Ajisaka, T. (1960). Education by Dr. Obara. Tokyo: Tamagawa University Press.Google Scholar

Allen, M., & Williams, G. (2011). Consciousness, plasticity, and connectomics: The role of intersubjectivity in human cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(20).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Arimoto, M. (2017). The prospect of educational assessment as a secret ingredient of effective pedagogy in the context of Japanese kizuki (with-it-ness) based on evidence-informed principles for effective teaching and learning. Annual Bulletin, Graduate School of Education, Tohoku University, 3, 10–35.Google Scholar

Assessment Reform Group. (1999). Assessment for learning: Beyond the black box. Cambridge School of Education, Cambridge University.Google Scholar

Baines, E., Rubie-Davies, C., & Blatchford, P. (2009). Improving pupil group work interaction and dialogue in primary classrooms: Results from a year-long intervention study. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39, 95–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175–1184.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (2008). The reconstruction of “free will” from the agentic perspective of social cognition theory. In Baer, J., Kaufman, J. C., & Baumeister, R. F. (Eds.), Are we free? Psychology and free will (pp. 86–127). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benkler, Y. (2011). The unselfish gene. Harvard Business Review, 89(7–8), 77–85.Google Scholar

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. London: School of Education, King’s College.Google Scholar

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2006). Assessment for learning in the classroom. In Gardner, J. (Ed.), Assessment and Learning (pp. 9–25). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 5–31.Google Scholar

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2010). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Kappan Delta, 92, 81–90.Google Scholar

Bostock, J., & Wood, J. (2014). Supporting student transitions 14–19: Approaches to teaching and learning. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bransford, J., Derry, S., Berliner, D., Hammerness, K., & Beckett, K. L. (2005). Theories of learning and their roles in teaching. In Darling-Hammond, L. & Bransford, J. (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 40–87). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Bromme, R., & Steinbring, H. (1994). Interactive development of subject matter in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27, 217–248.Google Scholar

Cave, P. (2016). Schooling selves: Autonomy, interdependence and reform in Japanese junior high education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar

Central Council for Education/Ministry of Education. (1996). Priorities and prospects for a lifelong learning society: Increasing diversification and sophistication; the future of lifelong learning; encouraging zest for living. Tokyo: MEXT. Retrieved from www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/hakusho/html/hpae199601/hpae199601_2_042.html.Google Scholar

Cheng, R. W., Lam, S.-F., & Chan, J. C. (2008). When high achievers and low achievers work in the same group: The roles of group heterogeneity and processes in project based learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 205–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, I. (2011). Formative assessment: Policy, perspectives and practice. Florida Journal of Educational Administration & Policy, 4, 158–180.Google Scholar

Clark, I. (2012). Formative assessment: Assessment is for self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 205–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, I., & Dumas, G. (2015). Toward a neural basis for peer-interaction: What makes peer-learning tick? Frontiers in Psychology, 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, I., & Dumas, G. (2016). The regulation of task performance: A trans-disciplinary review. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1862.Google Scholar

Fereshteh, M. H. (1992). The U.S. and Japanese education: Should they be compared? Paper presented at Lehigh University’s Conference on Education and Economics in Technologically Advancing Countries, Bethlehem, PA.Google Scholar

Goos, M., Galbraith, P., & Renshaw, P. (2002). Socially mediated meta-cognition: Creating collaborative zones of proximal development in small group problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, 192–223.Google Scholar

Guionnet, S., Nadel, J., Bertasi, E., Sperduti, M., Delaveau, P., & Fossati, P. (2012). Reciprocal imitation: Toward a neural basis of social interaction. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 971–978.Google Scholar

Hatano, G., & Oura, Y. (2003). Commentary: Reconceptualizing school learning using insight from expertise research. Educational Researcher, 32(8), 26–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutchinson, C., & Hayward, L. (2005). The journey so far: Assessment for learning in Scotland. Curriculum Journal, 16, 225–248.Google Scholar

Inoue, N. (2010). Zen and the art of neriage: Facilitating consensus building in mathematics inquiry lessons through lesson study. Journal of Mathematic Teacher Education, 14, 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inoue, N., Asada, A., Maeda, M., & Nakamura, S. (2016, August). Deconstructing adaptive teacher expertise for inquiry-based teaching in Japanese elementary classrooms: Neriage as inter-subjective pedagogy for social mind-storming. Paper presented at the ECER 2016 Leading Education conference, Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar

Kabat-Zinn, J. (2013). Full catastrophe living (rev. edn.). New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1784). An answer to the question: “What is enlightenment?” Retrieved from https://web.cn.edu/kwheeler/documents/What_is_Enlightenment.pdf.Google Scholar

Kazemi, E., Elliott, R., Hubbard, A., Carroll, C., & Mumme, J. (2007). Doing mathematics in professional development: Theorizing teacher learning with and through socio-mathematical norms. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Stateline (Lake Tahoe), NV: University of Nevada, Reno.Google Scholar

Kitayama, S., Markus, H., & Kurokawa, M. (2000). Culture, emotion, and well-being: Good feelings in Japan and the United States. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 93–124.Google Scholar

Kobayashi, M. (2004). Prospects. UNESCO International Bureau of Education, vol. 34, no. 2, 222–239. Retrieved from www.ibe.unesco.org/sites/default/files/obara.pdf.Google Scholar

Kobayashi, T. (1990). Masataro Sawayanagi (1865–1937) and the revised elementary code of 1900. Biography, 13, 43–56.Google Scholar

Kounin, J. (1977). Discipline and group management in classrooms. Huntington, NY: Krieger.Google Scholar

Krill, A. L., & Platek, S. M. (2012). Working together may be better: Activation of reward centers during a cooperative maze task. PLoS ONE, 2, e30613.Google Scholar

Kusanagi, K. (2013). The bureaucratising of lesson study: A Javanese case. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 16, 171–200.Google Scholar

Lave, J. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice. In Resnick, L., Levine, J., & Teasley, S. (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 63–82). Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lebra, R. S. (1976). Japanese pattern of behavior. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lebra, R. S. (2004). The Japanese self in cultural logic. Honolulu: Hawaii University Press.Google Scholar

Lesson Study Group. (n.d.). Teaching through problem solving: Students do mathematics to learn mathematics. Neriage. Retrieved from http://preservice.lessonresearch.net/polygon-overview/neriage/.Google Scholar

Lewis, C. (1995). Educating heart and minds: Reflections on Japanese pre-school and elementary education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Linquisti, R. (2014). Supporting formative assessment for deeper learning: A primer for policymakers. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.Google Scholar

Macintyre, L. M., Buck, G., & Beckenhauer, A. (2007). Formative assessment requires artistic vision. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 8(4), 1–23.Google Scholar

Ministry for Education (MEXT). (n.d. a). Improvement of academic abilities: Courses of study. Retrieved from www.mext.go.jp/en/policy/education/elsec/title02/detail02/1373859.htm.Google Scholar

Ministry for Education (MEXT). (n.d. b). Four basic policy directions. Retrieved from www.mext.go.jp/en/policy/education/lawandplan/title01/detail01/sdetail01/1373808.htm.Google Scholar

National Research Council. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (expanded edn.). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2005a). Formative Assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms. Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2005b). Formative Assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms. Policy Brief, November 2005. OECD Observer. Paris: OECD. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/edu/ceri/35661078.pdf.Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2016). Country note: Japan. Programme for International Student Assessment: Results from PISA 2015. Paris, France: OECD. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA-2015-Japan.pdf.Google Scholar

Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (Eds.) (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar

Popham, W. J. (2008). Transformative assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar

Pryor, J., & Torrance, H. (1996). Teacher–pupil interaction in formative assessment: Assessing the work or protecting the child? Curriculum Journal, 7, 205–226.Google Scholar

Redcay, E., Dodell-Feder, D., Pearrow, M., Mavros, P., Kleiner, M., Gabrieli, J., & Saxe, R. (2010). Live face-to-face interaction during fMRI: A new tool for social cognitive neuroscience. Neuroimage, 50, 1639–1647.Google Scholar

Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.Google Scholar

Sakaiya, S., Shiraito, Y., Kato, J., Ide, H., Okada, K., Takano, K., & Kansaku, K. (2013). Neural correlate of human reciprocity in social interactions. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7, 239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sakamoto, N. (2011). Professional development through “kizuki”: Cognitive, emotional and collegiate awareness. Teacher Development, 15, 187–203.Google Scholar

Salamone, J., & Correa, M. (2012). The mysterious motivational functions of mesolimbic dopamine. Neuron, 76, 470–485.Google Scholar

Schilbach, L., Timmermans, B., Reddy, V., Costall, A., Bente, G., Schlict, T., et al. (2013). Toward a second-person neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 393–462.Google Scholar

Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Scottish Government. (2011). Curriculum for excellence: Building the curriculum 5: A framework for learning and teaching. Edinburgh: Scottish Government. Retrieved from www.educationscotland.gov.uk/Images/BtC5Framework_tcm4-653230.pdf.Google Scholar

Shimahara, N. K. (1998). The Japanese model of professional development: Teaching as craft. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 451–462.Google Scholar

Shimizu, Y. (1999). Aspects of mathematics teacher education in Japan: Focusing on teacher’s roles. Journal of Mathematics Education, 2, 107–116.Google Scholar

Shinkawa, M., & Arimoto, M. (2012). Research for Japanese-like competency and assessment through challenges of eager schools for sustainability after the great earthquake and tsunami. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 3, 61–69.Google Scholar

Shulman, L. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134, 52–59.Google Scholar

Sivan, E. (1986). Motivation in social constructivist theory. Educational Psychology, 21, 209–23–3.Google Scholar

Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Sugita, H. (2012). Excerpts taken from a lecture given to novice Japanese teachers in light of the full implementation of Special Activities (tokkatsu) in the New Japanese Curriculum. Retrieved from www.p.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~tsunelab/tokkatsu/cms/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/sugita.pdf.Google Scholar

Takahashi, A. (2008). Neriage: An essential piece of a problem-based lesson. Teaching through problem solving: A Japanese approach. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Salt Lake City, UT.Google Scholar

Takanashi, Y. (2004). TEFL and communication styles in Japanese culture. Language Culture and Curriculum, 17, 1–14.Google Scholar

Thien, K. (2004) Buddhist general semantics: A new approach to Buddhist religion and its philosophy. New York: iUniverse.Google Scholar

Thompson, P. (2002). Didactic objects and didactic models in radical constructivism. In Gravemeijer, K., Lehrer, R., van Oers, B., & Verschaffel, L. (Eds.), Symbolizing, modeling, and tool use in mathematics education (pp. 191–212). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Tsuneyoshi, R. (2017). Educating the whole child: The Japanese model of educating the whole child. Graduate School of Education, University of Tokyo. Retrieved from www.p.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~tsunelab/tokkatsu/edwc/.Google Scholar

Vogel, E. (1979). Japan as number one: Lessons for America. Lincoln, NE: iUniverse.com.Google Scholar

Vogt, F., & Rogalla, M. (2009). Developing adaptive teaching competency through coaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 1051–1060.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S.(1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In Rieber, R. W. & Carton, A. S. (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, vol. 1: Problems of general psychology (pp. 39–285). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar

Walker, R. (2010). Socio-cultural issues in motivation. In Peterson, P., Baker, E., & McGaw, B. (Eds.), International encyclopaedia of education (pp. 712–717). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Walshaw, M. (2011). Working with teachers to enable both student and teacher learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14, 1–4.Google Scholar

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wiliam, D., Bartholomew, H., & Reay, D. (2004). Assessment, learning and identity. In Valero, P. and Zevenbergen, R. (Eds.), Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education: Issues of power theory and methodology (pp. 43–61). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Wiliam, D., & Leahy, S. (2007). A theoretical foundation for formative assessment. In McMillan, H. (Ed.), Formative assessment classroom: Theory into practice (pp. 29–42). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Willis, J. (2010). Assessment for learning as a participative pedagogy. Assessment Matters, 2, 65–84.Google Scholar

Wood, D. J., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychiatry and Psychology, 17, 89–100.Google Scholar

Young, V., & Kim, D. (2010). Using assessments for instructional improvement: A literature review. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 18(19), 1–40.Google Scholar

Zimmerman, B., & Cleary, T. (2006). Adolescents’ development of personal agency. In Urban, T. and Pajares, F. (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 45–70). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar