Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Contributors
- 1 Children, Social Science, and the Law: An Introduction to the Issues
- PART I CHILDREN'S RIGHTS, THEIR CAPABILITIES, AND SOCIETY'S RESPONSIBILITIES TO CHILDREN
- PART II CHILDREN AND FAMILY CHANGE
- 6 Termination of Parental Rights to Free Children for Adoption: Conflicts between Parents, Children, and the State
- 7 Child Custody Research at the Crossroads: Issues for a New Century
- 8 Children of Lesbian and Gay Parents: Research, Law, and Policy
- PART III JUVENILE AGGRESSION AND JUVENILE JUSTICE
- PART IV CHILDREN AS VICTIMS AND WITNESSES
- PART V CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
- Author Index
- Case Index
- Subject Index
- References
6 - Termination of Parental Rights to Free Children for Adoption: Conflicts between Parents, Children, and the State
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 July 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Contributors
- 1 Children, Social Science, and the Law: An Introduction to the Issues
- PART I CHILDREN'S RIGHTS, THEIR CAPABILITIES, AND SOCIETY'S RESPONSIBILITIES TO CHILDREN
- PART II CHILDREN AND FAMILY CHANGE
- 6 Termination of Parental Rights to Free Children for Adoption: Conflicts between Parents, Children, and the State
- 7 Child Custody Research at the Crossroads: Issues for a New Century
- 8 Children of Lesbian and Gay Parents: Research, Law, and Policy
- PART III JUVENILE AGGRESSION AND JUVENILE JUSTICE
- PART IV CHILDREN AS VICTIMS AND WITNESSES
- PART V CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
- Author Index
- Case Index
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
Before a child can be adopted into a new family, the rights of the child's birth parents must be totally and irrevocably terminated. As a result, thousands of children every year are affected by the legal process of terminating parental rights. In many cases of infant adoption, a birth mother and birth father voluntarily relinquish their rights over a child – a process that they may agree to months before their child is born. In other cases of infant adoption, and often when an older child is adopted, parental rights are terminated involuntarily as a result of a judicial determination that the birth parents are unable to provide adequate parenting. Consequently, every adoption is preceded by a termination, and public policy on adoption is always entangled in legal proceedings regarding the termination of parental rights.
In this chapter we focus on the process and consequences of the termination of parental rights, and in particular on cases in which termination of parental rights is being pursued because children have been chronically or severely maltreated by their parents or other caregivers. We start with a discussion of the need to balance the rights of parents and children in termination cases and efforts of current and past policy to do so. We then describe current laws regarding the legal process involved in the termination of parental rights and the ways in which the needs, rights, and obligations of parents, children, and the state are balanced in such proceedings.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Children, Social Science, and the Law , pp. 131 - 152Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2002
References
, & (1995). Parental rights vs. best interests of the child. Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy, 2, 63–96Google Scholar
Avery, R. J. (1998). Foster Case histories of children freed for adoption in New York State: 1988–1993. Public Agency Adoption in New York State, Phase Ⅰ Report. Grant number 5 R01 HD27529-05, Washington, DC: National Institute for Health and Human Development, Department of Health and Human Services
, & (1987). Outcomes of child welfare services under permanency planning. Social Service Review, 61, 71–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barth, R. P., & Berry, M. (1988). Child abuse and child welfare services. In M. Wald & M. Kirst (Eds.), Conditions of children in California (pp. 78–95). Berkeley: Policy Analysis for California Education
, , & (1994). Timing is everything: An analysis of the time to adoption and legalization. Social Work Research, 18, 139–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, N. M., & Libowitz, A. S. (1983). Recidivism in foster care. New York: Child Welfare League of America
(1971). A comparative study of adopted children, foster children, and children in their biological environment born after undesired pregnancies. Acta Paediatrica Scandinavia, 221 (Suppl.), 5–38Google ScholarPubMed
Boneh, C. (1979). Disruptions in adoptive placements. Boston: Department of Public Welfare
Caban v. Mohammed, 441 U.S. 380 (1979)
Cahn, K., & Johnson, P. (1993). Critical issues in permanency planning. In K. Cahn & P. Johnson (Eds.), Children can't wait (pp. 3–18). Washington, DC: Child Welfare League
Carrieri, J. R. (1991). Child custody, foster care, and adoptions. New York: Lexington Books
Colorado Ex rel M.M., 726 P. 2d 1108 (1986)
(1994). Factors associated with the reunification of foster children with their families. Social Service Review, 68, 81–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (1985). Developmentally disabled children can be adopted. Child Welfare, 64, 607–615Google ScholarPubMed
(1993–1994). Requiring proof beyond a reasonable doubt in parental rights termination cases. Journal of Family Law, 32, 785–815Google Scholar
(1995). Unresolved grief in women who have relinquished an infant for adoption. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A Humanities and Social Sciences, 55(9-A), 2987Google Scholar
(1996). Birth mother loss: Contributing factors to unresolved grief. Clinical Social Work Journal, 24(1), 65–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , & (1999). Characteristics of repeated referrals to child protective services in Washington State. Child Maltreatment, 4(4), 297–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994). The “Baby Jessica case: And the claimed conflict between children's rights and parents' rights. Wayne Law Review, 40, 285–331Google Scholar
, , , & (1983). After foster care: Outcomes of permanent planning for children. Child Welfare, 62, 485–562Google Scholar
Festinger, T. (1986). Necessary risk: A study of adoption and disrupted adoption placements. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America
, , & (1986). Factors associated with the discharge of children from foster care. Social Work Research and Abstracts, 29, 10–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996). Exploring stability and change processes in foster care: An application of organizational ecology to human populations. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A Humanities and Social Sciences, 57(4-A), 1846Google Scholar
(1990). The reunification process in substitute care. Social Service Review, 64, 422–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, G., Emery, R., & Haugaard, J. J. (1998). Developmental psychology and the law: Divorce, child maltreatment, foster care, and adoption. In I. Sigel & A. Renninger (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (5th ed.), Vol. 4. Child psychology in practice (pp. 775–876). New York: Wiley
, , , & (1994). Adoptive family system dynamics: Variations by level of openness in the adoption. Family Process, 33, 125–146CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haralambie, A. M. (1993). Handling child custody, abuse and adoption cases. Colorado Springs, CO: Shepard's/McGraw-Hill
Hardin, M., & Lancour, R. (1996). Early termination of parental rights: Developing appropriate statutory grounds. Washington, DC: ABA Center on Children and the Law
Hill v. Moorman, 525 So. 2d 681 (1988)
In re Adoption of B.G.S., 614 A. 2d 1161 (1992)
In re Department of Public Welfare, 419 N. E. 2d 285 (1981)
In re Doe, 638 N. E. 2d 181 (1994)
In re Raquel Marie Ⅹ., 559 N. E. 2d 418 (1990)
Jacobs, B. A. (1996). An analysis of characteristics affecting the length of time until termination of parental rights in New York State adoption cases. Unpublished honors thesis, Cornell University, Department of Policy Analysis and Management
Jones, M. A. (1983). A second chance for families – five years later: Follow-up of a program to prevent foster care. New York: Child Welfare League of America
Kadushin, A., & Martin, J. (1988). Child welfare services (4th ed.). New York: Macmillan
Kingsley v. Kingsley, 623 So. 2d 780 (1993)
(1994). The struggle for the child: Preserving the family in adoption disputes between biological parents and third parties. North Carolina Law Review, 72, 1279–1331Google Scholar
Lassiter v. Dept. of Social Services, 452 U.S. 18 (1981)
Lehr v. Robertson, 463 U.S. 248 (1983)
, & (1996). A closer look at self-image in male foster care adolescents. Social Work, 41(1), 85–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maas, H., & Engler, R. E. (1959). Children in need of parents. New York: Columbia University Press
(1992). Evaluating efforts to free foster children for adoption. Journal of Social Service Research, 16, 89–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (1992). Differential exit rates of minority children in foster care. Social Work Research and Abstracts, 28, 42–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 (1923)
(1998). A theory of relativity: Kinship foster care may be the key to stopping the pendulum of terminations vs. reunification. Vanderbilt Law Review, 51(5), 1427–1457Google Scholar
Partridge, S., Hornby, H., & McDonald, T. (1986). Legacy of loss: Visions of gain, an inside look at adoption disruption. Portland: University of Southern Maine, Human Services Department Institute
People ex rel. Sibley v. Sheppard, 445 N. Y. S. 2d 420 (1981)
Quilloin v. Walcott, 434 U.S. 246 (1978)
Ratterman, D. (1991). Termination barriers: Speeding adoption in New York State through reducing delays in termination of parental rights cases. Washington, DC: ABA Center on Children and the Law
Rosenthal, J. A. (1986). Final report on factors associated with Oklahoma special needs adoptive disruptions. Unpublished manuscript. University of Oklahoma, Norman
(1993). Outcomes of adoption of children with special needs. The Future of Children, 3, 77–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (1985). Foster care for child maltreatment: Impact on delinquent behavior. Pediatrics, 75, 562–568Google ScholarPubMed
(1993). Through the eyes of a child, “Gregory K.”: A child's right to be heard. Family Law Quarterly, 27, 365–933Google Scholar
(1987). Recidivism of foster children returned to their own homes: A review and new directions for research. Social Service Review, 61(1) 56–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 (1982)
(1994). For the sake of the child: Moving toward uniformity in adoption law. Washington Law Review, 69, 841–867Google Scholar
(1995). Unwed fathers' rights, adoption, and sex equality: Gender-neutrality and the perpetuation of patriarchy. Columbia Law Review, 95, 60–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994). Empowering children: Granting foster children the right to initiate parental rights termination proceedings. Cornell Law Review, 79, 1200–1262Google Scholar
Urban Systems Research and Engineering. (1985). Evaluation of state activities with regard to adoption disruption. Washington, DC: Urban Systems Research and Engineering
(1994). Termination of parental rights: The “psychological parent” standard. Villanova Law Review, 39, 737–771Google Scholar
, , & (1996). Factors in length of foster care: Worker activities and parent–child visitation. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 23, 755–784Google Scholar
(1991). Caseload dynamics and foster care reentry. Social Service Review, 65, 133–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 1
- Cited by