Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T04:04:40.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 18 - Limited-area ensemble forecasting: the COSMO-LEPS system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2009

Stefano Tibaldi
Affiliation:
ARPA-SIM, Bologna
Tiziana Paccagnella
Affiliation:
ARPA-SIM, Bologna
Chiara Marsigli
Affiliation:
ARPA-SIM, Bologna
Andrea Montani
Affiliation:
ARPA-SIM, Bologna
Fabrizio Nerozzi
Affiliation:
ARPA-SIM, Bologna
Tim Palmer
Affiliation:
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
Renate Hagedorn
Affiliation:
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The improvement of quantitative precipitation forecasting (QPF) is still one of the major challenges in numerical weather prediction (NWP). Despite the constant increase of computer power resources, which has allowed the development of more and more sophisticated and resolved NWP models, accurate forecasts of extreme weather conditions, especially when related to intense and localised precipitation structures, are still difficult beyond day 2 (Mullen and Buizza, 2001) and, in rare and selected cases, even at 24 hours. This limitation is due, among other reasons, to the inherently low degree of predictability typical of the relevant physical phenomena. The probabilistic approach has been recently increasingly explored to try to come to terms with the chaotic behaviour of the atmosphere and to help forecasting phenomena with low deterministic predictability.

In addition to this, almost twenty years ago Henk Tennekes, at the time member of the ECMWF (European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts) Scientific Advisory Committee, raised the question of the opportunity of producing a-priori estimates of forecast skill stating that ‘no forecast is complete without a forecast of the forecast skill’. It is not an overstatement to say that his bold assertion contributed greatly to the development, at least at ECMWF, of forecast skill studies, estimates and prediction techniques (e.g. Palmer and Tibaldi, 1988) and to the related development of statistical-dynamical prediction methods like ensemble forecasting.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arribas, A. (2004). Results of an initial stochastic physics scheme for the Met Office Unified Model. Forecasting Research Technical Report No 452. Available at Met Office, Exeter, UK
Buizza, R. (1997). Potential forecast skill of ensemble prediction and spread and skill distributions of the ECMWF ensemble prediction system. Mon. Weather Rev., 125, 99–1192.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buizza, R., Barkmeijer, J., Palmer, T. N. and Richardson, D. (1999). Current status and future developments of the ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System. Meteorol. Appl., 6, 1–14Google Scholar
Du, J., DiMego, G., M. S. Tracton and B. Zhou (2003). NCEP short-range ensemble forecasting (SREF) system: multi-IC, multi-model and multi-physics approach. Research Activities in Atmospheric and Oceanic Modelling, Report 33, CAS/JSC Working Group Numerical Experimentation (WGNE), WMO/TD-No. 1161
Frogner, I. and Iversen, T. (2001). Targeted ensemble prediction for northern Europe and parts of the North-Atlantic Ocean. Tellus, 53A, 35–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frogner, I. and Iversen, T. (2002). High-resolution limited-area ensemble predictions based on low-resolution targeted singular vectors. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 128, 1321–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haakenstad, H. and Frogner, I-L. (2004). Extended tests with a limited area ensemble prediction system at the Norwegian Meteorological Institute – LAMEPS. Met.no report 7. Meteorologist Institutt
Hersbach, H., Mureau, R., Opsteegh, J. D. and Barkmeijer, J. (2000). A short-range to early-medium-range Ensemble Prediction System for the European Area. Mon. Weather Rev., 128, 3501–192.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houtekamer, P. L., Derome, J., Ritchie, H. and Mitchell, H. L. (1996). A system simulation approach to ensemble prediction. Mon. Weather Rev., 124, 1225–422.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janjic, Z. I. (1990). The step-mountain co-ordinate: physical package. Mon. Weather Rev., 118, 1429–432.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsigli, C., Montani, A., Nerozzi, F., et al. (2001). A strategy for high-resolution ensemble prediction. II: Limited-area experiments in four Alpine flood events. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 127, 2095–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsigli, C., Montani, A., Nerozzi, F. and Paccagnella, T. (2004). Probabilistic high-resolution forecast of heavy precipitation over Central Europe. Nat. Hazard Earth Sys. Sci., 4, 315–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsigli, C., Boccanera, F., Montani, A. and Paccagnella, T. (2005). The COSMO-LEPS ensemble system: validation of the methodology and verification. Nonlinear Proc. Geoph., 12, 527–36CrossRef
Mason, S. J. and Graham, N. E. (1999). Conditional probabilities, relative operating characteristics and relative operating levels. Weather Forecast., 14, 713–252.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesinger, F., Janjic, Z. I., Nickovic, S., Gavrilov, D. and Deaven, D. G. (1988). The step-mountain co-ordinate: model description and performance for cases of Alpine lee cyclogenesis and for a case of Appalachian redevelopment. Mon. Weather Rev., 116, 1493–5182.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molteni, F., Buizza, R., Palmer, T. N. and Petroliagis, T. (1996). The ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System: methodology and validation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 127, 2069–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molteni, F., Buizza, R., Marsigli, C., Montani, A., Nerozzi, F. and Paccagnella, T. (2001). A strategy for high-resolution ensemble prediction. I: Definition of representative members and global-model experiments. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 127, 2069–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montani, A. (1998). Targeting of observations to improve forecasts of cyclogenesis. PhD thesis. University of Reading, Reading, UK
Montani, A., Marsigli, C., Nerozzi, F., Paccagnella, T. and Buizza, R. (2001). Performance of ARPA-SMR Limited-area Ensemble Prediction System: two flood cases. Nonlinear Proc. Geoph., 127, 2095–115Google Scholar
Montani, A., Marsigli, C., Nerozzi, F., Paccagnella, T., Tibaldi, S. and Buizza, R. (2003a). The Soverato flood in Southern Italy: performance of global and limited-area ensemble forecasts. Nonlinear Proc. Geoph., 10, 261–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montani, A., Capaldo, M., Cesari, D., et al. (2003b). Operational limited-area ensemble forecasts based on the Lokal Model. ECMWF Newsletter, 98, 2–7Google Scholar
Mullen, S. L. and Buizza, R. (2001). Quantitative precipitation forecast over the United States by the ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System. Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 638–632.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullen, S. L. and Buizza, R. (2002). The impact of horizontal resolution and ensemble size on probabilistic forecasts of precipitation by the ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System. Weather Forecast., 17, 173–912.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mylne, K. R., Evans, R. E. and Clark, R. T. (2002). Multi-model multi-analysis ensembles in a quasi-operational medium-range forecasting. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 128, 361–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, T. N. and Tibaldi, S. (1988). On the prediction of forecast skill. Mon. Weather Rev., 116, 2453–802.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, D. S. (2000). Skill and relative economic value of the ECMWF ensemble prediction system. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 126, 649–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tibaldi, S., Paccagnella, T., Marsigli, C., Montani, A. and Nerozzi, F. (2003). Short-to-medium-range Limited-area Ensemble Prediction: the LEPS system. Proceedings of ECMWF Seminars on Predictability of Weather and Climate, 9–13 September 2002, Reading, UKGoogle Scholar
Tracton, M. S. and Kalnay, E. (1993). Operational ensemble prediction at the National Meteorological Centre: practical aspects. Weather Forecast., 8, 379–982.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tracton, M. S., Du, J. and Juang, H. (1998). Short-range ensemble forecasting (SREF) at NCEP/EMC. Proceedings of the 12th AMS/NWP Conference, Phoenix AZ, pp. 269–72
Wilks, D. S. (1995). Statistical Methods in Atmospheric Sciences. Academic PressGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×