Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T12:04:50.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Design at the classical–quantum boundary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2010

A. F. J. Levi
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
Stephan Haas
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In this chapter we explore systems whose description lies at the boundary between classical and quantum theory. There are of course many ways to approach this problem. Here, we choose to study the interaction of classical light with small metal particles of arbitrary shape. Specifically, we consider a physical model that is capable of observing the transition from bulk material properties to nanoscale structures, for which quantum effects dominate. We then explore the landscape of possible physical responses of such systems, using optimal design techniques to train our intuition.

The prevalent classical model describing the interaction of visible and infrared electromagnetic radiation with nanoscale metallic clusters is based on Mie theory [1]. This local continuum field model which uses empirical values of a bulk material's linear optical response has been used to describe plasmon resonances in nanoparticles [2–4]. However, such a semi-empirical continuum description necessarily breaks down beyond a certain level of coarseness introduced by atomic length scales. Thus, it cannot be used to describe the interface between quantum and classical macroscopic regimes. Moreover, extensions of Mie theory to inhomogeneous cluster shapes are commonly restricted to low-order harmonic expansions (e.g. elliptical distortions) and so do not exhaust the full realm of possible geometric configurations. In addition, near-field applications, such as surface enhanced Raman scattering [5], are most naturally described using a real-space theory that includes the non-local electronic response of inhomogeneous structures, again beyond the scope of Mie theory.

In the following section we describe a microscopic approach that demonstrates the breakdown of this concept at atomic scales, whereas for large cluster sizes the classical predictions for the plasmon resonances are reproduced.

Type
Chapter
Information
Optimal Device Design , pp. 123 - 148
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Mie, G., Beiträge zur optik trüber medien, speziell kolloidaler metallösungen, Annalen der Physik 330, 377–445 (1908).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, D.M. and Ashcroft, N.W., Quantum size effects in the optical properties of small metallic particles, Physical Review B 25, 6255–6274 (1982); Rice, M.J., Schneider, W.R., and Strässler, S., Electronic polarizabilities of very small metallic particles and thin films, Physical Review B 8, 474–482 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Q.P. and DasSarma, S., Elementary excitation spectrum of one-dimensional electron systems in confined semiconductor structures: Zero magnetic field, Physical Review B 43, 11768–11786 (1991).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fredkin, D.R. and Mayergoyz, I.D., Resonant behavior of dielectric objects (electrostatic resonances), Physical Review Letters 91, 253902 1–4 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nie, S. and Emory, S.R., Probing single molecules and single nanoparticles by surface-enhanced Raman scattering, Science 275, 1102–1106 (1997).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pokrant, S. and Whaley, K.B., Tight-binding studies of surface effects on electronic structure of CdSe nanocrystals: the role of organic ligands, surface reconstruction, and inorganic capping shells, European Physical Journal D 6, 255–267 (1998); Chen, P. and Whaley, K.B., Magneto-optical response of CdSe nanostructures, Physical Review B 70, 045311 1–12 (2004); Schrier, J. and Whaley, K.B., Atomistic theory of coherent spin transfer between molecularly bridged quanatum dots, Physical Review B 72, 085320 1–8 (2005); Lee, S., Allmen, P., Oyafuso, F., Klimeck, G., and Whaley, K.B., Effect of electron-nuclear spin interaction on electron-spin qubits localized in self-assembled quantum dots, Journal of Applied Physics 97, 043706 1–8 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Press, W.H., Flanney, B.P., Teukolsky, S.A., and Vetterling, W.T., Numerical Recipes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1988.Google Scholar
Lindhard, J., On the properties of a gas of charged particles, Kongelige Danske Videnskab, Selskab, Matemat-Fysis Meddel 28 n. 8 (1954).Google Scholar
Ehrenreich, H. and Cohen, M.H., Self-consistent field approach to the many-electron problem, Physical Review 115, 786–790 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, W.A., Electronic Structure and the Properties of Solids, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, California, 1980.Google Scholar
Muniz, R.A., Haas, S., Levi, A.F.J., and Grigorenko, I., Plasmonic excitations in tight binding nanostructures, Physics Review B 80, 045413 (1–6) (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, J., Yuan, Z., and Gao, S., End and central plasmon resonances in linear atomic chains, Physical Review Letters 98, 216602 1–4 (2007).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, Ke, Troparevsky, M. Claudia, Xiao, Di, Eguiluz, Adolfo G., and Zhang, Zhenyu, Electronic coupling and optimal gap size between two metal nanoparticles, Physical Review Letters 102, 186804 1–4 (2009).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pines, D., Nozieres, P., The Theory of Quantum Liquids, 1, 55, W.A. Benjamin, Inc., New York, New York, 1966.Google Scholar
Kresin, V.V., Collective resonances and response properties of electrons in metal cluster, Physics Reports 220, 1–52 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thalken, J., Li, W., Haas, S., and Levi, A.F.J., Adaptive design of excitonic absorption in broken-symmetry quantum wells, Applied Physics Letters 85, 121–123 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grigorenko, I., Haas, S., and Levi, A.F.J., Electromagnetic response of broken-symmetry nano-scale clusters, Physical Review Letters 97, 036806 1–4 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grigorenko, I., Haas, S., Balatsky, A.V., and Levi, A.F.J., Optimal control of electromagnetic field using metallic nanoclusters, New Journal of Physics 10, 043017 1–4 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×