Vegetation Dynamics
A Synthesis of Plant Ecophysiology, Remote Sensing and Modelling
, pp. 43 - 109
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, MA, Simon, J and Pfautsch, S, (2010). Woody legumes: a view from the south. Tree Physiology 30, 1072–1082.Google Scholar
Baldocchi, DD and Meyers, T, (1998). On using eco-physiological, micrometeorological and biogeochemical theory to evaluate carbon dioxide, water vapor and trace gas fluxes over vegetation: a perspective. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 90, 1–25.Google Scholar
Barton, CVM, Duursma, RA, Medlyn, BE, Ellsworth, DS, Eamus, D, Tissue, DT, Adams, MA, Conroy, J, Crous, KY, Liberloo, M, Low, M, Linder, S and McMurtrie, RE, (2011). Effects of elevated atmospheric [CO2] on instantaneous transpiration efficiency at leaf and canopy scales in Eucalyptus saligna. Global Change Biology 18, 585–595.Google Scholar
Beer, C, Ciais, P, Reichstein, M, Baldocchi, D, Law, BE, Papale, D, Soussana, JF, Ammann, C, Buchmann, N, Frank, D, Gianelle, D, Janssens, IA, Knohl, A, Kostner, B, Moors, E, Roupsard, O, Verbeeck, H, Vesala, T, Williams, CA and Wohlfahrt, G, (2009). Temporal and among-site variability of inherent water use efficiency at the ecosystem level. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 23, GB2018 DOI: 10.1029/2008GB003233.Google Scholar
Boulain, N, Cappelaere, B, Ramier, D, Issoufou, HBA, Halilou, O, Seghieri, J, Guillemin, F, Oi, M, Gignoux, J and Timouk, F, (2009). Towards an understanding of coupled physical and biological processes in the cultivated Sahel-2. Vegetation and carbon dynamics. Journal of Hydrology 375, 190–203.Google Scholar
Bruemmer, C, Black, TA, Jassal, RS, Grant, NJ, Spittlehouse, DL, Chen, B, Nesic, Z, Amiro, BD, Arain, MA, Barr, AG, Bourque, CPA, Coursolle, C, Dunn, AL, Flanagan, LB, Humphreys, ER, Lafleur, PM, Margolis, HA, McCaughey, JH and Wofsy, SC, (2012). How climate and vegetation type influence evapotranspiration and water use efficiency in Canadian forest, peatland and grassland ecosystems. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 153, 14–30.Google Scholar
Choinski, JS, Ralph, P and Eamus, D, (2003). Changes in photosynthesis during leaf expansion in Corymbia gummifera.Australian Journal of Botany 51, 111–118.Google Scholar
Cowan, IR and Farquhar, GD, (1977). Stomatal function in relation to leaf metabolism and environment. In Integration of activity in the higher plant, pp. 471–505, Cambridge University Press.
Dewar, RC, (2002). The Ball-Berry-Leuning and Tardieu-Davies stomatal models: synthesis and extension within a spatially aggregated picture of guard cell function. Plant, Cell and Environment 25, 1383–1398.Google Scholar
Duursma, RA, Barton, CVM, Lin, Y-S, Medlyn, BE,Eamus, D, Tissue, DT, Ellsworth, DS, McMurtrie, RE, (2014). The peaked response of transpiration rate to vapour pressure deficit in field conditions can be explained by the temperature optimum of photosynthesis. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology189–190, 2–10.Google Scholar
Eamus, D, Cleverly, J, Boulain, N, Grant, N, Raux, R and Villalobos-Vega, R, (2013). Carbon and water fluxes in an arid zone Acacia savanna woodland: an analyses of seasonal patterns and responses to rainfall. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 182, 225–238.Google Scholar
Eamus, D, Hutley, LB and O'Grady, AP, (2001). Daily and seasonal patterns of carbon and water fluxes above a north Australian savanna. Tree Physiology 21, 977–988.Google Scholar
Eamus, D and Shanahan, S, (2002). A rate equation model of stomatal responses to vapour pressure deficit and drought. BMC Ecology 2(8), doi 10.1186/1472–6785.Google Scholar
Eamus, D, Taylor, DT, Macinnis-Ng, CMO, Shanahan, S and Silva, L De, (2008). Comparing model predictions and experimental data for the response of stomatal conductance and guard cell turgor to manipulations of cuticular conductance, leaf-to-air vapour pressure difference and temperature: feedback mechanisms are able to account for all observations. Plant, Cell and Environment 31, 269–277.Google Scholar
Ewers, BE, T, ST Gower, Bond-Lamberty, B and Wang, CK, (2005). Effects of stand age and tree species on canopy transpiration and average stomatal conductance of boreal forests. Plant, Cell and Environment 28, 660–678.Google Scholar
Farquhar, GD, Schulze, ED and Kuppers, M, (1980). Responses to humidity by stomata of Nicotiana glauca L. and Corylus avellana L. are consistent with the optimization of carbon dioxide uptake with respect to water loss. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 7, 315–327.
Hall, AE and Schulze, ED, (1980). Stomatal responses to environment and a possible interrelation between stomatal effects on transpiration and CO2 assimilation. Plant, Cell and Environment 3, 467–474.
Harris, PP, Huntingford, C, Cox, PM, Gash, JHC, Malhi, Y, (2004). Effect of soil moisture on canopy conductance of Amazonian rainforest. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 122, 215–227.Google Scholar
Hikosaka, K, Ishikawa, K, Borjigidai, A, Muller, O and Onoda, Y, (2006). Temperature acclimation of photosynthesis: mechanisms involved in the changes in temperature dependence of photosynthetic rates. Journal of Experimental Botany 57, 291–302.Google Scholar
Holmes, MG and Keiller, DR, (2002). Effects of pubescence and waxes on the reflectance of leaves in the ultraviolet and photosynthetic wavebands: a comparison of a range of speciesPlant, Cell and Environment 25, 85–93.Google Scholar
Houlton, BZ, Wang, Y-P, Vitousek, PM and Field, CB, (2008). A unifying framework for dinitrogen fixation in the terrestrial biosphere. Nature 454, 327–331.Google Scholar
Hutley, LB, O'Grady, AP and Eamus, D, (2001). Monsoonal influences on evapotranspiration of savanna vegetation of northern Australia. Oecologia 126, 434–443.Google Scholar
Jarvis, PG, (1976). Interpretation of variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 273, 593–610.Google Scholar
Jarvis, PG, and McNaughton, KG, (1986). Stomatal control of transpiration: scaling up from leaf to region. Advances in Ecological Research 15, 1–49.Google Scholar
Jongen, M, Pereira, JS, Aires, LMI and Pio, CA, (2011). The effects of drought and timing of precipitation on the inter-annual variation in ecosystem-atmosphere exchange in a Mediterranean grassland. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 151, 595–606.Google Scholar
Karnosky, DF, Zak, DR, Pregitzer, KS, Awmack, CS, Bockheim, JG, Dickson, RE, Hendrey, GR, Host, GE, King, JS, Kopper, BJ, Kruger, EL, Kubiske, ME, Lindroth, RL, Mattson, WJ, McDonald, EP, Noormets, A, Oksanen, E, Parsons, WFJ, Percy, KE, Podila, GK, Riemenschneider, DE, Sharma, P, Thakur, R, Sober, A, Sober, J, Jones, WS, Anttonen, S, Vapaavuori, E, Mankovska, B, Heilman, W, and Isebrands, JG, (2003). Tropospheric O3 moderates responses of temperate hardwood forests to elevated CO2: a synthesis of molecular to ecosystem results from the Aspen FACE project. Functional Ecology 17, 289–304.Google Scholar
Komatsu, H, Kang, KH, Kume, T, Yoshifuji, N and Hotta, N, (2006). Transpiration from a Cryptomeria japonica plantation, part 1: aerodynamic control of transpiration. Hydrological Processes 20, 1309–1320.Google Scholar
Kuglitsch, FG, Reichstein, M, Beer, C, Carrara, A, Ceulemans, R, Granier, A, Janssens, IA, Koestner, B, Lindroth, A, Loustau, D, Matteucci, G, Montagnani, L, Moors, EJ, Papale, D, Pilegaard, K, Ramba, S, Rebmann, C, Schulze, ED, Seufert, G, Verbeeck, H, Vesala, T, Aubinet, M, Bernhofer, C, Foken, T, Grünwald, T, Heinesch, B, Kutsch, W, Laurila, T, Longdoz, B, Miglietta, F, Sanz, MJ and Valentini, R, (2008). Characterisation of ecosystem water-use efficiency of European forests from eddy covariance measurement. Biogeosciences Discussion 5, 4481–4519.Google Scholar
Kutsch, WL, Hanan, N, Scholes, B, Kubheka, W, Eckhardt, H and Williams, C, (2008). Response of carbon fluxes to water relations in a savanna ecosystem in South Africa. Biogeosciences 5, 1797–1808.Google Scholar
Kuzyakov, Y and Gavrichkova, O, (2010). Time lag between photosynthesis and CO2 flux from soil: a review. Global Change Biology 16, 3386–3406.Google Scholar
Linderson, ML, Mikkelsen, TN, Ibrom, A, Lindroth, A, Ro-Poulsen, H and Pilegaard, K, (2012). Up-scaling of water use efficiency from leaf to canopy as based on leaf gas exchange relationships and the modelled in-canopy light distribution. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 152, 201–211.Google Scholar
Lloyd, J, (1991). Modelling stomatal responses to environment in Macadamia integrifolia. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 18, 649–660.Google Scholar
Lloyd, J and Farquhar, GD, (1994). 13C discrimination during carbon assimilation by the terrestrial biosphere. Oecologia 99, 201–203.Google Scholar
Lloyd, J, Grace, J, Miranda, AC, Meir, P, Wong, SC, Miranda, BS, Wright, IR, Gash, JHC, Mcintyre, J, (1995). A simple calibrated model of Amazon rain-forest productivity based on leaf biochemical properties. Plant, Cell and Environment 18, 1129–1145.Google Scholar
Lu, P, Yunusa, IAM, Walker, RR and Muller, WJ, (2003). Regulation of canopy conductance and transpiration and their modelling in irrigated grapevines. Functional Plant Biology 30, 68–98.Google Scholar
MacInnis-Ng, C, McClenahan, K and Eamus, D, (2004). Convergence in hydraulic architecture, water relations and primary productivity amongst habitats and across seasons in Sydney. Functional Plant Biology 31, 429–439Google Scholar
Martin, G, Myers, DA and Vogelmann, TC, (1991). Characterisation of plant epidermal lens effects by a surface replicate technique. Journal of Experimental Botany 42, 581–587.Google Scholar
Meinzer, FC, (1982). The effect of vapour pressure on stomatal control of gas exchange in douglas fir (Pseudotsuge menziesii) saplings. Oecologia 54, 236–242.
Mencuccini, M and Holtta, T, (2010). The significance of phloem transport for the speed with which canopy photosynthesis and belowground respiration are linked. Global Change Biology 185, 189–203.Google Scholar
Mooney, HA, Field, C, Williams, WE, Berry, JA, Blorkman, O, (1983). Photosynthetic characteristics of plants of a Californian cool coastal environment. Oecologia 57, 38–42.
Mott, KA and Parkhurst, DF, (1991). Stomatal responses to humidity in air and helox. Plant, Cell and Environment 14, 509–515.Google Scholar
Mott, KA and Peak, D, (2013). Testing a vapour phase mechanism for stomatal responses to humidity. Plant, Cell and Environment 36, 936–944.Google Scholar
Munekage, Y, Hashimoto, M, Miyake, C, Tomizawa, K-I, Endo, T, Tasaka, M and Shikanai, T, (2004). Coupled electron flow around photosystem I is essential for photosynthesis. Nature 429, 579–582.Google Scholar
Neilson, RP, (1995). A model for predicting continental-scale vegetation distribution and water balance. Ecological Applications 5, 362–385.Google Scholar
Nicolas, E, Barradas, VL, Ortuno, MF, Navarro, A, Torrecillas, A and Alarcon, JJ, (2008). Environmental and stomatal control of transpiration, canopy conductance and decoupling coefficient in young lemon trees under shading net. Environmental and Experimental Botany 63, 200–206.Google Scholar
Niinemets, U, Diaz-Espejo, A, Flexas, J, Galmes, J and Wanner, CR, (2009). Role of mesophyll diffusion conductance in constraining potential photosynthetic productivity in the field. Journal of Experimental Botany 60, 2249–2270.Google Scholar
O'Grady, AP, Worledge, D, Battaglia, M, (2008). Constraints on transpiration of Eucalyptus globulus in southern Tasmania, Australia. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 148, 453–465.Google Scholar
Parkhurst, DF, (1994). Diffusion of CO2 and other gases inside leaves. New Phytologist 126, 449–479.Google Scholar
Pataki, DE, Oren, R, Katul, G and Sigmon, J, (1998). Canopy conductance of Pinus taeda, Liquidambar styraciflua and Quercus phellos under varying atmospheric and soil water conditions. Tree Physiology 18, 307–315.Google Scholar
Peak, D and Mott, DK, (2011). A new vapour-phase mechanism for stomatal responses to humidity and temperature. Plant, Cell and Environment 34, 162–178.Google Scholar
Quentin, AG, Grady, AP, Beadle, CL, Worledge, D and Pinkard, EA, (2011). Responses of transpiration and canopy conductance to partial defoliation of Eucalyptus globulus trees. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 15, 1356–364.Google Scholar
Roelfsema, MR and Hedrich, R, (2005). In the light of stomatal opening: new insights into ‘the Watergate’. New Phytologist 167, 66–91.Google Scholar
Royer, DL, (2001). Stomatal density and stomatal index as indicators of paleoatmospheric CO2 concentration. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 114, 1–28.Google Scholar
Rust, S and Roloff, A, (2002). Reduced photosynthesis in old oak (Quercus robur): the impact of crown and hydraulic architecture. Tree Physiology 22, 597–601.Google Scholar
Santiago, SL, Goldstein, G, Meinzer, FC, Fisher, JB, Machado, K, Woodruff, D and Jones, T, (2004). Leaf photosynthetic traits scale with hydraulic conductivity and wood density in Panamanian forest canopy trees. Oecologia 40, 543–550.Google Scholar
Schymanski, SJ, Roderick, ML, Sivapalan, M, Hutley, LB and Beringer, JA, (2007). A test of the optimality approach to modelling canopy properties and CO2 uptake by natural vegetation. Plant, Cell and Environment 30, 1586–1589.Google Scholar
Stewart, JB, (1988). Modelling surface conductance of pine forest. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 43, 19–35.Google Scholar
Taylor, D and Eamus, D, (2008). Coordinating leaf functional traits with branch hydraulic conductivity: resource substitution and implications for carbon gain. Tree Physiology 28, 1169–1177.Google Scholar
Tholen, D, Ethier, G, Genty, B, Pepin, S and Zhu, X-G, (2012). Variable mesophyll conductance revisited: theoretical background and experimental implications. Plant, Cell and Environment 35, 2087–2103.Google Scholar
Thomas, DS and Eamus, D, (1999). The influence of predawn leaf water potential on stomatal responses to atmospheric water content at constant Ci and on stem hydraulic conductance and foliar ABA concentrations. Journal of Experimental Botany 50, 243–251.Google Scholar
Thomas, DS, Eamus, D and Bell, D, (1999). Optimization theory of stomatal behaviour I. A critical evaluation of five methods of calculation. Journal of Experimental Botany 50, 38–92.Google Scholar
Vogelmann, TC, Bornman, JF and Yates, DJ, (1996). Focusing of light by leaf epidermal cells. Physiologia Plantarum 98, 43–56.Google Scholar
Walker, BH and Langridge, JL, (1997). Predicting savanna vegetation structure on the basis of plant available moisture (PAM) and plant available nutrients (PAN): a case study from Australia. Australian Journal of Biogeography 24, 81–25.Google Scholar
Waring, RH and Schlesinger, WH, (1955). Forest Ecosystems: Concepts and Management. Academic Press, San Diego California USA.
Wharton, S, Schroeder, M, Bible, K, Falk, M and Paw, UKT, (2009). Stand-level gas-exchange responses to seasonal drought in very young versus old Douglas-fir forests of the Pacific Northwest, USA. Tree Physiology 8, 959–974.
Whitehead, D, (1998). Regulation of stomatal conductance and transpiration in forest canopies. Tree Physiology 18, 63–44.Google Scholar
Williams, WE, (1983). Optimal water-use efficiency in a Californian shrub. Plant, Cell and Environment 6, 145–151.
Wong, SC, Cowan, IR and Farquhar, GD, (1979). Stomatal conductance correlates with photosynthetic capacity. Nature 282, 424–426.
Yunusa, IAM, Aumann, CD, Rab, MA, Merrick, N, Fisher, PD, Eberbach, PL and Eamus, D, (2010). Topographical and seasonal trends in transpiration by two co-occurring Eucalyptus species during two contrasting years in a low rainfall environment. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 150, 1234–1244.Google Scholar
Zeppel, MJ and Eamus, D, (2008). Coordination of leaf area, sapwood area and canopy conductance leads to species convergence of tree water use in a remnant evergreen woodland. Australian Journal of Botany 56, 97–108.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×