Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T15:39:35.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Creativity in Mathematics Teaching: A Chinese Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Weihua Niu  and
Zheng Zhou
Edited by
Ronald A. Beghetto  and
James C. Kaufman
Weihua Niu
Affiliation:
Pace University, USA
Zheng Zhou
Affiliation:
St. John's University, USA
Ronald A. Beghetto
Affiliation:
University of Oregon
James C. Kaufman
Affiliation:
California State University, San Bernardino
Get access

Summary

A few years ago, the second author attended a parent-teacher conference in an elementary school located in Manhattan's Upper Westside. She noticed an interesting survey posted outside the classroom of a first-grade class about the students' preferences with regard to the subjects they learn in school. All the students were blind-folded as they raised their hands and responded to the question, “How many people like mathematics/science/reading/social studies/gym?” The survey results charted on the poster indicated that most first-graders liked mathematics. Coincidentally, two years later, when the author made another visit to the same school, she noticed a similar survey and discovered that mathematics had dropped to the third most favored subject among the third-graders.

Mathematics in China, on the other hand, is consistently regarded as an enjoyable subject to learn by many students from elementary school to high school. It is viewed by most Chinese students as a subject that “makes them smart” (Zhang, 2007). A popular belief in China is that learning mathematics well helps people earn a good living. In a survey of 3,371 students of all grades in ten Chinese provinces, Sun, Zheng, and Kang ([1999] 2001) found that more students consistently rated mathematics as “their most favorite subject” in elementary and middle schools than any other subjects. In high school, mathematics was rated as the second most favorite subject, only topped by foreign languages.

Type
Chapter
Information
Nurturing Creativity in the Classroom , pp. 270 - 288
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M., Hennessey, B. A., & Grossman, B. S. (1986). Social influences on creativity: The effects of contracted-for reward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 15–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baer, J. (1997a). Creative teachers, creative students. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Baer, J. (1997b). Gender differences in the effects of anticipated evaluation on creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, J. (1998). Gender differences in the effects of extrinsic motivation on creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 32, 18–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, J., & Wang, T. (2007, April). Conceptions of effective mathematics teaching within a cultural context: Perspectives of teachers from China and the United States. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Cavanagh, S. (2007). Asian equation. Education Week, 26, 22–26.Google Scholar
Chen, C., Kasof, J., Himsel, A., Dmitrieva, J., Dong, Q., & Xie, Q. (2005). Effects of explicit instruction to “be creative” across domains and cultures. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39(2), 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, C., Kasof, J., Himsel, A., Greenberger, E., Dong, Q., & Xie, Q. (2002). Creativity in drawings of geometric shapes: A cross-cultural examination with the consensual assessment technique. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 171–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (2001). Large classes in China: “Good” teachers and interaction. In Watkins, D. A. & Biggs, J. B. (Eds.), Teaching the Chinese learners: Psychological and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 115–134). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre/Victoria, Australia: The Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (1997). Can salient reward increase creative performance without reducing intrinsic creative interest?Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 72, 652–663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisenberger, R., & Cameron, J. (1996). Detrimental effects of reward: Reality or myth?American Psychologist, 51(11), 1153–1166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., & Pretz, J. (1998). Can the promise of reward increase creativity?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 702–714.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fan, L., & Zhu, Y. (2004). How have Chinese students performed in mathematics? A perspective from large-scale international mathematics comparisons. In Fan, L., Wong, N.-Y., Cai, J., & Li, S. (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders [Series on Mathematics Education] (Vol. 1, pp. 3–26). Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fullan, M. G. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Hennessey, B. A. (2001). The social psychology of creativity: Effects of evaluation on intrinsic motivation and creativity of performance. In Harkins, S. (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on the effects of evaluation on performance: Toward an integration (pp. 47–75). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horelik, I. K. (2007). Rewards and creativity: Building a bridge between two theories. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pace University, New York.
Lao, D.C. (1983). Confucius: The analects. London: Penguin Putnam.Google Scholar
Lin, C. (1992). Xuexi yu fazhan [Learning and developing]. Beijing: Beijing Education Publisher.Google Scholar
Lopez-Real, F., Mok, A. C. I., Leung, K. S. F., & Marton, F. (2004). Identifying a pattern of teaching: An analysis of a Shanghai teacher's lessons. In Fan, L., Wong, N.-Y., Cai, J., & Li, S. (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders [Series on Mathematics Education] (Vol. 1, pp. 382–410). Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, L.-P. (1999). Knowing and teaching mathematics: Teachers' understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Niu, W., & Liu, D. (2009). The effect of indicative instruction on creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 93–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niu, W., & Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Cultural influences on artistic creativity and its evaluation. International Journal of Psychology, 36(4), 225–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niu, W., & Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Societal and school influence on students' creativity. Psychology in the Schools, 40, 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hara, L. A., & Sternberg, R. J. (2000–2001). It doesn't hurt to ask: Effects of instructions to be creative, practical, or analytical on essay-writing performance and their interaction with students' thinking styles. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 197–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runco, M. A., Illies, J. J., & Eisenman, R. (2005). Creativity, originality, and appropriateness: What do explicit instructions tell us about their relationship?Journal of Creative Behavior, 39(2), 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paine, L. W. (1990). The teachers as virtuoso: A Chinese model for teaching. Teachers College Record, 92(1), 49–81.Google Scholar
Shen, J., & Xin, T. (1998). Luen Jiaoshi de jiankong nenli [On teachers' teaching-regulated ability]. Keti Yianjiou Tongxun Zhuan Kang, 38–46.Google Scholar
Shim, S. H. (2008). A philosophical investigation of the role of teachers: A synthesis of Plato, Confucius, Buber, and Freire. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 515–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Horvath, J. A. (1995). A prototype view of expert teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(6), 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, H. W., Lee, S., Chen, C., Lummis, M., Stigler, J. W., Liu, F., et al. (1990). Mathematics achievement of children in China and the United States. Child Development, 61, 1053–1066.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevenson, H. W., & Stigler, J. W. (1992). Mathematics classrooms in Japan, Taiwan, and the United States. Child Development, 58, 1272–1285.Google Scholar
Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Sun, Y., Zheng, X., & Kang, L. ([1999] 2001). Zhongxiaoxue Xuexi Yu Fazhan de ershi ge Faxian. [Twenty discoveries of public school students' learning and development] [electronic version]. China Education and Research Network, May 15; Retrieved from http://www.edu.cn/20010827/208598.shtml.
Xin, T., Shen, J.-L., & Lin, C.-D. (2000). Renwu zhixiangxin ganyu shoduan duai xiaoshijiaxue jiankong nenli de jinxian [The effect of task-oriented intervention on teachers' teaching regulated ability]. Xinli Kexue, 23(2), 129–132.Google Scholar
,U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (1996). Pursuing excellence: A study of U.S. eighth-grade mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 127–146). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Watkins, D. A., & Biggs, J. B. (Eds.) (1996). The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre/Victoria, Australia: The Australian Council for the Educational Research.
Watkins, D. A., & Biggs, J. B. (Eds.) (2001). Teaching the Chinese learner: Psychological and pedagogical perspectives. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre/Victoria, Australia: The Australian Council for the Educational Research.
Wilson, S. M., Shulman, L. S., & Richert, A. E. (1987). “150 Different ways” of knowing: Representations of knowledge in teaching. In Calderhead, J. (Ed.), Exploring teachers' thinking (pp. 104–124). London: Cassell Educational Limited.Google Scholar
Zhang, M. (2007). Xinli Zhisheng: Yiwei Xinlixuejia de Jiaoyu Faxian [Achieving psychological success: The educational discovery of a psychologist]. Beijing: Sinopec Press.Google Scholar
Zhou, Z., Peverly, S. T., & Xin, T. (2006). Knowing and teaching fractions: A cross-cultural study of American and Chinese mathematics teachers. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 438–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×