Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-13T23:22:49.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Quality control for the leading institutes of economic research in Germany: promoting quality within and competition between the institutes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2011

By
Gert G. Wagner
Edited by
Justus Lentsch  and
Peter Weingart
Gert G. Wagner
Affiliation:
Berlin University of Technology
Justus Lentsch
Affiliation:
Heinrich Böll Foundation
Peter Weingart
Affiliation:
Universität Bielefeld, Germany
Get access

Summary

Introduction

This paper deals with a special branch of the publicly financed system of research-based policy advice in Germany: the leading institutes for economic research. These institutes have the task of providing non-partisan advice to the public, the government, political parties, and NGOs of all kinds.

Following a short introductory discussion of concepts and problems of research-based policy advice and of some of the specific problems of economic and social policy advice that arise in this context, this chapter describes the idea and the system of quality control in the aforementioned institutes for economic research, whose shared aim is to provide non-partisan, independent advice. The system of quality control is (1) established within the individual institutes for economic research and (2) enhanced by competition between the institutes.

A major conclusion of this chapter deals with the common interest of governments, political parties and NGOs in obtaining partisan, and often confidential, advice – in other words, advice which is based on certain value judgements and political goals. The system of publicly funded non-partisan research institutes is not able to provide this kind of internal advice. One possible solution – that of founding private research institutes capable of providing such research- and value-based advice – is discussed in the outlook section below.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Politics of Scientific Advice
Institutional Design for Quality Assurance
 , pp. 215 - 228
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Frank, Robert H., Gilovich, Thomas and Regan, , Dennis T. 1993. ‘Does studying economics inhibit cooperation?’, The Journal of Economic Perspectives 7/2: 159–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, Bruno S. and Osterloh, , , Margit 2006. Evaluations: Hidden Costs, Questionable Benefits, and Superior Alternatives, Working Paper No. 302 of the Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, Zurich: University of Zurich.Google Scholar
Frey, Bruno S. and Meier, , , Stephan 2005. ‘Selfish and indoctrinated economists?’, European Journal of Law and Economics 19: 165–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Lutz and Wagner, , , Gert G. 1998. ‘Die Rolle der empirischen Wirtschaftsforschung für die Politikberatung', Wirtschaftsdienst 78/3: 185–92.Google Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm 1810. Über die innere und äuβere Organisation der höheren wissenschaftlichen Anstalten in Berlin. Wilhelm von Humboldt Ausgewählte Schriften – Herausgegeben von Theodor Kappstein, Berlin 1917: Borngräber.
Kaube, Jürgen 2006. ‘Die Öffentlichkeit der Wissenschaft’, Max Planck Forschung 3: 15–18.Google Scholar
Ketzler, Rolf and Zimmermann, , , Klaus F. 2009. ‘Publications: German economic research institutes on track’, Scientometrics 80/1: 231–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,KVI (Commission for the Improvement of the Statistical Infrastructure) 2001. ‘Summary report of the commission set up by the federal ministry of education and research (Germany) to improve the statistical infrastructure in cooperation with the scientific community and official statistics’, Schmollers Jahrbuch 121/3: 443–68.Google Scholar
Postlep, Rolf-Dieter and Wagner, , , Gert G. 1998. ‘Zur Ökonomik grundfinanzierter wirtschafts- und sozialwissenschaftlicher Forschung', Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 217/3: 345–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarewitz, Daniel 2004. ‘How science makes environmental controversies worse’, Environmental Science & Policy 7: 385–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Christoph 2006. ‘Fokus, Fokus, Fokus? Zur Rolle der auβeruniversitären Wirtschafsforschungsinstitute’, Allgemeines Statistisches Archiv 90: 617–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Christoph 2007. Policy Evaluation and Economic Policy Advice, IZA Discussion Paper 2700, Bonn.Google Scholar
Solga, Heike and Wagner, , , Gert G. 2007. ‘A modern statistical infrastructure for excellent research and policy advice – Report on the German council for social and economic data during its first period in office (2004–2006)’, Schmollers Jahrbuch 127/2: 315–20.Google Scholar
Tooze, Adam 1999. ‘Economic statistics and the Weimar state: The Reich's statistical office and the institute for business-cycle research, 1924–1933’, Economic History Review LII.Google Scholar
Tooze, Adam 2001. Statistics and the German State 1900–1945: The Making of Modern Economic Knowledge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weingart, Peter 1999. ‘Scientific expertise and political accountability: Paradoxes of science in politics’, Science and Public Policy 26/3: 151–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weingart, Peter 2006. ‘Providing policy advice is an academic duty’, Humboldt Kosmos 87: 8–11.Google Scholar
Wissenschaftsrat, 1998. Wirtschaftsforschungsinstitute der Blauen Liste in den alten Ländern – Allgemeine Gesichtspunkte (Drs. 3320/98), Berlin.Google Scholar
Wissenschaftsrat, 2002. ‘Empfehlungen des Wissenschaftsrat zur Stärkung der wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Forschung an den Hochschulen’, Schmollers Jahrbuch 122/4: 635–51.Google Scholar
Wissenschaftsrat, 2007. ‘Kriterien des Ausschusses Ressortforschung für die Begutachtung von Bundeseinrichtungen mit FuE-Aufgaben’ (Drs. 7693–07), Berlin.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×