Andrade, H. (2008). Self-assessment through rubrics. Educational Leadership, 65(4), 60–63.Google Scholar

Andrade, H. (2010). Students as the definitive source of formative assessment: Academic self-assessment and the self-regulation of learning. In Andrade, H. L. & Cizek, G. J. (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 90–105). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrade, H., Du, Y., & Wang, X. L. (2008). Putting rubrics to the test: The effect of a model, criteria generation, and rubric-referenced self-assessment on elementary school students’ writing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 27(2), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrade, H., & Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment. Theory into Practice, 48, 12–19.Google Scholar

Beaumont, C., O’Doherty, M., & Shannon, L. (2011). Reconceptualising assessment feedback: A key to improving student learning? Studies in Higher Education, 36, 671–687.Google Scholar

Brown, W. (2008). Young children assess their learning: The power of the quick check strategy. Young Children, 63(6), 14–20.Google Scholar

Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22, 151–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carless, D. (2016). Feedback as dialogue. In Peters, M. A. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational philosophy and theory (pp. 1–6). Singapore: Springer Singapore.Google Scholar

Chappuis, J. (2015). Seven strategies of assessment for learning (2nd edn.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar

Cheah, Y. M. (1998). The examination culture and its impact on literacy innovations: The case of Singapore. Language and Education, 12, 192–209.Google Scholar

Crisp, B. (2007). Is it worth the effort? How feedback influences students’ subsequent submission of assessable work. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32, 571–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, D. (2013). The purposeful classroom. Keynote address at the Primary School Education Seminar and Exhibition 2013, Ministry of Education, Singapore.Google Scholar

Fontana, D., & Fernandes, M. (1994). Improvements in mathematics performance as a consequence of self-assessment in Portuguese primary school pupils. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 407–417.Google Scholar

Gopinathan, S. (2001). Globalisation, the state and education policy in Singapore. In Tan, J., Gopinathan, S., & Ho, W. K. (Eds.), Challenges facing the Singapore education system today (pp. 213–251). Singapore: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Guskey, T. R., & Bailey, J. M. (2010). Developing standards-based report cards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Google Scholar

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heng, M. A. (2001). Rethinking the meaning of school beyond the academic “A.” In Tan, J., Gopinathan, S., & Ho, W. K. (Eds.), Challenges facing the Singapore education system today (pp. 108–118). Singapore: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Hogan, D., Chan, M., Rahim, R., Kwek, D., Khin, M. A., Loo, S. C., … & Luo, W. S. (2013). Assessment and the logic of instructional practice in Secondary 3 English and mathematics classrooms in Singapore. Review of Education, 1, 57–106.Google Scholar

Hounsell, D., McCune, V., Hounsell, J., & Litjens, J. (2008). The quality of guidance and feedback to students. Higher Education Research & Development, 27, 55–67.Google Scholar

Larson, R. W., & Brown, J. R. (2007). Emotional development in adolescence: What can be learned from school theatre program? Child Development, 78, 1083–1099.Google Scholar

Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies (2nd edn.). London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar

Lim-Ratnam, C. (2013). Tensions in defining quality pre-school education: The Singapore context. Educational Review, 65, 416–431.Google Scholar

McMillan, J. H., & Hearn, J. (2008). Student self-assessment: The key to stronger student motivation and higher achievement. Educational Horizons, 87, 40–49.Google Scholar

Ministry of Education. (2009). Report of the primary education review and implementation committee. Retrieved from www.moe.gov.sg/initiatives/peri/files/peri-report.pdf.Google Scholar

Ministry of Education (2010). Press release. PERI Holistic Assessment seminar 2010: 16 schools share Holistic Assessment practices and resources. Retrieved from http://archive-sg.com/sg/m/moe.gov.sg/2015–12 25_7252662_131/Ministry_of_Education_Singapore_Press_Releases_PERI_Holistic_Assessment_Seminar_2010_8212_16_Schools_Share_Holistic_Assessment_Practices_and_Resources/.Google Scholar

Munns, G., & Woodward, H. (2006). Student engagement and student self-assessment: The REAL framework. Assessment in Education, 13, 193–213.Google Scholar

Murtagh, L. (2014). The motivational paradox of feedback: Teacher and student perceptions. The Curriculum Journal, 25, 516–541.Google Scholar

Nichols, S. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2008). Testing the joy out of learning. Educational Leadership, 65(6), 14–18.Google Scholar

Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 501–517.Google Scholar

O’Connor, K. (2009). How to grade for learning: Linking grades to standards (3rd edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Google Scholar

Orsmond, P., Maw, S. J., Park, J. R., Gomez, S., & Crook, A. C. (2013). Moving feedback forward: Theory to practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38, 240–252.Google Scholar

Popham, W. J. (2008). Transformative assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar

Rahmat, F. A., & Wong, H. M. (2017, June). Analysing the nature of feedback in classrooms in Singapore. Paper presented at the Seventh Redesigning Pedagogy International Conference, Singapore.Google Scholar

Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioural Science, 28, 4–13.Google Scholar

Ratnam-Lim, C. T. L., & Tan, K. H. K. (2015) Large-scale implementation of formative assessment practices in an examination-oriented culture. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22, 61–78.Google Scholar

Ross, J. A. (2006). The reliability, validity, and utility of self-assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 11(10). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/pdf/v11n10.pdf.Google Scholar

Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.Google Scholar

Sadler, D. R. (2010a). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 535–550.Google Scholar

Sadler, D. R. (2010b). Fidelity as a precondition for integrity in grading academic achievement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 727–743.Google Scholar

Safii, L., & Wong, H. M. (2017, June). Seeing self-assessment and teacher feedback through students’ lenses. Paper presented at the Seventh Redesigning Pedagogy International Conference, Singapore.Google Scholar

Scoles, J., Huxham, M., & McArthur, J. (2012). No longer exempt from good practice: Using exemplars to close the feedback gap for exams. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 8, 631–645.Google Scholar

Shute, V. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153–189.Google Scholar

Tan, K. H. K. (2011a). Assessment for learning in Singapore: Unpacking its meanings and identifying some areas for improvement. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 10, 91–103.Google Scholar

Tan, K. H. K. (2011b). Assessment reform in Singapore: Enduring, sustainable or threshold? In Berry, R. & Adamson, B. (Eds.), Assessment reform in education: Policy and practice (pp. 75–88). London: Springer.Google Scholar

Tan, K. H. K. (2013a). A framework for assessment for learning: Implications for feedback practices within and beyond the gap. International Scholarly Research Notices.Google Scholar

Tan, K. H. K. (2013b). Variation in teachers’ conceptions of alternative assessment in Singapore primary schools. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 12, 21–41.Google Scholar

Wadsworth, B. J. (2003). Piaget’s theory of cognitive and affective development: Foundations of constructivism (5th edn.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar

Wiliam, D. (2010). An integrative summary of the research literature and implications for a new theory of formative assessment. In Andrade, H. & Cizek, G. (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 18–40). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.Google Scholar

Wiliam, D. (2012, April). Sustaining formative assessment with teacher learning communities. PERI HA Professional Learning Series Workshop, Ministry of Education, Singapore.Google Scholar

Wong, H. M. (2012a). The perceptions of Singaporean teachers and students toward academic self-assessments. Doctoral dissertation, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University.Google Scholar

Wong, H. M. (2012b). Students’ interview transcripts. In The perceptions of Singaporean teachers and students toward academic self-assessments. Doctoral dissertation, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University.Google Scholar

Wong, H. M. (2016). I can assess myself: Singaporean primary students’ and teachers’ perceptions of students’ self-assessment ability. Education 3–13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 44, 442–457.Google Scholar

Wong, H. M. (2017). Implementing self-assessment in Singapore primary schools: Effects on students’ perceptions of self-assessment. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 12, 391–409.Google Scholar