Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T18:25:14.369Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Creativity: A Look Outside the Box in Classrooms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Alexinia Young Baldwin
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut, USA
Ronald A. Beghetto
Affiliation:
University of Oregon
James C. Kaufman
Affiliation:
California State University, San Bernardino
Get access

Summary

The concept of creativity is often dependent on the ideas of the person presenting the concept, thereby generating both positive and negative responses that often confuse teachers who try to use creative skills within the classroom to enhance out-of-the-box thinking.

Creativity has become a major buzzword among scholars in the arts, psychology, business, education, and science and in many corporate offices where unique designs are a basic commodity. Although this is the current buzzword, as John Baer (2003, p. 37) has said:

Of all the things that it is hard to understand – and this would be a very long list – creativity is certainly one of the hardest, and most mysterious, even when considered within the confines of a single culture.

DEFINING CREATIVITY: WHAT IT IS AND IS NOT

Three decades ago, Treffinger, Renzulli, and Feldhusen (1971) argued that as a result of the lack of a unified widely accepted theory of creativity, researchers and educators have been confronted with several difficulties: establishing a useful operational definition, understanding the implications of differences among tests and test administration procedures, and understanding the relationship of creativity to other human abilities (p. 107).

Three decades later, there remains uncertainty and lack of reliability and acceptance of the existence of and the value of creative planning in the teaching of various subjects in the classroom.

Amabile (2001), who heads the Entrepreneurial Management Unit at the Harvard Business School, has devoted her research program to the study of creativity.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, J. L. (1979). Conceptual blockbusting: A guide to better ideas (2nd ed.). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (2001). Beyond talent: John Irving and the passionate craft of creativity. The American Psychologist, 56, 333–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, J. (2003). Double dividends: Cross-cultural creativity studies teach us about creativity and cultures. Inquiry: Critical Thinking across the Disciplines, 22(3) 37–39.Google Scholar
Baldwin, A. Y. (1984). Baldwin identification matrix 2 for the identification of gifted and talented. New York: Royal Fireworks.Google Scholar
Baldwin, A. Y. (1985). Programs for the gifted and talented: issues concerning minority populations. In Horowitz, F. & O'Brien, M. (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (pp. 223–249). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Creativity. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Daugherty, M., & White, C. S. (2008). Relationships among private speech and creativity in Head Start and low-socioeconomic status preschool children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredericks, A. D. (2005). The complete idiot's guide to success as a teacher. New York: Alpha.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1962). Potentiality for creativity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 6, 87–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henshon, S. (2006). Creative exploration: An interview with Don Treffinger. Roeper Review, 29, 119–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houston, H. (2007). The creative classroom: Teaching languages outside the box. Vancouver, BC: Lynx Publishing.Google Scholar
Kerr, B., & Gagliardi, C. (n.d.). Measuring creativity in research and practice. Retrieved on January 8, 2008, from the University of Arizona Web site: http://courses.ed.asu.edu/kerr/measuring_creativity.rtf.
,Management Consulting News (MCN). (2008). Retrieved on January 7, 2008, from http://www.managementconsultingnews.com/interviews/michalko_interview.php
Mann, E. (2006). Creativity: The essence of mathematics. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30, 236–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meeker, M. (1978). Measuring creativity from the child's point of view. Journal of Creative Behavior, 12, 52–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michalko, M. (2001). Cracking creativity. Berkeley, CA: Ten Speed Press.Google Scholar
Renzulli, J. S. (1999). What is this thing called giftedness, and how do we develop it? A twenty-five year perspective. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 3–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, M. S., Duel, L. S., Jean-Francois, B., & Urbano, R. C. (1996). Identifying cognitively gifted ethnic minority children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 147–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R., & Williams, W. (1996). How to develop student creativity. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Taylor, C. (1972). A climate of creativity. In Report on the Seventh National Research Conference on Creativity (pp. 22–23). Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (1965). Rewarding creative behavior: Experiments in classroom activity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (1971). I was a block and nobody builded me! Paper presented at the meeting of the Council on Exceptional Children, Miami Beach, FL.
Torrance, E. P. (1979). The search for Satori and creativity. Great Neck, NY: Creative Synergetics Association, Ltd.Google Scholar
Treffinger, D. J., Renzulli, J. S., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1971). Problems in the assessment of creative thinking. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 5, 104–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
West, T. G. (1991). In the mind's eye: Visual thinkers, gifted people with learning difficulties, computer images, and the ironies of creativity. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Whitcombe, A. (1988). Mathematics: Creativity, imagination, beauty. Mathematics in School, 17, 13–15.Google Scholar
Williams, F. E. (1970). Classroom ideas for encouraging thinking and feeling (rev. ed.). Buffalo, NY: D.O.K Publishers.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×