Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T19:21:50.384Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - An Introduction to Biogeography: Broad-Scale Relationships Amongst Climate, Vegetation Distribution and Vegetation Attributes

from Section One - Plant Ecophysiology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2016

Derek Eamus
Affiliation:
University of Technology, Sydney
Alfredo Huete
Affiliation:
University of Technology, Sydney
Qiang Yu
Affiliation:
University of Technology, Sydney
Get access

Summary

This chapter provides a broad-scale overview of the patterns of global distribution of rainfall, temperature and evaporative demand. In addition it provides an introduction to some of the causes of inter-annual variability (including the El Niño Southern Oscillation, the North Atlantic Oscillation and the Southern Annular Mode) in weather patterns. Examination of the impacts of inter-annual variability of rainfall and temperature is a recurrent theme in studies of vegetation ecophysiology, modelling of landscape function and the application of remote sensing to investigate landscape structure and function. This chapter describes how climate variables were originally used to classify vegetation assemblages into biomes but also discusses the concept of plant functional types and shows how these are increasingly used in the disciplines of modelling and remote sensing as a means of representing biomes. Finally, leaf and whole-plant attributes that are deemed important in land surface models and remote sensing are discussed and recent developments in the interpretation of plant functional types are presented.

Large-Scale Patterns in Climate

The Solar Constant and the Earth's Tilt

Directly above the equator, at noon, about 1367 watts of solar energy per square metre (1367 W m−2) are received at the outer edge of the atmosphere. This is termed the solar constant, although the sun's output is not constant with time because of changes in solar activity, including the 11-year sunspot cycle. About 7 percent of solar radiation is ultraviolet, about 41 percent is in the visible range (0.4–0.7 μm) and 51 percent has a wavelength > 0.7 μm (near infrared). The global annual average receipt of solar radiation at the edge of the atmosphere is, however, about 342 W m−2, that is, one quarter of the solar constant. This is because the surface area of a sphere (assuming the earth is a sphere) is four times larger than the surface area of a disc of the same radius and thus solar energy is spread across an area four times larger than if the earth were a simple flat disc.

Type
Chapter
Information
Vegetation Dynamics
A Synthesis of Plant Ecophysiology, Remote Sensing and Modelling
, pp. 3 - 42
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, M, (2010). Extratropical air-sea interaction, SST variability and the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO). In Climate Dynamics: Why does Climate Vary, D Sun and F Bryan (Eds.), AGU Monograph #189, Washington, DC, pp. 123–148.
Ball, JT, Woodrow, IE and JA Berry, (1987). A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions. In Progress in Photosynthesis Research, J Biggins (Ed.), Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, pp. 221–224.
Bonan, GB, Levis, S, Kergoat, L and Oleson, KW, (2002). Landscapes as patches of plant functional types: an integrating concept for climate and ecosystem models. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 16 (2), 1021. DOI:1029/2000GF001360Google Scholar
Bonan, GB, Levis, S, Sitch, S, Vertenstein, M and Oleson, KW, (2003). A dynamic global vegetation model for use with climate models: concepts and description of simulated vegetation dynamics. Global Change Biology 9, 1543–1566.Google Scholar
Brugger, K and Rubel, F, (2013). Characterizing the species composition of European Culicoides vectors by means of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Parasites and Vectors 6, 33.Google Scholar
Burgess, SSO, (2006). Measuring transpiration responses to summer precipitation in a Mediterranean climate: a simple screening tool for identifying plant water-use strategies. Physiologia Plantarum 127, 339–342.Google Scholar
Canadell, J, Jackson, RB, Erlinger, JR, Mooney, HA, Sala, E and Schulze, ED, (1996). Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale. Oecologia 108, 583–595.Google Scholar
Cox, PM, Huntingford, C and Harding, RJ, (1998). A canopy conductance photosynthesis model for use in a GCM land surface scheme. Journal of Hydrology 212, 79–94.Google Scholar
Eamus, D and Prichard, H, (1998). A cost-benefit analysis of leaves of four Australian savanna species. Tree Physiology 18, 537–545.Google Scholar
Grant, RF, Arain, A, Aroroa, V, Barr, A, Black, TA, Chen, J, Wang, S, Yuan, F and Zhang, Y, (2005). Inter-comparison of techniques to model high temperature effects on CO2 and energy exchange in temperate and boreal coniferous forests. Ecological Modelling 188, 217–252.Google Scholar
Kattge, J, et al., (2011). TRY: a global database of plant traits. Global Change Biology 17(9), 2905–2935.Google Scholar
Kottek, M, Grieser, J, Beck, C, Rudolf, B and Rubel, F, (2006). World map of Koppen-Geiger Climate Classification updated. Meteorological Zeitschrift 15, 259–263.Google Scholar
Merino, J, Field, C and Mooney, HA, (1984). Construction and maintenance costs of Mediterranean-climate evergreen and deciduous leaves. II. Biochemical pathway analysis. Acta Oecologica Oecologia Plantarum 5, 211–229.Google Scholar
Mitchell, PJ, Veneklass, EJ, Lambers, H, Burgess, SSO, (2008). Using multiple trait associations to define hydraulic functional types in plant communities of south-western Australia. Oecologia 158, 385–397.Google Scholar
Nemani, R and Running, SW, (1996). Implementation of a hierarchical global vegetation classification in ecosystem function models. Journal of Vegetation Science 7, 337–346.Google Scholar
Oliveira, RS, Dawson, TE, Burgess, SSO and Nepstad, DC, (2005). Hydraulic redistribution in three Amazonian trees. Oecologia 145, 354–363.Google Scholar
Running, SW, Lovel, TR and and Pierce, LL, (1995). A remote-sensing based vegetation classification logic for global land cover analyses. Remote Sensing of Environment 51, 39–48.Google Scholar
Schenk, HJ, (2008). The shallowest possible water extraction profile: a null model for global root distributions. Vadose Zone Journal 7, 1119–1124.Google Scholar
Schenk, HJ and Jackson, RB, (2002). The global biogeography of roots. Ecological Monographs 72, 311–328.Google Scholar
Schenk, HJ and Jackson, RB, (2005). Mapping the global distribution of deep roots in relation to climate and soil characteristics. Geoderma 126, 129–140.Google Scholar
Seager, R, Graham, N, Herweijer, C, Gordon, AL, Kushnir, Y and Cook, E, (2007). Blueprints for Medieval hydroclimate. Quaternary Science Reviews 26 (19–21), 2322–2336.Google Scholar
Sobrado, MA, (1991). Cost-benefit relationships in deciduous and evergreen leaves of tropical dry forest species. Functional Ecology 5, 608–616.Google Scholar
Whittaker, RH, (1970). Communities and ecosystems. MacMillan, New York.
Williams, K, Percival, F, Merino, J and Mooney, HA, (1987). Estimation of tissue construction cost from heat of combustion and organic nitrogen content. Plant Cell and Environment 10, 725–734.Google Scholar
Wright, IJ, Reich, PB, Westoby, M and Ackerly, DD, et al., 2004. The world-wide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428, 821–827.Google Scholar
Zeppel, M, Macinnis-Ng, CMO, Palmer, A, Taylor, D, Whitley, R, Fuentes, S, Yunusa, I, Williams, M and Eamus, D, (2008). An analysis of the sensitivity of sapflux to soil and plant variables assessed for an Australian woodland using a soil-plant-atmosphere model. Functional Plant Biology 35, 509–520.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×