Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Instructional Feedback
- The Cambridge Handbook of Instructional Feedback
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Theoretical Foundations
- Part II Domain-Specific Feedback
- Part III Contexts and Sources of Feedback
- 15 Technology-Enhanced Feedback
- 16 Digital Games as Tools for Embedded Assessment
- 17 Feedback in the Context of Self-Assessment
- 18 Providing Formative Peer Feedback
- 19 Feedback, Correctives, and the Use of Pre-Assessments
- 20 Teacher Expectations and Feedback Practices in South African Schools
- 21 Interactive Assessment
- 22 Instructional Feedback in Animals
- Part IV Student Responses to Feedback
- Part V Concluding Remarks
- Index
- References
22 - Instructional Feedback in Animals
from Part III - Contexts and Sources of Feedback
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 November 2018
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Instructional Feedback
- The Cambridge Handbook of Instructional Feedback
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Theoretical Foundations
- Part II Domain-Specific Feedback
- Part III Contexts and Sources of Feedback
- 15 Technology-Enhanced Feedback
- 16 Digital Games as Tools for Embedded Assessment
- 17 Feedback in the Context of Self-Assessment
- 18 Providing Formative Peer Feedback
- 19 Feedback, Correctives, and the Use of Pre-Assessments
- 20 Teacher Expectations and Feedback Practices in South African Schools
- 21 Interactive Assessment
- 22 Instructional Feedback in Animals
- Part IV Student Responses to Feedback
- Part V Concluding Remarks
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Instructional Feedback , pp. 504 - 516Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Altman, K. I., & Linton, T. E. (1971). Operant conditioning in the classroom setting: A review of the research. Journal of Educational Research, 64, 277–286.Google Scholar
Bailey, R., Bihm, E. M., Gillaspy, J. A., Abbott, H. J., Lammers, W. J., & Lammers, W. (2010). More misbehavior of organisms: A Psi Chi lecture by Marian and Robert Bailey. Psychological Record, 60, 505–522.Google Scholar
Bekoff, M., & Byers, J. A. (1998). Animal play. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentosela, M., Jakovcevic, A., Elgier, A. M., Mustaca, A. E., & Papini, M. R. (2009). Incentive contrast in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 123, 125–130.Google Scholar
Chiandetti, C., Avella, S., Fongaro, E., & Cerri, F. (2016). Can clicker training facilitate conditioning in dogs? Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 184, 109–116.Google Scholar
Davis, C., & Harris, G. (2006). Redefining our relationships with the animals we train: Leadership and posture. Soundings, 31(4), 6–8.Google Scholar
Dubanoski, R. A., Inaba, M., & Gerkewicz, K. (1983). Corporal punishment in schools: Myths, problems and alternatives. Child Abuse & Neglect, 7(3), 271–278.Google Scholar
Emer, S., Mora, C., Harvey, M., & Grace, M. (2015). Predators in training: Operant conditioning of novel behavior in wild Burmese pythons (Python molurus bivitattus). Animal Cognition, 18, 269–278.Google Scholar
Greydanus, D. E., Pratt, H. D., Richard Spates, C., Blake-Dreher, A. E., Greydanus-Gearhart, M. A., & Patel, D. R. (2003). Corporal punishment in schools. Journal of Adolescent Health, 32, 385–393.Google Scholar
Hiby, E., Rooney, N., & Bradshaw, J. (2004). Dog training methods: Their use, effectiveness and interaction with behaviour and welfare. Animal Welfare, 13, 63–69.Google Scholar
Kuczaj, S. A., Lacinak, T., Fad, O., Trone, M., Solangi, M., & Ramos, J. A. (2002). Keeping environmental enrichment enriching. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 15, 127–137.Google Scholar
Kuczaj, S. A., & Xitco, M. J. (2002). It takes more than fish: The psychology of marine mammal training. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 15, 186–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maag, J. W. (2001). Rewarded by punishment: Reflections on the disuse of positive reinforcement in schools. Exceptional Children, 67, 173–186.Google Scholar
McAllister, L. W., Stachowiak, J. G., Baer, D. M., & Conderman, L. (1969). The application of operant conditioning techniques in a secondary school classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 277–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millan, C. (n.d.). Cesar’s way: Achieving balance and harmony. Retrieved from www.cesarsway.com/.Google Scholar
Paulos, R. D., Trone, M., & Kuczaj, S. A. (2010). Play in wild and captive cetaceans. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 23, 701–722.Google Scholar
Pavlov, I. (1927). Conditioned reflexes (Anrep, G. V., trans.). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pearce, J. M., & Bouton, M. E. (2001). Theories of associative learning in animals. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 111–139.Google Scholar
Premack, D. (1965). Reinforcement theory. In Levine, D. (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Premack, D. (1971). Catching up with common sense or two sides of a generalization: Reinforcement and punishment. In Glaser, R. (Ed.), The nature of reinforcement (pp. 121–150). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pryor, K. W. (1975). Lads before the wind: Diary of a dolphin trainer. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Pryor, K. W. (1999). Don’t shoot the dog: The new art of teaching and training. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Pryor, K. W. (2014). Historical perspectives: A dolphin journey. Aquatic Mammals, 40, 104–114.Google Scholar
Pubols, B. H. (1960). Incentive magnitude, learning, and performance in animals. Psychological Bulletin, 57, 89–115.Google Scholar
R2 Fish School. (n.d.). The complete kit to teach your fish amazing tricks. Retrieved from www.r2fishschool.com/.Google Scholar
Ramirez, K. (1996). Secondary reinforcers as an indespensible tool: The effectiveness of non-food reinforcers. Marine Mammals: Public Display and Research, 2(1), 42–31.Google Scholar
Sigler, E. A., & Aamidor, S. (2005). From positive reinforcement to positive behaviors: An everyday guide for the practitioner. Early Childhood Education Journal, 32, 249–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. New York: Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
Smith, T. A., & Kimball, D. R. (2010). Learning from feedback: Spacing and the delay-retention effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 80–95.Google Scholar
Stevens, J. R., Rosati, A. G., Heilbronner, S. R., & Muhlhoff, N. (2011). Waiting for grapes: Expectancy and delayed gratification in bonobos. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 24, 99–111.Google Scholar
Sugai, G., & Horner, R. (2002). The evolution of discipline practices: School-wide positive behavior supports. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 24, 23–50.Google Scholar
van de Vijver, I., Ridderinkhof, K. R., & de Wit, S. (2015). Age-related changes in deterministic learning from positive versus negative performance feedback. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 22, 595–619.Google Scholar
van Kerkhove, W. (2004). A fresh look at the wolf-pack theory of companion-animal dog social behavior. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 7, 279–285.Google Scholar
Williams, B. A. (1994). Conditioned reinforcement: Experimental and theoretical issues. The Behavior Analyst, 17, 261–285.Google Scholar
- 9
- Cited by