Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T00:37:48.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - The ‘Public’ Character of the Universal Periodic Review: Contested Concept and Methodological Challenge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2017

Ronald Niezen
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montréal
Maria Sapignoli
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Palaces of Hope
The Anthropology of Global Organizations
, pp. 106 - 126
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alston, Phillip. 2006. ‘Reconceiving the UN Human Rights Regime: Challenges Confronting the New Human Rights Council’. Melbourne Journal of International Law 7: 185201.Google Scholar
Beitz, Charles R. 2011. The Idea of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Billaud, Julie. 2014. ‘Keepers of the Truth: Producing “Transparent” Documents for the Universal Periodic Review’. In Human Rights and the Universal Periodic Review: Rituals and Ritualism. Charlesworth, Hilary and Larking, Emma, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 6383.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, Hilary. 2010. ‘Swimming to Cambodia: Justice and Ritual in Human Rights after Conflict’. Australian Year Book of International Law 29: 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlesworth, Hilary and Larking, Emma. 2014. ‘Introduction’. Human Rights and the Universal Periodic Review: Rituals and Ritualism. Charlesworth, Hilary and Larking, Emma, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 121.Google Scholar
Cowan, Jane K. 2003. ‘Who’s Afraid of Violent Language? Honour, Sovereignty and Claims-making in the League of Nations’. Anthropological Theory 3(3): 271291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, Jane K. 2007a. ‘The Success of Failure? Minority Supervision at the League of Nations’. In Paths to International Justice: Social and Legal Perspectives. Dembour, Marie-Bénédicte and Kelly, Tobias, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cowan, Jane K. 2007b. ‘The Supervised State’. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power 14(5): 545578.Google Scholar
Cowan, Jane K. 2010. ‘Coincidences as Connections: “Reading across” Disciplines while “Reading from” Anthropology’. Focaal 56: 99105.Google Scholar
Cowan, Jane K. 2013. ‘Before Audit Culture: A Genealogy of International Oversight of Rights’. In The Gloss of Harmony: The Politics of Policy-making in Multilateral Organisations. Müller, Birgit, ed. London: Pluto, pp. 103133.Google Scholar
Cowan, Jane K. 2014. ‘The Universal Periodic Review as a Public Audit Ritual: An Anthropological Perspective on Emerging Practices in the Global Governance of Human Rights’. In Human Rights and the Universal Periodic Review: Rituals and Ritualism. Charlesworth, Hilary and Larking, Emma, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 4262.Google Scholar
Cowan, Jane K. and Billaud, Julie. 2015. ‘Between Learning and Schooling: The Politics of Human Rights Monitoring at the Universal Periodic Review’. Third World Quarterly 36(3): 11751190.Google Scholar
Gaer, Felice. 2007. ‘A Voice, Not an Echo: Universal Periodic Review and the UN Treaty Body System’. Human Rights Law Review 7 (1): 109139.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1969. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Holmes, Douglas R. and Marcus, George E.. 2007. ‘Cultures of Expertise and the Management of Globalization: Toward the Re-functioning of Ethnography’. In Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics and Ethics as Anthropological Problems. Ong, Aihwa and Collier, Stephen J., eds. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 235252.Google Scholar
Kelly, Tobias. 2009. ‘The UN Committee Against Torture: Human Rights Monitoring and the Legal Recognition of Cruelty’. Human Rights Quarterly 31(3): 777800.Google Scholar
Kelly, Tobias. 2011. This Side of Silence: Human Rights, Torture and the Recognition of Cruelty. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1999. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Marks, Susan. 2011. ‘Human Rights and Root Causes’. Modern Law Review 74(1): 5778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 2011. ‘Measuring the World: Indicators, Human Rights and Global Governance’. Current Anthropology 52 (S3): S8395.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle, Davis, Kevin, Kingsbury, Benedict and Fisher, Angelina. 2015. The Quiet Power of Indicators: Measuring Governance, Corruption, and Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miyazaki, Hirokazu and Riles, Annelise. 2007. ‘Failure as an Endpoint’. In Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics and Ethics as Anthropological Problems. Ong, Aihwa and Collier, Stephen J., eds. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 320331.Google Scholar
Moore, Sally Falk and Myerhoff, Barbara G.. 1977. Secular Ritual. Uitgeverij: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Niezen, Ronald. 2010. Public Justice and the Anthropology of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
OHCHR, Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. 2014. The Universal Periodic Review: A Practical Guide for Civil Society. Geneva.Google Scholar
Power, Michael. 1999. The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas. 1999. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shore, Cris and Wright, Susan. 1999. ‘Audit Culture and Anthropology: Neoliberalism in British Higher Education’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 5(4): 557575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoukry, Sameh, Abu Koash, Mohammed and Khan, Masood. 2008. ‘Non-paper on Remaining UPR Modalities’, submitted by the African, Arab and OIC groups’. Available from the Universal Periodic Review Extranet.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 2000a. ‘The Tyranny of Transparency’. British Educational Research Journal 26(3): 309321.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 2000b. Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×