Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T22:24:40.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Nitrogen flows in farming systems across Europe

from Part III - Nitrogen flows and fate at multiple spatial scales

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2011

By
Steve Jarvis ,
Nick Hutchings ,
Frank Brentrup ,
Jorgen Eivind Olesen  and
Klaas W. van de Hoek
Edited by
Mark A. Sutton ,
Clare M. Howard ,
Jan Willem Erisman ,
Gilles Billen ,
Albert Bleeker ,
Peringe Grennfelt ,
Hans van Grinsven  and
Bruna Grizzetti
Steve Jarvis
Affiliation:
University of Exeter
Nick Hutchings
Affiliation:
University of Aarhus
Frank Brentrup
Affiliation:
Yara International Centre
Jorgen Eivind Olesen
Affiliation:
Aarhus University
Klaas W. van de Hoek
Affiliation:
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment
Mark A. Sutton
Affiliation:
NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, UK
Clare M. Howard
Affiliation:
NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, UK
Jan Willem Erisman
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Gilles Billen
Affiliation:
CNRS and University of Paris VI
Albert Bleeker
Affiliation:
Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands
Peringe Grennfelt
Affiliation:
Swedish Environmental Research Institute (IVL)
Hans van Grinsven
Affiliation:
PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Bruna Grizzetti
Affiliation:
European Commission Joint Research Centre
Get access

Summary

Executive summary

Nature of the problem

  • Farms represent operational units which determine N-use efficiency and incorporation into products and, collectively, at the wider scale, determine the extent of environmental losses from agriculture.

  • The basic principles and objectives of using N, from whatever source, pertain to different systems across the wide range of farming types across Europe.

  • In addition to managing external inputs (fertilisers), there is much opportunity to improve N transfers within the farm. Mineral fertilisers are added to balance supply/demand for crops. Some systems rely on legume-N which, once incorporated into farm cycles, behaves in the same way as other N forms.

Approaches

  • Farm N cycles, their constituent parts and controlling influences are described and generalised principles identified.

  • Farm budgets for a range of systems, focussing on typical practice in NW Europe are shown which illustrate some general, important differences between farming systems.

Key findings/state of knowledge

  • Benefits of using N effectively are far reaching with immediate impact in promoting production. Use of N also provides an effective and flexible management tool for farmers.

  • Crop N requirements are determined from response curves and economic optima. Advice is supplied to farmers from various sources but the extent to which it is taken depends on many factors. New technologies are available to improve N-use efficiency. The basis of good N management is to optimise efficiency of added and soil N by increasing the temporal and spatial coincidence between availability and uptake of N.

  • […]

Type
Chapter
Information
The European Nitrogen Assessment
Sources, Effects and Policy Perspectives
 , pp. 211 - 228
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarnink, A. J. A. and Verstegen, M. W. A. (2007). Nutrition, key factor to reduce environmental load from pig production. Livestock Science, 109, 194–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arsenault, N., Tyedmers, P. and Fredeen, A. (2009). Comparing the environmental impacts of pasture-based and confinement-based dairy systems in Nova Scotia (Canada) using life cycle assessment. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 7, 19–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balasubramanian, V., Alves, B., Aulakh, M.et al. (2004). Crop, environmental, and management factors affecting nitrogen use efficiency. In: Agriculture and the Nitrogen Cycle: Assessing the Impacts of Fertilizer Use on Food Production and the Environment, ed. Mosier, A. R., Syers, J. K. and Freney, J. R., SCOPE 65, Island Press, Washington DC, pp. 19–33.Google Scholar
Berntsen, J., Jacobsen, B. H., Olesen, J. E., Petersen, B. M. and Hutchings, N. J. (2003). Evaluating nitrogen taxation scenarios using the dynamic whole farm simulation model FASSET. Agricultural Systems, 76, 817–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, L., Scholefield, D., Jewkes, E. C.et al. (2000). The effect of sulphur application on the efficiency of nitrogen use in two contrasting grassland soils. Journal of Agricultural Science, 135, 131–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, L., Scholefield, D., Jewkes, E. C., Lockyer, D. R. and Del Prado, A. (2005). NGAUGE: A decision support system to optimise N fertilisation of British grassland for economic and environmental goals. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 109, 20–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatskikh, D. and Olesen, J. E. (2007). Soil tillage enhanced CO2 and N2O emissions from loamy sand soil under spring barley. Soil & Tillage Research, 97, 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, B. T. (2004). Tightening the nitrogen cycle. In: Schjønning, P., Elmholt, S. and Christensen, B. T. (eds.) Managing Soil Quality: Challenges in Modern Agriculture, CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 47–67.Google Scholar
Crews, T. E. and Peoples, M. B. (2005). Can the synchrony of nitrogen supply and crop demand be improved in legume and fertilizer-based agroecosystems? A review. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 72, 101–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dämmgen, U. and Hutchings, N. J. (2008). Emissions of gaseous nitrogen species from manure management: a new approach. Environmental Pollution, 154, 488–497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clercq, P., Gertis, A. C., Hofman, G.et al. (2001). Nutrient Management Legislation In European Countries. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Vries, W., Liep, A., Reinds, G. J.et al. (2011). Geographic variation in terrestrial nitrogen budgets across Europe. In: The European Nitrogen Assessment, ed. Sutton, M. A., Howard, C. M., Erisman, J. W. et al., Cambridge University Press.
Díez, J. A., Roman, R., Cartagena, M. C.et al. (1994). Controlling nitrate pollution of aquifers by using different nitrogenous controlled release fertilizers in maize crop. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 48, 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksen, J. Askegaard, M. and Kristensen, K. (1999). NO3-leaching in an organic dairy/crop rotation as affected by organic manure type, livestock density and crop. Soil Use & Management, 15, 176–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksen, J., Vinther, F. P. and Søegaard, K. (2004). NO3-leaching and N2 fixation in grasslands of different composition, age and management. Journal of Agricultural Science, 142, 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulding, K., Jarvis, S. and Whitmore, A. (2008). Optimizing nutrient management for farm systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B, 363, 667–680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Groot Koerkamp, P. W. G. (1994). Review on emissions of ammonia from housing systems for laying hens in relation to sources, processes, building design and manure handling. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 59, 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groot Koerkamp, P. W. G., Speelman, L. and Metz, J. H. M. (1998). Litter composition and ammonia emission in aviary houses for laying hens. Part 1: Performance of a litter drying system. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 70, 375–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadjigeorgiou, I., Osoro, Fragoso de Almeida, K. P. and Molle, G., (2005). Southern European grazing lands: Production, environmental and landscape management aspects. Livestock Production Science, 96, 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchings, N. J. and Kristensen, I. S. (1995). Modelling mineral nitrogen accumulation in grazed pasture: will more nitrogen leach from fertilized grass than unfertilized grass/clover? Grass & Forage Science, 50, 300–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchings, N. J., Olesen, J. E., Petersen, B. M. and Berntsen, J. (2007). Modelling spatial heterogeneity in grazed grassland and its effects on nitrogen cycling and greenhouse gas emissions. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 121, 153–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchings, N. J., Sommer, S. G. and Jarvis, S. C. (1996). A model of ammonia volatilization from a grazing livestock farm. Atmospheric Environment, 30, 589–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huijsmans, J. F. M., Hol, J. M. G. and Hendriks, M. M. W. B. (2001). Effect of application technique, manure characteristics, weather and field conditions on ammonia volatilization from manure applied to grassland. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science, 49, 323–342.Google Scholar
Huijsmans, J. F. M., Hol, J. M. G. and Vermeulen, G. D. (2003). Effect of application method, manure characteristics, weather and field conditions on ammonia volatilization from manure applied to arable land. Atmospheric Environment, 37, 3669–3680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,IFA (2006). International Fertilizer Manufacturers Association, www.fertilizer.org (site accessed 24 September 2010).
Jarvis, S. C. and Aarts, H. P. M. (2000). Nutrient management from a farming systems perspective. In: Soegaard, K., Ohlsson, C., Hutchings, N. J., Kristensen, T. and Sehested, J. (eds). Grassland Farming Balancing Environmental and Economic Demands, Proceedings of the 18th General Meeting of the European Grassland Federation, Aalborg, Denmark, 22–25 May 2000 (Grassland Science in Europe, Vol. 5), pp. 363–373.
Jarvis, S. C., Hatch, D. J. and Roberts, D. H. (1989). The effects of grassland management on nitrogen losses from grazed swards through ammonia volatilization; the relationship to excretal N returns from cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, 112, 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkegaard, J., Christen, O., Krupinsky, J. and Layzell, D. (2008). Break crop benefits in temperate wheat production. Field Crops Research, 107, 185–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, C., Frolking, S. and Frolking, T. A. (1992). A model of nitrous oxide evolution from soil driven by rainfall events: 1. Model structure and sensitivity. Journal of Geophysical Research, 97, 9759–9776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, J., Buegger, F., Jensen, E. S., Schloter, M. and Heβ, J. (2003). Estimating N rhizodeposition of grain legumes using a 15N in situ stem labelling method. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 35, 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menzi, H. (2002). Manure management in Europe: results of a recent survey. In: Venglovsky, H. and Greserova, G. (eds.) RAMIRAN 2002. 10th International Conference on Hygiene & Safety, Strbske Pleso, High Tatras, Slovak Republic, pp. 93–102.Google Scholar
Murphy, D. V., MacDonald, A. J., Stockdale, E. A.et al. (2000). Soluble organic nitrogen in agricultural soils. Biology & Fertility of Soils, 30, 374–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyord, T., Sogaard, H. T., Hansen, M. N. and Jensen, L. S. (2008). Injection methods to reduce ammonia emission from volatile liquid fertilisers applied to growing crops. Biosystems Engineering, 100, 235–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oenema, O., Oudendag, D. and Velthof, G. L. (2007). Nutrient losses from manure management in the European Union. Livestock Science, 112, 261–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olesen, J. E., Askegaard, M. and Rasmussen, I. A. (2009). Winter cereal yields as affected by animal manure and green manure in organic arable farming. European Journal of Agronomy, 30, 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olesen, J. E., Jørgensen, L. N., Petersen, J. and Mortensen, J. V. (2003). Effects of rates and timing of nitrogen fertiliser on disease control by fungicides in winter wheat. 1. Crop yield and nitrogen uptake. Journal of Agricultural Science, 140, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olesen, J. E., Schelde, K., Weiske, A.et al., (2006). Modelling greenhouse gas emissions from European conventional and organic dairy farms. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 112, 207–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, F. J. and Rice, C. W. (1988). Crop rotation and its impact of efficiency of water and nitrogen use. In: Hargrove, W. L. (ed.) Cropping Strategies for Efficient Use of Water and Nitrogen, American Society of Agronomists, Madison, WI, pp. 101–113.Google Scholar
Rotz, C. A., Taube, F., Russele, M. P.et al. (2005). Whole-farm perspectives of nutrient flows in grassland agriculture. Crop Science, 45, 2139–2159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, C. A. and Fillery, I. R. P. (1996). Estimates of lupin below-ground biomass nitrogen, dry matter, and nitrogen turnover to wheat. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 47, 1047–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, P., Smith, J. U., Powlson, D. S.et al. (1997). A comparison of the performance of nine soil organic matter models using datasets from seven long-term experiments. Geoderma, 81, 153–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer, S. G. (2001). Effect of composting on nutrient loss and nitrogen availability of cattle deep litter. European Journal of Agronomy, 14, 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer, S. G., Friis, E., Bach, A. and Schjorring, J. K. (1997). Ammonia volatilization from pig slurry applied with trail hoses or broadspread to winter wheat: effects of crop developmental stage, microclimate, and leaf ammonia absorption. Journal of Environmental Quality, 26, 1153–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer, S. G., Géneremont, S., Cellier, P.et al. (2003). Processes controlling ammonia emission from livestock slurry in the field. European Journal of Agronomy, 19, 465–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer, S. G., Oenema, O., Chadwick, D.et al. (2006). Algorithms determining ammonia emission from buildings housing cattle and pigs and from manure stores. Agronomy Journal, 89, 264–335.Google Scholar
Starmans, D. A. J. and Hoek, K. W. (eds.) (2007). Ammonia: The Case of the Netherlands, Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.CrossRef
Thorup-Kristensen, K. (1994). The effect of nitrogen catch crop species on the nitrogen nutrition of succeeding crops. Fertilizer Research, 37, 227–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duinkerken, G., André, G., Smits, M. C. J., Monteny, G. J. and Šebek, L. B. J. (2005). Effect of rumen-degradable protein balance and forage type on bulk milk urea concentration and emission of ammonia from dairy cow houses. Journal of Dairy Science, 88, 1099–1112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×