Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Acknowledgements
- Biographical notes
- Part I Methodological issues: quality control and assurance in scientific policy advice
- Part II Collegial science advisory bodies
- Part III Collegial science policy advisory bodies
- Part IV Research-based advisory organisations
- 10 The industrial organisation of economic policy preparation in the Netherlands
- 11 Quality control for the leading institutes of economic research in Germany: promoting quality within and competition between the institutes
- 12 Quality control and the link between science and regulation from a national and EU administrator's perspective
- 13 Science into policy: The European Environment Agency
- 14 Reflective approaches to uncertainty assessment and communication
- 15 Looking through the telescope – quality assurance in scientific advice to politics
- 16 Scientific policy advice and foreign policymaking – Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP), the German Institute for International and Security Affairs
- Part V Academies of science
- Index
- References
10 - The industrial organisation of economic policy preparation in the Netherlands
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 October 2011
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Acknowledgements
- Biographical notes
- Part I Methodological issues: quality control and assurance in scientific policy advice
- Part II Collegial science advisory bodies
- Part III Collegial science policy advisory bodies
- Part IV Research-based advisory organisations
- 10 The industrial organisation of economic policy preparation in the Netherlands
- 11 Quality control for the leading institutes of economic research in Germany: promoting quality within and competition between the institutes
- 12 Quality control and the link between science and regulation from a national and EU administrator's perspective
- 13 Science into policy: The European Environment Agency
- 14 Reflective approaches to uncertainty assessment and communication
- 15 Looking through the telescope – quality assurance in scientific advice to politics
- 16 Scientific policy advice and foreign policymaking – Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP), the German Institute for International and Security Affairs
- Part V Academies of science
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
The ultimate aim of (economic) policy is to enhance social welfare. In an ideal world with perfect competition, no externalities and transaction costs, and with a perfect distribution of property rights, the optimal path of social welfare is reached automatically when all individuals maximise their own welfare. There is no need for coordination by the government since the market mechanism will do the job. However, the real world is not ideal. Various externalities, the provision of public goods and problems of distribution require government intervention. The discipline of public economics provides the theoretical foundation and practical solutions as to how to deal with problems of market failure and redistribution of income and wealth. Policy prescriptions on the most efficient ways for governments to intervene and solve the coordination problem at the macro level are widely discussed in the literature. Moreover, the problems of government failure, and of politicians and civil servants seeking to serve their own interests instead of the public interest of enhancing social welfare, are also subject of much academic debate.
However, the (economic) literature has paid far less attention to the way the process of policy preparation is organised. In democratic societies, the final step for policy measures to be implemented is that they are legitimised according to the existent democratic rules. However, before policy measures obtain parliamentary approval, a long and often winding road has to be followed to move from the first ideas about the policy measures to their final formulation.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Politics of Scientific AdviceInstitutional Design for Quality Assurance, pp. 177 - 214Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
References
1993. ‘Origin and development of Dutch National accounts’, in et al.(eds.), The Value Added of National Accounting, Voorburg/Heerlen: CBS, pp. 73–92.Google Scholar
and 2000. ‘Models and macroeconomic policy in the Netherlands’, in and (eds.), 2000, pp. 26–38.
and 1999. ‘A trade union model with endogenous militancy: Interpreting the French case’, Labour Economics 6: 355–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. ‘Interaction between model builders and policy makers in the Norwegian tradition’, Economic Modelling 15: 317–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2004. ‘Redesigning the employment protection system’, De Economist 152: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. and (eds.) 2003. Labour Participation and Unemployment; A Comparison of Developments and Institutions in Germany and The Netherlands, The Hague: WRR Working DocumentsW133.
1999. Configuring the Economy. The Emergence of a Modelling Practice in the Netherlands, 1920–1955, Amsterdam: Rozenberg Publishers (Thela Thesis).Google Scholar
2002. De verwevenheid tussen toekomstverkenning en beleid; het ontstaan van vertoogcoalities, The Hague: Working Document W127, Scientific Council for Government Policy (WRR).Google Scholar
2003. The National Accounts as a Tool for Analysis and Policy; Past, Present and Future, University of Twente: Academic Thesis.Google Scholar
1991. ‘Macroeconomic modelling and the policy of restraint in the Netherlands’, Economic Modelling 8: 16–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2004. ‘Statistics and the origin of the Royal Netherlands economic association’, De Economist 152: 439–46.Google Scholar
2007. ‘National accounts and indicators’, in (ed.), Measurement in Economics: a Handbook, Amsterdam/Boston: Elsevier Inc., pp. 189–229.Google Scholar
and 1998. ‘What makes the models-policy interaction successful?’, Economic Modelling 15: 443–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (eds.) 2000. Empirical Models and Policy Making: Interactions and Institutions, London: Routledge.CrossRef
and 2003. ‘The Dutch miracle, institutions, networks, and trust’, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 159: 362–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1997. Challenging Neighbours: Rethinking German and Dutch Economic Institutions, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
1996. ‘De positie van het Centraal Planbureau’ (The position of the central planning bureau), Economische Statistische Berichten 81: 208–12.Google Scholar
1998. ‘Verbons verwijten aan CPB onterecht’, Christen Democratische Verkenningen 9/10: 406–10.Google Scholar
2003. ‘Economic analysis of election programmes: What, how and why?’, in and (eds.), Economic Assessment of Election Programs: Does it Make Sense? Dordrecht, Boston: Kluwer, pp. 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, . and . (eds.) 1991. Applied General Equilibrium Modelling, Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRef
and (eds.) 1978. De voorbereiding van het economisch beleid kritisch bezien, Leiden: Stenfert Kroese.
and 2005. Generating Legitimacy for Labor Market and Welfare State Reforms: The Role of Policy Advice in Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden, IZA Discussion Paper No. 1845.Google Scholar
and 1959. ‘Quantitative determination of optimum economic policy’, Econometrica 27: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press and Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
1986. ‘Le conseil economique et social’, Notes et Etudes Documentaires, Paris: La Documentation Française.Google Scholar
2003. ‘Balancing information and uncertainty’, in , and (eds.), pp. 61–79.
and (eds.) 2003. Economic Assessment of Election Programmes: Does it Make Sense?, Dordrecht, Boston: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1974. Investeringen, lonen, prijzen en arbeidsplaatsen, Occasional Paper no. 2, The Hague: Central Planning Bureau.Google Scholar
and 1976. ‘Investment, wages, prices and demand for labour (a clay-clay vintage model for the Netherlands)’, De Economist 124: 32–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2004. ‘Wetenschappelijke beleidsadvisering in Nederland; trends en ontwikkelingen’ (Scientific policy advice in the Netherlands, trends and developments), Beleidswetenschap 18/1: 31–61.Google Scholar
1995. ‘Friendship among the French financial elite’, American Sociological Review 60: 202–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2004. Debating Climate Change; A Study of Stakeholder Participation in Integrated Assessment of Long-Term Climate Policy in the Netherlands, Utrecht: Lemma Publishers.Google Scholar
1990. Verzuilde dromen: 40 jaar SER (Pillarised dreams, 40 years SER), Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Balans.Google Scholar
1994. ‘Heeft Nederland een loongolf nodig? Een neo-Schumpeteriaans verhaal over bedrijfswinsten, werkgelegenheid en export’, Tijdschrift voor Politieke Ekonomie 17: 5–24.Google Scholar
2003. ‘Causes of the Dutch job miracle: There is no free lunch’, De Economist 151: 329–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (eds.) 2002. The Statistical Mind in a Pre-statistical Era: The Netherlands 1750–1850, Amsterdam: Aksant, NEHA Series III.
1973. Van Prognoses naar Programma's, Inaugural lecture, Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit, 13 April 1973.Google Scholar
1994. Denken over Welvaart, Koninklijke Vereniging voor de Staathuishoudkunde, 1849–1994, Utrecht: Lemma.Google Scholar
2004. The Economic Effects of Trust; Theory and Evidence, Tinbergen Institute Research Series no. 340, Amsterdam: Thela thesis.Google Scholar
and 2000. ‘The Netherlands and the United Kingdom: A European employment miracle?’, Economic Policy 30 (April 2002): 137–80.Google Scholar
and 1997. ‘Neither markets nor states: Linking transformation processes in collective action arenas’, in (ed.), Perspectives on Public Choice: A Handbook, Cambridge University Press, pp. 35–72.Google Scholar
1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
1989. Cijfers en Aequaties en Kennis der Staatskachten; Statistiek in Nederland in de negentiende eeuw, Amsterdam, Atlanta: Rodopi.Google Scholar
2002. ‘Vereeniging voor de Statistiek (VVS); een gezelschap van juristen’, STAtOR 3/2: 13–17.Google Scholar
1936. ‘Kan hier te lande, al dan niet na overheidsingrijpen een verbetering van de binnenlandse conjunctuur intreden, ook zonder verbetering van onze exportpositie? Welke lering kan ten aanzien van dit vraagstuk worden getrokken uit de ervaringen van andere landen?’, in Praeadviezen voor de Vereeniging voor de Staathuishoudkunde en de Statistiek, Den Haag: Nijhoff, pp. 62–108.Google Scholar
1998. ‘Vernieuwing van de partij – CPB modellen verwijtbaar ondeugdelijk’, Christen Democratische Verkenningen 7–8: 345–9.Google Scholar
2005. The Polder Model: From Disease to Miracle? Dutch Neocorporatism 1965–2000, Thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.Google Scholar
2002. ‘Driewerf hoera voor het poldermodel’, Economisch Statistische Berichten 87: 344–7.Google Scholar
- 12
- Cited by