Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T07:48:29.185Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Propaganda on Trial: Structural Fragility and the Epistemology of International Legal Institutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2017

Ronald Niezen
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montréal
Maria Sapignoli
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Palaces of Hope
The Anthropology of Global Organizations
, pp. 266 - 293
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anders, Gerhard (2014) “Contesting Expertise: Anthropologists at the Special Court for Sierra Leone.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 20(3): 426444.Google Scholar
Boas, Gideon (2007) The Milosevic Trial: Lessons for the Conduct of Complex International Criminal Proceedings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bringa, Tone (1995) Being Muslim the Bosnian Way: Identity and Community in a Central Bosnian Village. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, Kamari (2009) Fictions of Justice: The International Criminal Court and the Challenge of Legal Pluralism in Sub-Saharan Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Del Ponte, Carla (2008) Madam Prosecutor: Confrontations with Humanity’s Worst Criminals and the Culture of Impunity: A Memoir. With Sudetic, Chuck. New York: Other Press.Google Scholar
Dressler, Joshua and Garvey, Stephen P. (2012) Criminal Law. Sixth Edition. St. Paul: West.Google Scholar
Eltringham, Nigel (2013) “‘Illuminating the Broader Context’: Anthropological and Historical Knowledge at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 19: 338355.Google Scholar
Franklin, (2003) “Re-thinking Nature-Culture: Anthropology and the New Genetics.” Anthropological Theory. 3(1): 6585.Google Scholar
Good, Anthony (2007) Anthropology and Expertise in the Asylum Courts. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hazan, Pierre (2004) Justice in a Time of War: The True Story Behind the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. Translated by Snyder, James Thomas. College Station: Texas A&M Press.Google Scholar
Hart, H.L.A. and Honoré, Tony (1985) Causation in the Law. Second Edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Sheila (1995) Science at the Bar. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Langer, Máximo (2005) “The Rise of Managerial Judging in International Criminal Law.” American Journal of Comparative Law. 53(4): 835909.Google Scholar
Monahan, John and Walker, Laurens (2014) Social Science in Law. Eighth Edition. St. Paul: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Peskin, Victor (2008) International Justice in Rwanda and the Balkans: Virtual Trials and the Struggle for State Cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith (1986) Legalism: Law, Morals, and Political Trials. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sluiter, Göran. (2007) “Compromising the Authority of International Criminal Justice – How Vojislav Šešelj Runs His Trial.” Journal of International Criminal Justice. 5(2): 529536.Google Scholar
Tabeau, Ewa and Bijak, Jakub (2005) “War-related Deaths in the 1992–1995 Armed Conflicts in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A Critique of Previous Estimates and Recent Results.” European Journal of Population. 21: 187215.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1919/1996) “Politics as a Vocation.” In Turner, Bryan (ed.) For Weber: Essays on the Sociology of Fate. Second Edition. London: Sage, pp. 77129.Google Scholar
Wilson, Richard Ashby (2011) Writing History in International Criminal Trials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zahar, Alexander (2008) “Legal Aid, Self-Representation and the Crisis at The Hague Tribunal.” Criminal Law Forum. 19: 241263.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×