Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T02:43:43.754Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

40 - Sociolinguistic variation in Cane Walk: a quantitative case study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

John R. Rickford
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Jenny Cheshire
Affiliation:
Birkbeck College, University of London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Cane Walk is a pseudonym for a Guyanese village within half an hour's drive of Georgetown, the capital. In the mid 1970s, when the data for this study were collected, approximately 3,650 people lived there. About 97 per cent of these were East Indian, descendants of indentured labourers brought from India between 1838 and 1917 to replace and supplement Africans (emancipated in 1838) as the sugar industry's labour force. The Cane Walk community was created by the nearby LBI (La Bonne Intention)/Ogle Sugar estate in the 1950s to provide alternative housing for its workers, after the barrack-like ‘logies’ in which they had housed them, on the estate itself, were condemned. The community's stratification into two classes, which we will refer to as ‘Estate Class’ (EC) and ‘Non-Estate Class’ (NEC), reflects in part a sugar industry distinction between ‘laboureres’ and ‘junior class’ employees (see Jayawardena 1963: 28–52). Most EC members work as cane-cutters, weeders and in other labouring capacities in the canefields behind the village. Some NEC members are junior supervisors on the estate, but most work as shopowners, contractors, clerks and in similar ‘lower middle class’ jobs off the estate, some in Georgetown.

Data

In this paper, I will summarise some of the key findings about sociolinguistic variation in this community, drawing on an earlier study of pronominal usage in a judgement sample of 24 Cane Walkers (Rickford 1979).

Type
Chapter
Information
English around the World
Sociolinguistic Perspectives
, pp. 609 - 616
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×