Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T23:04:36.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - The road from qualitative to quantitative assay: What is next?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2011

Stephen A. Bustin
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London
Get access

Summary

The PCR is widely used in many applications throughout the world. It has its secure place in the history of molecular biology as one of the most revolutionary methods ever. The principles of PCR are clear, but how can the reaction procedure be optimized to bring out the best in each assay? What is the status quo and what is next? Where are there areas for improvement?

INTRODUCTION

PCR is defined as a relatively simple heat-stable Taq polymerase–based technique, invented by Kary B. Mullis and coworkers, who were awarded the Nobel Prize for chemistry in 1993 for this discovery. However, this terrain is contested, and many other scientists were instrumental in making PCR work in all kinds of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), ribonucleic acid (RNA), and protein (immuno quantitative PCR [qPCR])–based applications. Reverse transcription (RT) followed by PCR represents a powerful tool for messenger RNA (mRNA) quantification. Nowadays, real-time RT–PCR is widely and increasingly used because of its high sensitivity, good reproducibility, and wide dynamic quantification range. Today, quantitative real-time RT–PCR (qRT–PCR) represents the most sensitive method for the detection and quantification of gene expression levels. It has its tremendous advantages in elucidating small changes in mRNA expression levels in samples with low RNA concentrations, from limited tissue samples and in single cell analysis. Sensitivity and reproducibility is a particular requirement of expression profiling, which focuses on the fully quantitative approach for mRNA quantification, rather than simply qualitative analysis.

Type
Chapter
Information
The PCR Revolution
Basic Technologies and Applications
, pp. 110 - 128
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Mullis, K, Faloona, F, Scharf, S, Saiki, R, Horn, G, Erlich, H (1986) Specific enzymatic amplification of DNA in vitro: the polymerase chain reaction. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 51: 263–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saiki, RK, Scharf, S, Faloona, F, Mullis, KB, Horn, GT, Erlich, HA, et al. (1985) Enzymatic amplification of beta-globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of sickle cell anemia. Science 230(4732): 1350–1354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heid, CA, Stevens, J, Livak, KJ, Williams, PM (1996) Real time quantitative PCR. Genome Research 6: 986–993.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Higuchi, R, Fockler, C, Dollinger, G, Watson, R (1993) Kinetic PCR analysis: real-time monitoring of DNA amplification reactions. Biotechnology 11(9): 1026–1030.Google ScholarPubMed
Holland, PM, Abramson, RD, Watson, R, Gelfand, DH (1991) Detection of specific polymerase chain reaction product by utilizing the 5′-3′ exonuclease activity of Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 88(16): 7276–7280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ding, C, Cantor, CR (2004) Quantitative analysis of nucleic acids – the last few years of progress. Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 37(1): 1–10.Google ScholarPubMed
Pfaffl, MW, Hageleit, M (2001) Validities of mRNA quantification using recombinant RNA and recombinant DNA external calibration curves in real-time RT-PCR. Biotechnology Letters 23: 275–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockey, C, Otto, E, Long, Z (1998) Real-time fluorescence detection of a single DNA molecule. BioTechniques 24: 744–746.Google ScholarPubMed
Steuerwald, N, Cohen, J, Herrera, RJ, Brenner, CA (1999) Analysis of gene expression in single oocytes and embryos by real-time rapid cycle fluorescence monitored RT-PCR. Molecular Human Reproduction 5: 1034–1039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfaffl, MW (2004) Quantification strategies in real-time RT-PCR. In: Bustin, SA (ed), The Real-Time PCR Encyclopaedia A-Z of Quantitative PCR, pages 87–120. La Jolla, CA: International University Line.Google Scholar
Wittwer, CT, Garling, DJ (1991) Rapid cycle DNA amplification: time and temperature optimization. BioTechniques 10: 76–83.Google ScholarPubMed
Fleige, S, Walf, V, Huch, S, Prgomet, C, Sehm, J, Pfaffl, MW (2006) Comparison of relative mRNA quantification models and the impact of RNA integrity in quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Biotechnology Letters 28(19): 1601–1613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stahlberg, A, Hakansson, J, Xian, X, Semb, H, Kubista, M (2004) Properties of the reverse transcription reaction in mRNA quantification. Clinical Chemistry 50(3): 509–515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perez-Novo, CA, Claeys, C, Speleman, F, Cauwenberge, PV, Bachert, C, Vandesompele, J (2005) Impact of RNA quality on reference gene expression stability. BioTechniques 39: 52–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mannhalter, C, Koizar, D, Mitterbauer, G (2000) Evaluation of RNA isolation methods and reference genes for RT-PCR analyses of rare target RNA. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine 38: 171–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swift, GH, Peyton, MJ, MacDonald, RJ (2000) Assessment of RNA quality by semi-quantitative RT-PCR of multiple regions of a long ubiquitous mRNA. BioTechniques 28(3): 524–531.Google ScholarPubMed
Kruhoffer, M, Dyrskjot, L, Voss, T, Lindberg, RL, Wyrich, R, Thykjaer, T, et al. (2007) Isolation of microarray-grade total RNA, microRNA, and DNA from a single PAXgene blood RNA tube. The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics 9(4): 452–458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleige, S, Pfaffl, MW (2007) RNA integrity and the effect on the real-time qRT-PCR performance. Molecular Aspects of Medicine 27(2–3): 126–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raeymarkers, L (1993) Quantitative PCR: theoretical consideration with practical implication. Analytical Biochemistry 214: 582–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bengtsson, M, Ståhlberg, A, Rorsman, P, Kubista, M (2005) Gene expression profiling in single cells from the pancreatic islets of Langerhans reveals lognormal distribution of mRNA levels. Genome Research 15(10): 1388–1392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeman, TC, Lee, K, Richardson, PJ (1999) Analysis of gene expression in single cells. Current Opinions in Biotechnology 10(6): 579–582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nolan, T, Hands, RE, Bustin, SA (2006) Quantification of mRNA using real-time RT-PCR. Nature Protocols 1(3): 1559–1582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeman, WM, Vrana, SL, Vrana, KE (1996) Use of elevated reverse transcription reaction temperatures in RT-PCR. BioTechniques 20(5): 782–783.Google ScholarPubMed
Wong, L, Pearson, H, Fletcher, A, Marquis, CP, Mahler, S (1998) Comparison of the efficiency of Moloney murine leukaemia virus (M-MuLV) reverse transcriptase, RNase H–M-MuLV reverse transcriptase and avian myeloblastoma leukaemia virus (AMV) reverse transcriptase for the amplification of human immunoglobulin genes. Biotechnology Techniques 12(6): 485–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stahlberg, A, Kubista, M, Pfaffl, M (2004) Comparison of reverse transcriptases in gene expression analysis. Clinical Chemistry 50(9): 1678–1680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stangegaard, M, Dufva, IH, Dufva, M (2006) Reverse transcription using random pentadecamer primers increases yield and quality of resulting cDNA. BioTechniques 40(5): 649–657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zuker, M (2003) m-Fold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Research 31(13): 3406–3415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thellin, O, Zorzi, W, Lakaye, B, Borman, B, Coumans, B, Hennen, G, et al. (1999) Housekeeping genes as internal standards: use and limits. Journal of Biotechnology 75: 291–295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vandesompele, J, K, Preter, Pattyn, F, Poppe, B, N, Roy, A, Paepe, et al. (2002) Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biology 3(7): RESEARCH0034.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfaffl, MW (2001) Development and validation of an externally standardised quantitative insulin like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) RT-PCR using LightCycler SYBR® Green I technology. In: Meuer, S, Wittwer, C, and Nakagawara, K (eds), Rapid Cycle Real-Time PCR, Methods and Applications, pages 281–291. Heidelberg: Springer Press.Google Scholar
Reist, M, Pfaffl, MW, Morel, C, Meylan, M, Hirsbrunner, G, Blum, JW, et al. (2003) Quantitative mRNA analysis of bovine 5-HT receptor subtypes in brain, abomasum, and intestine by real-time PCR. Journal of Receptors and Signal Transduction 23(4): 271–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynisson, E, Josefsen, MH, Krause, M, Hoorfar, J (2005) Evaluation of probe chemistries and platforms to improve the detection limit of real-time PCR. Journal of Microbiological Methods 66(2): 206–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmittgen, TD, Zakrajsek, BA, Mills, AG, Gorn, V, Singer, MJ, Reed, MW (2000) Quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction to study mRNA decay: comparison of endpoint and real-time methods. Analytical Biochemistry 285(2): 194–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blow, N (2007) PCR's next frontier. Nature Methods 4: 869–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, , Rybalkin, I, Chen, S, Mukhamedova, N, Vlasik, T, Siebert, PD, et al. (1994) TaqStart antibody: “hot start” PCR facilitated by a neutralizing monoclonal antibody directed against Taq DNA polymerase. BioTechniques 16(6): 1134–1137.Google ScholarPubMed
Sharkey, DJ, Scalice, ER, Christy, KG Jr, Atwood, SM, Daiss, JL (1994) Antibodies as thermolabile switches: high temperature triggering for the polymerase chain reaction. Biotechnology (NY) 12(5): 506–509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reiter, M, Pfaffl, MW (2008) Effects of plate position, plate type and sealing systems on real-time PCR results. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment 22: 824–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schams, D, Kohlenberg, S, Amselgruber, W, Berisha, B, Pfaffl, MW, Sinowatz, F (2003) Expression and localisation of oestrogen and progesterone receptors in the bovine mammary gland during development, function and involution. Journal of Endocrinology 177: 305–317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berisha, B, Pfaffl, MW, Schams, D (2002) Expression of steroid receptors in the bovine ovary during estrous cycle and pregnancy. Endocrine 17(3): 207–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inderwies, T, Pfaffl, MW, HHD, Meyer, Blum, JW, Bruckmaier, RM (2003) Detection and quantification of mRNA expression of α- and β-adrenergic receptor subtypes in the bovine mammary gland of dairy cows. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 24: 123–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Livak, KJ (2001) ABI Prism 7700 Sequence detection System User Bulletin #2. Relative quantification of gene expression. Accessed July 22, 2009 and available at: http://docs.appliedbiosystems.com/pebiodocs/04303859.pdf.
Bustin, SA (2000) Absolute quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays. Journal of Molecular Endocrinology 25: 169–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wittwer, CT, Herrmann, MG, Gundry, CN, Elenitoba-Johnson, KS (2001) Real-time multiplex PCR assays. Methods 25(4): 430–442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bustin, SA (2002) Quantification of mRNA using real-time RT-PCR. Trends and problems. Journal of Molecular Endocrinology 29(1): 23–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Livak, KJ, Schmittgen, TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2′ [-delta delta C(T)] method. Methods 25(4): 402–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tichopad, A, Dzidic, A, Pfaffl, MW (2002) Improving quantitative real-time RT-PCR reproducibility by boosting primer-linked amplification efficiency. Biotechnology Letters 24: 2053–2056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tichopad, A, Dilger, M, Schwarz, G, Pfaffl, MW (2003) Standardized determination of real-time PCR efficiency from a single reaction setup. Nucleic Acids Research 31(20): e122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LightCycler Relative Quantification Software. (2001) Version 1.0, Roche Applied Science, Roche Molecular Biochemicals.
Muller, PY, Janovjak, H, Miserez, AR, Dobbie, Z (2002) Processing of gene expression data generated by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. BioTechniques 32(6): 1372–1378.Google ScholarPubMed
Pfaffl, MW, Horgan, GW, Dempfle, L (2002) Relative expression software tool (REST) for group-wise comparison and statistical analysis of relative expression results in real-time PCR. Nucleic Acids Research 30(9): e36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilhelm, J, Pingoud, A, Hahn, M (2003) SoFAR – Validation of an algorithm for automatic quantification of nucleic acid copy numbers by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Analytical Biochemistry 317(2): 218–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peirson, SN, Butler, JN, Foster, RG (2003) Experimental validation of novel and conventional approaches to quantitative real-time PCR data analysis. Nucleic Acids Research 31(14): e73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jin, N, He, K, Liu, L (2006) qPCR-DAMS: a database tool to analyze, manage, and store both relative and absolute quantitative real-time PCR data. Physiological Genomics 25(3): 525–527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hellemans, J, Mortier, G, Paepe, A, Speleman, F, Vandesompele, J (2007) qBase relative quantification framework and software for management and automated analysis of real-time quantitative PCR data. Genome Biology 8(2): R19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfaffl, MW (2001) A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Research 29: e35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rasmussen, R (2001) Quantification on the LightCycler. In: Meuer, S, Wittwer, C, and Nakagawara, K (eds), Rapid Cycle Real-Time PCR, Methods and Applications, pages 21–34. Heidelberg: Springer Press.Google Scholar
Morrison, TB, Weis, JJ, Wittwer, CT (1998) Quantification of low-copy transcripts by continuous SYBR Green I monitoring during amplification. BioTechniques 24(6): 954–962.Google ScholarPubMed
Huggett, J, Dheda, K, Bustin, S, Zumla, A (2005). Real-time RT-PCR normalisation; strategies and considerations. Genes and Immunity 6: 279–284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bengtsson, M, Hemberg, M, Rorsman, P, Stahlberg, A (2008) Quantification of mRNA in single cells and modelling of RT-qPCR induced noise. BMC Molecular Biology 9: 63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfaffl, MW, Tichopad, A, Prgomet, C, Neuvians, TP (2004) Determination of stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: BestKeeper – Excel-based tool using pair-wise correlations. Biotechnology Letters 26: 509–515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akilesh, S, Shaffer, DJ, Roopenian, D (2003) Customized molecular phenotyping by quantitative gene expression and pattern recognition analysis. Genome Research 13(7): 1719–1727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yuan, JS, Reed, A, Chen, F, Stewart, CN (2006) Statistical analysis of real-time PCR data. BMC Bioinformatics 7: 85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bar, T, Stahlberg, A, Muszta, A, Kubista, M (2003) Kinetic Outlier Detection (KOD) in real-time PCR. Nucleic Acids Research 31(17): e105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, MJ, Nixon, GJ, Foy, CA, Harris, N (2005) Standardisation of data from real-time quantitative PCR methods – evaluation of outliers and comparison of calibration curves. BMC Biotechnology 7: 31–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheskin, D (2000) Handbook of Parametric & Nonparametric Statistical Procedures. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Manly, B (1997) Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Morrison, T, Hurley, J, Garcia, J, Yoder, K, Katz, A, Roberts, D, et al. (2006) Nanoliter high throughput quantitative PCR. Nucleic Acids Research 34(18): e123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pohl, G, IeM, Shih. (2004) Principle and applications of digital PCR. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics 4(1): 41–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vogelstein, B, Kinzler, KW (1999) Digital PCR. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96(16): 9236–9241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kubista, M, Andrade, JM, Bengtsson, M, Forootan, A, Jonak, J, Lind, K, et al. (2006) The real-time polymerase chain reaction. Molecular Aspects of Medicine 2–3: 95–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smilde, A, Bro, R, Geladi, P (2004) MultiWay Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Bansal, M, Belcastro, V, Ambesi-Impiombato, A, di Bernardo, D (2007) How to infer gene networks from expression profiles. Molecular Systems Biology 3: 78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
D'Haeseleer, P (2005) How does gene expression clustering work?Nature Biotechnology 23: 1499–1501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tavazoie, S, Hughes, JD, Campbell, MJ, Cho, RJ, Church, GM (1999) Systematic determination of genetic network architecture. Nature Genetics 22: 281–285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ward, JH (1963) Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58(301): 236–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tichopad, A, Pecen, L, Pfaffl, MW (2006) Distribution-insensitive cluster analysis in SAS on real-time PCR gene expression data of steadily expressed genes. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 82: 44–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, P, Castillo-Davis, CI, Zhong, W, Liu, JS (2006) A data-driven clustering method for time course gene expression data. Nucleic Acids Research 34: 1261–1269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schedle, K, Pfaffl, MW, Plitzner, C, Meyer, HHD, Windisch, W (2008) Effect of insoluble fibre on intestinal morphology and mRNA expression pattern of inflammatory, cell cycle and growth marker genes in a piglet model using cluster analysis. Archives of Animal Nutrition 62(6): 427–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GenEx software, MultiD, Göteburg, Sweden.
Kohonen, T (1995) Self-Organizing Maps, Springer Series in Information Sciences. Vol. 30, 3rd ed. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×