Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Cited by 7
  • Print publication year: 2006
  • Online publication date: July 2010

2 - Liberalism

Summary

It is not uncommon to point to liberalism as the evil genius behind the ecological crisis. In this chapter, I shall argue that there were once good grounds to suspect liberalism of at the very least a certain indifference towards ecological challenges – yet this attitude is changing dramatically. Interest in environmental issues does not come naturally for liberalism, but its internal checks and balances are slowly yet perceptibly greening liberalism.

It is important in this context to distinguish between liberalism as a ‘pure’ political theory, and the practice of liberalism or the practices ascribed to liberalism, such as the free market and liberal democracy. Classical liberalism, especially, supports the idea of a free market, as it sees freedom of enterprise and freedom of trade as necessary conditions for the realisation of individuals' plans of life. Yet that does not necessarily mean that each and every existing free market system or each and every effect of free market enterprise is desirable or defensible from a liberal perspective – involuntary exploitation of humans through slavery or rape, for instance, never is.

Critique to the effect that liberalism is a threat to the world's ecology comes in many forms, and as it turns out, not all are appropriate. At the deepest philosophical level, critics argue that liberalism is a child of the Enlightenment from which it has inherited its parent's deficiencies (cf. Sagoff 1988). Primary among these defects are René Descartes' body/mind, mind/matter, human/nature and nature/culture dichotomies.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
References
Achterberg, W. (1993). ‘Can Liberal Democracy Survive the Environmental Crisis?’, in Dobson, A. and Lucardie, P. (eds.), The Politics of Nature: Explorations in Green Political Theory. London: Routledge, 81–101.
Anderson, T., and Leal, D. (1991). Free Market Environmentalism. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
Barry, B. (1989). Democracy, Power and Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Barry, B. (1995). Justice as Impartiality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Barry, J. (1999). Rethinking Green Politics. London: Sage.
Bell, D. (2002). ‘How Can Political Liberals Be Environmentalists?’, Political Studies 50: 703–24.
Carter, A. (2001). ‘Can We Harm Future People?’, Environmental Politics 10: 429–54.
Geus, M. (2003). The End of Overconsumption. Utrecht: International Books.
de-Shalit, A. (2000). The Environment Between Theory and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Devall, B. and Sessions, G. (1985). Deep Ecology. Layton, Ut.: Gibbs M. Smith.
DiZerega, G. (1996). ‘Deep Ecology and Liberalism’, Review of Politics 58: 699–734.
Dobson, A. (1998). Justice and the Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dobson, A. (2001). ‘Foreword’, in Barry, J. and Wissenburg, M. (eds.), Sustaining Liberal Democracy. Houndmills: Palgrave, vii–ix.
Dobson, A. (2003). Citizenship and the Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dryzek, R. (1990). Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy, and Political Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Eckersley, R. (1992). Environmentalism and Political Theory. London: UCL Press.
Garner, R. (2003). ‘Animals, Politics and Justice: Rawlsian Liberalism and the Plight of Non-humans’, Environmental Politics 12: 3–22.
Hailwood, S. (2004). How To Be a Green Liberal. Chesham: Acumen.
Holmes, S. (1993). The Anatomy of Anti-Liberalism. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Mill, J. S. (1998). On Liberty and Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mill, J. S. (1999). Principles of Political Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Naess, A. (1989). Ecology, Community, and Lifestyle. Cambridge: >Cambridge University Press.
Norton, B. (1991). Towards Unity Among Environmentalists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
Oksanen. M. (1998). ‘Environmental Ethics and Concepts of Private Ownership’, in Dallmeyer, D. and Ike, A. (eds.), Environmental Ethics and the Global Marketplace. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 114–39.
Ophuls, W. (1976). Ecology and the Politics of Scarcity. San Francisco: Freeman.
Rawls, J. (1972). A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rawls, J. (1993). Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Sagoff, M. (1988). ‘Can Environmentalists Be Liberals?’, in Sagoff, M., The Economy of the Earth. Cambridge: >Cambridge University Press, 146–70.
Schlosberg, D. (1999). Environmental Justice and the New Pluralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Singer, B. (1988). ‘An Extension of Rawls’, Theory of Justice to Environmental Ethics', Environmental Ethics 10: 217–31.
Smith, G. (2003). Deliberative Democracy and the Environment. London: Routledge.
Stephens, P. (1999). ‘Picking at the Locke of Economic Reductionism’, in Fairweather, N., Elsworthy, S., Stroh, M. and Stephens, P. (eds.), Environmental Futures. London: Macmillan, 3–23.
VanDeVeer, D. (1979). ‘Interspecific Justice’, Enquiry 22: 55–79.
Wallack, M. (2004). ‘The Minimum Irreversible Harm Principle’, in Wissenburg, M. and Levy, Y. (eds.), Liberal Democracy and Environmentalism. London: Routledge, 167–78.
Weale, A. (1992). The New Politics of Pollution. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Wenz, P. (1988). Environmental Justice. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Wissenburg, M. (1998). Green Liberalism. London: UCL Press.
Wissenburg, M. (2004). ‘Little Green Lies’, in Wissenburg, M. and Levy, Y. (eds.), Liberal Democracy and Environmentalism. London: Routledge, 60–71.