Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T09:25:58.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - 360-Degree Feedback at the Workplace

A Transformative Learning Perspective

from Part II - Domain-Specific Feedback

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2018

By
Vidya S. Athota  and
Ashish Malik
Edited by
Anastasiya A. Lipnevich  and
Jeffrey K. Smith
Anastasiya A. Lipnevich
Affiliation:
Queens College and the Graduate Center, City University of New York
Jeffrey K. Smith
Affiliation:
University of Otago, New Zealand
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Instructional Feedback , pp. 313 - 332
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al Ansari, A., Donnon, T., Al Khalifa, K., Darwish, A., & Violato, C. (2014). The construct and criterion validity of the multi-source feedback process to assess physician performance: A meta-analysis. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 5, 39.Google Scholar
Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., & Berg, P. Kalleberg, A. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off. New York: ILR Press.Google Scholar
Athota, V. S. (2016). Foundations and future of well-being: How personality influences happiness and well-being. In Impact of organizational trauma on workplace behavior and performance (pp. 279–293). Business Science Reference Press.Google Scholar
Athota, V. S., & Roberts, R. D. (2015). How extraversion + leads to problem-solving ability. Psychological Studies, 60, 332–338.Google Scholar
Atwater, L. E., & Brett, J. F. (2006). 360-degree feedback to leaders: Does it relate to changes in employee attitudes? Group & Organization Management, 31(5), 578–600.Google Scholar
Atwater, L., Waldman, D., Ostroff, C., Robie, C., & Johnson, K. M. (2005). Self–other agreement: Comparing its relationship with performance in the U.S. and Europe. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13, 25–40.Google Scholar
Baker, N. (2010). Employee feedback technologies in the human performance system. Human Resource Development International, 13(4), 477–485.Google Scholar
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.Google Scholar
Bell, S. T., & Arthur, W. A. (2008). Feedback acceptance in developmental assessment canters: The role of feedback message, participant personality, and affective response to the feedback session. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 681–703.Google Scholar
Blumberg, M., & Pringle, C. D. (1982). The missing opportunity in organizational research: Some implications for a theory of work performance. Academy of Management Review, 7(4), 560–569.Google Scholar
Bommer, W. H., Rubin, R. S., & Bartels, L. K. (2005). Assessing the “unassessable”: Interpersonal and managerial skills. In Martell, K. & Calderon, T. (Eds.), Assessment of student learning in business schools: Best practices each step of the way (pp. 103–130). Tallahassee, FL: Association for Institutional Research and AACSB International.Google Scholar
Bono, J., & Colbert, A. (2005). Understanding responses to multi-source feedback: The role of core self-evaluations. Personnel Psychology, 58, 171–203.Google Scholar
Boxall, P., & Purcell, J. (2016). Strategy and human resource management (4th edn.). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bracken, D. W., & Rose, D. S. (2011). When does 360-degree feedback create behaviour change? And how would we know it when it does? Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(2), 183–192.Google Scholar
Bracken, D. W., Rose, D. S., & Church, A. H. (2016). The evolution and devolution of 360 degree feedback. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 9(4), 761–794.Google Scholar
Brett, J., & Atwater, L. (2001). 360-degree feedback: Accuracy, reactions and perceptions of usefulness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 930–942.Google Scholar
Brown, A., Inceoglu, I., & Lin, Y. (2017). Preventing rater biases in 360-degree feedback by forcing choice. Organizational Research Methods, 20(1), 121–148.Google Scholar
Bunker, K. A., Kram, K. E., & Ting, S. (2002). The young and the clueless. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 80–87.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. J., & Lee, C. (1988). Self-appraisal in performance evaluation: Development versus evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 13(2), 302–314.Google Scholar
Campion, M. C., Campion, E. D., & Campion, M. A. (2015). Improvements in performance management through the use of 360 feedack. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 8(1), 85–93.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1982). Control theory: A useful conceptual framework for personality–social, clinical, and health psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 111–135.Google Scholar
Church, A. H. (2016). Is engagement overrated? Five questions to consider before doing your next engagement survey. Talent Quarterly, 9, 1–7.Google Scholar
Conger, J.A. (2002, November 29). The danger of delusion. Financial Times, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
Dalton, M. A. (1998). Best practices: Five rationales for using 360-degree feedback in organizations. In Tornow, W. W. & London, M. (Eds.), Maximizing the value of 360-degree feedback: A process for successful individual and organizational development (pp. 59–77). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Decotiis, T., & Petit, A. (1978). The performance appraisal process: A model and some testable propositions. Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 635.Google Scholar
Delahaye, B. L. (2004). Human resource development: Adult learning and knowledge management. Milton, Australia: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Delahaye, B. L., Limerick, D. C., & Hearn, G. (1994). The relationship between andragogical and pedagogical orientations and the implications for adult learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 44(4), 187–200.Google Scholar
DeNisi, A. S., & Kluger, A. N. (2000). Feedback effectiveness: Can 360-degree appraisals be improved? The Academy of Management Executive, 14(1), 129–139.Google Scholar
DeNisi, A., & Pritchard, R. (2006). Performance appraisal, performance management and improving individual performance: A motivational framework. Management and Organization Review, 2(2), 253–277.Google Scholar
DeNisi, A. S., & Murphy, K. R. (2017). Performance appraisal and performance management: 100 years of progress? Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 421–433.Google Scholar
de Silva, P. (2014). Tackling psychopathy: A necessary competency in leadership development? Progress in Neurology and Psychiatry, 5, 4–6.Google Scholar
Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048.Google Scholar
Farh, J. L., Werbel, J. D., & Bedeian, A. G. (1988). An empirical assessment of self-appraisal based performance evaluation. Personnel Psychology, 41, 141–156.Google Scholar
Festinger, L. (1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
Fleenor, J., Taylor, S., & Chappelow, C. (2008). Leveraging the impact of 360-degree feedback. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Fletcher, C. (2001). Performance appraisal and management: The developing research agenda. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(4), 473–487.Google Scholar
Franceschini, F., & Turina, E. (2013). Quality improvement and redesign of performance measurement systems an application to the academic field. Quality and Quantity, 47, 465–483.Google Scholar
Fredrickson, B. L., & Losada, M. (2005). Positive affect and the complex dynamics of human flourishing. American Psychologist, 60, 678–686.Google Scholar
Gorman, C. A., Meriac, J. P., Roch, S. G., Ray, J. L., & Gamble, J. S. (2017). An exploratory study of current performance management practices: Human resource executives’ perspectives. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 25(2), 193–202.Google Scholar
Gruman, J. A., & Saks, A. M. (2011). Performance management and employee engagement. Human Resource Management Review, 21(2), 123–136.Google Scholar
Hageman, M. G. J. S., Ring, D. C., Gregory, P. J., Rubash, H. E., & Harmon, L. (2015). Do 360-degree feedback survey results relate to patient satisfaction measures? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 473(5), 1590–1597.Google Scholar
Hazucha, J. F., Hezlett, S. A., & Schneider, R. J. (1993). The impact of 360‐degree feedback on management skills development. Human Resource Management, 32(2–3), 325–351.Google Scholar
Hermel-Stanescu, M. (2015). The role of performance appraisal in the context of performance management systems. SEA-Practical Application of Science, 3(1), 275–278.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G., & McRae, R. R. (2004). Personality and culture revisited: Linking traits and dimensions of culture. Cross-Cultural Research, 38, 52–88.Google Scholar
Hogan, J., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2011). Management derailment: Personality assessment and mitigation. In Zedeck, S. (Ed.), American Psychological Association handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 555–575). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Kossek, E. E., Huang, J. L., Piszczek, M. M., Fleenor, J. W., & Ruderman, M. (2017). Rating expatriate leader effectiveness in multisource feedback systems: Cultural distance and hierarchical effects. Human Resource Management, 56(1), 151–172.Google Scholar
Laleman, F., Pereira, V., & Malik, A. (2015). Understanding cultural singularities of “Indianness” in an intercultural business setting. Culture and Organization, 21(5), 427–447.Google Scholar
Lehman, B. J., & Conley, K. M. (2010). Momentary reports of social-evaluative threat predict ambulatory blood pressure. Psychological Science and Personality Science, 1, 51–56.Google Scholar
Losada, M., & Heaphy, E. (2004). The role of positivity and connectivity in the performance of business teams: A nonlinear dynamics model. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 740–765.Google Scholar
Luffarelli, J., Goncalves, D., & Stanatoginannakis, A. (2016). When feedback interventions backfire: Why higher performance feedback may result in lower self-percieved competence and satisfaction with performance. Human Resource Management, 55, 591–614.Google Scholar
Malik, A. (2013). Post-GFC people management challenges: A study of India’s information technology sector. Asia Pacific Business Review, 19(2), 230–246.Google Scholar
Malik, A., & Pereira, V. (2015). Culture research in India: Critical issues and future research opportunities. In Pereira, Vijay and Malik, Ashish (Eds.), Investigating cultural aspects in Indian organizations (pp. 185–197). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Malik, A., & Pereira, V. (2016a). Indian culture and work organisations in transition. New Delhi: Routledge.Google Scholar
Malik, A., & Pereira, V. (2016b). India: A culture in transition. In Malik, A. & Pereira, V. (Eds), Indian culture and work organisations in transition (pp. 1–13). New Delhi: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. C., and Davis, J. H. (1999). The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for mnagement: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(1), 123–136.Google Scholar
McKenna, S., Richardson, J., & Manroop, L. (2011). Alternative paradigms and the study and practice of performance management and evaluation. Human Resource Management Review, 21, 148–157.Google Scholar
Mezirow, J. (1981). A critical theory of adult learning and education. Adult Education Quarterly, 32(1), 3–24.Google Scholar
Mezirow, J. (1992). Transformation theory: Critique and confusion. Adult Education Quarterly, 42(4), 250–252.Google Scholar
Mezirow, J. (1994a). Understanding transformation theory. Adult Education Quarterly, 44(4), 222–232.Google Scholar
Mezirow, J. (1994b). Response to Mark Tennant and Michael Newman. Adult Education Quarterly, 44(4), 243–244.Google Scholar
Mohapatra, M. (2015). 360 degree feedback: A review of literature. Research Scholar of Management KIIT University Bhubaneswar Orissa, 2(1), 112–116.Google Scholar
Moscoso, S., & Salgado, J. (2004). “Dark side” personality styles as predictors of task, contextual, and job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 356–362.Google Scholar
Newman, M. (1994). Response to understanding transformation theory. Adult Education Quarterly, 44(4), 236–242.Google Scholar
Nowack, K. (1999). 360 degree feedback. In Langdon, D. G., Whiteside, K. S., & McKenna, M. M. (Eds.), Intervention: 50 performance technology tools(pp. 34–46). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Nowack, K., Hartley, J., & Bradley, W. (1999). Evaluating results of your 360-degree feedback intervention. Training and Development, 53, 48–53.Google Scholar
Nowack, M. K., & Mashihi, S. (2012). Evidence-based answers to 15 questions about leveraging 360-degree feedback. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 64(3), 157–182.Google Scholar
Obisi, C. (2011, December). Employee performance appraisal and its implication for individual and organizational growth. Australian Journal of Business and Management Research, 1(9), 92–97.Google Scholar
O’Connor, P. J., & Athota, V. S. (2013). The intervening role of agreeableness in the relationship between trait emotional intelligence and Machiavellianism: Reassessing the potential dark side of EI. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 750–754.Google Scholar
Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–568.Google Scholar
Pereira, V., & Malik, A. (2013). East is East? Understanding aspects of Indian culture(s) within organisations. Culture and Organization, 19(5), 453–456.Google Scholar
Pereira, V., & Malik, A. (2015a). Human capital in the Indian IT/BPO industry. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pereira, V., & Malik, A. (2015b). Investigating cultural aspects in Indian organizations: Empirical evidence. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Pereira, V., & Malik, A. (2015c). Culture in Indian organisations: Evidence-based research and practice. In Pereira, V. & Malik, A. (Eds.), Investigating cultural aspects in Indian organizations: Empirical evidence (pp. 1–10). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Pereira, V., & Malik, A. (2015d). Making sense and identifying aspects of Indian culture(s) in organisations: Demystifying through empirical evidence. Culture and Organization, 21(5), 355–365.Google Scholar
Pereira, V., & Malik, A. (2016a). Conclusion and future research directions. In Indian culture and work organisations in transition (pp. 220–232). Abingdon, UK: Routledge and Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Pereira, V., Malik, A., & Froese, F. (2017). Mapping the impact of Asian business systems on HRM and organisational behaviour: Multi-level comparative perspectives. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 11(3), 253–261.Google Scholar
Pichler, S. (2012). The social context of performance appraisal and appraisal reactions: A meta‐analysis. Human Resource Management, 51(5), 709–732.Google Scholar
Rai, H., & Singh, M. (2013). A study of mediating variables of the relationship between 360 feedback and employee performance. Human Resource Development International, 66(1), 56–73.Google Scholar
Rusu, G., Avasilcai, S., & Hutu, C.-A. (2016). Employee performance appraisal: A conceptual framework. Annals of the University of Oradea, 53–58.Google Scholar
Smith, A., Oczkowski, E., & Sellby-Smith, C. (2011). To have and to hold: Modelling the drivers of employee turnover and skill retention in Australian organisations. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(2), 395–416.Google Scholar
Smither, J. W., London, M., & Reilly, R. R. (2005). Does performance improve following multisource feedback? A theoretical model, meta‐analysis, and review of empirical findings. Personnel Psychology, 58(1), 33–66.Google Scholar
Swing, S. R. (2007). The ACGME outcome project: Retrospective and prospective. Medical Teacher, 29(7), 648–654.Google Scholar
Tennant, M. (1994). Response to understanding transformation theory. Adult Education Quarterly, 44(4), 233–235.Google Scholar
Viswesvaran, C., Ones, D. S., & Schmidt, F. L. (2016). Comparing rater groups: How to disentangle rating reliability from construct-level disagreements. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9(4), 800–806.Google Scholar
Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Antonioni, D. (1998). Has 360 degree feedback gone amok? Academy of Management Executive, 12(2), 86–94.Google Scholar
Ward, P. (1997). 360 Feedback. London: Institute of Personnel and Development.Google Scholar
Wright, P., Dunford, B., & Snell, S. (2001). Human resources and the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 6, 701–721.Google Scholar
Zhao, Y., Zhang, X., Chang, Q., & Sun, B. (2013). Psychometric characteristics of the 360 feedback scales in professionalism and interpersonal and communication skills assessment of surgery residents in China. Journal of Surgical Education, 70, 628–635.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×