Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T01:41:29.374Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Neoclassical realism and state mobilization: expansionist ideology in the age of mass politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Randall L. Schweller
Edited by
Steven E. Lobell ,
Norrin M. Ripsman  and
Jeffrey W. Taliaferro
Randall L. Schweller
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Steven E. Lobell
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Norrin M. Ripsman
Affiliation:
Concordia University, Montréal
Jeffrey W. Taliaferro
Affiliation:
Tufts University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

In chapter 1, Jeffrey Taliaferro, Steven Lobell, and Norrin Ripsman posed three questions about the politics of resource extraction and domestic mobilization in grand strategy: How do states mobilize the resources necessary to pursue their chosen security policies? How much power do domestic actors have to obstruct the state when it seeks to mobilize resources in different settings? Finally, what determines who is more successful in bargaining games between the state and societal groups? In this chapter, I address those questions as they pertain to variations in the ability of great powers to mobilize the resources required to pursue expansionist grand strategies, specifically bids for regional hegemony. I present a neoclassical realist theory to explain the puzzle of under-expansion and under-aggression: the suboptimal reluctance to use force or to build up military power in pursuit of profit or security or both. Neoclassical realism can explain why only certain great powers could make bids for regional hegemony in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. In brief, I make the controversial argument that a particular type of ideology – fascism – enabled the leaders of Nazi Germany (and to a lesser extent Italy and Japan) to extract the resources and mobilize the domestic support necessary to undertake a sustained hegemonic bid.

This chapter consists of four sections: the first discusses how and why the puzzle of under-expansion and under-aggression arises.

Type
Chapter
Information
Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy , pp. 227 - 250
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Schweller, Randall L., Deadly Imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler's Strategy of World Conquest (New York: Columbia University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J., The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: W. W. Norton, 2001)Google Scholar
Herbst, Jeffrey, “War and the State in Africa,” International Security 14, no. 4 (spring 1990), pp. 117–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holsti, K. J., “International Relations Theory and Domestic War in the Third World: The Limits of Relevance,” in Neuman, Stephanie G., ed., International Relations Theory and the Third World (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Segal, Gerald, “Does China Matter?” Foreign Affairs 78, no. 5 (September/October 1999), p. 28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evera, Stephen, “Primed for Peace: Europe after the Cold War,” International Security 15, no. 3 (winter 1990–1), pp. 7–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, PeterDoes Conquest Pay? The Exploitation of Occupied Industrial Societies (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Ferguson, Niall, Colossus: The Price of America's Empire (New York: Penguin Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Blainey, Geoffrey, The Causes of War (New York: The Free Press, 1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, Michael, Fascists (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolte, Ernst, Three Faces of Fascism, trans. Vennewitz, Leila (New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1965)Google Scholar
Trevor-Roper, H. R., “The Phenomenon of Fascism,” in Woolf, S. J., ed., Fascism in Europe (London: Methuen, 1981)Google Scholar
Payne, Stanley, Fascism: Comparison and Definition (Madison: University of Wisconsin, 1980)Google Scholar
Payne, , A History of Fascism: 1914–1945 (Madison: University of Wisconsin, 1995)Google Scholar
Paxton, Robert O., The Anatomy of Fascism (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2004)Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert, “The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism,” in Keohane, Robert O., ed., Neorealism and its Critics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986)Google Scholar
Gilpin, , “No One Loves a Political Realist,” Security Studies 5, no. 3 (spring 1996), pp. 3–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweller, Randall L. and Priess, David, “A Tale of Two Realisms: Expanding the Institutions Debate,” Mershon International Studies Review 41, Supplement 1 (May 1997), pp. 1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew, “Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics,” International Organization 51, no. 4 (autumn 1997), pp. 513–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legro, Jeffrey W.Moravcsik, Andrew, “Is Anybody Still a Realist?” International Security 24, no. 2 (fall 1999), pp. 5–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D., Defending the National Interest: Raw Materials Investments and US Foreign Policy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1976)Google Scholar
Mosse, George L., The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of the Third Reich (New York: Howard Fertig, [1964] 1998)Google Scholar
Schweller, Randall L., “Realism and the Present Great Power System: Growth and Positional Conflict over Scarce Resources,” in Mastanduno, Michael and Kapstein, Ethan B., eds., Unipolar Politics: Realism and State Strategies after the Cold War (New York: Columbia University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Thucydides, , The Peloponnesian War, trans. Crawley, Richard (New York: The Modern Library, 1934)Google Scholar
Carr, Edward Hallett, The Twenty Years' Crisis, 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations (New York: Harper and Row, [1939] 1964)Google Scholar
Thurlow, Richard, Fascism in Britain: From Oswald Mosley's Blackshirts to the National Front (New York: I. B. Tauris, 1998)Google Scholar
Benewick, Robert, The Fascist Movement in Britain (London: Allen Lane, Penguin, 1972)Google Scholar
Thomson, A. Raven, The Coming Corporate State (London: Greater Britain Publications, 1937)Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander, Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O., National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade (Berkeley: University of California Press, [1945], 1980)Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert, US Power and the Multinational Corporation: The Political Economy of Direct Foreign Investment (New York: Basic Books, 1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilpin, Robert, The Political Economy of International Relations (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander, “The State as Person in International Theory,” Review of International Studies 30, no. 2 (April 2004), pp. 289–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, Franz, Behemoth: The Structure and Practice of National Socialism, 1933–1944, 2nd edn (New York: Oxford University Press, 1944)Google Scholar
Stevenson, John and Cook, Chris, Britain in the Depression: Society and Politics, 1929–1939 (London: Longmans, 1994)Google Scholar
Slouka, Mark, “Quitting the Paint Factory: On the Virtues of Idleness,” Harper's Magazine 309, no. 1854 (November 2004), pp. 57–65 at p. 65Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl, The Concept of the Political (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, [1927] 1996)Google Scholar
Mosse, George L., The Culture of Western Europe: The Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, 3rd edn (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1988)Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J., Scientific Man vs. Power Politics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1946)Google Scholar
Christensen, Thomas J., Useful Adversaries: Grand Strategy, Domestic Mobilization, and Sino-American Conflict, 1947–1958 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J., “The False Promise of International Institutions,” International Security 19, no. 3 (winter 1994/5), pp. 5–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimko, Keith L., “Realism, Neorealism, and American Liberalism,” Review of Politics 54, no. 2 (spring 1992), pp. 281–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C., Arms and Influence (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1966)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×