Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T05:36:58.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Overshoot pathways to CO2 stabilization in a multi-gas context

from Part I - Climate system science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2010

T. M. L. Wigley
Affiliation:
National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder CO 80307–3000, USA
R. G. Richels
Affiliation:
Electric Power Research Institute 2000 L Street NW, Suite 805 Washington, DC 20036, USA
J. A Edmonds
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Joint Global Change Research Institute at the University of Maryland
Michael E. Schlesinger
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Haroon S. Kheshgi
Affiliation:
ExxonMobil Research and Engineering
Joel Smith
Affiliation:
Stratus Consulting Ltd, Boulder
Francisco C. de la Chesnaye
Affiliation:
US Environmental Protection Agency
John M. Reilly
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Tom Wilson
Affiliation:
Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto
Charles Kolstad
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Stabilization of the climate system requires stabilization of greenhouse-gas concentrations. Most work to date has considered only stabilization of CO2, where there are choices regarding both the concentration stabilization target and the pathway towards that target. Here we consider the effects of accounting for non-CO2 gases (CH4 and N2O), for different CO2 targets and different pathways. As primary cases for CO2 we use the standard “WRE” pathways to stabilization at 450 ppm or 550 ppm. We also consider a new “overshoot” concentration profile for CO2 in which concentrations initially exceed and then decline towards a final stabilization level of 450 ppm, as might occur if an initial target choice were later found to be too high.

Emissions reductions for CH4 and N2O are optimized for the different pathways using an energy-economics model (MERGE). The optimization procedure minimizes the total cost of emissions reductions. The CH4 and N2O emissions reductions lead to substantially reduced future warming and future sea-level rise relative to stabilization cases where likely emissions reductions for these gases are ignored. For central climate and sea level model parameter values the reductions are 0.3–0.4 °C and 2–3 cm in 2100 and 0.9–1.0 °C and about 14 cm in 2400. Reduced CH4 and N2O emissions also allow larger CO2 emissions by reducing the magnitude of climate feedbacks on the carbon cycle.

Type
Chapter
Information
Human-Induced Climate Change
An Interdisciplinary Assessment
, pp. 84 - 92
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Church, J. A. and Gregory, J. M. (co-ordinating lead authors) (2001). Changes in sea level. In Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. Houghton, J. T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D. J.et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 639–693.Google Scholar
Cubasch, U. and Meehl, G. A. (co-ordinating lead authors) (2001). Projections of future climate change. In Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. Houghton, J. T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D. J.et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 525–582.Google Scholar
Enting, I. G., Wigley, T. M. L. and Heimann, M. (1994). Future Emissions and Concentrations of Carbon Dioxide: Key Ocean/Atmosphere/Land Analyses. CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research Technical Paper No. 31.
Hoffert, M. L., Caldeira, K., Benford, G.et al. (2002). Advanced technology paths to global climate stability: energy for a greenhouse planet. Science 298, 981–987.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hourcade, J.-C. and Shukla, P. (co-ordinating lead authors) (2001). Global, regional and national costs and ancillary benefits of mitigation. In Climate Change 2001: Mitigation, Contribution of Working Group 3 to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ed. Metz, B., Davidson, A., Swart, R. and Pan, J.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 544–552.Google Scholar
IPCC (2000). Emissions Scenarios: A Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. Nakićenović, N. and Swart, R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Joos, F., Prentice, I. C., Sitch, S.et al. (2001). Global warming feedbacks on terrestrial carbon uptake under the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) emissions scenarios. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 15, 891–908, doi: 10.1029/2000GB001375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kheshgi, H. S. and Jain, A. K. (2003). Projecting future climate change: implications of carbon cycle model intercomparisons. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 17, 1047; doi: 10.1029/2001GB001842 (see also http//:frodo. atmos.uiuc.edu/isam).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leggett, J., Pepper, W. J. and Swart, R. J. (1992). Emissions scenarios for the IPCC: an update. In Climate Change 1992: The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment, ed. Houghton, J. T.et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 71–95.Google Scholar
Manne, A. S. and Richels, R. G. (2001). An alternative approach to establishing trade-offs among greenhouse gases. Nature 410, 675–677.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mastrandrea, M. D. and Schneider, S. H. (2004). Probabilistic integrated assessment of ‘dangerous’ climate change. Science 304, 571–575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Neill, B. C. and Oppenheimer, M. (2004). Climate change impacts sensitive to path to stabilization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101, 16411–16416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prentice, I. C. (co-ordinating lead author) (2001). The carbon cycle and atmospheric carbon dioxide. In Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. ed. Houghton, J. T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D. Jet al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 183–237.Google Scholar
Raper, S. C. B., Wigley, T. M. L. and Warrick, R. A. (1996). Global sea level rise: past and future. In Sea-Level Rise and Coastal Subsidence: Causes, Consequences and Strategies, ed. Milliman, J. and Haq, B. U.. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 11–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. J., Wigley, T. M. L. and Edmonds, J. A. (2000). A new route toward limiting climate change?Science 290, 1109–1110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, S. J., Pitcher, H. and Wigley, T. M. L. (2005). Future sulfur dioxide emissions. Climatic Change 73, 267–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swart, R., Mitchell, J. F. B., Morita, T. and Raper, S. C. B. (2002). Stabilisation scenarios for climate impact assessment. Global Environmental Change 12, 155–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigley, T. M. L. (1993). Balancing the carbon budget. Implications for projections of future carbon dioxide concentration changes. Tellus 45B, 409–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigley, T. M. L. (1995). Global-mean temperature and sea level consequences of greenhouse gas concentration stabilization. Geophysical Research Letters 22, 45–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigley, T. M. L. (2000). Stabilization of CO2 concentration levels. In The Carbon Cycle, ed. Wigley, T. M. L. and Schimel, D. S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 258–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigley, T. M. L. (2004a). Choosing a stabilization target for CO2. Climatic Change 67, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigley, T. M. L. (2004b). Modeling climate change under no-policy and policy emissions pathways. In The Benefits of Climate Change Policies: Analytical and Framework Issues. Paris: OECD Publications, pp. 221–248.Google Scholar
Wigley, T. M. L. (2005). The climate change commitment. Science 307, 1766–1769.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wigley, T. M. L. and Raper, S. C. B. (2001). Interpretation of high projections for global-mean warming. Science 293, 451–454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wigley, T. M. L. and Raper, S. C. B. (2002). Reasons for larger warming projections in the IPCC Third Assessment Report. Journal of Climate 15, 2945–2952.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigley, T. M. L. and Raper, S. C. B. (2005). Extended scenarios for glacier melt due to anthropogenic forcing. Geophysical Research Letters 32, L05704, doi: 10.1029/2004GL021238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigley, T. M. L., Richels, R. and Edmonds, J. A. (1996). Economic and environmental choices in the stabilization of atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Nature 379, 240–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×