Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T06:19:35.751Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Liberalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

By
Marcel Wissenburg
Edited by
Andrew Dobson  and
Robyn Eckersley
Marcel Wissenburg
Affiliation:
Nijmegen University
Andrew Dobson
Affiliation:
The Open University, Milton Keynes
Robyn Eckersley
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Get access

Summary

It is not uncommon to point to liberalism as the evil genius behind the ecological crisis. In this chapter, I shall argue that there were once good grounds to suspect liberalism of at the very least a certain indifference towards ecological challenges – yet this attitude is changing dramatically. Interest in environmental issues does not come naturally for liberalism, but its internal checks and balances are slowly yet perceptibly greening liberalism.

It is important in this context to distinguish between liberalism as a ‘pure’ political theory, and the practice of liberalism or the practices ascribed to liberalism, such as the free market and liberal democracy. Classical liberalism, especially, supports the idea of a free market, as it sees freedom of enterprise and freedom of trade as necessary conditions for the realisation of individuals' plans of life. Yet that does not necessarily mean that each and every existing free market system or each and every effect of free market enterprise is desirable or defensible from a liberal perspective – involuntary exploitation of humans through slavery or rape, for instance, never is.

Critique to the effect that liberalism is a threat to the world's ecology comes in many forms, and as it turns out, not all are appropriate. At the deepest philosophical level, critics argue that liberalism is a child of the Enlightenment from which it has inherited its parent's deficiencies (cf. Sagoff 1988). Primary among these defects are René Descartes' body/mind, mind/matter, human/nature and nature/culture dichotomies.

Type
Chapter
Information
Political Theory and the Ecological Challenge , pp. 20 - 34
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achterberg, W. (1993). ‘Can Liberal Democracy Survive the Environmental Crisis?’, in Dobson, A. and Lucardie, P. (eds.), The Politics of Nature: Explorations in Green Political Theory. London: Routledge, 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, T., and Leal, D. (1991). Free Market Environmentalism. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Barry, B. (1989). Democracy, Power and Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Barry, B. (1995). Justice as Impartiality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Barry, J. (1999). Rethinking Green Politics. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bell, D. (2002). ‘How Can Political Liberals Be Environmentalists?’, Political Studies 50: 703–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, A. (2001). ‘Can We Harm Future People?’, Environmental Politics 10: 429–54.Google Scholar
Geus, M. (2003). The End of Overconsumption. Utrecht: International Books.Google Scholar
de-Shalit, A. (2000). The Environment Between Theory and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devall, B. and Sessions, G. (1985). Deep Ecology. Layton, Ut.: Gibbs M. Smith.Google Scholar
DiZerega, G. (1996). ‘Deep Ecology and Liberalism’, Review of Politics 58: 699–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, A. (1998). Justice and the Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, A. (2001). ‘Foreword’, in Barry, J. and Wissenburg, M. (eds.), Sustaining Liberal Democracy. Houndmills: Palgrave, vii–ix.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, A. (2003). Citizenship and the Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryzek, R. (1990). Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy, and Political Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eckersley, R. (1992). Environmentalism and Political Theory. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Garner, R. (2003). ‘Animals, Politics and Justice: Rawlsian Liberalism and the Plight of Non-humans’, Environmental Politics 12: 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hailwood, S. (2004). How To Be a Green Liberal. Chesham: Acumen.Google Scholar
Holmes, S. (1993). The Anatomy of Anti-Liberalism. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1998). On Liberty and Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1999). Principles of Political Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Naess, A. (1989). Ecology, Community, and Lifestyle. Cambridge: >Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, B. (1991). Towards Unity Among Environmentalists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Oksanen. M. (1998). ‘Environmental Ethics and Concepts of Private Ownership’, in Dallmeyer, D. and Ike, A. (eds.), Environmental Ethics and the Global Marketplace. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 114–39.Google Scholar
Ophuls, W. (1976). Ecology and the Politics of Scarcity. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1972). A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1993). Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Sagoff, M. (1988). ‘Can Environmentalists Be Liberals?’, in Sagoff, M., The Economy of the Earth. Cambridge: >Cambridge University Press, 146–70.Google Scholar
Schlosberg, D. (1999). Environmental Justice and the New Pluralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, B. (1988). ‘An Extension of Rawls’, Theory of Justice to Environmental Ethics', Environmental Ethics 10: 217–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. (2003). Deliberative Democracy and the Environment. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, P. (1999). ‘Picking at the Locke of Economic Reductionism’, in Fairweather, N., Elsworthy, S., Stroh, M. and Stephens, P. (eds.), Environmental Futures. London: Macmillan, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanDeVeer, D. (1979). ‘Interspecific Justice’, Enquiry 22: 55–79.Google Scholar
Wallack, M. (2004). ‘The Minimum Irreversible Harm Principle’, in Wissenburg, M. and Levy, Y. (eds.), Liberal Democracy and Environmentalism. London: Routledge, 167–78.Google Scholar
Weale, A. (1992). The New Politics of Pollution. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Wenz, P. (1988). Environmental Justice. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Wissenburg, M. (1998). Green Liberalism. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Wissenburg, M. (2004). ‘Little Green Lies’, in Wissenburg, M. and Levy, Y. (eds.), Liberal Democracy and Environmentalism. London: Routledge, 60–71.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Liberalism
  • Edited by Andrew Dobson, The Open University, Milton Keynes, Robyn Eckersley, University of Melbourne
  • Book: Political Theory and the Ecological Challenge
  • Online publication: 06 July 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617805.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Liberalism
  • Edited by Andrew Dobson, The Open University, Milton Keynes, Robyn Eckersley, University of Melbourne
  • Book: Political Theory and the Ecological Challenge
  • Online publication: 06 July 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617805.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Liberalism
  • Edited by Andrew Dobson, The Open University, Milton Keynes, Robyn Eckersley, University of Melbourne
  • Book: Political Theory and the Ecological Challenge
  • Online publication: 06 July 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617805.003
Available formats
×