Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T23:35:06.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Neoclassical realism and resource extraction: State building for future war

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Jeffrey W. Taliaferro
Affiliation:
Tufts University
Steven E. Lobell
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Norrin M. Ripsman
Affiliation:
Concordia University, Montréal
Jeffrey W. Taliaferro
Affiliation:
Tufts University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

In the mid-nineteenth century, China and Japan faced the rising threat of western imperialism. Yet, despite the two countries' cultural ties and geographic proximity, their responses to that threat were quite different. When confronted with growing anti-Manchu rebellions at home and British demands for trade concessions in the 1830s, the Qing dynasty proved unable to mobilize the resources necessary to defend the empire. The first and second Opium Wars revealed disparities in military technology between China and the European great powers. Faced with internal unrest and the prospect of China's dismemberment, Chinese provincial leaders made an attempt at internal reform, the so-called Tongzi Restoration (1862–74), aimed at reforming the military, creating an arms industry, and strengthening traditional Confucian government. Although these and later reforms prolonged the Qing dynasty until 1911, they were insufficient to halt China's relative decline.

News of China's defeat in the Opium Wars, carried by Dutch and Chinese ships to Nagasaki and then relayed to the shogun at Edo (Tokyo), shocked Japan's feudal elite. The arrival of Commodore Matthew Perry and his “black ships” in Edo Bay in July 1853 ended Japan's two centuries of self-imposed isolation. The Tokugawa shogunate's inability to defend the country led to its overthrow in 1867–8 by a group of samurai from Satsuma and Choshu, who acted to “restore” the sixteen-year-old Emperor Meiji. The new leadership spent the next twenty years methodically emulating the military, political, and technological practices of the European great powers.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ralston, David B., Importing the European Army: The Introduction of European Military Techniques and Institutions into the Extra-European World, 1600–1914 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990), pp. 107–41Google Scholar
Kitaoka, Shin'ichi, “The Army as Bureaucracy: Japanese Militarism Revisited,” Journal of Military History 57, no. 5 (October 1993), pp. 67–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Presseisen, Ernst, Before Aggression: Europeans Prepare the Japanese Army (Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1965)Google Scholar
Paine, S. C. M., The Sino-Japanese War of 1894–1895 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
McNeill, William H., The Pursuit of Power: Technology, Armed Force, and Society since A.D. 1000 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982), pp. 185–215Google Scholar
Paret, Peter, “Napoleon and the Revolution in War,” in Murray, Williamson, Knox, MacGregor, and Bernstein, Alvin, eds., Makers of Modern Strategy: From Machiavelli to the Nuclear Age (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986), pp. 123–42Google Scholar
Posen, Barry R., “Nationalism, the Mass Army, and Military Power,” International Security 18, no. 2 (fall 1993), pp. 80–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrera, Geoffrey L. and Mahnken, Thomas G., “Military Diffusion in Nineteenth-Century Europe: The Napoleonic and Prussian Military Systems,” in Goldman, Emily O. and Eliason, Leslie C., eds., The Diffusion of Military Technology and Ideas (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003), pp. 205–42Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N., Theory of International Politics (New York: Random House, 1979)Google Scholar
Taliaferro, Jeffrey W., “Security Seeking under Anarchy: Defensive Realism Reconsidered,” International Security 25, no. 3 (winter 2000–1), pp. 128–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elman, Colin, “Horses for Courses: Why Not Neorealist Theories of Foreign Policy?Security Studies 6, no. 2 (autumn 1996), pp. 7–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posen, Barry R., Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain, and Germany between the World Wars (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984), pp. 17–18.Google Scholar
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer, “Realist Environment, Liberal Process, and Domestic-Level Variables,” International Studies Quarterly 41, no. 1 (March 1997), pp. 1–25, at p. 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard, “Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity,” both in Keohane, Robert O., ed., Neorealism and its Critics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986), pp. 204–54Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander, “Anarchy Is What States Make of It,” International Organization 42, no. 2 (spring 1992), pp. 391–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spruyt, Hendrik, The Sovereign State and its Competitors (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994), pp. 11–21.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, Jones, Charles, and Little, Richard, The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993), pp. 116–21Google Scholar
Sterling-Folker, , “Realist Environment, Liberal Process and Domestic-Level Variables,” International Studies Quarterly 41, no. 1 (March 1997), pp. 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobden, Stephen, International Relations and Historical Sociology (London: Routledge, 1998), pp. 66–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, John M., The State and International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), pp. 24–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walt, Stephen M., “The Enduring Relevance of the Realist Tradition,” in Katznelson, Ira and Milner, Helen V., eds., Political Science: State of the Discipline (New York: W.W. Norton, 2002), p. 227Google Scholar
Tellis, Ashley J., “Reconstructing Political Realism: The Long March to Scientific Theory,” in Frankel, Benjamin, ed., Roots of Realism (London: Frank Cass, 1996), pp. 91–4Google Scholar
Vasquez, John A. and Elman, Colin, eds., Realism and the Balancing of Power: A New Debate (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2003), pp. 1–22Google Scholar
Resende-Santos, João, “Anarchy and the Emulation of Military Systems: Military Organization and Technology in South America, 1870–1930,” in Frankel, Benjamin, ed., Realism: Restatements and Renewal (London: Frank Cass, 1996), pp. 193–260Google Scholar
Evangelista, Matthew, Innovation and the Arms Race: How the United States and the Soviet Union Develop New Military Technologies (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988), p. 12.Google Scholar
Mastanduno, Michael, Lake, David A., and Ikenberry, G. John, “Toward a Realist Theory of State Action,” International Studies Quarterly 33, no. 4 (December 1989), pp. 457–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J., Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 3rd edn (New York: Knopf, 1966), p. 102.Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry A., A World Restored: Metternich, Castlereagh, and the Problems of Peace, 1812–1822 (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1957), pp. 326–8, at p. 326.Google Scholar
Wolfers, Arnold, “The Actors in International Politics,” in Wolfers, Discord and Collaboration: Essays on International Politics (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1962), pp. 8–9.Google Scholar
Gulick, Edward Vose, Europe's Classical Balance of Power (New York: W. W. Norton, 1967), p. 14.Google Scholar
Carr, Edward Hallett, The Twenty Years' Crisis, 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations, 2nd edn (1945; New York: Harper and Row, 1964), p. 132.Google Scholar
Copeland, Dale, Origins of Major War (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000), pp. 3–4.Google Scholar
Lamborn, Alan C., “Power and the Politics of Extraction,” International Studies Quarterly 27, no. 2 (June 1983), pp. 125–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papayoanou, Paul A., “Interdependence, Institutions, and the Balance-of-Power: Britain, Germany, and World War I,” International Security 20, no. 4 (spring 1996), pp. 42–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trachtenberg, Marc, “The Question of Realism: A Historian's View,” Security Studies 13, no. 1 (autumn 2003), pp. 26–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spykman, Nicholas John, America's Strategy in World Politics: The United States and the Balance-of-Power (New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1942), p. 25.Google Scholar
Brooks, Stephen G., “Dueling Realisms,” International Organization 51, no. 3 (summer 1997), pp. 445–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, Robert, System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996), pp. 133–4.Google Scholar
Goldman, Emily O. and Andres, Richard B., “Systemic Effects of Military Innovation and Diffusion,” Security Studies 8, no. 4 (summer 1999), pp. 79–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouveritch, Peter, “The Second Image Reversed: The International Sources of Domestic Politics,” International Organization 32, no. 4 (autumn 1978), pp. 881–912Google Scholar
Desch, Michael C., “War and Strong States, Peace and Weak States?International Organization 50, no. 2 (spring 1996), pp. 237–68 at pp. 244–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, Bruce D., War and the Rise of the State: The Military Foundations of Modern Politics (New York: Free Press, 1994), pp. 113–21.Google Scholar
Christensen, Thomas J., “Perceptions and Alliances in Europe, 1860–1940,” International Organization 51, no. 1 (winter 1997), pp. 65–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, Richard J., Machiavelli's Children: Leaders and their Legacies in Italy and Japan (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2003), pp. 53–62Google Scholar
Beasley, W. G., The Rise of Modern Japan (New York: St. Martin's, 1995), pp. 152–3.Google Scholar
Thomson, Janice E., “State Sovereignty in International Relations: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Empirical Research,” International Studies Quarterly 39, no. 2 (June 1995), pp. 213–33, at p. 216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer, Theories of International Cooperation and the Primacy of Anarchy: Explaining US International Monetary Policy-Making after Bretton Woods (New York: State University of New York Press, 2002), p. 85Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael, Confronting the Costs of War: Military Power, State, and Society in Egypt and Israel (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Rose, Gideon, “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy,” World Politics 51, no. 1 (October 1998), pp. 144–72, at p. 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedberg, Aaron L., The Weary Titan: Britain and the Experience of Relative Decline, 1895–1905 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988)Google Scholar
Wohlforth, William Curti, The Elusive Balance: Power and Perception during the Cold War (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press 1993)Google Scholar
Edelstein, David M., “Managing Uncertainty: Beliefs about Intentions and Rise of Great Powers,” Security Studies 12, no. 1 (autumn 2002), pp. 1–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taliaferro, Jeffrey W., Balancing Risks: Great Power Intervention in the Periphery (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Walt, Stephen M., Origins of Alliances (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1987), pp. 22–6Google Scholar
Walt, , Revolution and War (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996), pp. 18–45.Google Scholar
Schweller, Randall L., Unanswered Threats: Political Constraints on the Balance of Power (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Friedberg, Aaron L., In the Shadow of the Garrison State: America's Anti-Statism and its Cold War Grand Strategy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000), chap. 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Stephen G. and Wohlforth, William C., “Power, Globalization, and the End of the Cold War: Revisiting the Landmark Case for Ideas,” International Security 25, no. 3 (winter 2000–1), pp. 5–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Thomas J., Useful Adversaries: Grand Strategy, Domestic Mobilization, and Sino-American Conflict, 1947–1958 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996), p. 11.Google Scholar
Evera, Stephen, “Hypotheses on Nationalism and War,” International Security 18, no. 4 (spring 1994), pp. 6–7.Google Scholar
Brown, Michael E., “The Causes of Internal Conflict: An Overview,” in Brown, Michael E., Coté, Owen R., Jr., Lynn-Jones, Sean M., and Miller, Steven E., eds., Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J., Tragedy of Great Powers (New York: W.W. Norton, 2001)Google Scholar
Labs, Eric J., “Beyond Victory: Offensive Realism and the Expansion of War Aims,” Security Studies 6, no. 4 (summer 1997), pp. 1–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Alexander L. and Bennett, Andrew, Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005), pp. 139–40Google Scholar
Evera, Stephen, Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997), pp. 39–40Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton, Essays in Positive Economics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953), pp. 14–23Google Scholar
Berger, Thomas, Cultures of Antimilitarism: National Security in Germany and Japan (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Kier, Elizabeth, Imagining War: French and British Military Doctrines between the Wars (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Johnston, Alastair Iain, Cultural Realism: Strategic Culture and Grand Strategy in Chinese History (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×